世界银行-2023财年尼泊尔国家意见调查报告（英）

FY

2023

NepalCountry

Opinion

Survey

ReportECR

Business

IntelligenceTeam

|

December

2023AcknowledgementsTheNepalCountry

Opinion

Survey

ispart

ofthe

County

Opinion

Survey

Programseries

of

theWorld

Bank

Group.Thisreport

was

prepared

bythe

BusinessIntelligence(BI)

team,

ledbyJoséDe

Buerba

(Senior

External

Affairs

Officer)

andSvetlanaMarkova

(Senior

External

Affairs

Officer).

Yulia

Danilina,

JessicaCameron,

Nan

Lin,andSofya

Gubaydullina

oversaw

thedesign,

reporting,

andanalysis.

Noreen

WambuiandIrina

Popova

provided

data

support.BIacknowledges

thesignificant

contribution

from

the

Nepal

country

teamandindependent

fielding

agency,

BlitzMedia

Private

Limited.

Inparticular,

BIisgrateful

forthesupport

from

Bigyan

Pradhan

(Senior

Operations

Officer)

and

AkashBabuShrestha

(External

Affairs

Officer)

who

coordinated

the

survey-related

activities

fromKathmandu,

Nepal.ContentsObjectivesMethodology

OverviewOverall

ContextOverall

Attitudes

Toward

the

World

Bank

GroupWorld

Bank

Group’s

Support

in

Development

AreasWorld

Bank

Group’s

Work

and

Engagement

on

the

Ground

in

NepalWorld

Bank

Group’s

Financial

Instruments

and

Knowledge

WorkThe

Future

Role

of

the

World

Bank

Group

in

NepalCommunication

and

OutreachDemographics

of

the

Sample

and

Detailed

Methodology3ObjectivesThissurvey

was

designed

toassist

the

World

BankGroup

(WBG)

ingaining

abetter

understanding

of

howstakeholders

inNepalperceive

theWBG.

Thesurvey

explored

the

following

questions:1.

Overall

Context:

How

do

stakeholders

perceive

the

country’s

direction?

How

familiar

are

they

with

the

WBG?

Howmuch

dotheytrust

theWBG?2.

KeyIndicators:

What

opinion

do

key

stakeholders

have

of

the

WBG

when

it

comes

toits

effectiveness,

relevance,alignment

with

Nepal’s

development

priorities,

andother

keyindicators?

Areopinions

improving

or

declining?3.

Development

Priorities:

What

areas

of

development

areperceived

tobethemost

important?

Have

theprioritieschanged

over

thepast

three

years?

Howeffective

istheWBG

perceived

tobeintheseareas?4.

Engagement

andWork

onthe

Ground:

What

dokeystakeholders

value

themost

andtheleast

when

itcomestotheWBG’s

work

inNepal?

HowistheWBG

perceived

as

adevelopment

partner?

Areopinions

improving

or

declining?5.

Financial

Instruments

andKnowledge

Work:

What

opinion

dokeystakeholders

have

of

WBG

financialinstruments

andknowledge

products?

Areopinions

improving

or

declining?

What

arestakeholders’suggestions

toimprove

WBG’s

effectiveness?6.

Communication

andOutreach:

What

arethe

preferred

communication

channels

and

which

channels

arereported

tobeused

themost?

Arethere

differences

among

stakeholder

groups

interms

of

preferred

channels?7.

MessageRecall:

What

key

topics

that

the

WBG

communicates

do

stakeholders

recall?

Is

there

arelationshipbetween

message

recall

and

views

ofthe

WBG’s

work?4Methodology

OverviewGovernmentInstitutionBilateralor

MultilateralAgencyPrivateSector20%17%17%14%▪

Fielded

June

through

August

2023▪▪▪1,106

potential

participants

wereasked

tocomplete

amostly

quantitative

surveyRespondents

completed

thequestionnaires

online

oron

paperListofnames

provided

bythe

WBG

country

team

and

supplemented

by

thefielding

agencyCivilSocietyOrganizationLocalGovernmentOfficeorStaff▪Processmanaged

onthe

ground

by

thefielding

agency10%▪

497

participants

(45%

response

rate)Academia/ResearchInstitute/ThinkTank▪▪▪43%

from

Bagmati

Province,23%

from

Kathmandu39%

currently

collaborate

with

theWBG6%5%5%4%3%1%Officeof

aParliamentarianMedia12%

specialize

ingovernance,

9%

ineducation▪

Compared

to

FY19

CountrySurvey▪▪▪421

participants

(65%response

rate)UniversityStudentsSurveys

completed

with

arepresentative

from

thelocal

fielding

agency27%

collaborated

with

theWBGOfficeof

thePresident,PrimeMinister,MinisterClick

here

for

detailsof

the

RespondentSampleandMethodology.OtherQWhich

ofthe

following

best

describesyour

current

affiliation?(Selectonly1response)

(Percentage

of

Respondents,

N=495)56Overall

Context“[The

WBG

should]

ensure

effective

utilization

of

resources.

Focus

onfewer

but

priority

areas

rather

thanspread

theresourcesin

almostallsectors.”(Bilateral

/Multilateral

Agency

Respondent)“

To

enhance

effectiveness

inNepal,

theWBG

should

prioritize

inclusive

projects

that

address

the

specificneeds

ofvulnerable

groups.

Activecommunity

engagement

during

planning

and

implementation

will

foster

ownership

andlocalparticipation.

Buildingcapacity

inNepali

institutions

enables

better

project

management.

Data-driven

approaches

arecrucial

for

informed

decision-making

andtracking

progress.

Emphasizing

climate

change

resilience

helps

tacklevulnerabilities

todisasters.

Public-private

partnerships

bring

additional

resources

andexpertise.

Knowledge

sharingamong

stakeholders

ensures

best

practices

andlessons

learned.

Effective

coordination

with

other

developmentpartners

avoids

duplication

andmaximizes

impact.

Through

these

strategies,

theWBG

canbetter

support

sustainabledevelopmentandpovertyreductioninNepal.”(Local

Government

Respondent)QInyouropinion,

what

is

the

mostimportant

thingtheWorld

BankGroup

coulddo

tohelpincreaseitseffectiveness

in

Nepal?

(N=274)Respondents

areSplitOverNepal’s

GeneralDirectionInFY23,

lessthanhalfof

all

respondents

feltthatNepalwas

headed

intheright

direction

(44%),

andathird

ofthemwere

unsure.▪

Respondents

from

government

institutions

weresignificantly

more

likelytoindicate

thatthecountry

washeaded

inthe

rightdirection

(67%)

while

respondentsfrom

theprivate

sector

were

most

likelytosaythat

thecountry

was

onthe

wrong

track(35%).44%The

rightdirectionThewrongdirectionNotsure▪

Over

halfof

therespondents

from

bilateral/multilateralorganizations,

themedia,

andparticularly

universitystudents

(60%)

were

unsure

about

Nepal’s

direction.19%37%Q7FY23:Ingeneral,

wouldyousay

that

Nepal

isheaded

in

...?(Percentage

ofRespondents,

N=494)Familiaritywith

theWorld

Bank

has

Improved▪

Year

comparison:

Respondents

inthisyear’s

CountryAllRespondents5.9Survey

reported

somewhat

higher

levels

of

familiarity

withtheWorld

BankGroup

compared

toFY19:GovernmentInstitution6.86.36.1Mean

familiarity:FY23

=5.9LocalGovernmentAcademiaFY19

=5.6▪

Collaboration

withthe

WBG:

Respondents

who

collaboratewith

theWBG

reported

significantly

higher

levels

offamiliaritywith

theinstitution’s

work:Media6.05.9Mean

familiarity:Collaborate

withWBG=6.9Do

not

collaborate

=5.3Bilateral/MultilateralAgencyPrivateSector5.6CivilSociety5.65.4GovernmentPrincipalsUniversityStudents4.012345678910MeanRatingofFamiliarityQHowfamiliar

areyouwiththe

work

of

theWorld

Bank

GroupinNepal?Scale:

1Notfamiliar

at

all–10Extremelyfamiliar

(N=497)

Significantly

different

betweenstakeholder

groups8TheWBG

isOne

ofthe

MostTrusted

Institution

in

Nepal7.06.9CentralBankofNepalTheWorldBankGroup*6.96.5Respondents

gave

the

highest

ratings

of

trust

fortheCentralBankof

Nepal,

theWorld

BankGroup,

and

theUN.

Atthesame

time,

the

Parliament

andprovincial/local

government

inNepal

received

somewhat

lower

trustratings

among

theinstitutions

studied.6.86.4TheUnitedNations(UN)*6.66.1Regional

developmentbanks*Bilateral/Multilateralorganizations*TheInternationalMonetaryFund*6.65.9▪

Ratings

of

trustwere

significantly

higher

formost

of

theinstitutions

inFY23

than

intheFY19

survey,

except

forthefederal

government

andthemedia

whose

ratings

of

trustdropped

significantly

sinceFY19.6.55.9Academia/thinktanks/researchinstitutions6.46.2FY23FY19▪

InFY23,

respondents

from

thelocal

government

gave

thehighest

ratings

of

trust

forthe

WBG

(mean=7.8),

whereasrespondents

from

academia

(mean=5.8)

anduniversitystudents

(mean=6.1)

gave

significantly

lower

ratings

oftrust.Privatesector*Civilsociety5.96.05.75.76.2Thefederalgovernment*Media*5.66.15.5Provincial/LocalgovernmentParliament/legislativebranch5.512345678910To

whatextentdoyoutrust

each

ofthe

following

groups

todo

whatis

right?Scale:

1To

no

degree

atall–10To

averysignificant

degree

(FY23N=~454;

FY19N=~356)*Significantly

different

betweenyearsMeanRatingofTrustQ9Overall

AttitudestowardtheWorld

BankGroup“WBG

needs

tobring

global

expertise

and

customize

[theexpertise]

tothecontext

and

needs

of

theNepalipeople.”(Academia

Respondent)“WBG

should

beabletoprovide

support

by

influencing

thepolicy

which

supports

grassroots-level

people.WBG

should

helpcreate

equitable

opportunities,

capacity

development,

andaccess

forpoor

and

marginalpeople.”(Civil

SocietyRespondent)QInyouropinion,

what

is

the

mostimportantthingtheWorld

BankGroup

coulddo

tohelpincreaseitseffectiveness

in

Nepal?

(N=274)10Improvement

inaKey

Performance

IndicatorInFY23,

ratings

for

thekeyareas

of

the

WBG

performanceInfluencesthe

development6.96.6were

similar

tothose

reported

inFY19,

except

for

theagenda*perceptions

ofthe

Bank’s

influence

onthe

developmentagenda,

which

has

improved

significantly

since

FY19.6.76.5•

Respondents

from

local

governments

gave

thehighestratings

(mean

across

allfive

questions=7.4)

whileuniversity

students

gave

significantly

lower

ratingsacross

all

ofthese

performance

indicators

(mean=5.6).University

students

alsoreported

the

lowest

levels

offamiliarity

with

the

WBG

compared

toother

stakeholdergroups.Relevance6.5AlignmentwithdevelopmentprioritiesFY23FY196.56.36.4Effectivenessinachievingresults^Endsextremepoverty6.212345678910MeanRatingQThe

WBG

currently

playsarelevant

rolein

development

in

Nepal.

Scale:

1Strongly

disagree

–10Strongly

agreeTo

whatextentdoestheWBG

influence

thedevelopment

agenda

in

Nepal?

Scale:

1To

no

degree

atall

–10To

averysignificant

degreeHoweffective

has

theWBG

been

in

achieving

development

results

inNepal?

Scale:

1Noteffective

at

all

–10

VeryeffectiveTheWBG’s

workis

aligned

withwhatIconsider

thedevelopment

priorities

forNepal.

Scale:

1Strongly

disagree

–10Strongly

agreeTheWBG’s

workhelps

end

extremepovertyin

Nepal.

Scale:

1Strongly

disagree–10

Strongly

agree*Significantly

differentbetweenyears^Compared

toamean

score

ofthetwoquestions

asked

in

FY19:"Overall,please

rateyourimpression

of

theWBG’s

effectiveness

in

Nepal.Scale:

1Noteffective

at

all–10

Veryeffective;

To

whatextentdoestheWBG’s

workhelp

toachieve

development

results

in

Nepal?Scale:

1To

no

degree

atall–10To

averysignificant

degree11Local

GovernmentRespondents

HaveMore

Positive6.57.27.86.96.66.9TrustintheWBG*5.86.96.1Perceptions

oftheWBG7.16.8GovernmentPrincipals7.6Influencesthedevelopmentagenda*6.96.8Comparing

ratings

of

keyperformanceindicators

between

stakeholder

groups,clear

patterns

emerge

intheir

perceptions

oftheWBG

anditswork.

Respondents

fromlocal

governments

tendtohave

themostpositive

perceptions

while

universitystudents

give

significantly

lower

ratings

oftheWBG

anditswork.6.7GovernmentInstitution7.36.95.86.1LocalGovernment6.7Bilateral/Multilateral7.56.96.76.36.67.0Relevance*CivilSocietyPrivateSectorAcademiaMedia5.46.16.57.4Effectivenessinachievingresults*6.36.05.86.26.6QUnivesityStudents5.7TheWBG

currently

playsarelevant

rolein

development

inNepal.

Scale:

1Strongly

disagree

–10

Strongly

agree6.36.6To

whatextentdoyoutrust

theWBG

todowhatisright?Scale:

1To

no

degree

atall–10To

averysignificant

degree7.3*Significantly

differentbetweenstakeholdergroupsAlignmentwithdevelopmentpriorities*6.86.46.16.46.2To

whatextentdoestheWBG

influence

thedevelopmentagenda

in

Nepal?Scale:

1To

no

degree

atall–10To

averysignificant

degreeHoweffective

has

theWBG

been

in

achieving

developmentresults

in

Nepal?Scale:

1Noteffective

at

all–10

Veryeffective5.312345678910TheWBG’s

workis

aligned

withwhatIconsider

thedevelopment

priorities

for

Nepal.MeanRatingScale:

1Strongly

disagree–10Strongly

agree12FamiliarityLeads

toMore

Positive

Perceptions7.9When

comparing

ratings

of

keyperformance

indicatorsTrustintheWBG*6.9among

respondents

highlyfamiliar

with

the

WBG(ratings

of

8-10ona10-point

scale)

andthose

with

littlefamiliarity

with

the

WBG

(ratings

of

1-4ona10-point5.57.56.9scale),

onecan

seethatthe

more

familiar

stakeholdersarewith

the

WBG,

the

more

positive

perceptions

theyhave

ofthe

WBG

and

itswork.Influencesthe

developmentagenda*6.07.5Meaningful

engagement

and

outreach

cancontinuetoincrease

positive

perceptions.Relevance*6.75.57.4Alignmentwithdevelopmentpriorities*6.55.37.1Effectivenessinachievingresults*6.45.112345678910MeanRatingHowfamiliarareyou

withtheworkoftheWBG

inNepal?HighFamiliarity(8-10)SomeFamiliarity(5-7)LowFamiliarity(1-4)QTheWBG

currently

playsarelevant

rolein

development

in

Nepal.

Scale:

1Strongly

disagree

–10Strongly

agree*Significantly

different

betweenlevels

offamiliarityTo

whatextentdoyoutrust

theWBG

todowhatisright?

Scale:

1To

no

degree

atall

–10To

averysignificant

degreeTo

whatextentdoestheWBG

influence

thedevelopment

agenda

in

Nepal?

Scale:

1To

no

degree

atall

–10To

averysignificant

degreeHoweffective

has

theWBG

been

in

achieving

development

results

inNepal?

Scale:

1Noteffective

at

all

–10

VeryeffectiveTheWBG’s

workis

aligned

withwhatIconsider

thedevelopment

priorities

forNepal.

Scale:

1Strongly

disagree

–10Strongly

agree13Nepal

Rated

Lower

thanother

IDA

Countries

inFY23

onKey

Performance

IndicatorsThemean

ratings

for

relevance,

alignment,

andeffectiveness

inachieving

results,

as

well

asthe

trustrating,

were

somewhatlowerinNepal

compared

tothose

inother

IDA

countries^

surveyed

inFY23,

except

for

theinfluence

rating,

which

was

onparwith

other

IDA

countries.6.9Trust7.16.9Influencesthedevelopmentagenda6.96.7Relevance7.2Nepal

FY23IDAFY236.56.8Alignmentwithdevelopmentpriorities6.3Effectivenessinachievingresults6.912345678910MeanRatingQ14^FY23IDAcountries

included:

Central

AfricaRepublic,

Djibouti,

TheGambia,

Ghana,Guinea,

Honduras,

TheKyrgyzRepublic,

Mali,

SãoToméand

Príncipe,

and

Tanzania,Stakeholder

Trends

across

Performance

IndicatorsRespondents

from

local

governments

had

thehighestmean

rating

across

theaggregated

responses

totheseventeen

COS

indicator

questions

whereas

universitystudents,

academia,

and

the

private

sector

hadsignificantly

lower

ratings.AllRespondentsLocalGovernmentBilateralor

MultilateralAgencyMedia6.57.06.66.66.56.56.4▪

Collaboration

withthe

WBG:

Respondents

whocollaborate

with

the

WBG

gave

significantly

higherratings

across

theaggregated

indicator

questionscompared

torespondents

who

donot

collaborate

withtheWBG:GovernmentPrincipalsGovernmentInstitutionCivilSocietyMean

rating:Collaborate

withWBG=6.7Do

not

collaborate

=6.3PrivateSector6.2Academia/ThinkTankUnivesityStudents6.25.512345678910MeanRatingof

Aggregated

Indicator

QuestionsQAll

IndicatorQuestionsasked

on

aScalefrom1to

10.Click

here

for

details

ofthese

IndicatorQuestions.15World

BankGroup’s

SupportinDevelopment

Areas“-

Partnership

with

local

government

for

urban

planning

anddevelopment,

Waste

management,

Tourismdevelopment,

and

promotion

etc.-

Work

focuses

on

strengthening

local

CSOs

and

community

mobilization

and

partnership

for

sustainabledevelopment-

GRID-

Support

tolocal

government

for

educational

sector

improvement

plan.”(Local

Government

Respondent)QInyouropinion,

what

is

the

mostimportant

thingtheWorld

BankGroup

coulddo

tohelpincreaseitseffectiveness

in

Nepal?

(N=274)16Development

PrioritiesforNepalAgricultureand

food

securityEducation48%46%Jobcreation/employmentPublicsectorgovernanceHealth45%40%36%Agriculture

and

food

security,

education,

and

jobcreationwere

thetopareas

inFY23

where

stakeholders

would

liketheWBG

tofocus

itsresources.MacroeconomicstabilityClimatechange28%26%▪

Respondents

from

local

government

and

governmentprincipals

were

most

likelytoselect

agriculture

and

foodsecurity

as

atop

development

priority

inNepal

(67%and64%,

respectively)Privatesector

developmentTransport25%24%24%DigitaldevelopmentEnvironment/Naturalresourcemanagement18%17%▪

University

students

were

significantly

more

likelytoselecteducation

(85%)

and

job

creation/employment

(60%)

astheir

topdevelopment

priorities

inNepal.SocialinclusionEnergy/ExtractivesGenderequity17%16%▪

Climate

change

has

increased

inpriority

from

just

over

2%inFY19

to26%inFY23.

Respondents

from

civil

society

(46%)andacademia

(48%)

were

most

likelytoselect

climatechange

among

their

topdevelopment

priorities.Watersupplyand

sanitationinfrastructureDisasterriskmanagementTrade15%13%12%11%UrbandevelopmentSocialprotection8%7%Debt

sustainabilityCrimeandviolenceRegionalintegrationOther6%4%3%QPlease

identify

whichof

thefollowingdevelopment

priorities

youconsider

themost

important

inNepal.(Choose

no

more

than

5)

(Percentage

ofRespondents,

N=487)17Poverty

ReductionJobcreation/employmentEducation67%53%52%Agricultureand

food

securityPrivatesector

developmentHealthAsinFY19,

agriculture

and

food

security,

education,

andjobcreation

were

thetopareas

inFY23

thatstakeholders

believewould

contribute

themost

toreducing

poverty

inNepal.32%29%27%PublicsectorgovernanceSocialinclusion▪

Private

sector

development

was

more

likelytobechosen

byrespondents

from

media,

the

private

sector,

and

academia(52%,

49%,

and38%,

respectively).26%25%25%MacroeconomicstabilityTransportSocialprotectionTrade20%In

your

opinion,

whatisthemostimportantthing

theWBG

coulddo

tohelpincrease

its

effectiveness

in

Nepal?20%20%DigitaldevelopmentGenderequity“TheWorld

Bank

will

be

effective

ifit

works

inthefollowingareas

inNepal:17%Implementtailored

initiatives

that

integrate

marginalizedcommunitieslikeDalits

with

others,

rather

than

employing

generic

programs.To

achieve

holistic

progress

inthe

political,

economic,

and

socialaspects

of

theDalitcommunity,

efforts

should

focus

onscientificreservationClimatechange11%11%10%9%Environment/NaturalresourcemanagementEnergy/ExtractivesUrbandevelopmentEmphasis

should

beplaced

on

theunity

and

inclusion

of

marginalizedcommunitiesinNepal.Debt

sustainability9%Effortsshould

be

madetoaddress

and

rectify

theinequality

issues

inNepalOnceall

forms

of

discrimination

are

eradicated,

itisappropriate

toimplementinclusiveprograms”DisasterriskmanagementWatersupplyand

sanitationinfrastructureRegionalintegration8%6%6%3%2%(Civil

Society

Respondent)CrimeandviolenceQPovertyreduction

isabroad

termthat

encompasses

workinmany

different

areas.

Which

FIVE

areasof

development

listedbelow

do

youbelievewouldcontribute

most

toreducing

poverty

in

Nepal?(Choose

no

more

than

5)(Percentage

ofRespondents,

N=487)Other18Areas

fortheWBG

toPrioritizeJobcreation/employmentAgricultureand

food

securityEducation51%43%36%34%31%Theareas

theWBG

should

prioritize

initswork

were

well

alignedwith

thedevelopment

priorities

identified

bythe

stakeholders:

jobcreation,

agriculture

and

food

security,

and

education.PublicsectorgovernanceMacroeconomicstabilityHealth30%30%Privatesector

developmentTransport▪

University

students

were

significantly

more

likelytoprioritizejob

creation/employment

compared

toother

stakeholdergroups

(75%).28%27%23%22%18%16%DigitaldevelopmentEnergy/ExtractivesClimatechange▪

Respondents

from

bilateral/multilateral

agencies

were

mostlikelytoselect

public

sector

governance

as

atoparea

fortheWBG

tofocus(54%).

Climate

change

was

also

arelatively

high

priority

forthisgroup

(36%).SocialinclusionUrbandevelopmentEnvironment/Naturalresourcemanagement16%15%In

your

opinion,

whatisthemostimportantthing

theWBGcould

do

tohelpincrease

itseffectiveness

in

Nepal?TradeGenderequity“Promotepolicy

stability

(both

fiscalas

well

as

monetary),supporting

long-term

broad-based

development

agendasFocus

onlarge

infraprojects

insectors

such

asenergy,transport,etc.Promotesustainable

agriculture

tocurbagro-based

importsandexplore

export

potential.13%11%Debt

sustainabilityDisasterriskmanagementWatersupplyand

sanitationinfrastructureSocialprotection10%9%Engage

injob

creation-based

projects;

promoteSMEecosystemetc.”9%Regionalintegration7%(PrivateSector

Respondent)Crimeandviolence3%1%OtherQWhich

areas

should

theWBG

prioritize

inits

work

in

Nepal

tohavethemost

impact

on

development

results

inthecountry?

(Choose

no

more

than

5)

(Percentage

of

Respondents,

N=482)19Finance

/Institutions/EconomicGrowthEffectiveness

ofWBG’sSupport

inSectoral

AreasMacroeconomicstability5.85.6TheWBG’s

work

inthe

area

of

transport

received

the

highest

ratings

ofeffectiveness

inNepal,

although

rated

significantly

lower

compared

toFY19.Almost

all

sectoral

areas

witnessed

adecline

intheperception

ofeffectiveness

sinceFY19,

especially

thekeyareas

of

education,

publicsector

governance,

and

agriculture

and

food

security.Publicsectorgovernance*6.45.65.7PrivatesectordevelopmentFY23FY195.6Regionalintegration*6.06.26.4Genderequity5.5Debtsustainability6.0Health*6.55.5Human

DevelopmentJobcreation/employment*5.95.9Education*6.65.45.8Trade5.96.0SocialinclusionFY23FY195.65.7SocialprotectionEnvironmentalSustainabilityInfrastructure6.56.8Transport*5.96.26.2DisasterriskmanagementEnergy/Extractives*6.6Watersupplyand

sanitationinfrastructure*5.96.16.1Climatechange*6.36.7FY23FY19Environment/Naturalresourcemanagement5.86.0Urbandevelopment*Digitaldevelopment*FY23FY196.65.75.7Agricultureandfoodsecurity*^*Significantly

differentbetweenyears6.466.2123457891012345678910MeanRatingofEffectivenessMeanRatingofEffectivenessQHoweffectivedo

youbelieve

theWBG

isin

termsof

theworkit

doesin

thefollowing

areasof

development

in

Nepal?Scale:

1Noteffective

at

all–10Veryeffective

(Ifyou

have

NOexposure

to/experiencein

working

in

anyof

thesectors

listed

below,

please

respond

“Don’t

know”)

^The

mean

score

of“Agriculture

and

rural

development”

and

“Foodsecurity”

asked

in

FY19was

taken

forthis

comparison

analysis.20Green,Resilient,and

InclusiveDevelopment

(GRID)

of

NepalHowfamiliar

are

you

with

theGRIDobjectives?Almost

half

ofthe

respondents

(45%)

reported

knowing

alotor

afair

amount

about

theGRIDobjectives.Iknowalot

about

theGRIDobjectivesRespondents

from

government

organizations

andbilateral/multilateral

agencies

tended

tobe

more

aware

oftheGRIDaction

plan

(50%and55%of