供应商审核检查表.doc_第1页
供应商审核检查表.doc_第2页
供应商审核检查表.doc_第3页
供应商审核检查表.doc_第4页
供应商审核检查表.doc_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩7页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

供应商审核检查表ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES SUPPLIER AUDIT CHECKLIST供应商(SUPPLIER):_地址(LOCATION):_AMD审核成员(AMD AUDITORS):_ _日期(DATE):_现场审核(ON-SITE AUDIT)_ 书面审核(MAIL AUDIT)_注意:审核员在每个空格将输入一些关键数字,应答者应回答YES或NO,如果不适用回答N/A NOTE:On-site auditors will enter the key number rating in each space. For mail audit surveys, respondents will answer yes or no, or use the key number rating system in each space. If aquestion does not apply, answer N/A.1.0 质量承诺(QUALITY COMMITMENT)1.1 是否有质量方针、目标或质量手册? Is there a quality policy, statement, or manual? _ 1.1.1是否定期评审、更新质量方针及手册? Is the quality policy or manual updated regularly? _ 1.1.2质量方针或手册是否包括本检查单提及的基本系统? Does the policy or manual include basic systems as identified in this checklist? _ 1.2 对质量有影响的人员的职责与权限有无明文规定? Is the Quality functions authority and responsibilities clearly defined in writing? _ 1.3 有无组织结构图? Is there an organization chart which identifies quality function elements? _ 1.4 是否负责质量的人员有权拒绝不符合规定要求的物品? Does the Quality function clearly have the authority to withhold items that have not met an acceptable quality standard? _ 1.5 有无书面的持续改进计划? Is there a documented quality improvement plan? _意见(COMMENTS): _总计(POINT TOTAL):_2.0 总体质量体系的要求(GENERAL QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS) 2.1 有无定义了过程质量控制点的过程流程图? Is there a current process flow chart with process or quality inspection points defined? _ 2.2 有无追溯交付到原材料的系统并能贯穿在进出货检验、过程检验之中? Is there a system for lot traceability of materials that will trace materials from raw supplies to shipped product, which contains, quantity in/out, inspection performed? _ 2.3 有无进料检验的管理程序? Is there a system which indicates the acceptance of material throughout the process? _ 2.4 有无描述过程检验,使产品达到规定要求的整个生产过程的验收? Does the Quality function maintain a system for the use and control of inspection stamps or an alternate method of indicating acceptance and identification of the person making the decision? _意见(COMMENTS): _总计(POINT TOTAL):_3.0 统计程序及质量控制(STATISTICAL PROCESS AND QUALITY CONTROL) 3.1 有无书面的SPC系统文件? Is a SPC system defined and documented? _ 3.2 是否有最高管理层参与评审SPC控制系统? Is there evidence of top management involvement? _ 3.3 是否用统计的方法进行持续改进,以证明公司的质量方针、目标,是否达到? Do company policies/objectives reflect managements commitment to continuous improvement through the use of statistical methods? _ 3.4 是否建立了通过适当的特性来监控每个关键过程的程序,并且指明用何种统计技术? Have procedures and techniques been established to determine the appropriate characteristics to be monitored for each critical operation? _ 3.5 是否有书面的文件规定当超出控制线时应提供适当的书面反应,并给予必要的行动? Is there a documented procedure defining out of control limits and significant patterns within control limits which provides appropriate written responses for actions taken? _ 3.6 有否使用控制图? Are control charts in use? _3.7 控制图是否简明、扼要、清晰? Are the charts clear and concise? _ 3.8 统计的控制线是否用于管制图中? Are statistical control limits used on the control charts? _ 3.9 由谁发现失控情况? Who detects out of control condition(s)? 操作工operators? _ 主管supervisors? _ 维护人员maintenance? _ 工程师engineers? _ 经理managers? _ _ 3.10 谁对失控现象作出反应? Who responds to out of control condition(s)? 操作工operators? _ 主管supervisors? _ 维护人员maintenance? _ 工程师engineers? _ 经理managers? _ _ 3.11 当发生时有无及时的解决方案? Is there prompt resolution of out of control conditions? _ 3.12 有无制定记录控制图上的相关信息的程序,且被执行? Has a procedure been implemented for recording pertinent information on control charts? _ 3.13 有无调整控制线的控制程序并执行? Has a procedure been implemented for establishing and adjusting control limits? _ 3.14 有无建立减小过程变差的目标? Have goals been established to reduce variation in the process? _意见(COMMENTS): _总计(POINT TOTAL):_4.0 人员培训及证明(PERSONNEL TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION) 4.1 有无建立关键过程、操作、检验员工的培训程序? Are there training procedures for personnel assigned to work on critical processes, operations, and inspections? _ 4.2 培训计划是否包括下列几个方面? Does the training procedure include the following? 4.2.1 操作姿势指导及测试? Hands-on instruction and testing. _ 4.2.2 在特定的时期结束时或效果不好的特定时期,再测试和再培训? Retesting or retraining of personnel at the end of a specific time period or when performance indicates poor performance for a specified time period. _ 4.2.3 有无取消颁发能力资格证的标准规定? The criteria for decertifying and recertifying personnel. _ 4.3 培训记录及培训人员名单是可利用的、可保留的? Are training records and a list of trained personnel available and maintained? _ 4.4 人员是否被培训在工作中用到的统计方法, Are personnel trained to use statistics within the job,especially SPC/SQC methods? _ 人员达到了何种水平? What level of personnel? _意见(COMMENTS): _总计(POINT TOTAL):_5.0 测量设备的控制(TEST AND MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT CONTROL) 5.1 有无程序规定测量设备的周期性校验? Is there a documented system for the automatic recall and periodic calibration of test and measuring equipment and measurement standards? _ 5.1.1 若员工被允许使用自已的量测设备、那么此设备是否在公司规定的控制之中? If employees are permitted to use their own test and measuring equipment, is such equipment incorporated in the system? _ 5.2 测试及测量设备的标准的校对是否基于制造商的定期(时间间隔)统计数据的基础上? Are test and measuring equipment and standards calibrated based on an established manufacturers interval or upon current statistical data? _ 5.3 关于测量设备及测量标准的校对是否有文件化规定? Are procedures documented for the calibration of test and measuring equipment and Measurement standards? _ 5.3.1 公差的定义是否已被文件化? Are tolerances defined and documented? _ 5.3.2 这份文件是否定义了对于超出公差的纠正措施? Do the procedures specify corrective action for an out of tolerance condition? _ 5.3.3 这些校验是否遵循NISN、ASTM等标准? Is calibration traceable to nationally acceptable standards such as NIST, ASTM, etc.? _ 5.3.4 校验记录是否包含以下信息? Does the calibration record include the following information? 5.3.4.1 校验日期Calibration date. _ 5.3.4.2 校验人Person who calibrated the equipment. _ 5.3.4.3 下次校验的时间Next calibration due date. _ 5.3.4.4 适用的条件Applicable environmental conditions. _ 5.3.4.5 超出公差的设备在校验前有无保存记录? For out of tolerance equipment,initial reading before and final reading after calibration. _5.3.4.6 超差的情况是否有相应的纠正措施? Corrective actions taken for out of tolerance conditions. _5.3.4.7 校验使用的基准物质有否进行校验? Unique identifier of the equipment being calibrated. _5.3.4.8 有无使用的校验程序? Reference to the calibration procedure used. _5.3.5 在使用前是否重新做测试及验证? Are acquired or reworked test and measuring equipment inspected and calibrated prior to use? _ 5.4 有无预防性维护程序与日程安排? Are there preventive maintenance procedures and schedules maintained in each area? _ 5.5 对于测量设备是否经常做相关的措施? Are regular correlation tests for measurement equipment conducted? _ 5.6 测量设备是否有标识注明:校验日期、校验人、下次校验时间? Are labels utilized on test and measuring equipment and measurement standards to show the current calibration date, next calibration due date, and the person who performed the last calibration? _ 5.7 是否有标识或其它方法表明测量设备或测试标准是过期的或超出公差范围的? Is there a system which uses tags or another method to identify past due or out of tolerance test and measuring equipment and measurement standards? _ 5.8 对超出公差的测量设备是否会缩短其校验周期? Is the calibration interval for test and measuring equipment subject to decrease when identified as out of tolerance? _意见(COMMENTS): _总计(POINT TOTAL):_6.0 文件与资料变更的控制(DOCUMENTATION AND CHANGE CONTROL) 6.1 书面化的资料是否包含以下各项?Are the following documented? 6.1.1 主要的设计特性(适用时)Major design characteristics (if applicable) _ 6.1.2 使用的材料Materials used. _ 6.1.3 过程控制程序Process procedures. _ 6.1.4 检验程序Inspection procedures. _ 6.1.5 有关成品的制造及测试所必须的程序和记录是否被控制? All other necessary procedures needed for manufacturing and testing of finished products. _ 6.2 有否建立文件变更的管理系统? Has a system been established to make changes in controlled documentation? _ 6.3 有否建立文件变更的审批准则? Is there an established level of approval needed for documentation changes? _ 6.4 更改内容、生效日期是否在图纸、程序等文件上标明或证实? Are change levels and effectivity dates indicated and verifiable on drawings, procedures, etc.? _ 6.5 若允许,手工的改动是否有受控文件的控制? If permitted, are handwritten changes to controlled documentation limited? _ 6.5.1 依靠什么手段?By what means?_6.5.2 在规定的期限内,文件总清单上是否被更新以反映经认可的手写变动? Are specification masters upgraded to reflectauthorized handwritten changes withi n a specific time period? _ 如何控制?How is this controlled?_6.6 现行的文件是否有有效文件总清单? Are there master document files for active specifications? _6.7 是否保留文件变更的记录? Is the revision history for specifications retained? _ 6.8 有无一既定的方法用来清除所有生产、检验现场内作废的图纸的程序及说明? Is there a method for removing obsolete drawings, procedures, and specifications from all production and inspection areas? _ 6.9 对于受控文件及其它公司的记录是否建立或已有一个纠正措施程序? Have error correction procedures for controlled documentation and other company records been establishedand implemented? _ 程序是否包含以下各项?Does the procedure include the following: 6.9.1 不允许使用修正液No use of correction fluid allowed. _ 6.9.2 不允许使用铅笔No use of pencil allowed. _ 6.9.3 不允许使用钢笔No use of felt-tip pens allowed. _ 6.9.4 不允许涂改错误No obliteration of errors allowed. _ 6.9.5 纠正人能识别Identification of person making the correction. _ 6.9.6 修正的日期(年、月、日)Date (month, day, year) of the correction? _ 6.9.7 是否注明修正的原因Reason for correction if not obvious. _ 6.10 在自动分发系统中对可能会没有被接收的是否每年定期审阅? For specifications not received by automatic distribution, is there an annual review of specifications that assures that only the latest specifications are in use? _ 6.11 必要的标准、图纸是否在现场易于得到并被理解? Are necessary specifications, required drawings, and other drawings accessible to in-process personnel? _意见(COMMENTS): _总计(POINT TOTAL):_7.0 记录保存(RECORD RETENTION) 7.1 以下记录是否被保存至所列出的期限内? Are the following records retained for the minimum time periods listed? 7.1.1 人员的培训及测试(一年内的有效保存在整个雇用期间的记录) Personnel training and testing (one year active file retention, then archived for entire period of employment). _ 7.1.2 检验操作记录、生产过程记录、进料和过程记录(一年) Inspection operations: production processes, incoming, and in-process (one year). _ 7.1.3 有关图片、认证、质量一致性的检验(五年) Screening, qualification, and quality conformance inspection (five years). _ 7.1.4 不良记录及分析(五年)Failure reports and analysis (five years). _ 7.1.5 有关设计、材料、过程变更的书面记录(五年) Initial documentation and subsequent changes in design, materials, and processing (five years). _ 7.1.6 设备的校验记录(五年)Equipment calibration (five years). _ 7.1.7 预防性维护记录(五年)Preventive maintenance (one year). _7.1.8 有关过程、利用率及材料控制的记录(一年) Process, utility, and material control (one year). _ 7.1.9 证明产品的记录(5年)Product lot identification (five years). _ 7.1.10 追溯产品的记录(5年)Product traceability (five years). _意见(COMMENTS): _总计(POINT TOTAL):_8.0 异常时的纠正措施(NON-CONFORMANCE TO SPECIFICATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION) 8.1 不良材料是否被标识并隔离? Is non-conforming material identified and segregated from conforming material? _ 8.2 不良材料是否定期做报告并提交管理层批阅? Are reports for non-conforming material regularly prepared and reviewed by management for action? _ 8.3 有无文件化的纠正措施系统?Is there a documented corrective action system? _8.3.1 是否能提供预防同一问题再度发生的纠正措施? Does the system provide prompt, remedial action to prevent recurrence? _8.3.2 对重大或重复发生的问题能否提供永久性的解决方案? Does the system provide permanent resolution to major or recurring problems? _8.3.3 是否制定了所有纠正措施及措施被实施的跟进文件? Does the system provide documentation of and follow up on all corrective actions? _ 8.4 有无MRB体统处理不良材料? Is there a Material Review Board (MRB) system to disposition non-conforming material? (i.e. SCAR,NCMR, etc.) _ 8.5 所采取的纠正措施是否以内部检验结果及过程分析、自我审核、客户输入为基础? Are corrective actions and dispositions taken based upon internal material review, process analysis, self-audit results, and/or customer input? _ 8.6 当不良品已被运往AMD时,供应商是否通知适当的AMD质量或采购人员? Does the supplier notify appropriate AMD Quality/Purchasing personnel when non- conforming material may have been shipped to AMD? _ 8.7 若允许返工,是否有限制返工的不良材料的程序? If rework is permitted, are there documented procedures and limits for reworking non-conforming material? _ 8.8 是否有返工、拒收材料的检验的书面程序? Are there documented procedures requiring the re-inspection of rejected or reworkedm aterial? _ 8.9 是否对不良材料的最终处理权限做了书面规定? Is documentation available to provide

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论