溶栓后PCI青岛

心肌梗死再灌注-2个值得关注的问题,何奔 MD PhD FACC上海交通大学仁济医院,时间就是心肌，就是生命,时间对再灌注抢救的意义,0 - 0.5 hrs预防梗死0.5 2 hrs 大量挽救心肌 + IRA开通的益处2 6 hrs心肌挽救降低, IRA开通的益处 6 hrs基本不挽救心肌, 但有IRA开通的益处,快速，有效，持续,90年代中已证明溶栓治疗的益处与安慰剂对比,2003年，心梗治疗-溶栓与介入对比-We know,是否意味着都做PCI? PCI时间肯定要比直接注射药物长，不是所有医疗机构都具有PCI条件。所以一系列问题需要研究,溶栓与介入的比较,NRMI-2: 死亡率与时间的关系,Door-to-Balloon Time (minutes),校正了的死亡率,P=0.01,P=0.0007,P=0.0003,n = 2,230,5,734,6,616,4,461,2,627,5,412,“拖” 多久可以接受？,我们已经知道,PCI优于溶栓但是PCI慢于溶栓，慢可用疗效弥补，但有个度这个“度”的把握很重要,北京的调查显示，D2B时间达标比例低,如何选择溶栓与介入？ 溶栓后还可以介入？,溶栓与PCI选择之考虑,至少有部分病人，溶栓可能优于PCIWho? When? Where? What? Which?,2004ACC/AHAAMI指南的选择的推荐,下列情形下溶栓更好到院很早（3h）介入可能延迟介入不可选 导管室没空 血管入路有困难 没有熟练的医生介入延迟(Door-balloon)-(Door-needle)1hMedical contact-balloon time1.5h,下列情形下介入更好熟练的队伍且有外科保障(Door-balloon)-(Door-needle)1hMedical contact-balloon time3h诊断STEMI有疑问,如果3小时之内到院，没有特别情况，两种方案均可,Sx Door Needle Balloon,策略的变化,2003 Greg Stone(Lancet): PPCI regardness of nearest cath suite 3 floors or 3 hrs away2007JACC ACCAHA guidelineLytic if anticipated PPCI is 90min give lytic within 30min,选择依据1-起病长短,选择依据2-拖延时间NRMI资料,192509例患者，645个中心,Circulation 2006；114：2019-25,114min是个坎但：所有病人一样吗？,选择依据2-拖延时间起病早 ASA + Heparin 5000U; pre-hospital tPA vs primary PCI,p=0.29,p=0.61,p=0.13,p=0.12,p=0.06,30d events rate,Bonnefoy, Lancet 2002 ；360:825-29,Key trials for facilitate PCI,如果已经准备PCI,不要乱给药了，不给更好,FINESSE,PCI前常规abciximab或PCI时嘱情abciximab的比较不管是否有半量瑞替普酶溶栓结果一样且院前应用Ab出血增多Finesse+OnTime2：PCI前Ab无益处,Meta analysis for F-PCIprePCI TIMI flow not transfer to good outcome,Meta analysis for F-PCI,Facilitate PCI 2007 guideline,Pharmacoinvasive概念的提出,转运是安全的,易化，立即，转运的综合,问题：那些无法在90min内PCI的患者接受半量瑞替普酶+Ab 后，是该立即转运作PCI还是等到发现未再通再进行 转运补救PCI?,180min,110min,D2B,转运与立即PCI的结合,Tenecteplase溶栓后的病人何时转运？1059例高危患者均在2h内溶栓提示：尽早转运做PCI有益；发现了溶栓后早期介入的时间窗可以提前到3h N Engl J Med 2009; 360:2705-2718.,32.5h,2.8h,转运与立即PCI的结合:Sx2hTNK,Bohmer E etal:JACC2010;55:102-110,3d,2.7h,溶栓后PCI Meta2010,溶栓后PCI获益,溶栓后PCI Meta-2011,30d 复合终点,溶栓后PCI Meta-2011,30d缺血终点,30d出血终点,30d死亡率,是否优于PPCI?: 尚无足够证据，仅此一篇,Latest Guideline, Whats new?,Triage and transfer for PCI ,esp in high risk ,but no emphasize surgical backup Abandon the many terms of PPCI,immediate, rescueLytic then PCI safePt be divided into sent to capability of PCI institute or notEmphasize PPCI ASAP,2010ESC介入指南,rt-PA半量溶栓后早期PCI治疗急性STEMI 疗效及安全性评价,上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院 何 奔 沈玲红,Time intervals,lysis,2.0h 1.1h 0.5h 1.5h 6.8h,Median D-to-N time: 1.6h Median D-to-B time: 8.4h,symptom onset,hospitalization,consent signature,balloon infllation,2 with no lesions 50% diameter stenosis and 1 with unsuitable anatomy did not undergo PCI,6 had TIMI 0-1,34 had TIMI 2-3,50 enrolled and accepted half-dose rt-PA,40(81.6%) Achieved clinical criteria of reperfusion,1 was unwilling to undergo angiography,9(18.4%) underwent rescue PCI,4 had TIMI 2-3,5 had TIMI 0-1,Early PCI 75.5%,Final flow of IRA,Final flow of IRA,8 had TIMI 2-3,1 had TIMI 0-1,36 had TIMI 2-3,1 had TIMI 0-1,Improved TIMI grade flow,48.532.1,37.925.6,p0.01,Improved CTFC,Improved MBG,Procedural characteristics (n=46),Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa use, - no.(%) 7 ( 15.2 % )Thrombectomy, - no.(%) 0 ( 0 % )Coronary-artery bypass grafting, - no.(%) 0 ( 0 % )Distal protection device, - no.(%) 0 ( 0 % )Coronary stents, - no.(%) 45 ( 97.8 % )Complications - no.(%) Minor dissection 1 ( 2.2 % ) No reflow 2 ( 4.3 % ),(PPCI 5-25%),Clinical outcomes at 30days after symptom onset (n=47),1.5% 8.1%,Borgia1 et al.,1.0% - 4.9%,1.2% - 5.8%,Discussion-1,Who benefit from Early PCI?,Discussion-1,Who benefit from Early PCI?,GRACIA-2,Discussion-2,Early PCI 的最佳时机？,From the start of thrombosis to early PCI CARESS-in-AMI(1.8h), TRANSFER-AMI(2.8h), NORDISTEMI(2.7h), CAPITAL AMI(1.6),GRACIA-1(16.7)Meta-regression analysis (SP DSouza) no correlation between magnitude of benefit and timing of early PCI strategy within the 24 h windowGuideline recommendation: 3-24hOur Pilot Study (from the end of lysis):6.8h,Optimal time of early PCI (Pilot),137.557.3,110.851.3,116.752.5,157.044.8,n=12,n=8,n=4,n=14,Optimal time of early PCI (