英语语用学言语理论Speech Act Theory.ppt

1、Speech Act Theory Vera (韩玉霞),2 Constative vs Performative,1 General Definition,5 Development of Speech Acts,4 The theory of illocutionary acts,3 Collapse of the dichotomy,Contents,1.1 General Definition,A speech act in linguistics and the philosophy of language is an utterance that has performative

2、function in language and communication. The contemporary use of the term goes back to J. L. Austins development of performative utterances and his theory of locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts.,1.2 Speech Act Theory,Originated with the British philosopher John Austin in the late 50s

3、of the 20th century Challenged the so-called “descriptive fallacy” Further developed by other scholars, particularly J.Searle,John Langshaw Austin (March 26, 19111 February 8, 1960) was a British philosopher of language, born in Lancaster and educated at Shrewsbury School and Balliol College,Oxford

4、University.,1.3 Austin,1.4 Austins Work,1. Words and Deeds 言与行（1952） According to J.Austin, there seems to be no clear-cut boundary between speaking and acting. Rather, saying is sometimes acting. Alternatively, to put it in another way, words are part of deeds. 2. How to Do Things with Words 如何以言行事

5、（1962）,Austin made the primary distinction between two types of utterances: constative:表述句 performative：施为句,2.1 Constative vs. Performative,Constative utterances （表述话语） are verifiable (true or false) statements, aiming to either state or describe. I go to the park every Sunday.,Performative utteranc

6、es （施事话语）are statements not verifiable (not true or false), aiming at performing a certain act. (Austin 1962),1. I do. 2. I name this ship Queen Elizabeth.,Performative verbs: name, bet, etc.,The term “speech acts” was initially invented to portray the actions accomplished via performative utterance

7、s. In its later broad sense, speech acts also cover actions performed by utterance that are not strictly performative. Now, speech acts are considered to be the basic or minimal units of linguistic communication.,2.2 Definition Expansion,Common feantures of classic examples of performantives: 1 Firs

8、t-person subject （第一人称主语） 2 The simple present tense（一般现在时） 3 Indicative mood （陈述句） 4 Active voice （主动语态） 5 Performative verbs （施为动词）,3.1 Collapse of the dichotomy,However, Austin soon finds out that: 1. the subject may be: the first person plural, as in We promise to clean the room afterwards”; sec

9、ond person, as in You are hereby authorized to pay for the purchase“; or third person, as in “Passengers are warned to cross the track by the briage only”. 2. the voice may be passive e.g. Notice is hereby given that passengers will be prosecuted.,3. In informal situations, other moods than the indi

10、cative may be used. e.g. Turn right.(Instead of “I order you to turn right”). 4. vocabulary may not be a reliable criterion. e.g.to issue an order, one doesnt need to use the word order“. 5. performatives verbs can be used in constative ways. e.g. She names this sip the Queen Elizabeth. so the speak

11、er can perform certain acts either by uttering sentences with explicit performative verbs or by other devices identified as word order, stress, intonation, and even context.,4.1 The theory of illocutionary acts (言语行为三分说） Owing to these problems and others, J. Austin rejected the distinction between

12、constatives and performatives. Instead, he proposed a new and more general framework of speech act analysislocutionary act, illocutionary act, and perlocutionary act. (P206),A locutionary act is the act of uttering words, phrases, clauses. It is the act of conveying literal meaning by means of synta

13、x lexicon and phonology. An illocutionary act is the act of expressing the speakers intention. It is the act performed in saying something. A perlocutionary act is the act performed by or resulting from saying something. it is the consequence of, or the change brought about the utterance. (Austin 19

14、62),Among the three acts, the illocutionary act is what linguists have been studying all along, which involves many psychological and social factors, of which we are still more or less in the dark. So the illocutionary act is what Austin really driving at. In this sense, speech act theory is in fact

15、 a theory of the illocutionary act.,4.2 (Illocutionary) Speech acts classified,According to J. Austin, (illocutionary) speech acts fall into certain types in terms of their illocutionary force, as listed below: verdictives(裁决型), exercitives(行使型), commissives(承诺型), behavitives(行为型), expositives(阐述型),

16、A. verdictives 裁决类 Its a verdict given by a jury, arbitrator or umpire. e.g. final decisions, estimate, reckoning or appraisal B. exercitives 行使类 It involves the exercising of powers, rights or influence. e.g. appointing, voting, ordering, urging, advising, warning, etc. C. Commissives 承诺类 It is ess

17、entially act of promising or other undertaking which includes declarations or announcements.,D. behabitives 行动类 It is characterized by the expression of attitudes and social behavior, covering such acts as apologizing, congratulating, commending, condoling, cursing, and challenging. E. expositives表述

18、类 It refers to those speech acts of expounding ones views, conducting arguments, clarifying usages and references and the like.,5.1 Development of Speech Acts,Searles understanding of linguistic communication: Mans use of language is an intentioned act conditioned by rules. And the basic unit of spe

19、ech communication is not words or sentences but speech acts as they express the speakers intention. Also, the speech act is a function of sentence meaning.,5.2 Searles Indirect Speech Act Theory,Language is restricted by rules. Searles two different rules. Regulative rules(调节性规律）are those which modi

20、fy the existing activities and could existing independently. The cancellation of the rule would not be the cancellation of the activity. Rules we stick to in daily life: traffic rules, etiquette rules, writing rules etc.,Constitutive rules（构成性规律） are those which set new systems to restrict our activ

21、ities. The cancellation of the rule would be the cancellation of the activity simultaneously. Rules we follow when playing games: chess, football, finger-guessing game.,If formularized, the two kinds of rules could be as followed: 1. Regulative rules: if X, do Y When the traffic is red, you should n

22、ot cross the road. 2. Constitutive rules: X counts as Y You shoot the football into other teams door and your team gets one point.,The necessary and sufficient conditions for the act of promising to have been performed in the utterance of a given sentence: 1. Normal input and output conditions obtai

23、n 2. Speaker expresses a proposition by uttering the sentence 3. In expressing the proposition, speaker predicates his future act 4. Hearer would prefer Speakers doing the act to his not doing it, and Speaker believes Hearer would prefer his doing that act to his not doing it 5. It is not obvious to

24、 both Speaker and hearer that Speaker will do the act in the normal course of events.,5.3 How to Promise,6. Speaker intends to do the act. 7. Speaker intends that the utterance of the sentence will place him under an obligation to do the act. 8. Speaker intends that the utterance of the sentence will produce in Hearer a belief that conditions 6 and 7 obtain by means of the recognition of the intention to produce that belief, and he intends this recognition to be achieved by means of the recognition of the sentence as one conventionall