农产品供应链管理外文翻译(可编辑) .doc_第1页
农产品供应链管理外文翻译(可编辑) .doc_第2页
农产品供应链管理外文翻译(可编辑) .doc_第3页
农产品供应链管理外文翻译(可编辑) .doc_第4页
农产品供应链管理外文翻译(可编辑) .doc_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩11页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

农产品供应链管理外文翻译 外文翻译原文agri-supply chain management material source: /0. author: jan van roekel this section describes three cases of cross-border supply chain development in the food industry. each case highlights background, objectives, approach, and cooperation and the development process. the ghanaian processed fruit supply chain background:imports of vegetables, fruits, nuts and cereals from developing countries into the european union amounted to more than billion in 1999 buurma et al., 2001. developing country producers face increasing difficulties in meeting international standards for quality and food safety. moreover, many multinational food chains are creating and implementing their own standards for quality and safety. smallholder producers, due to their limited resources, are at a disadvantage in accommodating such requirements for quality and safety guarantees and certification. objectives: the company blue skies was formed in 1997 and started to produce processed tropical fruits for the international market in ghana early 1998. shortly thereafter, the company initiated a supply chain management project aimed at improving the quality of its processed fruit. one task was to take a hard look at the organization of the processed fruit supply chain. the result of this analysis was the companys decision to move some processing activities to ghana, to the benefit of both the enterprise and the local community in the form of jobs. the move brought more value-added activities to the country, and the quality of the product was also improved, as the processing was brought closer to the growing area. approach: blue skies initiated and guided the project development process, translating european market opportunities into a strategic business model for the ghanaian supply chain partners. quality of processed fruit and the entire production process is now guaranteed through an integrated approach to supply chain management from farm to fork. some smallholders, large-scale producers and their out-growers supply fresh fruit to the processing factory. noteworthy outputs of the project include the following:- development and implementation of a trusted third-party certification scheme by all chain partners within 24 months- added value to raw materials in the country of origin- substantial export flow to upper-end market segments in various european countries- signed agreement of fruit suppliers on farm audits and approved pesticides for each crop- staff of the processing factory 250 local employees trained to assemble, prepare and dispatch fruit according to haccp principles- development of a quality manual for certification cooperation and the development process: the food processing company has developed close links with a broad range of public and private partners. each makes its own contributions to the chain project: providing help and assistance to farmer-suppliers in the form of agricultural education and advice, developing a sound transport and logistics infrastructure, developing resilient and suitable packaging processes and implementing quality management systems. the public partners and international centers of expertise participated in the design of the project and implementation of the code of conduct on good agricultural practices with the fruit suppliers and the processing factory south africa?the netherlands fresh fruit supply chain background:south africas fresh fruit industry has experienced tough times recently due to the 1997 deregulation of the export system. competition increased and prices dropped. these developments prompted the stakeholders of the sector to undertake a feasibility study on optimization of the cold fruit supply chain between south africa and the netherlands, a major trading partner. the study was conducted in 2000 with farmers, fruit cooperatives, private companies and knowledge institutes from both countries. it found that lack of accurate information on logistics flows and quality aspects of the fruit was a problem common among all the chain partners from farmer to retailer. to address the problem, the partners initiated an information system development project to enable them to monitor product flow from country of origin to market. objectives:the first objective was to assess the potential benefits and costs of an integrated supply chain information system. the south african information and communication technology provider paltrack had already developed a system used by south african authorities to record the quantity of all fruit exported from the country. the aim of the fresh fruit supply chain pilot project was to extend this information system with logistics and quality data for fruit from south africa destined for the netherlands. approach:three existing distribution chains for fresh fruit exports from south africa to the netherlands served as models in the project. participating research institutes gathered information from these private companies via interviews. questions focused on how information on logistics and produce quality was exchanged from farmer to retailer and on specific requirements for additional information on these two aspects. the researchers analyzed the three distribution chains separately to ensure confidentially of chain information.a number of project outputs are worthy of note: world bank papercross-border agri supply chain management- generic modeling of a supply chain information system for fruit which can be used or adapted by other supply chains- ideas for improving information exchange between chain partners- suggestions for farmer-level improvements concerning harvest and post-harvest activities- suggestions for cooperative/exporter-level improvements regarding quality-control practices, feedback to farmers and standardization, for example, of shipping pallets- suggestions for government-level improvements such as investments in fruit sector infrastructure packing houses, transport, harbor, quality control and research facilities- dissemination of results in workshops, conferences, publications and web sites cooperation and the development process:both private and public parties participated in the project. some of the private companies involved were motivated to participate because their competitor did so or to make sure that they did not miss out on market advantages or innovations. coordinator responded to information requests and solved problems such as misunderstandings and disagreements among project participants. the committees task was to approve project activities, monitor project performance and act on new developments within the supply chain. the participants apparently valued these meetings, since most were present at all. the atmosphere of the meetings was open and positive and even competitors chatted amicably before and after the official business. because participants had signed clear agreements on confidentiality, intellectual property rights and information dissemination to the outside world, no significant problems arose concerning these issues. public sector contributions reflected the two countries commitment to private-sector development and, there with, to economic growth on both sides. fresh food supply chain in thailand background: thai consumers are spending an increasing proportion of their income on fresh fruits and vegetables, the percentage having risen from 19% in 1985 to 24% in 1993. most produce is sold in traditional market outlets, in ambulant street trade and in the so-called wet markets. overall, 5% of sales are made through supermarkets, although this proportion has already reached 50% in the capital bangkok. in recent years, international retailers world bank papercross-border agri supply chain management like 7-eleven, royal a hold, tesco, makro, carrefour and sainsburry have established supermarkets especially to serve thailands urban conglomerates. in 1996, royal a hold established a joint venture with the thai central retail corporation and started to operate more than 30 tops supermarkets most of which are located in bangkok and chiangmai. from the start, tops proliferated itself as the supermarket chain for quality fresh food. objectives: in 1998, tops began a supply chain project aimed at providing thai consumers high-quality, safe, fresh produce with reliable availability at affordable prices. to achieve that goal, however, the supply chain faced a number of problems. for example, roughly 250 suppliers were delivering perishables directly to the backdoors of 35 stores at least three times a week. this meant high handling costs, significant post-harvest and shrinkage losses and low service levels meaning that produce was often out of stock. tops enlisted public-sector assistance and started the project with four objectives: raising the level of service within the perishables supply chain; reducing lead times and post-harvest losses and shrinkage; improving quality and safety of produce by developing preferred supplier relationships and introducing good agricultural practices and a certification scheme; and raising the knowledge and awareness of employees and professionals in the local food industry through on-the-job training e.g., in haccp and a mini-mba program. approach: the tops supply chain has thus far focused on delegating value-added activities and selecting preferred suppliers. since at the start of the project none of the fresh-goods suppliers performed the value-added functions required e.g., sorting, packaging, the project decided to build a fresh distribution center that would also perform productive functions like quality control, packaging and processing. this value-added center was a complete green-field operation located on the edge of bangkok. the center served as the locus for the projects work to improve supply chain performance for perishables. a number of noteworthy results were achieved:- establishment of the fresh distribution center in bangkok- reduction of the number of preferred suppliers from 250 to 60 in the first half of 2001, with 40 out of the 60 certified by the department of agriculture doa and carrying the doa label- provision of training to quality control managers at the tops distribution center and in the stores, with the service level increasing to 98%- development of a value-chain analysis model- development of a model for lead-time reduction- reduction of the lead-time from farm-to-fork from 68 hours to less than 24 hours cooperation and the development process: between 1998 and 2002, the emphasis of the supply chain development strategy gradually changed from chain optimization to integral chain care. chain partners established cross-border public-private alliances with international research institutes and ministries of agriculture to find ways to increase food safety assurance and improve certification, as well as to strengthen research and education capacity about and within the food chain. the project became affiliated with the department of agricultures certification program to increase public awareness and gain trust and to build the image of a reliable and responsible retailer. the main challenges the project encountered concerned intercultural barriers. for example, the preferred supplier program ran up against the traditional thai system of personal networks in agricultural trade. buyers and suppliers customarily maintain personal relationships to create stability and continuity in trade, despite the fact that this is not always economically efficient. consequently there has been some resistance to optimization of the supplier network. however, the project has helped to convince many participants that the implementation of the preferred supplier program is required to improve the supply of perishables. also, the chain partners sometimes experienced intercultural communication barriers. this resulted in delays and postponements but also contributed to a growing mutual understanding.译文农产品供应链管理资料来源: /.作者:杰.范.洛克尔 这部分描述了三个跨国的食品生产供应链的案例。每个案例都强调了背景、目标、方法,及合作发展的过程。 加纳加工水果供应链 背景:从发展中国家进口蔬菜、水果、坚果和谷物到欧盟,到2001年总计已经超过0亿。发展中国家的出口商在达到国际水平的质量和食品安全上不断遇到困难。除此之外,许多跨国食物链正在生成和实施他们自己的质量和安全水平。由于小农户生产者受到资源的限制,处于弱势,需要得到质量和安全的保证及认可。 目标:蓝天公司成立于1997年,在1998年早期开始生产已加工过的热带水果,运往加纳的国际市场。不久之后,这个公司为了提高已加工水果的质量,启动了供应链管理项目。其中一项任务就是认真审视已加工水果组织的供应链。分析得出结果,公司必须对加纳市场采取一些处理活动,使公司和当地组织都能获利。这项措施不仅带动了其他附加活动,同时产品的质量也得到了提升,生产过程也更接近市场。 方法:蓝天公司创造并引导了这个项目的发展,改变了欧洲市场机遇,为加纳供应链合作伙伴提供战略业务模型。通过对供应链管理“从农场到餐桌”方式的整合保证了已生产水果的质量和整个生产过程。一些小农户们或者大规模的生产者和他们的专门种植者为生产工厂提供新鲜的水果。值得注意规定项目如下: -在24个月内供应链内所有的合作伙伴开发和实施第三方认证制度。 -对原产国的原材料增加附加价值。 -实质性的出口到欧洲不同国家的市场上。 -签署农场水果供应商审核并批准对每种农作物农药的协议。 -生产工厂的员工(250个本地员工)要根据haccp原则练习装配,准备并调度水果。 -开展质量手册,以便资料核对的。 合作发展过程:食品加工公司已经开发出了一系列紧密联系在一起的公共建筑和私人合作伙伴。每个人都致力于这个供应链项目:以农业教育及指导的方式为农民-提供者提供帮助与方便,发展良好的运输和物流基础设施,发展弹性的合适包装过程和实施质量管理体系认证。专业的公众参与者和国际中心参与工程的设计,实施以良好的农业措施和水果供应商为准则的项目。农业生态提供发展中的一个质量手册来支持认证程序;加纳植物保护和管理服务提供额外的对农药应用的训练;校准喷涂设备和适当的耕作实践。 南非-荷兰的新鲜水果供应链 背景:南非的新鲜水果工业由于1997年的出口放松管制制度经历了艰难的时刻。竞争加剧,价格下降,这些发展促使该部门为了优化主要供应链贸易伙伴-南非和荷兰的冷链供应链,对利益相关者进行可行性研究。这项研究是对2000年两国的农民、水果合作社、私人公司和机构的信息知识进行调研。结果发现,缺乏准确的对物流流量和果实品质方面的信息问题在所有供应链合作伙伴(从农民到零售商)是常见的。为了解决这一问题,合作伙伴发起的信息系统开发项目,使他们能够监控产品从原产地到市场国家的流动情况。 目标:第一个目标是评估潜在的利益和整合供应链信息系统的综合成本。南非信息和通信技术提供商已经开发了南非当局用来记录从该国出口的所有果实的出口量的制度。该新鲜水果供应链试点项目的目的是要扩大这个物流信息系统和自南非到荷兰的果实品质数据。 方法:从南非到荷兰的现存三个新鲜水果出口供应链在项目中担任项目模型。参与研究机构通过采访收集了这些私营公司的信息。问题集中在从农民到零售商如何在物流信息交换和生产质量这两方面的得到其他信息要求。研究人员分开分析了三个销售链,以确保信息保密。对项目产出的数目是值得注意的:世界银行跨境农业供应链。 -通过建模的水果信息系统供应链可被其他供应链使用或者调整。 -提高供应链合作伙伴之间的信息交流。 -为农民有关收获以及收货后活动提供农民层面上的技术改进建议。 -为合作/出口商级改进有关质量控制、反馈农民和标准化的建议。如:航运托盘。 -对于政府层面的改进建议,如在水果部门的基础设施(包装房屋,交通,港口),质量控制和研究设施的投资。 -传播讲习班,会议,出版物和网站的结果。 合作发展过程:私人和公共缔约方参加了本项目。一些私人公司之所以涉及是因为他们的竞争对手也在如此做或者是为了确保他们没有错过市场优势或者创新。协议

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论