全球员工满意度市场调研和分析报告(英文版)-2024年1月上传培训课件_第1页
全球员工满意度市场调研和分析报告(英文版)-2024年1月上传培训课件_第2页
全球员工满意度市场调研和分析报告(英文版)-2024年1月上传培训课件_第3页
全球员工满意度市场调研和分析报告(英文版)-2024年1月上传培训课件_第4页
全球员工满意度市场调研和分析报告(英文版)-2024年1月上传培训课件_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩43页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

POLITICS

&

SOCIETYEmployee

satisfactionworldwideOverview

report

on

employee

satisfaction

with

their

employer

worldwideEmployee

satisfaction

is

the

key

to

a

successful

modern

companyExecutive

summaryThecompetition

fortalentbetween

employers

hasaccelerated

inrecent

years.

Low

Theaverage

worldwide

NPSis16

percent,

meaning

thatthere

isanetmajority

ofunemployment

hascharacterized

labormarkets

sincetheinitialeconomicdownturn

of

COVID-19,

givingemployees

agreater

degree

of

bargaining

powerthan

usual.Even

without

these

recent

developments,

however,

modern

employersarestriving

tocreate

awelcoming,

inclusive,andfriendly

workplace.

Theemployer-employee

relationship

of

2023

hasevolved

from

simply

aquid-pro-quoarrangement

between

capitaland

labortoamultifaceted

bondthatincludesseveral

aspects

of

well-being

tobetter

engagetheworkforce.employees

whopromote

theiremployer

over

thosewho

donot.•

APAC

was

theregion

with

the

largest

shareof

promoters,

withanNPSof

30percent,

andthe

Philippineswas

theleading

country

at50

percent.

Asfarasindustrieswere

concerned,

theIT,technology,

and

telecommunication

sectorhadthehighest

NPS,at34

percent.•

Explainingwhatdrives

employee

satisfaction,analyzed

theimportanceof

fivekey

metrics,

includingcompany

image,

the

employer’s

culture,colleagues,andsuperiors,

theperceived

equality

intheworkplace,

employee

salary,andtheinfrastructureandequipment

supplied

byacompany.

Estimatessuggest

thatequality

isthe

most

valuedamong

thefivesatisfaction

factors.Inasurvey

conducted

between

the

monthsof

September

2022

and

August

2023,collected

answers

from

almost

200,000

employees

in56

world

countries

toquestionsregarding

satisfactionwith

theircurrent

employer.

Thisreport

analyzestheoutcome

of

thissurvey,

focusingon

theshare

ofrespondents

sosatisfied

withtheiremployer

thattheywould

recommend

ittoafriend

or

relative,

compared

totheshare

of

respondents

who

would

not

recommend

theiremployer.

Thedifference

between

these

twogroupsof

employees

iscalled

thenetpromoterscore

(NPS).•

Whereas

thevariousdemographic

groups

do

notshow

remarkable

differencesinratingthe

importance

ofthefivedifferent

satisfaction

factors,country-specifictrendsaremore

clearly

observed.Thisreport

presents

theaggregated

survey

resultsandfurtherevaluationsonemployee

satisfaction,offering

detailedinsightsregarding

regions,

industries,selected

focuscountries,

and

selected

companies.Some

of

the

key

findings

inthisreport

are:301Introduction•

Thesurvey•

Overview

of

countries

and

respondentsAre

employees

satisfied

with

their

employers?

Statista’s

comprehensive

surveyprovides

answersto

this

questionGlobal

employee

survey,

questions“Ona

scaleof0to10,

howlikelyisitthatStatista’s

survey

consistsof

two

differentmeasurementsegments:

First,

the

question

of

whether

theemployee

wouldrecommend

the

employer

to

friendsor

family

evaluates

thegeneral

satisfaction

of

theemployee.

Thesecond

part

divesdeeper

into

their

satisfaction

with

key

aspectsof

theworkingenvironment,

like

the

image

of

theemployer,

thecompany’sculture

and

the

relationship

with

colleagues

andsuperiors

intheworkplace,

working

conditions

(the

infrastructure

andequipment

provided),

salary,

and

thelevel

of

equality.OverallExplained

variableScore:

0(lowest)to10youwouldrecommendyouremployertosatisfactionafriendorfamilymember?”ImageThecompanyenjoysa

good

imageThecompanyprovidesroomfor

growthanddevelopment,andpromotestheemployees’wellbeingCulture,colleagues,andsuperiorsThe

surveywas

conductedbetweenSeptember2022InfrastructureandequipmentThecompanyhasgood

workingconditions(infrastructure/equipment)Explanatory

variablesScore:

1(lowest)to5andAugust

2023.

In

total,interviewed

198,284employeesfrom

56

countriesworldwide.appliedthe

Random

Forest

algorithm

to

estimatetheimpact

each

ofthesatisfactionfactors

hasontheoverall

satisfaction–therecommendation

probability.TheRandomForest‘s

outputistheestimate

ofwhich

shareof

theoverall

satisfactionis

driven

byeach

oftheexplanatory

categories.SalaryThecompanypaysa

good

wageMenandwomendoingthesamejobarepaidthesamesalaryANDmenandwomenhavethesameopportunitiesforadvancementEquality5Sources:The

analysis

includes

198,284

respondents

from

56

countries

fromall

world

regionsGlobal

employees

survey,respondents

perregion

andfocuscountry*90,843

Europe8,350

MEA55,223

Americasv43,117

APAC6Notes:*All

focus

countries

have

more

than

9,000

respondents

in

the

survey.MEArefers

toQatar,Saudi

Arabia,

Kuwait,

Egypt,

UAE,Morocco,Israel,Iran,and

Tunisia.

APAC

refers

to

Asian

and

Oceanian

ones.Additional

564

respondents

arefrom

the

Africancountries

notincluded

in

the

MEAregion.Due

to

the

low

number

ofrespondents

in

this

region,no

detailed

analysis

forthis

regionis

provided

in

the

following.

Forthe

remaining187

respondents,

the

country

is

unknown

and

thereforenotpartofthe

analysis.Sources:

Gyglietal.;WorldBank02Findings

by

region•

Net

promoter

score,

overview•

Image•

Culture,colleagues,

and

superiors•

Infrastructureandequipment•

Salary•

EqualityEmployees

promoting

their

employer

exceed

those

who

do

not

bya

globalaverage

of

16

percentage

pointsNet

promoter

score,

byregions

and

focuscountriesThenetpromoter

score

(NPS)

measurestheworkforce’s

satisfactionwith

theiremployer

byaskingabouttheprobability

ofrecommending

theemployer

to

friendsor

family.TocalculatetheNPS,theshare

ofdetractors

(respondents

answering

sixor

less)

isdeducted

from

thepromoters(respondents

answering

nineor

10).R

E

G

I

O

N

SF

O

C

U

S

C

O

U

N

T

R

I

E

S100%80%60%40%20%0%50%30%Worldwide,

42

percent

ofemployees

arepromoters,

almost

certain

to

activelyrecommend

theiremployer

tofriendsandfamily.26

percent

would

rathernotrecommend

theiremployer

–thedetractors**.

Asaresult,

theworldwideaverage

netpromoter

score

(NPS)lies

at16

percent

(detractor’s

sharesubtractedfrom

promoter’s

share).25%25%U.S.24%20%16%7%5%5%-4%World*AmericasEuropeAPACMEACanadaGermanyFranceSingapore

PhilippinesPromoter(Scores:9or

10)Passive(Scores:7or

8)Detractor(Scores:0-6)NPS(promoters-detractors)8Notes:*World

figures

are

based

onthe

full

dataset,

including

observations

forwhich

the

industry

was

notreportedby

the

respondent.

**Hereby

and

in

the

following

are

defined

“promoters”those

employees

that

answeredthequestion

“On

a

scale

of0

to10,

how

likely

is

it

that

yourecommend

youremployerto

afriend

orfamily

member?”either

9or

10;

“passives”

those

that

answered

with

a

score

of7or8;“detractors”those

who

answeredwith

ascore

of6orlower.The

net

promoterscore

(NPS)

is

the

difference

between

the

shareofpromoters

and

detractors.Sources:APAC

employees

the

happiest

with

their

company’s

imageSatisfactionwith

theemployer’s

image,

byregions

andfocuscountries*Witharatingof

4.4

outof

5.0,

employees

who

worked54321forAPAC

companies

were

the

most

satisfied

withtheimage

oftheiremployer.

By

comparison,

workersbased

inEuropewere

the

least

satisfiedandhad

aratingof

3.7.

American

employees

were

equaltotheglobal

average,

with

aratingof

3.9,

while

MEArespondents

were

justbelow

at3.8.4.54.44.24.13.93.93.93.83.73.73.7Among

the

focus

countries

forthisreport,

GermanyandFrancehadthe

lowest

ratingsrelating

totheircompany’s

image.

Thecountry

with

the

highest

scorethisyearwas

the

Philippinesat4.5,

with

SingaporeandCanada

alsobeingabove

the

global

average.

Thescore

forthe

United

Stateswas

the

same

astheglobalaverage

this

year.R

E

G

I

O

N

SF

O

C

U

S

C

O

U

N

T

R

I

E

SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore

PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartile9Notes:*198,284

respondents.

Only

respondents

fromCanada,

Germany,France,the

Philippines,

Singapore,and

the

United

States

werespecifically

askedquestions

about

their

perception

oftheircompanies’

image,culture,

colleagues,

and

superiors,salary,equality,

and

infrastructure

and

equipment.

Therefore,only

respondents

from

these

countries

are

included

here.mageSources:German

workers

the

least

satisfied

with

their

employer’s

atmosphereSatisfactionwith

theemployer’s

culture,colleagues,

andsuperiors,

byregions

andfocuscountries*Firms

in

Germany

were

given

the

lowest

rating

for54321their

culture,

colleagues,

andsuperiors

among

theprovided

focus

countries.

How

these

aspects

areperceived

byemployees

may

includefactors

suchasgood

communication,

aninformal

butprofessionalatmosphere,

androom

forindividualgrowthanddevelopment.4.14.03.93.93.83.73.73.53.53.43.3Thehigherscores

given

byAPAC

and

Americanrespondents

inrelation

tocompany

image

(see

page9)

arerepeated

here.

Filipinorespondents

rated

theatmosphere

attheiremployer

the

highest,at4.1,followed

closely

byU.S.employees

at4.0.

SingaporeanandCanadian

employees

were

slightlylesspositiveabouttheirworking

atmosphere

and

were

close

totheworld

average

of3.7.

Europe’s

overall

score

of

3.4

isinfluenced

bythecomparatively

low

ratingsgiven

byFrenchandGerman

employees.R

E

G

I

O

N

SF

O

C

U

S

C

O

U

N

T

R

I

E

SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore

PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartileCulture,colleagues,andsuperiors10

Notes:Sources:*198,284

respondents.

Only

respondents

fromCanada,

Germany,France,the

Philippines,

Singapore,and

the

United

States

werespecifically

askedquestions

about

their

perception

oftheircompanies’

image,culture,

colleagues,

and

superiors,salary,equality,

and

infrastructure

and

equipment.

Therefore,only

respondents

from

these

countries

are

included

here.Satisfaction

with

working

conditions

in

APAC

and

the

Americas

contrasts

withEurope

and

MEASatisfactionwith

theemployer’s

infrastructureandequipment,byregions

and

focuscountries*Working

conditions(infrastructureandequipmentprovided

to

theemployee)

canvary

substantiallyacross

different

countries,

industrysectors,

andjobroles.

Among

the

focus

countries

forthissurvey,workers

inthePhilippinesperceived

theirworkingconditionstobethe

most

satisfactory.

By

contrast,workers

inFrance

rated

theirworking

conditionsthelowest,

with

discontent

among

German

workers

alsodraggingdown

Europe’s

overall

score.543214.34.24.14.14.13.93.93.73.73.73.5Alongwith

Europe,

respondents

from

the

MEA

regionalsoreported

low

satisfaction

withtheir

workingconditions.

Inthemiddleofthepackonce

again

wereAmerican

countries,

with

Canada

reporting

the

samescore

astheglobalaverage

at3.9.R

E

G

I

O

N

SF

O

C

U

S

C

O

U

N

T

R

I

E

SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore

PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartilenfrastructureandequipment11

Notes:Sources:*198,284

respondents.

Only

respondents

fromCanada,

Germany,France,the

Philippines,

Singapore,and

the

United

States

werespecifically

askedquestions

about

their

perception

oftheircompanies’

image,culture,

colleagues,

and

superiors,salary,equality,

and

infrastructure

and

equipment.

Therefore,only

respondents

from

these

countries

are

included

here.Wagedissatisfaction

evident

in

France

and

MEA

countriesSatisfactionwith

thesalarypaidbytheemployer,

byregions

and

focuscountries*Theperception

of

beingpaidafairsalary

byan54321employer

isacritical

factorinrelation

to

employeesatisfaction.

Amongtheprovided

regions,

APACcountries

were

happiestwith

theirremuneration,followed

byAmerican

ones,

andthenEuropeancountries

second

to

last.Employees

based

inMEAcountries

were

the

least

satisfied

inthisregard,scoring

farbelow

the

global

average.4.14.03.93.93.83.73.73.53.53.23.1Thiscategory

displayssome

of

the

lowest

levels

ofsatisfaction

when

itcomes

to

employee

perceptions.Among

the

individualcountries

included,Frenchworkers

were

the

least

satisfied,while

workers

inthePhilippinesrated

theiremployer

thehighest.R

E

G

I

O

N

SF

O

C

U

S

C

O

U

N

T

R

I

E

SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore

PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartile12

Notes:Sources:*198,284

respondents.

Only

respondents

fromCanada,

Germany,France,the

Philippines,

Singapore,and

the

United

States

werespecifically

askedquestions

about

their

perception

oftheircompanies’

image,culture,

colleagues,

and

superiors,salary,equality,

and

infrastructure

and

equipment.

Therefore,only

respondents

from

these

countries

are

included

here.SalaryEquality

rated

highly

in

APAC

and

MEA,

with

work

to

be

done

according

toEuropean

employeesSatisfactionwith

equality

intheworkplace,

byregions

and

focuscountries*Inrecent

years,

workers

havebecome

farlesstolerant54321of

inequalityinthe

workplace.

Contemporary

socialmovements

thathavehad

amassive

influenceonpoliticsandcultureincludeBlack

Lives

Matter,

aswellasthelegalization

ofsame-sex

marriage

inavariety

ofcountries.

Associety

haschanged,sotoohavetheexpectations

of

employees,

andequalityhasbecome

acentral

issue

intheworkplace.4.24.04.03.93.83.83.73.73.63.53.5From

thissurvey,

we

cansee

thatwhile

workers

inAPAC

and

MEA

countries

thoughttheiremployersperformed

well

inthisregard,workers

inAmerica,

andespecially

Europe,were

farmore

ambivalent.

WhileU.S.workers

rated

theiremployer's

equalityslightlyabove

the

global

average,

Canadian

companies

weregraded

slightlylower.

German

workers

rated

equalityintheirworkplaces

the

lowest,

atjust3.5.R

E

G

I

O

N

SF

O

C

U

S

C

O

U

N

T

R

I

E

SWorld*AmericasEuropeAPACMEAU.S.CanadaGermanyFranceSingapore

PhilippinesLowerquartileMeanUpperquartile13

Notes:Sources:*198,284

respondents.

Only

respondents

fromCanada,

Germany,France,the

Philippines,

Singapore,and

the

United

States

werespecifically

askedquestions

about

their

perception

oftheircompanies’

image,culture,

colleagues,

and

superiors,salary,equality,

and

infrastructure

and

equipment.

Therefore,only

respondents

from

these

countries

are

included

here.Equality03Country

profiles•

Overview

of

focuscountries•

United

States•

Canada•

Germany•

France•

Singapore•

PhilippinesMain

influences

of

employee

satisfaction

differ

across

our

focus

countriesMost

importantaspects

ofemployee

satisfaction

worldwideThefollowing

pagesexamine

thecountries

with

the

most

respondents.Eachcountry-specific

snapshotincludes:CanadaCountry

profilesGermany•

(1/2)

Overview

of

the

survey’s

resultforthecountry

(barchartand

table)andestimation

of

the

impact

ofthescore

ineach

ofthefivecategorieson

the

overall

satisfactionFranceUnitedStatesPhilippines(doughnut

chart).•

(2/2)

Topfivecompanies

rankedSingaporebycategory.Disputed

areas15U.S.

employees

are

happiest

with

their

employer’s

infrastructure

andequipment,

but

less

content

when

it

comes

to

equality(1/2)

United

States:

employee

profile

2023“Onascaleof

0to10,

howNetpromoter

score

(inpercentage)likelyisitthatyourecommendyouremployertoa

friendorfamilymember?23%28%49%At

26percent,

theU.S.scores

abovetheworldaverage

intheNPS(16percent).26%”Detractors(0-6)Passive(7-8)Promoters(9-10)Satisfaction

drivers(scale1–5)InfluenceofsatisfactiondriversonNPSImage

hadthehighest

influence

onoverall

satisfaction

and

wasgivenanaverage

score

of3.90

byU.S.respondents.3.903.964.103.873.81Interms

ofhowtheywouldrate

theiremployer’s

culture,colleagues,

andsuperiors,

U.S.respondents

hadanaverage

score

of3.96.16.5%21.0%Employees

withintheU.S.thought

their

employers

performed

best

inrelation

to

infrastructureand

equipment.18.1%At

3.87,salaryhadthesecond-lowest

score

across

all

factors

intheUnited

States.22.9%21.6%Withanaverage

score

of3.81,

equality

hadthelowestscore

amongtheprovided

satisfaction

drivers.16

Notes:Sources:United

States;

September

2022

toAugust

2023;

41,271

respondents;18

years

and

olderUnitedStatesAlphabet

dominates

3

out

of

5

rankings

but

misses

out

on

overall

top

spotto

Microsoft(2/2)

United

States:

Top-performing

employer

rankingintheUnited

States2023,

bymetricCulture,

colleagues,andsuperiorsInfrastructureandequipmentNPSImageSalaryEquality12345MicrosoftAlphabetAlphabetVerizonVerizonMicrosoftVerizonAlphabetAlphabetBankofAmericaUnitedHealthGroupVerizonMicrosoftVerizonAlphabetBankofAmericaMicrosoftMicrosoftVerizonMicrosoftUnitedHealthGroupAlphabetBankofAmericaUnitedHealthGroupBankofAmericaStarbucksBankofAmericaUnitedHealthGroupAT&TUnitedParcelService17

Notes:Sources:United

States;

September

2022

toAugust

2023;

41,271

respondents;18

years

and

olderUnitedStatesCanada

scores

highly

across

all

metrics,

withimage

and

equality

especially

high(1/2)

Canada:employee

profile

2023“Netpromoter

score

(inpercentage)Onascaleof

0to10,

howlikelyisitthatyourecommendyouremployertoa

friendor23%33%43%WithanNPS

of20percent,

employees

inCanada

ranked

around

themiddleofthefocus

countries.20%familymember?”Detractors(0-6)Passive(7-8)Promoters(9-10)Satisfaction

drivers(scale1–5)InfluenceofsatisfactiondriversonNPSTheaverage

score

for

image

isthehighest

across

allfactors

inCanada,coming

out

at4.39.4.394.094.143.994.31Culture,colleagues,

and

superiors

wasalso

scored

highly

byCanadianworkers,especially

in

relation

totheother

focus

countries.21.8%19.9%Thethird-highest

metric

forCanadian’s

was

infrastructureandequipment,

withascore

of4.14.20.1%Theaverage

score

for

salary

inCanada

wasthelowest

across

allfactors,

butsecond

only

tothePhilippines

incomparison

toother

focus

countries.20.4%17.8%Theemployer’s

equality

score

inCanada

wasthehighest

amongallfocuscountries

but

forCanada

wassecond

toimage.18

Notes:Sources:Canada;

September

2022

to

August

2023;

9,204

respondents;18

yearsand

olderCanadaFinancial

firms

Desjardins

and

TD

Bank

achieve

Canada’s

highest

NPS

this

year(2/2)

Canada:Top-performing

employer

ranking

inCanada

2023,

bymetricCulture,

colleagues,andsuperiorsInfrastructureandequipmentNPSImageSalaryEqualityCanadian

ImperialBank

ofCommerce12345DesjardinsCostco

WholesaleDesjardinsDesjardinsCostco

WholesaleCanadianImperialBankofCommerceTDBankCanadianTireDesjardinsTelusDesjardinsAmazonDesjardinsAmazonRogersCommunicationsRogersCommunicationsAmazonCostcoWholesaleScotiabankRoyalBankofCanadaCanadianImperialBankofCommerceCanadianImperialBankofCommerceBankofMontrealTDBankRogersCommunicationsCostcoWholesaleTelusAmazonCanadaBank

ofMontreal19

Notes:Sources:Canada;

September

2022

to

August

2023;

9,204

respondents;18

yearsand

olderImage

important

to

German

workers

but

infrastructure

and

equipment

receivehighest

rating(1/2)

Germany:

employee

profile

2023“Netpromoter

score

(inpercentage)Onascaleof

0to10,

howlikelyisitthatyourecommendyouremployertoa

friendor30%34%35%At

five

percent,

Germany's

NPS

isthesecond

lowestcompared

totheotherfocus

countries.5%familymember?”Detractors(0-6)Passive(7-8)Promoters(9-10)Satisfaction

drivers(scale1–5)Theemployer’s

imageisthemostimportant

driver

for

thesatisfaction

ofGerman

employees.

Withanaverage

score

of3.67,

however,

Germanyscored

below

theworld

average

intheimage

factor.InfluenceofsatisfactiondriversonNPS3.673.323.743.533.46Withascore

ofjust

3.32,theaverage

score

for

culture,colleagues,

andsuperiors

wasthelowest

across

allfactors

forGermany,

andthelowestamong

allfocuscountries.18.6%Althoughworkinginfrastructureand

equipment

wastheleast

importantsatisfaction

driver,

German

employees

nevertheless

scored

thismetric

thehighest.18.9%20.1%For

salary,

thescore

for

Germany

was3.53.Thiswasthethird-highest

scoreamong

thesatisfaction

drivers.

Thoughwith20.1

percent

influence

ontheNPS,salary

wasnotrated

especially

highforGerman

workers.22.2%20.3%Theaverage

score

for

equality

isthesecond

worstacross

all

categories

inGermany,

andtheworst

whencompared

toother

focus

countries.20

Notes:Sources:Germany;September

2022

toAugust

2023;

30,053

respondents;18

yearsand

olderGermanyBMW

leads

the

NPS

ratings

and

was

also

rated

the

best

for

image(2/2)

Germany:

employee

profile

2023Culture,

colleagues,andsuperiorsInfrastructureandequipmentNPSImageSalaryEquality12345BMW

GroupBMW

GroupSAPBMWGroupAllianzAllianzSAPVolkswagen

GroupSAPVolkswagenGroupSAPSchwarzGruppeDaimlerBMWGroupBASFBASFSAPAllianzBoschBMWGroupBoschBoschBoschSiemensAllianzDaimlerSiemensSiemensSiemensBMWGroup21

Notes:Sources:Germany;September

2022

toAugust

2023;

30,053

respondents;18

yearsand

olderGermanyLow

scoresgiven

to

employers

in

France

across

the

board(1/2)

France:

employee

profile

2023“Netpromoter

score

(inpercentage)Onascaleof

0to10,

howlikelyisitthatyourecommendyouremployertoa

friendor32%40%28%France’s

NPS

wasbyfarthelowestamong

thefocus

countries

at

negativefourpercent.-4%familymember?”Detractors(0-6)Passive(7-8)Promoters(9-10)Satisfaction

drivers(scale1–5)InfluenceofsatisfactiondriversonNPSTheimage

oftheemployer

received

ascore

of3.67

fromFrenchemployees,

thehighest

ofthefivesatisfaction

drivers.3.673.453.553.163.65Culture,colleagues,

and

superiors

intheworkplace

hadascore

of3.45,thesecond

lowestamong

theprovided

focus

nations.20.2%Infrastructureand

equipment

wererated

justabove

salary

andculture,colleagues,

andsuperiors

for

French

workers,

butreceived

thelowestscorewhencompared

totheothercountries.17.8%20.7%French

workers

weretheleastsatisfied

withtheirsalary,

andwithascoreof3.16,

ithadthelowestrating

ofalldrivers

forall

thefocus

countries.21.9%19.5%Equalityintheworkplace

hadthemostimportant

influence

forFrenchworkers

andwasgiven

ascore

of3.65,

higher

thanthescore

fromemployees

inGermany.22

Notes:Sources:France;September

2022

toAugust

2023;

15,730

respondents;

18

years

and

olderFranceOrange

ratedthe

highest

across

all

categories

in

France(2/2)

France:

Top-performing

employer

rankinginFrance2023,

bymetricCulture,

colleagues,andsuperiorsInfrastructureandequipmentNPSImageSalaryEquality12345OrangeOrangeOrangeCréditAgricoleÉlectricitédeFranceBNPParibasOrangeBNPParibasOrangeOrangeÉlectricitédeFranceÉlectricitédeFranceBNPParibasBNPParibasÉlectricitédeFranceCréditAgricoleLaPosteCréditAgricoleSNCFGroupSocd'importationleclercÉlectricitédeFranceCréditAgricoleBNPParibasCreditAgricoleSocd'importationleclercSocd'importationleclercSocd'importationleclercCréditAgricoleLaPosteÉlectricitédeFrance23

Notes:Sources:France;September

2022

toAugust

2023;

15,730

respondents;

18

years

and

olderFranceEquality

highly

valued

but

rated

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论