GMAT作文要写多少字.docx

GMAT作文要写多少字GMAT写作要想获得理想的分数除了要掌握一定的技巧和方法还要注意自己的字数。GMAT写作并不是字数越多越好，相反如果你的文章华而不实，言之无物，那分数肯定高不了。接下来小编就GMAT作文要写多少字为大家做详细介绍，希望对大家的GMAT写作备考有帮助。GMAT作文字数要求GMAT考试官方对GMAT作文的字数并没有明确地要求。但即使如此，考生也不要以为字数多就能分数高，因为这样的做法可能会适得其反。即使AWA写作没有规定明确的字数，但是据统计，大多数的高分作文字数还是集中在400+到550左右。考生只要能够对找出的逻辑错误给出全面深刻的反驳即可，没必要无话找话。但前提是考生一定要对题干中的逻辑错误理解到位，并尽可能的把里面所有的逻辑错误全部找出来。GMAT作文写作的目的是为了将你的观点清晰的表达出来，并指出题干中论证的不足之处。所以在练习的时候，考生要注意段落之间的衔接，不要让它被孤立，否则会为你的写作减分。论述时保证每段在80字左右即可，用两到三句话把论点表达清楚即可，不要显得冗长。更多相关内容请点击GMAT写作字数有要求吗。如何判断自己的作文字数在prep的作文界面，一行平均有18-20个单词，为简化计算，按每行20个单词来计算。注意，在这里，无论是完整的一行，还是只有几个单词的一行，都记为单独的一行，用来简化计算。凡是一行，都按20个单词来计算。这样，我们可以得出：三行的段落60个单词，四行的段落80个单词，五行的段落100个单词，以此类推。通常我们会写会写4-5个段落，建议每段不要少于3行，也不要要多于6行。有了这些数据，一眼扫下来，基本自己写了多少字就很清楚了。另外大家在备考阶段就要注意自己的写作字数，练习时可以在电脑上打字做实验。最好使用GMAT写作的模拟界面进行，这样练习几篇以后大家对自己的作文字数基本就能够很好的控制了。建议大家在练习把握字数的同时注意提升自己的打字速度，不要让速度影响了文章的正常完成。更多相关内容请点击GMAT作文字数计算方法。GMAT满分范文展示这篇官方钦定GMAT满分作文，其最明显的优点在于：1. 字数为533, 在上文提到的字数范围内。2. 标准的五段制，首段、末端，中间三段，看上去结构清晰。3. 没有陈词滥调、满篇废话的模板式语言，语言简洁到位。This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesnt necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made.This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。， coal mine)。 Before any decision is made, all this