论异化与归化的连续体关系.txt

2()042 271 (llj) modernforeignlanguages(quarterly) februaiy2004 vol7no . l 黯 / : 黯黯 ;黯黯 黯 ;黯 :黯 hosa10036105(2004)01004907 黯黯 黯 黯 İ 黯 İ (2002:25) 黯 黯 壬黯 1. 20 mathesins halliday greenberggiv6nhopperthompson greenberggiv6n greenbeian(eroft1990:2) (markedness)(hierarchy) (prototype)(implicationaluni- versals)(ieonieity) greenberg 1973 档(greenberg1973:59) 1980 (1999: 60)(1997:i) 黯 塣 comrie (1986:85)c 黯 黯 1.2 (1999:22) 磬 1.3 r ereeerg966) croft(299()oiv6n(2995)eiv6n oiv6n(1995:28) a . b.() () c. ( ) (2000:21 1 . 4 croft(l99():66) (scalar) :singular()1 (2)aeeordingtothestatistiesasfarasthetranslationof50that15eoneernednonliterary translationinchineselaysmorestressonstrueturaleorrespondence.(3)there15nofixedor eonsistentequivalentfor50thatinchinese.some()fthestructuralequivalentsemployedare eontingentandthetranslatedtextrefleetsthestrueture()ftheoriginal. thefindingssupportourelaimthattranslationcanaddnewstrueturestothesyntaetic repertoireofthesourcelanguageexertneweonstraintsontheexistingsyntaetiestruetureor inereasethetyequencyofrarelyusedstruetures. astudyonthecontinuumbetweenforeignizationanddomestieationbywangren- qiangp4() thisstudyprobesintothetranslationstrategiesofforeignizationanddomestieationfrom theperspeetjveofthefunetionaltypologiealmarkingtheory. markednessinlanguagereferstoasyllllnetrywithinaeategory.injudgingmarkedness eriteriawehaveadoptedgiv6ns(1995)eriteriaofstrueturaleolllplexityfrequeney distributionandeognitiveeomplexity.asformarkednesspatternstheelassiealmarking theoryallowsforonlyonesortofpattern:anabsoluterelationshipbetweentwovaluesofabi- naryvauedcategory thispartoftypologiealmarking15inadequatealmostfromthestart. thusresearchershaveextendedthemarkingtheoryarguingthatmembersofaeategoryforma hierarchyoreontinuumandthatmarkedness15eontextdependent.thismarkingtheoryhas founditsapplieationsbothwithiniinguistiesandbeyond basedonthefunetionaltypologiealmarkingtheorywehavereachedthefollowing conelusions:(l)dornestication15theunmarkedstrategyoftranslationwhileforeignizationthe markedbuttheehoieeofforeignizationshouldbejustifiedasnecessary;(2)foreignizationand domestieationeanbesubdividedandtherelationshipbetweenthesubcategories15amatterof degree:(3)theboundarybetweenthem15fuzzyandahierarehyoreontinuum15forllled betweenthetwoextremes.howeverforeignizationanddomesticationeanbereversedin eertaineontextsorbycertainfaetorssuehasthetranslatorsdifferentbilingualandbicultural eompeteneetheirdifferentthinkingoftranslation.ditterenttexttypespassageoftime differentreaderseulturaldistaneeandpowerorpolitzesoftranslation. npsalienceandstructuralformationinexistentialsentencebyguhualinp.56 linguistshavebeenarguingaboutsomelanguagephenomenainenglishexistential senteneesuehasthegrammatiealfunetionandmeaningoftherethesubjeetinthesenteneeand npquantifieation.thepoint15thattheyonlyseekthesolutionoftheproblemfromtheinternal linguistiestrueture.asaresultthemoretheystudythemorecomplieatedthelinguistic strueturebeeomes.infaettheformationoflinguistiestruetureshouldnotbe50eomplieatedfor atthebeginningoflanguageforminghumanintelligeneedidnotdeveloptosuehadegreeas thatofustoday . inadditiontheformationoflinguistiestrueture15notarbitrarynorinnatein themindbuteomesfromsomesimpleprineipleorrulewhichbearsonpereeptionofextemal linguistiefunetions.weeanexplainthefor