academic essay.doc

Title:The researcher of college English teachers performance appraisalTopic:Performance -performance appraisal-performance appraisal of college English teacherResearch questions:1. What kind of aspects should be included in college English teacher performance?2. What are the functions, Principles and significance of college English teacher performance evaluation?3. what are the particularities of college English teacher performance?4. What kind of teacher can be called high-qualified college English teacher? What are their characteristics?5. What is the status quo of college English teacher performance evaluation?6. How to establish a reasonable college English teacher performance evaluation system? What should be included in this system? What are the guidelines and stages of the reasonable evaluation system?7. What is the appropriate evaluating method to college English teacher Performance?摘要本文的研究主要包括三大部分:第一部分,大学英语教师绩效评估现状研究,在这一部分里主要研究了大学英语教师绩效的概念界定,大学英语教师绩效的特殊性,高绩效大学英语教师的特征,同时采用问卷调查与访谈的方法对当前大学英语教师绩效评估的现状进行了研究。第二部分,大学英语教师绩效评估指标体系研究,在这一部分中主要研究了大学英语教师绩效评估指标体系建立的理论基础、基点、原则和功能,指标体系的具体结构和权重。第三部分,大学英语教师绩效评估的实施方法研究,包括应用数据包络分析方法和标杆管理方法对教师绩效进行排名,对绩效不佳的教师提出具体改进措施,利用增加约束的办法来平衡大学英语教师的教学、科研和服务工作。为了进行深入研究,本论文进行了充分的准备与论证,重点针对大学英语教师绩效评估所涉及的7个方面,展开了较为全面的理论思辨和实证研究。abstractThis dissertation includes three Parts. Part1 is research status. In this Part, the definition and the Particularities of college English teacher Performance are made clear , it Is a kind of conceptual refinement; The characteristics of high performance college English teacher is analyzed: the status quo of college English teacher performance Evaluation is studied by the way of questionnaires and interview. Part2 is the study of Index system of college English teacher Performance evaluation . in this Part, the Theoretical basis, guidelines, Principles and function of the index system are illustrated; The concrete structure and weight scales of the assessment index system are constructed. Part3 is actualization (or implementation method) study of college English teacher Performance evaluation. It includes :ranking 15 teachers using data envelopment analysis Method and bench-making method: bringing forward betterment measures to non-valid (or poor performance) teachers: balancing teaching, scientific research and service work Of college English teacher by adding constraints . In order to make an in-depth study or an intensive study, an adequate preparation And a substantial argument are made. Especially to the 7 aspects involved in college English teacher Performance evaluation, a comprehensive theoretical speculativeness and Empirical research are developed.Citation:教师绩效评估(teacher performance evaluation)是指按照一定的教育方针和政策,确立教师的工作目标和行为指标,对教师所实施的各种教育教学活动的有效性以及完成工作的状态水平进行科学的价值判断的过程,以了解教师工作的质量,通常是在工作中通过课堂观察、由领导、同事和学生等做出评定(蔡永红,2001)。教师评估,有人也称为“教师评价”、“教师评估”、“教师考核”。教师评估通过对教师素质及其在教育教学工作中的行为表现状况的测量,评判教师的素质水平和教育教学效果,并为进一步提高教师的素质水平和提高其教育教学效果提供切实可行的建议。何宪在人才评价师给出教师评估的概念是:教师评价是评价主体采用科学的方法,收集被评价者在主要活动领域中的表征信息,针对评价目标体系做出量值或价值的判断过程,或者直接从所收集的表征信息引发与推断某些素质特性的过程“。本文认为,教师评估主要指根据学校的发展目标和教师的工作任务制定出的相应的评估指标体系,运用科学的方法(定性和定量)收集信息,对教师日常工作的有效性进行价值判断的过程,达到促进学科发展,为人事决策提供依据,促使教师成长和发展的目的。具体来说,大学教师评估应是在对大学教师的综合素质、教学、科研和服务等进行客观描述的基础上,对其做出价值判断的活动。一个完整的教师评估体系,包括评估的目的、评估运用的规则标准、评估的目标群体、评估所要涵盖的范围、评估的步骤和方法、评估的手段、评估所要涉及的人员以及评估所提供的反馈信息等(陈玉馄,1998)。Reference:参考文献Alan Bryman, Dunean Cramer. Quantitative Data Analysis with Minitab A guide for Social Scientist Collection and Analysis. Lond and New York: International Thomson Publishing ComPany.1996.Ali A l, et al. Strict vs. weak ordinal relations for multipliers in DEAJ.management Scienee,1991,37,(6):733-738.Athanasso Poulos A D, Gounaris C, Sissouras A. A Descriptive Assessment of the Produetion and Cost Efficiency of General HosPitals in GreeceJ.Health Care management science,1999,2(2):97-106.Avkiran N K. Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities Through data envelopment analysisJ.Socio-economic Planning Scienees,2001,35(1):57-50Bandura, A.Self-efficacy:The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997Brouwers, A. & Tomie, W.,Alongitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom managementJ.Teaching and Teacher Edueation,2000,16(3),239-253Cameron Kim, Smart John. Maintaining Effectiveness Amid Downsizing and Decline inInstitution of Higher EdueationJ.Research in Higher Edueation,1998,39(l):65-86.Dale L L. A blueprint for a teacher development ProgramA.Second Language Teacher educationC.北京:外语教学与研究出版社,人民教育出版社,2000.Freeman D. Teacher training, development, and decision making model: A model of the teaching and related strategies for language teacher educationJTESOL Quarterly,1989,(23):27-45.Xiao-BaiLi, Gray R, Reeves. A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysisJ.European journal of operational Research,1999,115:507-517.Zilla S, et al. Ranking units via AHP in the DEA contextC.The15th TriennialInternational Conference of IROFS99,Beijing,1999,Aug.:15-20.班杜拉.自我效能:控制的实施M.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2003.包乌云.美国教师评价制度的改革与发展J.教育探索.2004,45-47布鲁纳,教育论著选M,人民教育出版社,1989布卢姆BS、邱渊译,教育评价M.华东师范大学出版社,1987.蔡基刚.大学英语教学若干问题思考J.外语教学与研究,2005,(2).蔡言厚,田金山,吴厚平.大学科研定量评价指标体系的探讨J.中国高等教育评估,2002(2):21-24蔡永红.对教师绩效评估研究的回顾与反思J.高等师范教育研究,2001.蔡永红、黄天元教师评价研究的缘起、问题及发展趋势J.北京师范大学学报2003(1)蔡永红,林崇德.教师绩效评价的理论与实践J.教师教育研究,2005(01).车卡佳周晓光.高校高新技术企业人力资源管理的研究J.科技进步与对策,2002(6)陈伯成,王友平.对层次分析法的认识J.管理工程学报,1997(3):155-161.陈凌芹.绩效管理M.北京:中国纺织出版社,2004:38陈宏,应用型高等院校教师绩效考核体系研究D,浙江大学硕士论文,2009.03陈荣昭.可用于分析民意测验的一个统计分析方法J.数理统计与应用概率,第三卷,第四期:417一424.陈述云,张崇甫.对多指标综合评价的主成分分析方法的改进J.统计研究1995,(1):35-39.陈通,白建英.我国高等教育投入产出相对有效性的评价研究J.中国高等教育评估,2002,(6).陈伟.层次分析法在教师年度评估中的应用J.辽宁财专学报,2001(03)陈玉馄.教育评价学.第5次版.北京:人民教育出版社,2003:8,24-26.陈孝大.论教师的形成性评价和终结性评价J.教育理论与实践,1988(2).陈向明.定性研究中的效度问题J.教育研究.1996,(7):52-58.岑建君.我国高校外语教学现状J.外语教学与研究,1999,(1).代蕊华.高校的教学、科研及其评价J.高等教育研究,2001,(l):94-98.代蕊华,高校办学效益研究D.上海:华东师范大学,1999.戴曼纯,张希春.高校英语教师素质抽样调查J.解放军外国语学院学报,2004,(3).戴亦欣,孙荣玲.无形资产价值实现及其量化J.中国软科学.2000,(7):73-76.邓红霞,甘泉,张松.基于层次分析法的教学质量模糊评价J.四川教育学院学报,2005(5):94-96.邓华,基于战略管理的高校教师绩效评价系统D,重庆大学硕士论文,2008.10邓金主编.培格曼最新国际教师百科全书M.学宛出版社,1989.丁文恒,冯英浚,康宇虹.同时面向投入和面向产出的一种数据包络分析(DEA)模型J.数量经济技术经济研究,2001,(11):41一44.丁小浩.中国高等院校规模效益的实证研究M.北京:教育科学出版社,2000:63一69.段海军.教师效能感与教师专业的自主发展J.陕西师范大学继续教育学院学报,2007,(1):10一13.樊相宇,谢昌芸.邮电高校办学效益DEA分析J.西安邮电学院学报,1999,(6).方鹏.定量考核方法分析及高校教师定量考核实践J.高等农业教育,2000(5):52一55.方旭儒.高校教师绩效评估研究.D.西南石油学院,2003.冯茁.试论素质教育背景下教师评价机制的转变J.沈阳师范学院学报,2002(2).冯玉芳.美国高校教师教学评价研究D.河北师范大学.2004傅道春.教师的成长与发展M.教育科学出版社,2001.付亚和,许玉林.绩效考核与绩效管理M.北京:电子工业出版社,2003.甘正东.反思性教学:外语教师自身发展的有效途径J外语界,2000(4).高广学,施丽梅.对