




已阅读5页,还剩3页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
ITBS Fall 2009 Summary ReportThe ITBS (Iowa Test of Basic Skills) is a nationally norm-referenced test (NRT) used to compare the achievement of students in Marietta City Schools (MCS) to that of a representative national sample of students. The purpose of the NRT is to obtain information about how the performance of MCS students compares with that of students in a national sample, an external reference group. In other words, the ITBS is used to rank students performance on a scale. Scores from a norm-referenced test tell how a given students knowledge or skill measures up to that of others in a norm group. Prior to the fall of 2006, the ITBS was administered in the spring. However, in response to benefits cited by local school systems and research conducted at the University of Iowa, MCS decided to administer the ITBS in the fall beginning in 2006. Georgia law (O.C.G.A., Section 20-2-281) states that each local school system may elect to administer, with state funding, nationally norm-referenced instruments in reading, mathematics, science, or social studies in grade three, four, or five and in grade six, seven, or eight, subject to available appropriations, with assistance to such school systems by the State Board of Education with regard to administration guidance, scoring, and reporting of such assessments. The Marietta School Board of Education approved assessing students performance in grades 2, 4, and 7 using the ITBS in 2009-2010.Note: The availability of norms makes it possible to make score comparisons with the most relevant group of students. In 2007 Marietta City Schools began using the 2005 norms for scoring grade 2. The states contract with Riverside Publishing through the 2008-2009 school year specified that 2000 norms would be used for state funded scoring. In 2008-2009 due to a change in the law, MCS was able to select grades 4 and 7 as the grades to be scored using state funds. For this reason ITBS scores reported for grades 4 and 7 in 2008-2009 were based upon 2000 norms. Beginning in the 2009-2010 school year, the state entered into a new contract with Riverside publishing which specifies that 2005 norms be used for state funded scoring. In 2009-2010 ITBS scores reported for grades 2, 4, and 7 are based on 2005 norms. However, scores reported for grades 4 and 7 were also reported using 2000 norms. Consequently, 2009 ITBS scores for grades 4 and 7 outlined in this report may be compared to 2008 ITBS scores. For the purpose of this report, score variance is considered significant at +/-5 percentage points.This report presents information regarding the results of the ITBS administered in September 2009. The report is divided into the following parts: I. Comparison of MCS ITBS NPR results (2 years) for grades 2, 4, and 7a. Key Findings II. Comparison of ITBS NPR results by school for grades 2, 4, and 7a. Key FindingsIII. Comparison of ITBS NPR results by demographic groups for grades 4 and 7a. Key FindingsIV. NPR Data (2008-2009)a. Presented by school and subject tested for grades 2, 4, and 7b. Disaggregated by total NPR, ethnicity, English Language Learners, special education, and gender for grades 4 and 73/1/2019 1:07 上午 C:Documents and SettingslpierceMy Documents2010ITBSITBS2009-2010Reports 2009-2010ITBS 2009-2010 Summary Report with 2000 and 2005 norms.docDefinitionsNorm: a measure provided by a norm-referenced test that relates the test performance of an individual or group to the performance of the norm group.NPR (National Percentile Rank): the percentage of students in a norm group whose scores fall below a given students scaled score. For example, if a student score converts to a national percentile rank (NPR) of 75, the student scored higher than approximately 75 percent of the students in the national norm group. At the same time the average range of NPR is between the 25th and 75th percentile rank, and a score of 50 suggests half of the students making up the norm group would score above and below a student with this score.Reading Total (RT): average of Vocabulary and Reading Comprehension.Math Total (MT): average of Concepts & Estimation, Problem Solving, and Computation.I. Comparison of MCS ITBS NPR results (2 years) for grades 2, 4 and 7Key FindingsAn examination of NPR scores for MCS over two years (2008 and 2009) was conducted. In grade 4, MCS Computation score decreased (-10). Results indicate increases in: Grade 29o Concepts & Estimation (6)o Problem Solving (6)o Math Total (6) Grade 4o None Grade 7o Computation (9)II. Comparison of ITBS NPR results by school for grades 2, 4, and 7Key Findings An examination was conducted comparing NPR scores over two years (2008 and 2009) by school for each subject tested. Results indicate significant increases in NPR scores for the following:Grade 2 Vocabularyo ALB (15)o MC (13)o WS (6) Comprehensiono ALB (8)o MC (9)o SR (10)o WS (6) Reading Totalo ALB (13)o MC (14)o WS (7) Concepts & Estimationo ALB (16)o MC (23)o PS (7)o SR (5) Problem Solvingo ALB (12)o MC (22)o PS (11)o SR (7) Computationo ALB (6)o MC (13)o PS (6)o SR (10) Math Totalo ALB (13)o MC (23)o PS (10)o SR (10)Grade 4 Vocabularyo ALB (14)o HH (18)o WS (15) Comprehensiono ALB (5)o HH (14)o PS (5)o WS (10) Reading Totalo ALB (8)o HH (16)o WS (13) Concepts & Estimationo ALB (6)o HH (5)o MC (10)o PS (9)o WS (6) Problem Solvingo HH (16)o MC (19)o SR (5) Computationo MC (14) Math Totalo HH (7)o MC (13)Grade 7 Computationo MMS (9)An analysis of the 2009 range of NPR (scores) by grade level across schools was conducted for variability. Measures of variability are used to provide a description of how spread out scores are in a distribution. The table below represents the 2009 range of the NPR within MCS by subject and grade level tested. Ranges are presented as the distance from the lowest to the highest score in the NPR:2009 ITBS National Percentile Rank Scores RangesGradeReadingMath237-8234-73439-9239-927*4551*Only one school in MCS, therefore actual scores are presentedIII. Comparison of ITBS NPR results by demographic group for grades 4 and 7No comparative data for demographic groups can be derived at this time since data for 2009 is baseline data. The data for 2009 is treated as baseline since the norms used in deriving the scores for these two grades were changed to align with the norms required by the state contract with Riverside Publishing for scoring tests and reporting results. The state contract specifies that 2005 Norms will be used.Key FindingsGrade 4System NPR scores exceeded the average NPR (50) in Math (53)Demographic groups with NPR scores above the 50th percentile in Readingo Asian (78)o White (82)o Female (51) Matho Asian (89)o White (80)o Female (53)o Male (53)Grade 7Demographic groups with NPR scores above the 50th percentile in Readingo Asian (54)o White (71) Matho Asian (74)o White (71) IV. NPR Data 2009 - 2010ITBS NPR Grade 2 (2005 Norms)ReadingMathVoc.Comp.TotalConceptsProb. Sol.Compu.Total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eginning in 2007, scores are based on the 2005 norms establishing baseline data.ITBS NPR Grade 4 (2000 Norms)ReadingMathVoc.Comp.TotalConc./Est.Prob. Sol.Compu.TotalMCS200847615565616263200950615765625261ALB200846615667666667200960666473685567DL200834554555554654200932433940384139HH200824403351434648200942544956594355LH200840514655505654200940484551444046MC200852595647333841200952535357525254MCAA200889909194898392200988929294927592PS200832423844436350200936474253475051SR200837494554445351200932443951494449WS200860666470707472200975767776737275Beginning in 2009, scores are based on the 2005 norms establishing baseline data. However, scores using 2000 norms were also reported allowing 2008 to be considered as a baseline data year for 2000 norms.ITBS NPR Grade 7 (2000 Norms)ReadingMathVoc.Comp.TotalConc./Est.Prob. Sol.Compu.TotalMCS/MMS200847494852524349200944474554505251Beginning in 2009, scores are based on the 2005 norms establishing baseline data. However, scores using 2000 norms were also reported allowing 2008 to be considered as a baseline data year for 2000 norms.ITBS NPR Grade 4 (2005 Norms)ReadingMathVoc.Comp.TotalConc./Est.Prob. Sol.Compu.TotalMCS200945545054544853ALB200955595863625161DL200928343330313832HH200938464346503947LH200936414042373638MC200947454646454747MCAA200985888892907390PS200931393643394643SR200928363342424041WS200971707267686969Beginning in 2009, scores are based on the 2005 norms establishing baseline data and should not be compared to prior years results.ITBS NPR Grade 7 (2005 Norms)ReadingMathVoc.Comp.TotalConc./Est.Prob. Sol.Compu
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2025广东汕尾市陆河县高校毕业生就业见习招募15人(第三批)考前自测高频考点模拟试题及完整答案详解一套
- 2025广东省生物制品与药物研究所招聘12人模拟试卷及一套答案详解
- 2025海南澄迈县就业局招聘见习生1人模拟试卷及完整答案详解
- 2025广东惠州市博罗县东部自来水有限公司招聘及模拟试卷及答案详解(新)
- 2025年松原市繁荣社区卫生服务中心公开招用编外(聘用)人员的(20人)考前自测高频考点模拟试题附答案详解(突破训练)
- 2025广东惠州市惠阳区教育局选调下属事业单位工作人员15人模拟试卷及答案详解(必刷)
- 2025福建厦门夏商集团有限公司招聘2人考前自测高频考点模拟试题及答案详解(考点梳理)
- 2025安徽蚌埠市五河县乡村医生“乡聘村用”招聘30人考前自测高频考点模拟试题及完整答案详解一套
- 2025福建福州市招聘培训顾问1人模拟试卷及答案详解(网校专用)
- 2025年甘肃陇南事业单位预计将于5月中旬发布模拟试卷及答案详解(易错题)
- 中小学学生心理健康测评工具汇编
- 采光顶玻璃拆除施工方案
- 医院电梯乘坐安全培训课件
- 2025重庆市勘测院有限公司招聘6人考试参考题库及答案解析
- 钢厂安全教育培训课件
- 第一部分 第七章 第41课时 气象灾害(重难课时)2026年高考地理第一轮总复习
- 2025年中国航空发动机整体叶盘零件市场调查研究报告
- 2025年中考数学真题知识点分类汇编之二次函数(四)
- 2025年注册会计师题库带答案分析
- 呼吸科出科考试题临床及答案2025版
- 设计管控管理办法
评论
0/150
提交评论