财务会计理论(司可脱)ppt文件11_scott_im_ch11_第1页
财务会计理论(司可脱)ppt文件11_scott_im_ch11_第2页
财务会计理论(司可脱)ppt文件11_scott_im_ch11_第3页
财务会计理论(司可脱)ppt文件11_scott_im_ch11_第4页
财务会计理论(司可脱)ppt文件11_scott_im_ch11_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩12页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-1,Chapter 11,Earnings Management, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-2,Earnings Management (EM),DefinitionChoice of accounting policies to achieve some specific manager objectiveCan Also Include Management of Real VariablesR&D, advertising, maintenanceTiming of disposals, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-3,Earnings Management Techniques,Revenue RecognitionAccounting Policy ChangeTiming of Adoption of New StandardsWriteoffs, Asset Sales, ProvisionsAccruals (Discretionary)Direct Charges to Retained Earnings, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-4,Patterns of EM,BathIncome MinimizationIncome MaximizationIncome Smooth, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-5,Reasons For EM,Financial Reporting To meet investors earnings expectationsTo credibly communicate inside information about earnings expectations (“Good EM”)ContractualBonus Healy (1985)Debt covenant Sweeney (1994)Political Jones (1991)IPOs, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-6,Review of Arguments for “Good” EM,Securities & Labour Market Argument Manager “foolish” to report higher earnings than can be maintainedWhy? accruals reverseManager is best placed to know persistent earnings (inside information)Blocked communicationEM is credible way to release blocked, inside information, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-7,Review of Arguments for “Good” EM, Contd.,Contracting ArgumentTo give firm some flexibility in the face of rigid, incomplete contractsConcept of an incomplete contractContract rigidityContract violation is costly, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-8,“Bad” EM,Financial Reporting PerspectiveHanna, (1999)Investors and analysts look to core earnings, ignoring extraordinary and non-recurring itemsImplies manager not penalized for non-core charges, such as writedowns, provisions for restructuringBut current non-core charges increase core earnings in future years, through lower amortization and absorption of future costs, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-9,“Bad” EM, Contd.,Hanna, contd.As a result, managers tempted to “overdose” on non-core charges, thereby putting earnings “in the bank” (also called cookie jar accounting)Note securities market reactionHanna found evidence that market uses frequency of such charges as proxy for their misuse-lower ERC when greater frequencyExample: Nortel, 2004 (text, Section 11.6.1), 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-10,“Bad” EM, Concl.,Contracting PerspectiveOpportunistic bonus maximizationHealy (1985)To avoid debt covenant violationsDechow, Sloan, and Sweeney (1996), 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-11,Do Managers Accept Securities Market Efficiency?,PerhapsPoor disclosure enables earnings management even if markets efficientPerhaps NotTheory and evidence that securities markets may not be fully efficientPro-forma earningsSchrand and Walther (2000), 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-12,Implications For Accountants,Improved DisclosureSarbanes-Oxley, 2002; CICA Handbook, Sections 1100 and 1400, 2003Reporting effects on core earnings of previous writeoffs, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-13,Earnings Management at General Electric,Text, Chap. 11, Q. 9EM DevicesAssumed rate of return on pension fundsRestructuring chargesAcquisitions, sales of divisionsConservative accounting practicesSales of leased aircraftAllocation of goodwill on purchase of subsidiaries, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-14,Earnings Management at General Electric, Contd.,Reported Net Income (Millions)2004$16,5932003 15,0021002 14,1182001 13,6842000 12,7351999 10,7171998 9,296,1997 8,2031996 7,2801995 6,5731994 4,7261993 4,3151992 4,725, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-15,Earnings Management at General Electric, Concl.,EM Devices Used In Harmony to Report Steadily Increasing EarningsSecurities Market Efficiency?Given complexity and diversity of GE, even analysts cannot understand whole company?“Good” or “Bad” EM at GE?If analysts cannot figure GE out, role for management to credibly reveal earnings expectations by EM, 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.,11-16,Earning

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论