世界银行-菲律宾农业公共支出审查:特别关注Mandanas裁决对农业食品系统的影响(英)_第1页
世界银行-菲律宾农业公共支出审查:特别关注Mandanas裁决对农业食品系统的影响(英)_第2页
世界银行-菲律宾农业公共支出审查:特别关注Mandanas裁决对农业食品系统的影响(英)_第3页
世界银行-菲律宾农业公共支出审查:特别关注Mandanas裁决对农业食品系统的影响(英)_第4页
世界银行-菲律宾农业公共支出审查:特别关注Mandanas裁决对农业食品系统的影响(英)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩185页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

PublicDisclosureAuthorizedPublicDisclosureAuthorizedPublicDisclosureAuthorizedPublicDisclosureAuthorized

AgriculturePublicExpendituresReview:

WithaspecialfocusontheimplicationsoftheMandanasRulingfortheagri-foodsystem

Philippines

FEBRUARY16,2023

Co-fundedbytheEuropeanUnion

Co-fundedbythe

EuropeanUnion

Philippines

AgriculturePublicExpendituresReview:

WithaspecialfocusontheimplicationsoftheMandanasRulingfortheagri-foodsystem

FEBRUARY16.2023

StandardDisclaimer

1

©2023InternationalBankforReconstructionandDevelopment/TheWorldBank

1818HStreetNW

WashingtonDC20433

Telephone:202-473-1000

Internet:

ThisworkisaproductofthestaffofTheWorldBankwithexternalcontributions.Thefindings,interpretations,andconclusionsexpressedinthisworkdonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsofTheWorldBank,itsBoardofExecutiveDirectors,orthegovernmentstheyrepresent.

TheWorldBankdoesnotguaranteetheaccuracy,completeness,orcurrencyofthedataincludedinthisworkanddoesnotassumeresponsibilityforanyerrors,omissions,ordiscrepanciesintheinformation,orliabilitywithrespecttotheuseoforfailuretousetheinformation,methods,processes,orconclusionssetforth.Theboundaries,colors,denominations,andotherinformationshownonanymapinthisworkdonotimplyanyjudgmentonthepartofTheWorldBankconcerningthelegalstatusofanyterritoryortheendorsementoracceptanceofsuchboundaries.

NothinghereinshallconstituteorbeconstruedorconsideredtobealimitationuponorwaiveroftheprivilegesandimmunitiesofTheWorldBank,allofwhicharespecificallyreserved.

RightsandPermissions

Thematerialinthisworkissubjecttocopyright.BecauseTheWorldBankencouragesthedisseminationofitsknowledge,thisworkmaybereproduced,inwholeorinpart,fornoncommercialpurposesaslongasfullattributiontothisworkisgiven.

Anyqueriesonrightsandlicenses,includingsubsidiaryrights,shouldbeaddressedtoWorldBankPublications,TheWorldBankGroup,1818HStreetNW,Washington,DC20433,USA;fax:202-522-2625;e-mail:pubrights@.

Coverphoto:PhilippineRuralDevelopmentProject

Samplecreditforanon-WBimage:©AmiVitale/PanosPictures.UsedwiththepermissionofAmiVitale/PanosPictures.Furtherpermissionisrequiredforreuse.

SamplecreditforaWBimage:©CurtCarnemark/WorldBank.Furtherpermissionrequiredfor

reuse.

Coverdesign:MichelleElinorLomibao

Acknowledgments

2

Thisreportwasproducedbyamulti-sectoralteamfromtheWorldBankGroup,ledbyEliWeissandAnujaKar,withtheleadco-authorsJohnNash,NoraOliveros,andRoehlBriones.ThestudyteamalsoincludedKevinCruz,MariaTheresaQuinones,MioTakada,JockAnderson,andPaulaBeatriceMacandog.ThereportwaspreparedundertheoverallguidanceofDinaUmali-Deininger,NdiameDiop,AchimFock,andMadhuRaghunath.KatrinaBrandon,MeganMayzelleandLindsayHartley-Backhouseeditedthereport,andMildrenPenalesprovidedadministrativeandlogisticalsupport.

WethankthepeerreviewersSergiyZorya,RichardRecord,IrinaKlytchnikova,andClarissaCrisostomoDavidandDavidLloricoLloritofortheirveryusefulguidance.WealsothanktheDepartmentofAgriculture(DA)andtheDepartmentofBudgetandManagement(DBM)fortheirexcellentcollaborationandinputtothestudy.WeespeciallythanktheDAOfficeofPolicyandPlanning,theDAOfficeforSpecialConcernsanditsBureauofAgricultureandFisheriesEngineering,andtheDAOfficeofRegionalFieldOperationsfortheirextensivecontributions.Wewouldalsoliketoexpressourappreciationtoallthelocalgovernmentunits(LGUs),focalpoints,andstaffofthevariousagenciesforcontributingtothiswork,andotherstakeholdersfromthepublicandprivatesectorandacademiafortheirconstructiveengagementandinputs.ThisdocumentwasproducedwiththefinancialassistanceoftheEuropeanUnion.TheviewsexpressedhereincaninnowaybetakentoreflecttheofficialopinionoftheEuropeanUnion.

CurrencyEquivalent

ExchangerateeffectiveasofJune8,2022

Currencyunit

=PhilippinePeso(₱)

US$1.00

=52.96

AcronymsandAbbreviations

3

A&F

AgricultureandFisheries

ACEF

AgriculturalCompetitivenessEnhancementFund

ACPC

AgriculturalCreditPolicyCouncil

AFMA

AgricultureandFisheriesModernizationAct

AgPer

AgricultureSectorPublicExpenditureReview

AgGDP

Agriculturalgrossdomesticproduct

AMCFP

Agro-IndustryModernizationCreditandFinancingProgram

ASF

Africanswinefever

BARMM

BangsamoroAutonomousRegioninMuslimMindanao

BFAR

BureauofFisheriesandAquaticResources

CAR

CordilleraAutonomousRegion

CARP

ComprehensiveAgrarianReformProgram

CLUPs

ComprehensiveLand-usePlans

CSA

Climate-smartagriculture

DA

DepartmentofAgriculture

DAR

DepartmentofAgrarianReform

DILG

DepartmentoftheInteriorandLocalGovernment

DTP

Devolutiontransitionplan

F2C2

FarmandFisheriesClusteringandConsolidationProgram

FMRs

Farm-to-marketroads

GAA

GeneralAppropriationsAct

GDP

Grossdomesticproduct

GHGs

Greenhousegases

GOCCs

Government-ownedandcontrolledcorporations

GVA

Grossvalueadded

HLURB

HousingandLandUseRegulatoryBoard

IFPRI

InternationalFoodPolicyResearchInstitute

IRR

ImplementingRulesandRegulationspolicy

LGC

LocalGovernmentCode

LGUs

Localgovernmentunits

M&E

Monitoringandevaluation

MFD

MaximizingFinanceforDevelopment

NCR

NationalCapitalRegion

NFA

NationalFoodAuthority

NIA

NationalIrrigationAdministration

NMIS

TheNationalMeatInspectionService

4

NTA

NationalTaxAllocation

O&M

Operationsandmaintenance

ODA

OneDAAgenda

OECD

OrganizationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment

OSEC

OfficeoftheSecretary

PhilippinePeso

PCAF

PhilippineCouncilforAgricultureandFisheries

PCC

PhilippineCompetitionCommission

PDP

PhilippineDevelopmentPlan

PFA

PhilippineFranchiseAssociation

PFM

Publicfinancialmanagement

PFIDA

FiberIndustryDevelopmentAuthority

PFMAT

Publicfinancialmanagementassessmenttool

PhilRice

PhilippineRiceResearchInstitute

PSA

PhilippineStatisticsAuthority

R&D

Researchanddevelopment

RA11203

RiceLiberalizationAct

RBM/RBMS

Results-basedmanagement/Results-basedmanagementsystem

RCEF

RiceCompetitivenessEnhancementFund

RFUs

Regionalfieldunits

RSSP

RiceSelf-SufficiencyProgram

SAFDZs

StrategicAgricultureandFisheriesDevelopmentZones

SGLG

SealofGoodLocalGovernance

Contents

5

ACRONYMSANDABBREVIATIONS

3

LISTOFTABLES

6

LISTOFFIGURES

6

1.INTRODUCTION

18

CONTEXTANDRATIONALE

18

UNDERLYINGSTRATEGIES

21

2.ASSESSMENTOFSECTORALPERFORMANCEANDSTRATEGICORIENTATION

23

ECONOMICPERFORMANCEOFTHEOVERALLAGRICULTURALSECTOR

23

THEPOLICYANDINSTITUTIONALFRAMEWORK:DECENTRALIZATION

28

3.LEVELS,COMPOSITION,ANDSOURCESOFPUBLICEXPENDITURESONAGRICULTURE

33

NATIONALGOVERNMENT

33

LOCALGOVERNMENT

40

REGIONALDISTRIBUTION

43

DABUDGETFRAMEWORK

49

DEVOLUTION2022—2024,RESULTINGFROMTHEMANDANASRULING

50

4.DISTRIBUTIONALIMPACT

63

DISTRIBUTIONASACRITERIONFOREVALUATINGAGRICULTURALPUBLICEXPENDITURE

63

REGIONALALLOCATION

64

5.CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS

69

CHALLENGE1:CHANGINGTHESTRATEGICFOCUSTOBETTERALIGNEXPENDITURESWITHTHENEWTHINKING

70

CHALLENGE2:IMPROVINGTHELOWEFFECTIVENESSOFCURRENTSPENDINGANDPROVIDINGTHEBASISFORAHIGHER

BUDGETALLOCATIONFORAGRICULTURE

76

CHALLENGE3:DEALINGWITHPUBLICEXPENDITUREISSUESARISINGFROMDEVOLUTION

81

APPENDIXA:ABRIEFHISTORYOFEARLIERAGRICULTURALSERVICEDECENTRALIZATIONEFFORTS

86

APPENDIXB:CALCULATINGTHEPROPORTIONOFGOVERNMENTBUDGETDEVOTEDTOAGRICULTURE

88

APPENDIXC:THEIMPORTANCEOFTHEPOLICYENVIRONMENT

90

APPENDIXD:DEVOLUTIONCASESTUDY

93

6

ListofTables

TABLE1.1GROWTHRATESOFAGRICULTURALGVABYSUBSECTOR,2001–2021(%)IN2018

19

TABLE2.1GROWTHRATESOFAGRICULTURALGVABYSUBSECTOR,2001–2021(%),IN2018PRICES

24

TABLE2.2POVERTYINCIDENCEAMONGFARMERSANDFISHERFOLK,BYREGION,2015AND2018

24

TABLE2.3MAGNITUDEOFPOVERTYAMONGFARMERSANDFISHERFOLK,BYREGION,2015AND2018

25

TABLE2.4THEDAAGENDAKEYSTRATEGIES

31

TABLE3.1SELECTEDAGRICULTURECOMMODITYSELF-SUFFICIENCYRATIO,2015–2018

34

TABLE3.2TOTALDABUDGETBYFUNDINGOFFICE2015–2019,IN₱MILLIONS

36

TABLE3.3ALLOCATIONTOTHECOMMODITYBANNERPROGRAMS,2015–2019,IN₱MILLIONS

37

TABLE3.4NATIONALRICEPROGRAM(INPUTSUBSIDY)2015–2019,IN₱MILLIONS

38

TABLE3.5OSECBUDGETBYPROGRAMS,PROJECTS,ANDSERVICES,IN₱MILLIONS

38

TABLE3.6FINANCIALPERFORMANCE,2019–2021,IN₱MILLIONS

40

TABLE3.7GOVERNMENTALLOCATIONSFORAGRICULTURETOLGUS,BYLGULEVEL,IN₱BILLIONS

40

TABLE3.8LGUEXPENDITUREALLOCATIONBYSECTOR,2015–2019,IN₱MILLIONS

42

TABLE3.9DISTRIBUTIONOFDAEXPENDITUREALLOCATEDTOREGIONSOUTSIDETHENCR

44

TABLE3.10MAGNITUDEOFPOORFARMERSANDFISHERFOLK,2015AND2018,INTHOUSANDS

45

TABLE3.11REGIONALDAEXPENDITUREASAPROPORTIONOFAGRICULTURALGVA,INCURRENTPRICES(%)

46

TABLE3.12COMPARISONOFREGIONALRANKINGBASEDONDIFFERENTAGRICULTURALINDICATORS,2018

48

TABLE3.13MULTIAGENCYAFMACOMPONENTS

49

TABLE3.14TOTALA&FAPPROPRIATIONS,2015–2019,IN₱MILLIONS

50

TABLE3.15THEDEVOLVEDANDPOST-DEVOLVEDFUNCTIONSANDSERVICESOFTHEDA

51

TABLE3.16DAOSECAPPROPRIATIONS,2021–2022,IN₱

52

TABLE3.17NATIONALTAXALLOCATION,2020–2022,IN₱MILLIONS

54

TABLE4.1REGIONALDAEXPENDITUREASAPROPORTIONOFAGRICULTURALGVA,INCURRENTPRICES(%)

64

TABLE4.2COMPARISONOFREGIONALRANKINGBASEDONDIFFERENTAGRICULTURALINDICATORS,2018

67

TABLE5.1DAALLOCATIONFORTHEBANNERCOMMODITYPROGRAMS

72

ListofFigures

FIGURE2.1POVERTYANDMALNUTRITIONINDICATORS,BYREGION(%)

26

FIGURE2.2POLICYFRAMEWORK

29

FIGURE3.1DAAPPROPRIATIONLEVELSIN₱BILLIONS,ANDASARATIOTOAGRICULTURALGVA(%)

34

FIGURE3.2ALLOCATIONOFNATIONALGOVERNMENTEXPENDITURESFORAGRICULTUREANDAGRARIANREFORM,2020–

2022,IN₱BILLIONS

35

FIGURE3.3DISTRIBUTIONOFAGRICULTURALGVABYREGION,2018PRICES(%)

45

FIGURE3.4RATIOOFDAREGIONALEXPENDITURESHARESTOPOVERTYSHARES,2018

47

FIGURE4.1DISTRIBUTIONOFCROPFARMERSBYISLANDGROUP(%)

65

FIGURE4.2THERATIOOFDAREGIONALALLOCATIONSHARESTOPOVERTYSHARES,2018

66

FIGURE5.1ACTUALINTENSITYRATIOSANDATTAINABLEINVESTMENTTARGETS

74

FIGURE5.2AGRICULTUREORIENTATIONINDEX(AOI)FORGOVERNMENTEXPENDITURES

77

7

Abstract

TherecentpositivepolicydirectionsembodiedintheNewThinkingandOneDAagendahavenotyetfullytranslatedintoashiftinpublicexpenditurepatternsinthePhilippineagriculturesector.Oneresultisthatagriculturalgrowthremainslow,andpovertyinruralareas,wherefarmingremainsthemainsourceofincome,hasstayedhigh.Underinvestmentinpublicgoodsinagriculture,vitalforinclusivegrowth,alsodrivesthelackofgrowth.Thecontinuedbiassupportingriceproductionhascomeattheexpenseofotheragriculturalproducts.ThesituationcouldworsenwiththeongoingdevolutionresultingfromtheMandanasRulingoftheSupremeCourtunlesstheshiftintheagriculturebudgetfromcentralgovernmenttolocalgovernmentunits(LGUs)accompaniesclearchangesinexpenditurepolicies.TotakefulladvantageoftheopportunitiesarisingfromthenewstrategicdirectionsandtodevolvemoreresponsibilitiestoLGUs,agriculturalpublicexpenditurepoliciesmustdealwithchallengesinthreedimensions.

FirstisthechallengeofaligningexpenditureswiththeambitionoftheNewThinking.Thereisaneedtotransitionawayfrompreviousandcurrentspendingpatternsfocusedonincreasingself-sufficiencythroughcommodity-basedbannerprograms,especiallyrice,towardsinvestmentsinimprovingtheoverallresilience,competitiveness,inclusiveness,andsustainabilityoftheagriculturesector.Therearethreewaystoachievesuchimprovementsby(a)shiftingfromasingle-commodityandproduction-basedapproachtoamoreholisticandarea-basedplanningapproach;(b)focusingmoreonprogramsthatfundpublicgoodsthatarecurrentlyunder-funded,suchasresearch,agricultureextensionandinnovationsystems,marketinformationsystems,infrastructure,biosecuritysystemsandprogramssupportingclimatesmartagriculture(CSA);(c)providingmoreemphasistoprogramsintendedtoovercomebarrierstocollectiveactionandeconomiesofscale.

Thesecondchallengeisimprovingthecurrentlyloweffectivenessofpublicspending,whichisonefactorbehindtherelativelylowagriculturalshareinthegovernment’soverallbudget.Improvingeffectivenesswillrequirecorrectingtheproblemsthatleadtolowbudgetdisbursementratesandtheinstitutionalandproceduralshortcomingsthatimpedethegovernment’sabilitytomonitorandevaluateoutcomesandmakeevidence-baseddecisions.Itwillalsorequireimportantchangesinhowthegovernmentsupportsfarmers.Therelianceonsupportinstrumentsthatareinefficienttoolsforimprovingfarmers’competitivenessandproductivityneedstochange,particularlygovernmentprovisionofsubsidizedfertilizer,machinery,andotherinputs.Duringthetransitionperiodofthericeliberalization,whensupporttoaffectedricefarmersisneeded,thegovernmentcouldimplementashort-terme-voucherssystem.Suchasystemwouldgrowtheprivatesectorininputmarketsandgivefarmersmoreflexibilityinmanagingtheirproductiondecisionscomparedtothecurrentsubsidies.Inthemediumtolongterm,thegovernmentcouldconsideranevenmoreefficientmechanismanddecouplesupportpayments,whichdonotdependonthetypesofcommoditiesorinputs.

ThethirdchallengeissuccessfullyimplementingthefinancialandfunctionaldevolutionresultingfromtheMandanasRuling.Inthe1990s,theefforttodevolveagriculturalservicesdidnotgosmoothlyandwaslargelyreversed.Toavoidasimilarfatewiththecurrenteffortandfullyrealizethistransfer’spotentialbenefits,thegovernmentmustcarefullyconsiderwhichfunctionstotransferandwhatcapacitybuildingwillbenecessaryforLGUstocarryoutnewlytransferredresponsibilitiessuccessfully.Therewillalsoneedtobesomemechanisminplacetoensurethatspendingdecisionsatthelocallevelalignwiththenationalinterestandstrategies.

ExecutiveSummary

ExecutiveSummary

8

Background

Recentagriculturalpolicychangesbythegovernment—includingtheOneDAAgendapursuedbytheDepartmentofAgriculture(DA)basedontheNewThinkingforAgricultureintroducedin2019—arepositivedevelopmentsthathavethepotentialtoreversetheagriculturesector’srecentstagnantperformance.Thesepolicieshavethepotentialtotransformthesectorifproperlyoperationalized,implyingspendingdecisionsmustfullyandeffectivelyreflectthem,whichuntilnowhasnotbeenthecase.TheRiceLiberalizationAct(RA11203),whichabolishedthelong-standingprotectivequantitativerestrictionsonriceimports,andreplacingitwithasignificanttariff,isindicativeofthetruespiritofthisstrategicshift.

TheMandanasRulingcouldbetransformationalforlocalservicedeliveryifmanagedproperly.ThefavorableSupremeCourtrulingontheMandanasappealrequiresthecentralgovernmenttoincreasetheInternalRevenueAllotment(IRA)—theshareofgovernmenttaxrevenuegoingtothelocalgovernmentunits(LGUs)—startingin2022.TheIRAwillincreasebynearly37.9percentannually,thoughtransferswilllikelydeclineinsubsequentyears.SinceitwillsharemorerevenuewiththeLGUs,thecentralgovernmentintendstodevolvemoreresponsibilityforadministeringandfundingprojectsandprograms.Thoughsuchdevolutionpresentsanopportunitytomakeservicedeliverymoreclient-drivenandimproveaccountability,thereremainsignificantrisksifitisnotwellmanaged.

ThisPhilippinesAgricultureSectorPublicExpenditureReview(AgPER)aimsto(a)helpthegovernmentevaluatethedirectionofspendingpoliciesundertheNewThinkingstrategyand(b)considerthebestwayforwardindevolvingagriculturalservicestoLGUsasaresultoftheSupremeCourt’sMandanas

Ruling.

MainFindings

Levelandcompositionofspendingonagricultureatthecentrallevel

Theoverallbudgetshareallocatedtoagriculturebeganasteadydeclinein2016.By2020,itwaslowerthanmostcomparatorcountriesrelativetothesizeofagricultureintheeconomy.Thisreviewconcludesthatagriculturehasfaredpoorlyinthepoliticalmeleeofbudgetallocation,atleastpartlyduetotheperceptionthatthespendingofagriculturalfundswasineffective.Ofcourse,theDAproposestoraisethebudgetarypriorityaccordedtothesectorinthNationalAgricultureandFisheriesModernizationandIndustrializationPlan(NAFMIP)2021-2030.Demonstratingthatthebudgetdevotedtoagriculturedeliversmoreimpactperdollarwouldsupportthiseffort.

TheDepartmentofAgriculture(DA)receivedthelargestshare—over50percent—ofthetotalagriculturalbudgetin2021–22andisthefocusofthisreview,givenitsdominantshareoftheagriculturalpublicexpenditure.Otheragenciesreceivingsignificantsupportincludethegovernment-ownedandcontrolledcorporations(GOCCs),ledbytheNationalIrrigationAdministration(NIA)andNationalFoodAuthority(NFA),andtheDepartmentofAgrarianReform(DAR).

9

WithintheDA,theOfficeoftheSecretary(OSEC)receivesanaverageof81percentoftheDA’sbudget,withcapitalinvestmentsrepresentingaround16percentoftheOSECbudget.Theseinvestmentsconsistofprojectsfundedfromdomesticsourcesandforeignborrowingsorgrants.Locallyfundedprojectsareshort-andlong-terminitiativescraftedoridentifiedbytheDA,mainlyservingselectedLGUs.Someoftheseprojectshavelastedlessthanayear,whileothersbecamepermanentfeaturesintheDAbudget.Foreign-fundedprojectsareinvestmentsrequiringhugecapitalandlongerimplementationperiods.

ThisreviewidentifieshowspendingpatternshaveevolvedandexamineswhethertheyalignwiththeDA’scurrentstrategicdirectionsandobjectivesandtheirefficacy.Animportantobjectiveunderpinningpastagriculturalspendingpolicywasachievinghighself-sufficiencyinfoodproducts,especiallyrice,throughthesinglecommoditybannerprograms,andbudgetdecisionsreflectedthis.

ThebudgetallocationpatternisinconsistentwiththeNewThinking,yetitdoesnotappearthatitisbeingreallocated.Forthebannerprogramsoverall,thebudgetallocationsfor2021and2022weremorethan50percenthigherthanfor2019and2020.Inthe2022budget,thebannerprogramsaccountedforabout38percentoftheDA’sbudget,comparedto27percentin2020.Mostofthiswasahugeincreaseinthericebudget.However,evenaftersubtractingoutthericeallocation,thebannerprograms’budgetincreasedby23percentfrom2020to2022,from₱8.7billionto₱10.7billion,indicatingthereorientationofspendingprioritieshasnotyetbegun.

DAspendingtosupportriceproduction—includingsubsidies,infrastructure,andagriculturalservicesspecificallyaimedatpalayproduction—isextremelyhighbyanystandard.Whilericeaccountsforonlyaround20percentoftheagriculturalsector’sproductionvalue,riceproductionspendingamountedto57percentofthebudgetforbannerprogramsoraround22percentoftheDA’stotalbudgetin2022.SupportforriceextendsbeyondtheDAbudgetandtheNationalRiceProgram.Itincludesirrigationdevelopmentinrice-growingareas,apaddyprocurementprogramundertheNFA,theRiceCompetitivenessEnhancementFund(RCEF),andriceresearchthroughPhilRice.Riceproducershavealsobenefitedfromhightariffbarriersprotectingthemfromimportcompetition.However,thisischangingwiththericetariffication,whicheliminatedquantitativerestrictionsonriceimportswhileleavingatariffof35percentforimportedricefromASEANcountriesandahighertariffforotherimports.

Suchexpenditurehasbeenmanifestlyineffectiveinraisingriceproductivity.ThePhilippineslagsbehindregionalneighborsandcomparablecountries,withrelativelystagnantyieldgrowthsincethemid-2000s.Wemustaskwhythispublicexpenditurehasnothadalargerimpact.First,asexperiencehasdemonstratedthroughouttheworld,inputsubsidiesareaninefficientwaytoraiseproductivity.Inaddition,fertilizerdistributionproceduresinteractwiththebudgetingsysteminproblematicways.Budgetssometimessufferdelays,whilein-kinddistributionmeansthegovernmentmustbeinvolvedincomplicatedbiddingprocedureswithopportunitiesforslippageormistakesatseveralsteps.Auditsindicatethat(a)somefarmersdonotreceivethefertilizerstheyareregisteredtoget,(b)deliveryistoolate,therebyhinderingfarmers’abilitytofollowgoodmanagementpracticesinfertilizerapplication,and(c)theproductsdelivereddonotmeetfarmers’needsandaresometimesdefective.Thewaysubsidiesaredistributedalsocrowdsoutprivatesectorinvestmentinupstreamactivities.Furthermore,althoughsubsidiesraisebeneficiaries’incomes,theydosoregressivelysincelargerfarmerswhousemoreinputsreceivemoresubsidiesthansmallercounterparts.

10

LevelandcompositionofLGUspendingonagriculture

FinancialincentivesforqualifiedLGUsthatmeetthecriteriaforgoodgovernancearemadeavailableinthenationalbudgetandmanagedbytheDepartmentoftheInteriorandLocalGovernment(DILG).TheincentivesallowLGUstofinancebig-ticketprojectstheycannotaccommodateundertheirrespectivebudgets.ReportsindicatethatsomeLGUswereawardedincentivesseveraltimes,whileothers,particularlythelower-incomeLGUs,couldnotmeetthecriteria.

TheagriculturalallocationforLGUsincreasedovertimeinnominaltermsbutnotasashareofLGUallocation.Accordingtothemostrecentdata,LGUspendingonagriculturein2018wasonly₱8.5billion,afiguredwarfedbywhattheDAreceives.Overthesameperiod,agriculture’sshareintheoverallLGUappropriationfromthecentralgovernmentshrankfrom2.1percentofthetotalin2012to1.5percentin

2018.

TheDevolutionTransitionPlan(DTP)developedbytheDAtocomplywithExecutiveOrder(EO)138didnotspecifytheservicesfordevolutionbutreiteratedthosedevolvedunderthe1991LocalGovernmentCode(LGC).Theseserviceswereallocatedatotalbudgetof₱37.1billionin2020.WhilethisapproximatesthebudgetthatLGUsshouldallocatetomaintaincurrentserviceactivitylevels,therearevalidreasonstodoubtthatLGUswillallocatethisspendinglevel.Noclearmechanismsexisttoensurethattheywill.

AstheDAmovesforwardwithfine-tuningandoperationalizingitsDTP,itwillneedtocopewithmanyissues,asdidothercountriessuchasGhana,China,andVietnamwhentheydecentralizedservicedelivery.AreasthatneedtobeaddressedfortheprocessinthePhilippinesinclude:

a)NeedforimprovingcoordinationbetweentheDAandLGUsinplanninganddeliveringbasicservices.1

b)Improvingresults-basedmonitoring,evaluation,andreportingsystemattheLGUlevel.Thelackofproperresults-basedmonitoring,evaluationsystemsattheLGUlevelremainsaconcern.2

c)EnhancingfinancialandskilledworkforcecapacityforeffectiveexpenditureplanningandmanagementinmanyLGUs,especiallyinthelowerincomecategories.Theabilitytofollowbudgetrules,managefinances,orevenassesstheirowncapabilityforfinancialmanagementusingthePublicFinancialManagementAssessmentTool(PFMAT)isoftenmissing.

d)ThefocusLGUsgivetohigh-visibilityexpenditureswithanimmediatepoliticalpayoff,meaningthatruralandagriculturalprojectstendtogetshort-changed.Thisfocusonhighvisibilityseeminglyoccu

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论