考研英语真题阅读理解解析翻译

1、考研英语真题阅读理解解析翻译由于阅读在考研英语试卷中所占的分值最高， 所以在考研英语圈 子里一向有得阅读者得天下一说。下面就是给大家整理的考研英语真题阅读理解解析翻译，希望对你有用！考研英语阅读原文 The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today.The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, aft

2、er widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings."Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal," writes McNutt in an editorial.Working with the American Statistical A

3、ssociation, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE).Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal's internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.The SBoRE panel will then

4、find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said:"The creation of the 'statistics board' was motivated by concerns broadly with the applicationofstatistics and data analysis in scientific researc

5、h and is part of Science's overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish."Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group.He says he expects the board to "play primarily an advisory role.&

6、quot;He agreed to join because he "found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact.This impact will not only be through the publicationsinScience itself, but hopefully through a larger groupofpublishing places that may want t

7、o model their approach after Science."John loannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is "a most welcome step forward" and "long overdue.""Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quali

8、ty of what they publish.I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review," he says.But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet p

9、ay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist.Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should

10、also take a tougher line, "engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process".Vaux says that Science's idea to pass some papers to statisticians "has some merit,but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editor

11、s to identify 'the papers that need scrutiny' in the first place".考研英语阅读翻译总主编马西娅；麦克娜特今天宣布：科学杂 志在同行评阅之外又增加一轮数据审查。数据分析中出现的基本错误致使许多出版的研究发现不可再生 得到广泛关注后，科学也随即效仿了其他杂志的做法。“一定要让读者对我们出版的研究结论有信心，”麦克娜特在一 篇专栏中写道。该杂志与美国统计协会一道，任命七名专家成立了 一个数据校对 编辑委员会。原稿将由杂志内部编辑，或已经成立的数据校对编辑委员会委员 或外部同行校对员标注

12、以供进一步的审查。届时该委员会成员将物色外部统计专家来审查这些原稿。在被问及是否已有特殊的论文促成了这样的改变时，麦克娜特说：“对科学研究领域的统计学应用和数据分析的广泛关注，促使了 ‘数据校对编辑委员会的成立’,该委员会成立也是全 面提高我们出版的研究可再生性努力的一部分。”乔瓦尼；帕尔米贾尼是哈佛大学公共卫生学院的生物统计学家、 该委员会的成员。他说他期望该委员会“能扮演最基本的顾问角色”。他同意加入是因为“他发现建立该委员会的眼光很新颖、独特， 还可能会有持久的影响力。”它影响到的不仅是科学杂志本身，而且可能影响到更多想要 在科学杂志之后成为行业模

13、范的出版社。约翰;伊奥尼迪斯，一名专攻研究方法论的物理学家，称这一政 策是“最受欢迎的进步”却又“姗姗来迟。”“数据审查是大多数杂志的薄弱环节，而这会损害出版物的质量。我认为，对于当今大多数的科学论文来说， 数据审查比专家审查 更为重要，”他说道。他曾指出，生物医学杂志如内科医学年鉴美国医学会杂志 和柳叶刀都非常注重数据审查。细胞生物学家大卫；沃克斯称：“人们认为职业科学家应该懂得如何进行数据分析，但是已出版的研究中的数据错误却极其普遍。”他2012年在自然杂志中写到，研究者应提高他们的专业水 准，而杂志更要不甘示弱，“聘用通晓统计的校对员和能核实数据的 编辑”。沃克斯表示，科学杂志将论文交给

14、统计学家审查的想法有其 可取之处,但它的不足是依赖委员会的审查编辑先识别出 ‘需要审查的论文’。考 研 英 语 阅 读 词 语 解 析additionalə'diʃənladj.附力口的，另外的overdue'əuvə'dju:adj.过期的，未兑的，迟到的overalləuvə'rɔ:ladj.全部的，全体的，一切在内的widespread'waidspredadj.分布（或散布）广的，普遍的manuscript'mænjuskriptadj. 手抄的n.手稿，原稿联想记忆verify'verifaivt. 查证，核实methodology.meθə&#