版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
EUROPEANCENTRALBANKEUROSYSTEMEneaCaccia,JensTapking,ThomasVlassopoulosCentralbankdigitalcurrencyandmonetarypolicyimplementationDisclaimer:ThispapershouldnotbereportedasrepresentingtheviewsoftheEuropeanCentralBank(ECB).TheviewsexpressedarethoseoftheauthorsanddonotnecessarilyreflectthoseoftheECB.Abstract2Non-technicalsummary31Introduction62ImpactofaCBDConthedemandforbankdeposits8Box1TheimpactofazeroremunerationofCBDConthedemandforbankdeposits123ThebalancesheetmechanicsofaCBDC153.1TheimpactofaCBDC-induceddepositoutflowonreserves153.2ThemaximumamountofCBDC-induceddepositoutflowstolerablefromamonetarypolicyimplementationperspective21Box2High-leveldesignchoicesofcurrentCBDCinitiativesacrosstheglobe244CBDCandthesmoothimplementationofmonetarypolicy284.1Floorsystem28Box3ModelshowingtheimpactofaCBDContheamountofreservesneededforsmoothimplementationofmonetarypolicy:floorsystem324.2Corridorsystem35Box4ModelshowingtheimpactofCBDContheamountofreservesneededforsmoothimplementationofmonetarypolicy:corridorsystem385Conclusions42Proofsofresults1to444References48AbstractThispaperdiscussestheimpactthataretailcentralbankdigitalcurrency(CBDC)couldhaveontheimplementationofmonetarypolicy.MonetarypolicyimplementationcouldbeaffectediftheintroductionoftheretailCBDCchangesthevolumeofcommercialbankdepositsheldbycustomers,whichwould,inturn,affectcentralbankreserves.WhileitisoftenassumedthatcustomerdepositswoulddecreaseifaCBDCwasintroduced,weprovideargumentswhythisisbynomeansclearcutanddepositscouldevenincrease.Ifbankdepositsdodecrease,bankswouldneedtodrawon,andthereforereduce,theircentralbankreserveholdings.Moreover,uncertaintyastothetimingandextentofanyconversionsofdepositsintoCBDCmightpromptbankstoscaleuptheirdemandforcentralbankreservesinordertoholdlargerprecautionarybuffers.Consequently,centralbanksmightneedtoadjusttheirreservesupplyandotherfeaturesoftheirmonetarypolicyimplementation,depending,forexample,onwhethertheyuseafloororacorridorsystemformonetarypolicyimplementation.Inthespecificcaseofthedigitaleuro,thefeaturesalreadyenvisagedforitsdesignwouldmakeitpossibletominimisetheriskofnegativeconsequencesformonetarypolicyimplementation.JELcodes:E41,E42,E43,E52,E58,G21Keywords:Monetarypolicyimplementation,centralbankdigitalcurrency,centralbankreserves.CentralbanksaroundtheworldhavebeenassessingtheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofCBDCs.ACBDCisanewformofcentralbankmoney.Likebanknotes,itisaclaimontheissuingcentralbankthatcanbeusedtomakepaymentswithinstantsettlement24hoursaday,sevendaysaweek.Butunlikebanknotes,itexistsonlyindigitalform.Ifitisavailabletothegeneralpublic,includinghouseholdsandnon-financialcorporations,itisreferredtoasaretailCBDC.Ifitcanonlybeusedby(financial)institutions,itisreferredtoasawholesaleCBDC.In2022,80outofthe86centralbanksthatrespondedtoasurveyconductedbytheBankforInternationalSettlement(BIS)saidthattheywereengagedinworkontheissueofCBDCs.1AsmallnumberofcentralbankshadalreadyintroducedaretailCBDC(thecentralbanksofNigeria,theBahamas,JamaicaandtheEasternCaribbeanCurrencyUnion)orwereconductingpilottests(China,India).OthercentralbankshaveannouncedconcreteinvestigationsintoaretailCBDC(e.g.theBankofEnglandandtheECB).Inthispaper,wediscussthepotentialimplicationsofaretailCBDCfortheimplementationofmonetarypolicy.Oneofthemainobjectivesofmonetarypolicyimplementationistosteershort-termmarketinterestratestothelevelthatisconsideredappropriateforthemonetarypolicybeingpursued.Formostcentralbanks,thisisachievedby,amongotherthings,controllingtheamountofreservesthatthebankingsectorholdswiththecentralbank.GiventhataretailCBDCcouldhaveanimpactonthestockofreserves,itisanimportantfactortobeconsideredinrelationtomonetarypolicyimplementation.ThispaperlooksatdifferentaspectsoftheintroductionofaretailCBDCandthelikelyimplicationsformonetarypolicyimplementation,focusinginparticularontheimpactonbankdepositsandreserves.Itsfindingscanbesummarisedasfollows:monetarypolicyoperatioThecurrentpaperconsidersagenericretailCBDCbut,whenrelevant,alsodiscusseshowthedesignfeaturesenvisagedforadigitaleurowouldmakeitpossibletoaddresstheriskofnegativeconsequencesformonetarypolicyimplementation.InOctober2021theECBstartedatwo-yearinvestigationintothepossibilityofissuingaCBDCfortheeuroarea:thedigitaleuro.InOctober2023theECBdecidedtolaunchapreparationphaseasanextstepandpublishedareportsummarisingthedesignfeaturesenvisagedforadigitaleuro.2Havingexaminedthosefeatures,thecurrentpaperconcludesthattheywouldreducetheriskofadigitaleurohavingnegativeconsequencesformonetarypolicyimplementation.CentralbanksaroundtheworldhavebeenassessingtheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofCBDCs.ACBDCisanewformofcentralbankmoney.Likebanknotes,itisaclaimontheissuingcentralbankthatcanbeusedtomakepaymentswithinstantsettlementaroundtheclock.Butunlikebanknotes,itexistsonlyindigitalform.Ifitisavailabletothegeneralpublic,includinghouseholdsandnon-financialcorporations,itisreferredtoasaretailCBDC.Ifitcanbeusedonlyby(financial)institutions,itisreferredtoasawholesaleCBDC.3In2022,80outofthe86centralbanksthatrespondedtoasurveyconductedbytheBISsaidthattheywereengagedinworkontheissueofCBDCs.4AsmallnumberofcentralbankshavealreadyintroducedaretailCBDC(thecentralbanksofNigeria,theBahamas,JamaicaandtheEasternCaribbeanCurrencyUnion)orareconductingpilottests(China,India).OthercentralbankshaveannouncedveryconcreteinvestigationsintoaretailCBDC(e.g.theBankofEnglandandtheECB).5Inthispaper,wediscussthepotentialimplicationsofaretailCBDCfortheimplementationofmonetarypolicy.Oneofthemainobjectivesofmonetarypolicyimplementationistosteershort-termmarketinterestratestothelevelthatisconsideredappropriateforthemonetarypolicybeingpursued.Formostcentralbanks,thisisachievedby,amongotherthings,controllingtheamountofreservesthatthebankingsectorholdswiththecentralbank.GiventhataretailCBDCcouldhaveanimpactontheamountofreserves,itisanimportantfactortobeconsideredinrelationtomonetarypolicyimplementation.Therestofthispaperisorganisedintofoursectionsandfourboxes.Section2andBox1discusstheimpactofaretailCBDConthedepositsheldbycustomerswithcommercialbanks,giventhatthisaffectstheamountofcentralbankreservesandthereforemonetarypolicyimplementation.Section3firstanalyseshowaretailCBDCmightinfluencetheaggregatebalancesheetsofthecentralbank,thebankingsectorandthenon-banksector.ItthendiscussestheamountofbankdepositsacentralbankcouldallowcustomerstoconvertintoCBDCgivensomeoftheconstraintsarisingfromtheaggregatebalancesheets.Box2providesanoverviewofthecurrentCBDCinitiativesofcentralbanksworldwide.Section4,togetherwithBoxes3and4,providesadetailedassessment,includingamodel-basedanalysis,oftheconsequencesthataCBDCmighthaveonthewaythatcentralbankscouldimplementmonetarypolicy,distinguishingbetweenfloor-based3Foradetaileddiscussionofthforexample,Section2and34SeeKosseandMandcorridor-basedmonetarypolicyimplementationsystems.Section5concludes.Inthissection,wediscusstheimpactthattheintroductionofaCBDCmighthaveonthedemandforbankdeposits.Weshowthattheimpactis,exante,ambiguous,giventhatseveraloftheCBDC’sinherentfeaturesaswellasdesignchoicesinteractwitheachotherinwaysthatcanoffsettheireffectonthedemandfordeposits.6FollowingtheintroductionofaCBDC,someofthegoodsandservicesthatwerepreviouslypaidforwithcash(banknotesandcoins)orthroughbankdepositswillbepaidforwithCBDC.Currentlythereare,broadlyspeaking,twotypesofmeansofpayment:bankdepositsandcash.7ACBDCwouldbeathirdmeansofpayment.WhiletheintroductionofaCBDCwouldhaverelativelylittleimpactonthetypesandquantitiesofthegoodsandservicespeoplewillwanttobuy,itmayhaveastrongimpactonhowpeoplepayforthosegoodsandservices:someitemsthatwouldhavebeenpaidforwithcashorfrombankdepositswouldbesettledinCBDC.IfindividualswishedtopayforanitemwithaCBDC,theymightneedtoconvertcashorbankdepositsintoCBDCbeforehand.ThiswouldgenerateademandforCBDCandreducethedemandforcashand/orbankdeposits.However,themechanicsofconvertingbankdepositsintoothermeansofpaymentwouldhaveadecisiveimpactondemandforbankdeposits.Togiveasimpleexample,8anindividualinitiallyholdsonlybankdepositsandwouldliketoconducttransactionsforanamountPoneachoftwoconsecutivedays.AssumingthataCBDCisnotavailable,thatindividualwishestomakeacashpaymentofCandapaymentfromabankdepositofD(C+D=P)oneachofthedays.ThesplitofPintoCandDisassumedtobedrivenbytheacceptabilityoftherespectiveformsofpaymentforthetransactionstobemade.SincegoingtoanATMontwoseparatedayswouldbeinconvenient,theindividualdecidestogothereonlyonday1andtowithdraw2.Cincash.Consequently,theindividualpaysonecashamountofConday1andholdstheothercashamountofCovernightfromday1today2.Assumingthatamountspaidtomerchantsincentralbankmoney(cashor,inthefurthercourseofourexample,CBDC)areconvertedintobankdepositsonthesameday,i.e.thesumsarenotheldbythemincashovernight,Cistheportionofthecashwithdrawnfromtheindividual’sdepositsthatremainsincirculationfromday1today2.6PapersthattrytoestimatethedemandforCBDCaCBDConthedemandforbpossiblyhaveapositiveim7Forthepurposesofthisillcreditcardsore-mThissituationissummarisedinthefirstcolumnofTable1.However,holdingcashovernightexposesindividualstophysicalsecurityrisks.Consequently,incaseswherebothcashandbankdeposittransfersareacceptedforpayment,theindividualmayprefertopaythroughabankdepositsothattheamountofcashwithdrawncanbekeptassmallaspossible.Table1Holdingofcash,depositsandCBDCWithdrawals-CD-C--WithdrawalsCD-TheabilitytopayusingCBDCmayincentivisepeopletoholdasignificantamountoftheirfundsinthisformandholdlessinbankdeposits.Takingtheaboveexample,supposethataCBDChasbeenintroducedandisacceptedforsettlingtransactions,someofwhichwerepreviouslymadeincashandsomethroughbankdeposits.Theindividualwouldnowliketomake,oneachofthetwodays,acashpaymentofC*,apaymentthroughbankdepositsofD*andaCBDCpaymentofZ*,whereC*+D*+Z*=C+D=P.Onday1,shenowwithdrawsacashamountof2.C*andconvertsanamountof2.Z*ofdepositsintoCBDC,assumingthatitisalsosufficientlyinconvenienttoconvertbankdepositsintoCBDConeachofthetwodays.Asaresult,shenowholdsanamountofcentralbankmoney(cashplusCBDC)ofC*+Z*overnightfromday1today2.Incontrasttocash,CBDCisnotsubjecttophysicalsecurityrisksandmightthereforebecomethepaymentoptionofchoiceonceadigitalcurrencyisintroduced.Thiscouldleadtolessdemandforbankdeposits,i.e.C*+Z*>CandD*<D,ifaCBDCisintroduced.AsituationinwhichthereisaCBDCbutconvertingbankdepositsintoCBDCisnotstraightforwardissummarisedinthesecondcolumnofTable1.If,however,customersfindconvertingbankdepositsintoandoutofCBDCstraightforwardandaconvenientoption,thentheintroductionofaCBDCmightincreasethedemandforbankdeposits.AgaintakingtheexamplesetoutabovebutnowassumingthattheCBDChasbeendesignedsothatconvertingbankdepositsintoCBDCisstraightforward–meaningthattheconversionisinstantaneous,possibleatalltimes,costlessandeasy–thesituationwouldbeasfollows.Theindividualnowdecidestoconvertonlyasingleamountofz*intoCBDConday1andthesameamountagainonday2.ThisisparticularlylikelyifbankdepositsarebetterremuneratedthanCBDC.Asaresult,theindividualholdsacashamountofC*overnight,butnoCBDCand,giventhatC*<C,theamountheldintheindividual’sbankdepositsovernighthasnowincreasedascomparedwiththesituationinwhichnoCBDCexists.ThisisillustratedinthethirdcolumnofTable1.CBDCdesignfeatures,suchasawaterfallandreversewaterfallmechanism,thatallowtheautomaticconversionofbankdepositsintoandoutofCBDCwouldhaveasignificantimpactintermsofconvenienceandarethereforeparticularlyrelevantforreducingincentivestoaccumulateCBDCratherthanbankdeposits.AwaterfallisamechanismwherebyifCBDCholdingsexceedaprespecifiedthreshold,e.g.becauseofalargeincomingpayment,theexcessamountisautomaticallyandimmediatelytransferredintothepayee’sbankaccount,i.e.convertedintoabankdeposit.AreversewaterfallallowsapayertomakeaCBDCpaymentthatislargerthanthepayer’sCBDCholdings:anyamountneededforthepaymentandnotavailableinthepayer’sCBDCaccountwouldbeautomaticallytransferredfromthepayer’sbankaccountintotheCBDCaccountandpaymentisthentriggeredinstantly.ItshouldbenotedthatthereversewaterfallcanbeseenasatoolthatwouldmaketheconversionofbankdepositsintoCBDCaveryconvenientoption.AnindividualmightdecidenottohaveanyCBDCholdingsatallbutcouldneverthelessmakeCBDCpaymentsgiventhatthereversewaterfallmechanismwouldalwaysconvertanyrequiredamountfrombankdepositsintoCBDCasandwhenneeded.Consequently,aCBDCwithareversewaterfallcouldincreasethedemandforbankdeposits.WidespreadadoptionofCBDCasapaymentinstrumentwouldnotnecessarilyresultinreduceddemandforbankdeposits.Paymenttechnologiesarenetworktechnologies.Ifmanypeopledecidetouseatechnology,manymorewillfollow.9However,thisdoesnotnecessarilymeanthatextensiveadoptionofCBDCasapaymentinstrumentwouldreducedemandforbankdeposits.Asindicatedabove,howstraightforwarditistoconvertintoandoutofCBDCcouldbeexpectedtobeanimportantdriverofadoption,togetherwithgeneralacceptanceamongmerchantsofpaymentsinCBDCandthecreationofasymbioticecosystemalongsideothermeansofpayment.9Foramodel-baseddiscussionofthenetworkeffetal(2022).Whiletheargumentsabovefocusonthepaymentfunction,aCBDCcould,inprinciple,alsobeusedasastoreofvalue.TheextenttowhichaCBDCmightbeusedasastoreofvalueislikelytodependprimarilyonitsremuneration,discussedinBox1,andtheperceivedriskofholdingalternativestoresofvalue,suchasbankdeposits.WithregardtotheinteractionofCBDCholdingsandtheperceivedriskofholdingbankdeposits,theimpactofCBDConthedemandfordepositsislikelytobehighlysituation-specific.CBDCisaliabilityofthecentralbankinitsdomesticcurrencyand,assuch,isnotsubjecttodefaultrisk.Thiscouldmakeitaparticularlyattractiveoptioninabankingcrisis,whendepositorsmaywishtoconvertlargeamountsofbankdepositsintocentralbankmoneyforfearoflosses.ConvertingbankdepositsintoCBDCwouldbeeasierandfasterthanconvertingthemintobanknotes.Furthermore,holdingCBDCwouldnotbesubjecttotherisks,storageandinsurancecoststhatholdinglargeamountsofcashentails.10Assuch,aCBDCmightreducethedemandforbankdepositsinabankingcrisis.11However,holdinglimitsmightbeatoolforpreventinglargeholdingsofCBDCtothedetrimentofbankdepositsinsuchasituation(andmoregenerally),i.e.theymightlimitthepossiblenegativeimpactofaCBDConthedemandforbankdeposits.12TheECBhasannounceditsintentiontoofferwaterfallandreversewaterfallfunctionalitiestoalldigitaleuroend-usersandtoapplydigitaleuroholdinglimits.13Theargumentssetoutabovesuggestthatbyincorporatingthesedesignfeatures,thedigitaleuromightnothaveanegativeimpactonthedemandforbankdepositsinnormaltimesandcouldavoidunduelossofbankdepositsduringabankingcrisis.GiventhataCBDCwhichreducesthedemandforbankdepositsmaybechallengingformonetarypolicyimplementation,wefocusonthisissueinthefollowingsections.Asarguedinthissection,aCBDCcouldincreaseorreducethedemandforbankdeposits,dependingonthefeaturesincorporatedintoit.IfaCBDCweretoreducethedemandforbankdeposits,thebankingsectormayloseanimportantfundingsource.Thiscouldbechallengingformonetarypolicyimplementation.WethereforeanalysethecaseofaCBDCthatreducesthedemandforbankdepositsinthesectionsbelowwithaviewtomotivatingdesignfeaturesthatcouldpreventanysuchreduction.considermovingdepositsawayfaCBDCwalletthattheyuseforwouldthenrequireasecondacfundsintoCBDCwouldthenbeethataCBDCcouldchangethebehaviouroregulatorstherebydecreasingfinancialTheimpactofazeroremunerationofCBDConthedemandforbanTheimpactofaCBDConthedemandforbankdepositswoulddependsignificantlyonthelevelsofremunerationofthesetwoinstruments.IftheCBDCbenefitedfromhigherremunerationthanbankdeposits,peoplemightprefertoholdmoreCBDCandholdlessinbankdeposits,regardlessofwhetherornottheyusetheCBDCforpaymentpurposes.Inordertolimitanylossofdepositsinsuchcircumstances,banksmightreactbyincreasingtheremunerationpaidonbankdeposits.Thisstrategymight,however,beseenbythebanksasbeinglessprofitable,depending,forexample,ontheamountofreservesavailabletothebankingsector,inwhichcasetheymightprefertoacceptthelossofdeposits.InordertoavoidanyremunerationofCBDCinfluencingthedemandforbankdeposits,centralbankscouldconsidervariousstrategies.Theycould,forexample,offerCBDCremunerationatthelevelofthe(average)remunerationonbankdeposits(possiblyminusaconstantspread).Thisapproachmight,however,beconsideredtoocomplicatedforaretailCBDC.Furthermore,attimeswhencentralbankpolicyratesarenegative,theaverageremunerationonbankdepositsmightalsoslipintonegativeterritory.IftheremunerationonCBDCisthenalsosetatanegativelevel,thereputationandacceptanceofCBDCcouldsuffer.Zeroremunerationwouldmirrortheremunerationonbanknotesandistheapproachthatmost,ifnotall,centralbanksconsiderpreferableforaCBDC(seeBox2).Attimeswhenratesonbankdepositsarehigh,forexampleduetohighcentralbankpolicyrates,zeroremunerationofCBDCcouldresultinlowerdemandforCBDC.Whenbankdepositratesarenegative,forexampleduetonegativecentralbankpolicyrates,zeroremunerationofCBDCcouldleadtolowerdemandforbankdeposits.Thismightmakebanksreluctanttoapplynegativeratestobankdeposits,weakeningthetransmissionofnegativecentralbankpolicyrates.However,ifarelativelytightCBDCholdinglimitisapplied,theremunerationofCBDCrelativetothatonbankdepositsmighthaveverylittleimpactonthedemandforbankdeposits.Forinstance,Eurosystemofficialshavementionedadigitaleuroholdinglimitfornaturalpersonsof€3,000to€4,000asanoption.15Inaddition,itisenvisagedtoapplyazeroremunerationtothedigitaleuro.16ThelowestECBpolicyratewas-0.5%(betweenSeptember2019andJuly2022).Letussupposethattheaverageremunerationonbankdepositsfallstothislevel.Zeroremunerationofadigitaleuroandaholdinglimitof€3,000wouldthanmeanthatthelossthatanindividualcouldavoidbyconvertingabankdepositintodigitaleurouptothemaximumholdinglimitwouldbeamere€15peryear.17Evenwithouttightholdinglimits,zeroremunerationofCBDCholdingsbyhouseholdsmighthavelimitedimpactontheirlevelofdemandforbankdepositsgiventhattheremunerationonhouseholdovernightbankdepositstendsto17AsanalternativetoaCBDChCBDCremuneration,i.e.thedeviaterelativelylittlefromzero.TheimplicationsofzeroremunerationofCBDCholdingsonthedemandfordepositsmightdifferforhouseholdsandforcorporations.Startingwithhouseholdsandtakingtheeuroareaasanexample,Chart1showsthataverageinterestratesonovernightbankdepositsofhouseholdsbarelyslippedintonegativeterritoryduringtheperiodwhenmarketinterestratesintheeuroareawerenegativebutinsteadstayedclosetozero.ZeroremunerationofCBDCatthattimewouldnothaveprovidedasufficientincentiveforhouseholdstoconvertbankdepositsintoCBDC.And,whenpolicyratesandmoneymarketinterestrateswererelativelyhigh,ataround4%,in2008,theaverageratesonovernightbankdepositsbarelyexceeded1%,againprovidinglittleincentiveforhouseholdstoconvertsignificantamountsofCBDCintobankdepositsevenifCBDChadbeenremuneratedat0%.18However,thestickinessofinterestratesonbankdepositsat0%whencentralbankpolicyratesandmarketinterestratesturnnegativemaybeundesirablefromamonetarypolicyperspectivegiventhatitmeanslimitedtransmissionofpolicyrates.AndzeroCBDCremunerationwithoutarelativelytightCBDCholdinglimitcouldcementthisstickinessandresultina“reversalinterestrate”,i.e.apolicyratelevelbelowwhichfurtherratecutswouldtendtohaveatighteningratherthanlooseningeffectsontheeconomy,therebycurtailingmonetarypolicyspace.19Chart1Remunerationofovernightbankdepositsheldbyhouseholds%Source:IndividualmonetaryfinanciaNotes:Theblueareaistheshareremuneratedatratesabove0.05%andtheredareashort-termrate.EONIAdenotestheinterbankovernightlendingreplacedwiththe€STR.VWRat
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- YC/T 608-2024卷烟爆珠强度测试仪通用技术条件
- 2024年诊断用单克隆抗体项目分析评价报告
- 2024年标准气体项目经营分析报告
- 2024年SUR二次纤维障碍控制剂行业商业计划书
- 手术室抢救流程及应急预案
- 国外幼儿劳动教育研究现状
- 高中英语必修一《Unit 5 Languages Around the World Reading for writing》教案与导学案
- 2024安全员知识考试题附参考答案(综合卷)
- 2024年【安全员(初级)】考试题库及答案(基础+提升)
- 2024年国家安全员考试题库及答案(网校专用)
- 部编版小学四年级下册道德与法治《期末测试卷》附答案【模拟题】
- (高清版)JTG 5142-2019 公路沥青路面养护技术规范
- 商业伦理与企业社会责任(山东财经大学)智慧树知到期末考试答案章节答案2024年山东财经大学
- 2024年山东省济南市槐荫区中考三模数学试题
- 2024年天津市河北区九年级中考二模历史试卷
- 克与千克-教案
- “红旗杯”竞赛总题库-8班组长生产管理能力考试题库(附答案)
- 人工智能技术在人力资源咨询行业的应用
- 北航空气动力学习题答案-不完全版.ppt
- 人教版四年级数学下册期末复习教案
- 小儿高热惊厥急救演练评分标准
评论
0/150
提交评论