资源流动研究的理论框架与决策应用_成升魁

29 3 2007 M5 S RESOURCES SCIENCEVol.29, No.3May, 2007cI|:1007-7588(2007)03-0037-08l :2006-11-17; :2007-03-22 “:SE1 S “(I|:30670374, 30470317)。Te: 6 , 3, ,p V,p V 3 =,1V Y 3 、 u j( !)、M( 4M) 1 ,tMr V ? ,W, u o, V。 |6?ZV PK,h V1 7F ,K1 -V/Y,4 3 r q, %15。t5,Bt。yN, sd t H b。7 、 、 S、o SV 7 , V。S=F |, SFAO(2002)1) j g、 g、3hn 9hn j Y,S9(EDP)、9(EVA)、(EC)、(ECF) “ s ”S 。SEd9 F“ lF”3SEEA 21 。(2) gNd g(n、) E 、h“h Y 9 。 L N V , L N 。 oG .% wL(EKC) P 6?ZM1“, (GDP9 (40 S 29 3 9F 8 ,TV ,GDP9 9g9F y, “$ ! ph , vh t 。?S: %i ? ( ?9 , 3 6B T ? ? 。 ? 3 、“d 3 $, ? q| 3 “d = %i Y ? dBS ?,N“d“d , Huang(2003) 23 3 6“d sV, ?T N。 ZE6 V g-g - g,96 3 N 7- F- g r- hn-l ) 24 , 8 “S $ aRZE, NVr。4 %T SE5 % “ T,18C/Z :4.1 V5 WI V , x V5 I n ( 7- 3-l) )8 ,6?ZKy ! u vd 3 ,4 3 3 V 3, j | V 3Z T,h i 8 b。S=6T?ZF(OECD)1 pS 3 , PiB?Z lZE, V5 。 x S5y B*S8“6 W ,TMR 3 V,SEEA 6 V,V g _6 3YV, %+ 7? , i% %gZ_。 xh rZE h ) p, ,Yl。 “ -Xi L Factor 4Factor 10 ,i9 f S 1)。1)Factor 4: 20 30 M,1 hh “ -1 4;Factor 10: 30 40 M,1 hh “ -1 10。o |TMRT V6?ZS, g/ V5 A I nTMR , g。S ? j Kv2, i 8 bCO2NOx b,h b 3 ?Z1 “S。WIYVr 8 r T,V7 ?,TS8“2Z xQ, ,2Z V l 3$ F e。| x (The EuropeanResource Strategy) “S h“69 r, rN “S31oy : 3 r q、 3 、9V。yp 3 E,V“( ” _“u ”V NY,E 3 Y SEWM。| x | uSEW 4 p, H,|yB*S8“、 B“ “、r( M 3“) 25 M =r “S,| x Z。4.2 V?Z S8“S “(UNEP)MFAZE N?Z V。BtSE sy S8“, V?Z。 V s,y 16S8“, 9 p, V?Z %。T V?Z1Z ,SMFA 3 3 r, 3 5 5。Haberl(2004) 25| ? s(MEFA)T V?Z S1 Q,y S1 S = 。 , V V 3hh l h V VZ_?Z,B| MEFA V, V 。V19 xV1 x V5 VTable1 EvolutionofresourceflowandmanagementinEuropeM= 1970 1985 5 m ?cd2Zxp g5 / V 3 / hn A P 1!7 85 V4129 3 6 : O % 5 VV, Ux,hn5 v 3 z、mM1、Y$Z m VZ_?Z。 S “ g 5 %4G I,6 3 x?Z。 “ -ZSEB l o Z, F Zl oyT。S8“9|B ,“6S,yp9F 、 3 3 LS 11 。5 S 7ZM1 US,6?Z 7?、 、 、5 1 6V, # 7?、 、M1 3 5、5M V。 ( 、8FD、 7? 、 、 n、r q、 u 1、M 5S?Z 26,27 。 “ -Sh ?rSEiv 。 W591SE,S 56,rKSE 。5 (BQ ?、 、 C、 )GDPh W ( 1.9。 Si V ? “69Z T, SEM1, ) EsYb?Z 。 S 1、 7?、 、hnBL,V +?, H b? p# ?ZWM1“, “ z 7?、 、 5 ,x g、6?ZW1“, P _ 3i?ZZ_ - 28 。yN,V Vs,s V5 ro。S=S 7ZM1 $, ,yp I n/+Z = :(1) Q Oy: S6?ZVh1 , C , r q 3 rm。(2) S: ) ,yp46?Z M1,6h 。 bW V6?Z 、, 、 、 、 ,69 0 g ,9 V4M4 , TW, 、 W。 HW VS6?Z1o H 。(3)y S1 o k:1, y o k。) 8d9, d97/ BV L 。 ? ? ? f s Y y ? l, J 3 j# 8、 g、E ! , 3y l。SE)、 8)、 g)、E)T) d9 s S9 dB g 。(4)F E ly。Z L, M,SE|“E6” T , 6y !68S,VSE6v?Z H 。 6?Z p,E l n5y i 。 H_SEd9 4 ,) W ly。(5) o5 : tS=、 u 4 H b,ypd9 l1 ,y o Z,M1:, 。(6)h6?Z Y: s, US1 H b V# ? p, U6hC t ,# 6 3 Y。| T5 %1G。6?Zh1o# r q, uW Z#5 。6 1V 7?Khn V、 r q V ? 3 3 #r。S?rSEX 、ZE ),T6?Z L 。 WS6 y ?Z, 、/ 、 F,S=W uW |mN。S 7ZM1X 。S42 S 29 3 ,S n5 6?ZVhn1 , H b,6t C 3 3 r; H,y l o,?rSEy Z8“, S$。 ID (References): 1 Scasny M , Kovanda J, Hak T .Material flow accounts, balances andderived indicators for the Czech Republic during the 1990s:resultsand recommendations for methodological improvements J .EcologicalEconomics, 2003, 45:41 57. 2 6 , i, .V s V N J .1 , 2005, 20(3):407 414. CHENG Sheng-kui , MIN Qing-wen, YAN Li-zhen.From static assessment todynamic processing:resources flow and its contents and methods J .JournalofNaturalResources, 2005, 20(3):407 414. 3 Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Energy and Environment (WI),Annual Report (M).WI, German.2005. 4 Chambers N , Child R, Jenkin N, Lewis K, Vergoulas G, WhiteleyM.Stepping Forward:A resource flow and ecological footprintanalysis of the South West of England Resource flow report M .BestFoot Forward Ltd, United Kingdom.2005. 5 Suh S.Theory of materials and energy flow analysis in ecology andeconomics J .EcologicalModelling, 2005, 189:251 269. 6 Peter B.Green Accounting and Material Flow:Alternatives orComplements? M .WI papers No .106.2000. 7 Shutz H, Welfens MJ.Sustainable Development by Dematerializationin Production and Consumption-Strategy for the New EnvironmentalPolicy in Poland M .WI papers No .103.2000. 8 Stefan B.2002.Towards Sustainable Resource Management in theEuropean Union M .WI papers No .121. 9 Krausmanna F , Haberla H, Erba KH, Wackernagel M .Resourceflows and land use in Austria 1950 2000:using the MEFAframework to monitor society-nature interaction for sustainability J .LandUsePolicy, 2004, 21:215 230. 10 Susanne K , Faist M , Baccini P.Economically extendedMFA :Amaterial flow approach for a better understanding of food productionchain J .JournalofCleanerProduction, 2004, 12:877 889. 11 IHDP.Industrial transformation draft science plan - 2nd draft,International Human Dimensions Programme on Global EnvironmentalChange, Amsterdam M .1999.In:McEvoy, D.Resource flowaudit for sustainability :Literature review M .Report prepared byCentre for Urban and Regional Ecology , University of Manchester,USA .2005. 12 McEvoy D.Resource Flow Audit for Sustainability :Literature Review M .Report prepared by Centre for Urban and Regional Ecology ,University of Manchester, USA.2005. 13 Brunner PH, Rechberger H.Practical Handbook of Material FlowAnalysis, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton:Book reviews J .WasteManagement, 2005, 25:111 113. 14 Stahmer C, Kuhn M , Braun N .Physical Input-Output Tables forGermany M .Eurostat workingpapers, Eurostat, Luxembourg .1998. 15 Tjahjadi D B, Schafer W, Radermacher H.Material and energy flowaccounting in Germany-Data base for applying the national accountingmatrix including environmental accounts concept J .StructuralChangeandEconomicDynamics, 1999, 10:73 97. 16 Manfred LD.Energy requirements of Sydney households J .EcologicalEconomics, 2004,( ):375 399. 17 Narayanaswamy V.et al .Resource flow and product chain analysisaspractical tools to promote cleaner production initiatives J .JournalofCleanerProduction, 2003, 11 (4):375 387. 18 World Resources Institute .Material flows in the United States.2005,9:http: . 19 Chuan Y.Review on studies of economy-wide material flow analysis J .JournalofNaturalResources, 2005, 20(3):415 421. 20 Hinterberger F , Luks F , Stewen M .Okologische wirtschaftspolitik-Zwischen Okodiktatur and Unweltkatastrophe M .Berlin, Bale ,Boston.1996.In:Orbach T , Liedtyke C.Eco-Managementaccounting in Germany :concepts and practical implications M .WIpapers No .88.1998. 21 United Nations.Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting M , Handbook of National Accounting .Studies in Methods, SeriesF , No .61.New York.1993. 22 Huang SL, Hsu WL.Material flow analysis and emergy evaluation ofTaipei s urban construction J .LandscapesandUrbanPlanning,2003, 63:61 74. 23 Reginald BH, Khoo HT .An LCA study of a primary aluminum supplychain J .JournalofCleanerProduction, 2005, 13:607 618. 24 Haberl H, Kowalski MF , Krausmann F , Weisz F, Winiwarter V .Progress towards sustainability ? What the conceptual framework ofmaterial and energy flow accounting (MEFA)can offer J .LandUsePolicy, 2004, 21:199 213. 25 6 . S+5) J . S, 1998, 20(2):1 9. CHENG Sheng-kui.1998, Approach to issues of resourcesscience J .ResourcesScience, 20(2):1 9. 26 6 .85) J . S, 2000, 22(1):1 4. CHENG Sheng-kui.Exploration on issues concerningcomprehensive research of resources J .ResourcesScience, 2000, 22(1):1 4. 27 . S M .: S, 2004. FENGZhi-ming.Resources Science M .Beijing :Science Press, 2004.4329 3 6 : O %ResourceFlow:TheoreticalFrameworkand ApplicationforDecisionMakingCHENG Sheng-kui , ZHEN Lin(InstituteofGeographicSciencesandNaturalResourcesResearch, CAS, Beijing 100101, China)Abstract:A resource flow analysis aims to quantify the flow of resources, in terms of mass, within adefined geographical area or industry sector over a set period of time .The outcomes of a resource flowanalysis provide an opportunity for a better understanding of how and where to target activities to managematerial consumption and minimization.It is essential for dematerialization between resources use andeconomic development , particularly for developing countries like China, where economic development iscoupled with an intensive consumption of natural resources, affecting coordinated development betweensocio-economy, environment and institutions.The paper exams the progresses in resource flow analysis made by developed countries, includingtheoretical background, methodology applied, major results and their socio-economic implications.Relevant experiences for China to conduct this sort of research are summarized and recommendationsmade.It is concluded that proper understanding of the concept , identification of major resources relatedclosely to socio-economic development and involved in the flow process are fundamental basis for resourceflow analysis, spatial-temporal scales should be taken into consideration, vertical and horizontal flows ofresources over time and its ecological and environmental effects will have to be emphasized.Mostimportantly , resource flow accounting system and database should be establi