农夫保险公司.doc

Dear Mr. Shaffer:亲爱的Shaffer先生：This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter regarding the above-captioned matter.确认收到您关于提及上述事件的来函。I have forwarded your demand to Farmers Insurance, my insurance carrier. Farmers informed me that the only way it will pay any claim is when my house is damaged and it pays for repairs under my homeowners policy. Since Mr. Dressler has no interest in the house or privity with Farmers, your claim will be rightfully rejected. Farmers will officially reply to you on the matter in due course.我已经把您的要求转发给了我的保险公司，农夫保险公司（Farmers Insurance）。农夫公司通知我，该公司仅限根据我的房屋保单，在我的房子遭损而索赔时付修理费。由于Dressler先生对我的房屋并无权益，与农夫公司亦无合同关系，您的权利要求将被正当驳回。农夫公司届时将就此事正式回复您。Mr. Shaffer, the claims in your letter are not borne out by the facts below:Shaffer先生，您来函中的权利要求并未由以下事实所证实：1. Claim of disregard of your clients rights. 有关漠视您的委托人权利的主张。Your client defaulted on his rent for August 2006. On September 7, 2006, I obtained an eviction order from the Cleveland County Court and personally handed it over to him. The eviction order stated that he had FORTY-EIGHT hours to move out. I waited ONE HUNDRED TWENTY hours before I came back to the house on September 12, 2006, with a deputy to lock him out. Your client not only refused to accept personal service of the original summons for the forcible entry and detainer action, which we then did by certified mail, but also refused to answer the door on September 12 when we did the lockout. I had to use a spare key to get into the house.Under such circumstances, how can you claim that I disregarded his entitlement of forty-eight (48) hours? 您的委托人拖欠了2006年8月的房租。2006年9月7日，我拿到克利夫兰郡法院（Cleveland County Court）驱逐令并且亲自交给了他。该驱逐令规定他在48小时内搬出。我等了120小时，于2006年9月12日回到房屋，与一名本郡副警长对他封锁房屋。您的委托人不仅拒收亲自送达的强行入屋查封案原传票（而我们随后以保付邮件送达），9月12日我们去锁闭房屋时他还拒绝开门。我不得不用备用钥匙进门。在这种情况下，您怎么能说我漠视了他48小时的权利？2. Civil vs. criminal matter. 民事对刑事案件。During the week of September 12, 2006, after Mr. Dressler was locked out, he exchanged a series of e-mail messages with me, in which he indicated that he would pay the court judgment in return for my permission to remove his possessions from the rental premises. This turned out to be a ruse; on September 16, 2006, the day that he said he would pay me the money, he illegally broke into the house in spite of the court order barring him from entry to remove his belongings. He told the neighbors, police officers and bystanders present that he had deposited the money into my bank account that morning, so he had the right to remove his properties. This was a sheer lie.在2006年9月12日那一周，Dressler先生被锁屋赶出后，他不停与我通电子邮件，说他会付清法院判决的欠租，作为交换我要允许他从上述出租房产中搬走他的财产。原来这是他的诡计：2006年9月16日，就是他承诺付款的当天，他不顾法院禁令非法闯入房子搬他的东西。他告诉在场的邻居、警察和看热闹的人说，他当天早上已经把钱存入了我的银行账户，所以他有权搬走他的财物。这纯属谎言。Mr. Shaffer, one does not need to be a lawyer to know that when a court order bars someone from entering a house and he still does so, it is a criminal violation and constitutes illegal breaking and entering. The Cleveland County prosecutors office correctly reduced the charge against your client to illegal breaking and entering from the initial charge of second degree burglary after consulting me but somehow failed to file papers for the amended charge with the court. You seized on that failure and obtained a dismissal of the case based on a technicality. The case against your client has never been tried ON THE MERITS. Instead of being satisfied with your clients stroke of luck, you sent me a totally baseless claim for $15,000 in an attempt to intimidate and harass me, violating 455 of Title 21, The Oklahoma Witness Intimidation Statute.Shaffer先生，不是律师的人也知道，当法院禁止某人进入一栋房屋而如果那人仍然这么做了的话，即违反刑法，构成非法侵入。在与我商议后，克利夫兰郡检察官办公室恰当地把您的委托人原先的二级入室行窃罪指控减为指控他非法侵入，但不知何故没有把修改后的指控文件递交给法院。您抓住了这一疏忽，并基于技术性细节得以争取撤销该案。您的委托人的这个案子从没根据是非曲直来判。您并不对您的委托人的好运感到满意，而是致函给我，毫无根据地要我付一万五千美元，试图胁迫和骚扰我，这违反了俄克拉荷马州证人胁迫法的第21款455节。For your information, I do not have any control over the way the Cleveland County prosecutors office conducts its business. Prosecutors use their discretion to decide whom to prosecute and what to charge them with. Your claim that I somehow single-handedly turned a civil matter into a criminal case is ridiculous and simply glosses over the fact that your client broke into a rental house against a court order, thus violating the criminal law.我谨告知您，我对克利夫兰郡检察官办公室的执法方式毫无控制权。检察官们拥有酌处权，决定要起诉谁及以何种罪名控告他们。您声称，我单枪匹马，妙手将一个民事案件办成一个刑事案件，这是荒谬的；您对您的委托人违反法院禁令闯入出租房屋的事实却只字不提，虽然这违反了刑法。3. The issue of libel. 诽谤问题。You claimed that I libeled your client and caused him embarrassment. 您声称我诽谤了您的委托人，令他难堪。The definition of “libel” is: “a false or malicious unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, or effigy or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to public hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or which tends to deprive him of public confidence, or to injure him in his occupation, or any malicious publication as aforesaid, designed to blacken or vilify the memory of one who is dead, and tending to scandalize his surviving relatives or friends.” 771, Title 21. Crimes and Punishments, Oklahoma Statutes. How did I libel your client? Did I do any of such things that harmed your client? If you do not have any basis for your claim, I seriously question your knowledge of law on the libel issue. “诽谤”的定义是：“通过书面、印刷品、绘图、肖像、模拟像或其他固定形式的视觉手段，在不限阅读对象的出版物中，虚假或恶意地使某人受到公众憎恶、蔑视、奚落、辱骂，或轻易剥夺公众对其信任，或对其职业造成损害，或在任何上述出版物恶意做出上述任意行为，故意诋毁或污蔑亡故者的名声，并羞辱其健在亲友。”（俄克拉荷马州犯罪处罚条例第21款771节）。我怎么诽谤您的委托人了？我做了任何这样的事来伤害您的委托人了么？如果您的权利要求没有任何根据，我严重怀疑您有关诽谤问题的法律知识。Did your client default on his rent or not? Did he break into my house or not after he was locked out by a court order? If all that is true, what libel is there?您的委托人有没有拖欠房租？在他被根据法院令锁闭赶出后他有没有闯入我的房屋？如果那全是真的，有什么诽谤可言？If we go into litigation, all of the above claims will be readily struck down by the court. (2012: 6, Title 12, Chapter 39, Oklahoma Pleading Code, Civ. Pro., Oklahoma Statutes. Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.)如果我们进入诉讼，所有上诉权利要求都会立即被法院驳回。（俄克拉荷马州成文法，民事程序法，俄克拉荷马州诉讼规范，三十九章，十二款，2012节，第六项。未能说明可予救济的权利要求。）4. The claim for bond money. 索要保释金的权利要求。On March 2, 2007, during the trial of your client, you specifically requested the court to release the $1,500 bond posted by Mr. Dressler, which the court granted, and yet you still included this sum of money in your demand to me, knowing full well that he did not experience that alleged l