雅思G类大作文范文讲解笔记.docx

Argument-A lot of children are using mobile phones. Some people think it is a positive development? Do you agree or disagree?Mobile phones, as is widely considered a communicating tool, have been penetrating into peoples daily life = peoples daily practice in a wide range of areas. There is an increasing number of= an significant number of / a sizeable percentage of / the major proportion of / a considerable amount of / a substantial number of / an overwhelming number of / a great amount of children who tend to use mobile phones frequently, with regard to which is a positive or negative development, people hold divergent view.Living in such a world saturated with a significant number of2 advanced technological innovations that children are granted a great many opportunities to apply mobile phones into their life, which has been universally believed beneficial to their future development. Initially, it is the mobile phones that render render opportunities (help) / provide / offer children enormous= tremendous / opportunities to contact with their friends and family members wherever they are in an effective manner. So efficient is this communicating tool that relationship among family members can be substantially guaranteed. Subsequently, it is a widely held perception that childrens interests in the advancement of technologies can, to a large extent, be fostered. In another word, via using mobile phones, children are more likely to catch up with the amazing advances in the area of technology, which is also rewarding for them to become experts specialized in innovating communicating technologies.Such a significant amount of2 merits mobile phones can bring about into childrens life that an array of people has lost sight of their demerits accompanying, thereby blindly encouraging the widespread application among children, which is evidently erroneous concerning childrens physical health and their academic performance. In the first place, overindulgence of the utilization of mobile phones may largely jeopardize childrens health. As a result of the tremendous radiation from mobile phones, a sizeable percentage of2 children who are using mobile phones in their daily practice are more likely to develop diseases ranging from insomnia to in digestion. In the second place, it has been confirmed thatIt is commonly held that 【11】 children using mobile phones during their education period may have a higher likelihood of failing to perform as well as they used to. This will probably result in their inability of graduation from school.Conclusively, baneful as the application of mobiles phones among children may be, however, the trend is inevitable= unavoidable / irresistible / irreversible / irrefutable / unassailable=invulnerable / incontrovertible / indispensable due to the technological power. It is highly suggested that sufficient supervision and guidance should be given upon children.Some people argue that the technology such as mobile phone (cell phone) destroys social interaction. Do you agree or disagree?More often than not, peoples social life is extensively associated with the technological innovations, including computer and mobile phone. However, a sizzling debate with regard to whether peoples social interactions (= social life) are adversely affected by those technologies or not has been sparked off, which draws enormous attention from the public.A sizzling debate with regard to whether has been sparked off.So drastic is the development of modern technologies that a vast number of people assert that numerous baneful effects have been given rise to, saying technology is a curse for those living in contemporary society.= So efficient is this communicating tool that relationship among family members can be substantially guaranteed.So (+ adj. + is + n.) that In the first place, as a result of the so- called “efficiency” technologies bring about, scarcely will people need a face-to-face meeting in dealing with the business which can be done in a more effective and efficient manner, yet the relationships among people may be aggravated. In the second place, hardly can people have more opportunities to go for a holiday due to the full schedule ofwork induced from the remarkable progress of technologies. In other words, people are more likely to be occupied with a large quantity of work, so that they cannot have more leisure time to be with their family, which means the deterioration of family relationships.A number of others, who enjoy the benefits modern technologies impart, conversely, are in favor of the idea that social interaction has been largely enhanced. Initially, contacts among people are enormously facilitated with the advent of a series of technological innovations. This indicates a substantial proportion of time can be accordingly saved for other purposes, such as attending vocational training and traveling overseas to have a break with family members. Subsequently, a more solid friends circle can be, to a larger extent, maintained, consolidated and improved through fairly more contacts via mobile phone and a great many other forms of communication offered by technologies. Finally, without stepping out the door, people are more likely to make new friends on the internet, through which way may the workaholic have less fear for not finding a soul mate. It is the communicating technology that affords people with a platform of social interaction.To sum up, detrimental (=baneful) as the technological innovations are, by no means should people lose sight of the upsides offered by the application of technologies. This essay is inclined to maintain that social interaction may not necessarily be impaired given sufficient emphasis placed on face-to-face communication.Charity organizations should give aid to people in the greatest need, wherever they are from, or help people in their own countries. Discuss both views and give your opinion.As a result of the development of world economy, peoples donation to charity organizations is at an unprecedented level, which has brought attention to an ongoing debate concerning whether charity organizations should only assist people in their own countries.As a result of the development of world economy (=national welfare), is at an unprecedented level, which has brought attention to an ongoing debate concerning whether (观点一 慈善的来源主要是本国，所以应该用在本国。观点二 跨国慈善会造成不必要的误解)In the proponents proponent / opponent mind, charity organizations should keep the majority of their aid in the country. Initially, it is domestic donations that compose the major proportion of the income of the charity organization; therefore, the money should be spent mostly on poor people within the country. In addition, the assistance from other countries may spark off unnecessary tensions and misunderstandings due to the political, social and cultural differences. It is commonly held thatit has been confirmed that It is a commonly shared convention that It is a widely held perception that volunteers without sufficient preparation may violate customs of local communities.(观点一 人道 观点二帮助减少误解，促进国际文化交流 观点三 发达国家的过剩资源，不用浪费)Opponents of charity organizations giving only aid domestically, however, contend that the assistance be open to the people in need no matter where they are from. To start with, it is the functionality of charity organizations to render help to those who are in great need, regardless of their nationalities. Otherwise, it may be considered to go breach of the purposes they are established for. What is more, not only can international charity assistance enhance the friendship of two nations, but also help eliminate the conflicts and misunderstanding, thereby stimulating the cultural exchanges between countries. In the last place, a surplus of resources, including food, clothing and medicine, are produced in developed countries every year. Donating them to the impoverished people in developing countries is more reasonable than just throwing them away.Overall, I tend to believe that charity should not be constrained in ones own country. It is highly recommended thatit is highly suggested / recommended that charity organizations help people alleviate poverty, disease and illiteracy at an international level.Report-Some people fail on their school but achieve success in their adult life. Why do you think this will happen? What causes/reasons may lead to a persons successful life? Given education has long been considered as an imperative approach leading people to success, enormous attention than ever before has been placed on it. Nevertheless, a significant number of2 examples have demonstrated that critical though education seems to be in the perspective of the general public, a great amount of2 people become successful without completing their academic studies, which arouses peoples interests, thereby initiating discussion over the causes of such phenomenon and factors contributing to ones success.The predominant reason leading to this issue can largely be contributed to the education that schools afford. It is a widely held perception that【11】 schools mostly render students academic knowledge which may assist them to achieve success in the pursuit of becoming professionals, such as professors and experts. Yet, rarely do all the students hold the same ambition. To them, school education tends to be limited in terms of either cultivating students talents for other fields or offering practical skills helping them to get employed after their graduation. In this sense, discontinuing their school education, people are not doomed to fail in their adult life. Additionally, school education is not taken as the only way for people to achieve success but there is a number of other factors.As a result of divergent definitions towards success offered by people with different backgrounds, causes resulting in a persons success may, to a large extent, vary. From a general angle, school education should not be disregarded. It is the theoretical knowledge people acquire from school that provides them with sufficient confidence in coping with tricky issues in adult life, which enhances their possibility of achieving success. Apart from school education, sound social networking people establish in the society should also be given much emphasis. Not only is it beneficial for people to maintain a solid friends circle but it also indicates the underlying opportunities for people to become successful, particularly in their career life. Vital as school education and social networking are, under no circumstances should people lose sight of the likelihood of peoples being successful their worke experiences may give rise to. Since work experience has been given precedence over in a wide range of professions, people with a substantial amount of experiences relating to their job have a higher likelihood of being successful.To sum up, essential as education tends to be in a persons success which, however, is not solely determined by the level of education they have received from school. A great many other factors are suggested to be taken into consideration with regard to a persons success, such as social networking and work experience.There is a trend that more and more people live on their own, what is the reason, and do you think that is a good trend or not.The trend that an increasing number of2 people living independently has gained popularity, which sparked off a contentious discussion over the root cause of this phenomenon followed by the pros and cons of this tendency.The trend that has gained popularity, which sparked off a contentious (=controversial/debatable) discussion over It is a widely held perception that recent years economic boom increases the amount of peoples money at their own disposal, in conjunction with their recognition that a dwelling place of their own may help to establish their sense of safety and belonging as well as their ascending awareness of privacy. Consequently, a considerable amount of2 people flood to live independently far away from their friends and other family members, which trend procures both upsides and downsides.Some people, who are in favor of the idea that it is beneficial for people to live independently, assert that people living on their own brings about a significant number of meritsSome people, who are in favor of the idea (view) that , assert (contend) that brings about a significant number of merits (demerits). Initially, it is clear evident that people living geographically independently add no extra burden to their parents. So intensive is peoples daily life that those who have infants may probably spare no time for attending their kids who are more likely to be taken care by their grandparents, which inevitably conduces more burdens to the elderly. By contrastConversely, by contrast, on the contrary, this trend may be rewarding for the old to have a placid life. Subsequently, people living financially independently have a higher likelihood of becoming successful in their future life. Seeing the fact that people are having fewer children than they used to, a sizeable percentage of2 children are being spoiled in the m