




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、Job Grades & Salary Ranges.Compa-ratios (CR) a compa-ratio (comparative ratio) is a measure of the extent which the average salaries in a grade deviate from the target salary. it is used to compare actual averages with the target salary to indicate the extent which salary levels are high or low. the
2、 formula for calculating a compa-ratio is:Average of all salaries in the grade - x 100 Midpoint of the salary rangea compa-ratio of 100 indicates that the average salary is aligned to the midpoint of the salary grade and no corrective steps need to be taken.Compa-ratios (CR)a compa-ratio of 80 would
3、 indicate a need to investigate why average salaries were low and possibly no longer competitive. a compa-ratio of 120 would suggest either there were a lot of long-service staff or that staff were being overpaid, and that increases needed to be modified. compa-ratio analysis can reveal a situation
4、where earnings drift has taken place.Competitive Posture (CP)Competitive Posture is a measure of how competitive the salary is with respect to a given market benchmark.Competitive Posture can be used to measure the competitiveness of both companys or individuals salary competitiveness in the marketC
5、ompetitive Posture for a company is computed as:CR = Average of all Salaries in a given Job GradeMarket Benchmark Salary Competitive Posture for an individual is computed by:CR = Salary of the individual Employee Market Benchmark Salary .Salary AdministrationMinimum Salary Points1. Minimum salary fo
6、r the grade2. Minimum for Job In the market3. Set compa-ratio at 1 .004. Overlap between 60% to 80%5. Avoid leapfrogging tendencies6. Allow for realistic minimum.Salary AdministrationMaximum Salary Points1. Maximum salary for the grade2. Maximum for job in the market3. Keep salary range short (8 - 1
7、2 years)4. Maxmin ratio between 1.5 to 2.05. Set compa-ratio at 1.006. Allow for realistic maximum.Salary AdministrationMaximum1. Maximum salary for the grade2. Maximum for job in the market3. Keep salary range short (8 - 12 years)4. Maxmin ratio between 1.5 to 2.05. Set compa-ratio at 1.006. Allow
8、for realistic maximumMinimum1. Minimum salary for the grade2. Minimum for Job In the market3. Set compa-ratio at 1 .004. Overlap between 60% to 80%5. Avoid leapfrogging tendencies6. Allow for realistic minimumMinimum And Maximum Points.Streamlining of Salary Ranges (Executives)Effective 1 January 19
9、95* Most typical value corresponds to the working midpoint of the range Derived from annual base salary# Dispersion factor of +/ - 25% around Q1 values.Job Reference LevelsThe reference job description prepared to assist non-hay evaluated companies with job matching, are each evaluated and quality a
10、ssured against Hays standards. The evaluations are then slotted into the relevant job unit range which forms the reference levels. These reference levels and corresponding job unit ranges are now standard throughout all Hays main remuneration surveys and are detailed below. .Job Reference Levels.Sal
11、ary AdministrationDetermining Entry Salary 1. Market value 2. Candidates existing salary 3. Basic qualifications 4. Additional qualifications 5. Relevant working experience6. Related working experience 7. Completion of national service 8. Geographical location of company 9. Nature of industry (dirty
12、 or hazardous)10. Minimum salary for job grade11. Salaries of existing incumbents12. Re-grossing annual salary.Incremental Systems Incremental systems vary from rigid procedures with fixed and predetermined movements through a scale related to age, service in the company or service in the job, to fl
13、exible systems where management exercises complete discretion over the award and size of increments without any guidelines. Between the two extremes there is a middle ground of semi-flexible systems.Fixed scales with automatic progression where individuals move through jobs or grades by predetermine
14、d steps related to age or service, these could be rate for age scales. Fixed scales are criticized because they do not give enough incentive to effort and the improvement of performance-promotion might only be an award in the longer term, if at all. They are defended because they can be operated wit
15、h complete impartiality- many people, especially civil servants, question the possibility of determining a fair relationship between merit and reward where the only method of measurement is the subjective opinion of someones boss.Incremental Systems.Fixed scales with limited flexibility where it is
16、possible to give double or even triple increments to high flyers and withhold increments for poor performers.Semi- fixed scales which allow automatic progression to a merit bar at which progression for some people may stop while other can advance at different rates according to performance.Fixed par
17、allel scales which allow for the exercise of more managerial discretion by providing different patterns of incremental progression for different levels of performance, as shown in figure 10.Incremental Systems.Variable progression with guidelines where there are no fixed incremental points, but mana
18、gers are given more or less mandatory instructions on how they should exercise their discretion. The minimum guidelines in this system nay consist of the annual increments that can be awarded for different levels of performance. These may be extended in more rigid systems to give the proportion of s
19、taff who should receive a given increment.Variable progression in range without guidelines where management discretion in the award of increments and the determination of their size tends to be restricted only by the maximum of the salary range and the budget they are allowed for salary increases.In
20、cremental Systems.Annual IncrementFixed increment system- Fixed $- Fixed %Variable increment system- Fixed variable- Fixed Plus (merit increment)Flexible increment system - Fixed component + flexible componentMatrix system- Salary quadrant vs. performance matrix.Salary Progression Curve.Increment vs Performance Matrix.Market Value Computation.Salary Review GuidelinesOverall cost guidelines in which a budget of x% of payroll is imposed for merit reviews. This is the essential guideline, and managers may be
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 农村小学数字农业课程培养未来农业科技人才
- 小学英语悦读教学:激发阅读兴趣提升综合素养
- 小学国际理解教育的实践困境与突破:以成都市T小学为例
- 孕期心脏储备功能动态变化及多元影响因素的深度剖析
- 教育信息化背景下的智慧型护理实训室建设
- 提升公民满意度数字政府服务的创新实践与思考
- 在线学习平台的数字化转型经验
- 财务信息的安全管理计划
- 2025年一建《机电工程管理与实务》考试质量控制与验收真题解析与题库
- 食堂产品引进合作协议书
- 2025年6.5世界环境日知识答题试题及答案
- 眼睛修复协议书
- 2024 - 2025学年一年级下册道德与法治期末考试卷附答案(三套)
- 欠债用车抵债协议书
- 设计合作月结协议书
- 溴素行业分析报告
- 《基于PLC的包装机控制系统设计实现》10000字(论文)
- 地铁安检机考试题及答案
- 泰康之家管理体系
- 2025年浙江省金华市义乌市六年级下学期5月模拟预测数学试题含解析
- 高压均质及热处理改性鹰嘴豆蛋白对减磷猪肉糜凝胶特性的影响机制
评论
0/150
提交评论