供应商选择工具

SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR.40.PR.SQ.170/REV1.0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19991 SELECTION TOOL 选择供应商的工具选择供应商的工具 SUPPLIER INFORMATION 供应商信息： Supplier name: 供应商名称： Phone: 电话： Fax: 传真： Corporate headquarters address: 总部地址： Supplier web page address: 网址： Contact name/title: 联系人： Phone: 电话： Fax: 传真： Contact address: 联系地址： Contact email: EMAIL： Other important information: 其他重要信息： SQE ANALYSIS SQE 分析： Weight 比重 Supplier A 供应商 A Supplier B 供应商 B Supplier C 供应商 C RTS Readiness Suppliers Outgoing Quality Level/DPPM 供应商出货品质水平/DPPM Suppliers Customers Line Reject Rate 供应商客户的厂内不良率： Suppliers Customers Field Reject Rate 供应商客户的市场不良率： Forecasted LRR Customer 预估的客户产线不良率 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR.40.PR.SQ.170/REV1.0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19992 Forecasted IFIR Customer CUSTOMER 的预期初始市场不良率 Quality System 品质系统： Quality Resources 品质资源： TOTAL (weighted) 总计总计 100% SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR.40.PR.SQ.170/REV1.0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19993 SQE WORKSHEET SQE 工作表： RTS READINESSSCORE: _ 分数： Detail:How soon may the product be successfully introduced into Customer manufacturing, and does the compatibility of the design meet Customers needs? 说明： 产品需要多长时间才能成功导入 CUSTOMER 生产，设计能力是否可以满足 CUSTOMER 需求？ Scoring:1Represents high risk to schedule and quality OR not compatible 分数： 时间及品质具有高风险性，配合度差 2Represents medium risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质具有中等风险性，配合度好 3Represents low risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质具有低风险性，配合度好 4No risk to schedule or quality; compatible 时间及品质无风险性，配合度好 Comments 备注:_ _ _ SUPPLIERS OUTGOING QUALITY LEVEL/DPPMSCORE: _ 供应商出货品质等级/DPPM Detail:(Suppliers history) _ 说明 供应商的历史状况 Supplier should be measuring DPPM rates, analyzing/categorizing reasons for failures, and taking appropriate corrective actions. 供应商能够计算出不良率，分析失效原因并加以分类，并能够剔除有效的改善对策。 Scoring:1Supplier does not measure DPPM rate 分数： 供应商无法计算出不良率 2Supplier measures DPPM rate, however, there is no analysis (pareto) or corrective action 供应商能够计算出不良率，但无法提供分析及改善对策。 3Supplier measures DPPM rate and performs analysis (pareto), however, no corrective action is taken SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR.40.PR.SQ.170/REV1.0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19994 供应商能够计算出不良率，能够剔除原因分析，但是无法提供改善对策。 4Supplier measures DPPM rate, performs analysis (pareto) and has effective corrective action system 供应商能够计算出不良率，提供原因分析及有效的改善对策。 GENERAL DPPM INFORMATION: 主要的市场不良资讯： a)Agree to Customers DPPM goals: Yes, goals are _ No 是否达到 CUSTOMER 不良率目标： 是，目标是： 否 b)Plan to support achievement of DPPM goals: Yes (plan attached) Plan promised by _ 是否有确保达到不良率目标的计划： 是（相关计划） 计划确定人： Comments 备注:_ _ _ SUPPLIERS CUSTOMERS LINE REJECT RATESSCORE_ 供应商客户的厂内不良率 分数： Detail:(Suppliers customers history)_ (Customers current goal)_ 说明： （供应商的历史状况） CUSTOMER 的现行目标 Scoring:1Suppliers customers LRR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal 分数： 供应商客户的长期不良率超过 CUSTOMER 现行目标值的 2 倍 2Suppliers customers LRR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商客户的长期不良率超过 CUSTOMER 现行目标值，但是小于其 2 倍 3Suppliers customers LRR is approximately equal to Customers current goal 供应商客户的长期不良率基本与 CUSTOMER 现行目标一致 4Suppliers customers LRR is better than Customers current goal 供应商客户的长期不良率优于 CUSTOMER 现行目标值 SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR.40.PR.SQ.170/REV1.0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19995 SUPPLIERS CUSTOMERS FIELD REJECT RATESSCORE: _ 供应商客户的市场不良率 分数： Detail:(Suppliers customers history)_ (Customers current goal)_ 说明： 供应商客户的历史状况 CUSTOMER 现行目标 Scoring:1Suppliers customers FIR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal 分数： 供应商客户的市场不良率超过 CUSTOMER 现行目标值的 2 倍 2Suppliers customers FIR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater CUSTOMER 客户的市场不良率超过 CUSTOMER 现行目标，但低于其 2 倍 3Suppliers customers FIR is approximately equal to Customers current goal 供应商客户的市场不良率基本与 CUSTOMER 现行目标值一致 4Suppliers customers FIR is better than Customers current goal 供应商客户的市场不良率优于 CUSTOMER 现行目标值 FORECASTED LRR CUSTOMERSCORE: _ 预期的CUSTOMER产线不良率 分数 DETAIL:(SUPPLIERS FORECASTED)_ (CUSTOMERS CURRENT GOAL) 说明： 供应商的预估值 CUSTOMER 的现行目标 Scoring:1Suppliers LRR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal 分数： 供应商的产线不良率超过 CUSTOMER 现行目标值的 2 倍 2Suppliers LRR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商的产线不良率超过 CUSTOMER 的现行目标值，但低于其 2 倍 3Suppliers LRR is approximately equal to Customers current goal 供应商的产线不良率基本与 CUSTOMER 现行目标值一致 4Suppliers LRR is better than Customers current goal 供应商的产线不良率优于 CUSTOMER 现行目标值 FORECASTED IFIR CUSTOMERSCORE: _ 预期的CUSTOMER早期市场不良率 分数 Detail:(Suppliers forecasted)_ (Customers current goal) _ SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR.40.PR.SQ.170/REV1.0 CUSTOMER COMPUTER CORPORATION 19996 说明： 供应商的预估值 CUSTOMER 的现行目标值 Scoring:1Suppliers IFIR is 2 times worse than Customers current goal 分数 供应商的早期市场不良率超过 CUSTOMER 现行目标值的 2 倍 2Suppliers IFIR is greater than Customers current goal, yet less than 2 times greater 供应商的早期市场不良率超过 CUSTOMER 的现行目标值，但低于其 2 倍 3Suppliers IFIR is approximately equal to Customers current goal 供应商的早期市场不良率基本于 CUSTOMER 现行目标值一致 4Suppliers IFIR is better than Customers current goal 供应商的早期市场不良率优于 CUSTOMER 现行目标 QUALITY SYSTEMSCORE: _ 品质系统 分数 Detail 细则: a) ISO Certification: 1 Yes (circle one: 9001 9002) 0 No a) ISO 认证 b)Customer Quality Systems Audit scoring ranges: b) 品质系统稽核得分 0Less than 70% (Not Approved) 2Between 7089% (Conditionally Approved) 4Between 90100% (Approved) QUALITY RESOURCES SCORE: _ 品质资源 分数 Detail 细则: The Supplier should have a dedicated Quality Department with adequate staffing resources to attend to tactical issues and a Quality Manager with time to attend to strategic issues. Additionally, Supplier should be willing to appoint a Joint Quality Engineer for each mfg site. 供应商应当建立专门的品保系统、足够的品保员工参与品质问题的解决，任命品保经理 参与公司决策，另外供应商还要在每个制造厂任命一名 JQE Scoring:1Inadequate resources 系统不健全 2Quality staff; however, no Quality Manager 有品保员工，但没有专职品保经理 3Quality Department and dedicated Quality Manager 有品保员工和专职品保经理 4Quality Department, Quality Manager, and willing to appoint a JQE SUPPLIER SELECTION TOOLCOR.40.PR.SQ.