Shouldthedeathpenalty,thatis,capitalpunishmentbeabolishedthroughouttheworld.docx

business communication assessmentshort easyshould the death penalty, that is, capital punishment be abolished throughout the world?name: yijun linstudent number：4287teacher: vedranashould the death penalty, that is, capital punishment be abolished throughout the world?capital punishment is controversial topic in the world. some people want to see justice done. they think it is necessary to control violence in society. however, some people disagree to death penalty, apparently out of human love. most people nowadays choose to stand somewhere in between the two extreme points of view.capital punishment is can support reduce people crime. in history, almost every country has the existence of the death penalty, serving as a real stop to serious crimes. obviously, it should prove safe for society. china topped the world in the imposition of the death penalty (hong, l.2008). the crimes low includes not only violent crimes, but also economic offense, offenses concerning public safety, public order, and corruption, drug trafficking (hong, l.2008) it is also self-evident that dead criminals can not commit further crimes, so that the prison of the crisis, escape, or after the release make trouble. also, it would makes good for economic, because of huge cost involved in keeping dangerous criminals behind bars. on the other hand, some people oppose capital punishment. the reasons are sometimes the justice system mistake that later found to be innocent. live just only one, how allow of mistake executes people? many countries still carried out the death penalty, but that county does not decrease the people crimes, so the death penalty is not necessarily the best way to solve the problems. there is a societal consensus that the punishment offends civilized standards of human decency (john j, wilson. 2000). therefore, like china, have some reform for the law, such as it exempts minors and pregnant women, it makes legal representation mandatory for all capital cases and it has the suspended death sentence, which may be used when an offender “should be sentenced to death” but “immediate execution is not essential.” (hong, l.2008).the argument against the death penalty mostly from humanitarian and religious sectors. they think an eye for an eye ancient principle, cannot apply to today, is to be put to death cant accept the implementation of the living. as an alternative, life without parole is recommended (amnesty international, 2012). kill someone is always wrong, and two wrongs can never make a right. moreover, mistakes are bound to happen, people should have forgiveness, give second change to learn from mistakes. also, saving money can never be a justification for taking someones life.different religions have difference opinion for the capital punishment. buddhists place great emphasis on non-violence and compassion for all life (horigan, damien p. 1996). christians churches accepted that capital punishment was a necessary part of the mechanisms of society (david brion d. 1957).bibliographies: l hong,l.(2008)chinas death penality: reforms on capital punishment, east asian institute background brief no.412l john j,wilson.(2000)coordinating council on juvenile justice and delinquency prevention, u.s. department of justice, office of justice programs, office of juvenile justice and delinquency preventionl amnesty international, (2012). abolish the death penalty.accessed 11 april 2012 /en/death-penaltyl horigan, damien p. (1996): of compassion and capital punishment: a