




已阅读5页,还剩21页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
breadtalk group: from local to global breadtalk group: from local to global breadtalk credit risk of overview overview of breadtalk business adjustment converting operating lease into capital lease non-recurring items profitability and credit risk peer companies profitability, activity, solvency and liquidity forecast balance sheet income statement cashflow statement conclusion 1 adjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion contents c 25 breadtalk founded as an f&b operator in singapore in 2000 and listed on the sgx in 2003, the breadtalk group limited has rapidly expanded to become a distinctive household brand owner that has established its mark on the world stage with its bakery, restaurant and food atrium footprints. its brand portfolio comprises breadtalk, toast box, food republic, din tai fung, the icing room, ramenplay and carls jr in china. with global staff strength of 6,000 employees, the group has a network of over 400 bakery outlets in 16 countries such as singapore, china, hong kong, south korea and the middle east. it also operates more than 10 michelin star din tai fung restaurants in singapore and thailand, as well as over 30 award-winning food republic food atriums in singapore, prc, hong kong and malaysia. of 2 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk steps 1.obtain the sum of operating lease (ol) contracted 2.take the interest expense on capital lease incurred in 2007 divided by the present value of capital lease obligations at the end of 2006 the implicit interest rate can then be calculated 3.project ol payment schedules over the years 4.calculate the pv of the ol payment schedules over the years 5.calculate interest expense in year 1 base on the opening ol obligations in 2007 6.calculate the difference of the lease payments and interest expense to obtain the principal repayment each year of converting operating lease into capital lease 1 3 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk 9. increase current portion of liabilities by 1st year principle payments in balance sheet of 2007 10. increase long term liabilities by 1st year ending lease obligation in balance sheet of 2007 11. reduce rent expense in 2007 income statement by 2006s operating lease payments 12. increase depreciation expense in 2007 income statement 13. interest expense in 2007 income statement 14. remove principal repayment from financing cashflow 15. add principal repayment to operating cashflow 16. recalculate the ratio respectively of 4 converting operating lease into capital lease 1 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk information group inputs20072006 $000$000 no later than 1 year$33,411$22,438 later than 1 year but not later than 5 years$77,496$50,082 later than 5 years$21,471$6,916 $132,378$79,436 finance lease interest expense2521 finance lease obligations, secured (pv)610410 of 5 converting operating lease into capital lease 1 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk calculating assumptions (ignores sublease rental) 20072008200920102011 % of payment 25%25%25%25% payments made over first 5 years $22,438 $12,521$12,521 $12,521 $12,521 number of years after 2013 the existing payment runs0.55 straight line depreciation period6 years output implicit interest rate in capital lease contract6.10% =interest expense on capital lease (2007) / pv of lease obligations at beg 2007 (end 2006) of 6 converting operating lease into capital lease 1 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk results years lease payments implicit discount factor discounted pv interest expense principle payment lease obligation balance depreciation of assets lease asset balance total expense (dep + int) 6.10% 6.10% 2006 $66,797 $66,797 2007$22,4380.94$21,148$4,073$18,365$48,432$11,133$55,665$15,206 2008$12,5210.89$11,123$2,953$9,567$38,865$11,133$44,532$14,086 2009$12,5210.84$10,483$2,370$10,151$28,714$11,133$33,399$13,503 2010$12,5210.79$9,881$1,751$10,770$17,945$11,133$22,266$12,884 2011$12,5210.74$9,313$1,094$11,426$6,519$11,133$11,133$12,227 2012$6,9160.70$4,849$397$6,519$0$11,133$0$11,530 $79,436 $66,797$12,639$79,436$207,273$66,797$0$79,436 of 7 converting operating lease into capital lease 1 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk of gain on sale of property of 4.2 million in 2010 2 adjustment for non-recurring items 8 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk of 1 peer comparison comparison companies not public listed companies: bengawan solo, yakun and crystal jade my bread. mcdonalds (mcd), yum! brands (yum) and sakae sushi (5do) peer companies 9 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk more profitable than the sector except for roe. cfo growth: bt saw a large dip after 2007 global financial crisis, but maintained at approximately 20%, outperforming the sector for the past five years. sales growth: bts more volatile but still did better than the sector. of profitability ratio 2 10 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk gross margin: bts constant at approximately 55% operating margin: mixed, sector better in 2009 and 2010escalating operating expenses and the sales may be growing at a rate lower than that of expenses. net profit margin: dropped in 2009 and 2010. bts profitability has been relatively consistent for the past four years signaling sustainable cash flows from operations and the exceptional ability to maintain profit margins. of profitability ratio 2 11 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk moderate operating activities. ratio of inventory growth over sales growth : relatively constant 1.01.6inventory management kept up with its sales growth. as for asset turnover, the group largely underperformed the sector by 50%. this can be attributed to its low profit margin where the group did not outperform the sector by much and even underperformed during the period 2009-2010. of activity ratio 3 12 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk debt to equity ratio: bts on the rise for the past years climbing from 3.0x in 2007 to 4.5x in 2010, with an average of approximately 2x over the sectors average debt to equity ratiobt is probably taking on too much debt, and this raises a question as to whether net profit for the company will be further reduced due to the need to service its escalating debt through interest payments. of solvency ratio 3 13 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk of balance sheet forecast total receivables projected as a proportion of sales (5%) inventory based on inventory turnover ratio (28) total long term debt excluding leases forecasted based on the a constant long term debt to assets (5%) operating leases and gross ppe increase accordingly with sales retained earnings increased while common stock remains constant cash used to balance projected assets and the sum total of projected equity and liabilities 14 1 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk of income statement forecast growth rate was projected to be 8.55% for breadtalk historical weighted average growth rate of singapore (6.60%) and china (10.49%) md&a accrues 52% of sales from singapore and 48% of sales from china & hong kong cagr of breadtalk revenue has been 25.12% mean reversion to occur and growth rate to drop 0.5*6.6%+0.5*10.49%=8.55% 15 2 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk of income statement forecast projected items based on sales revenue would grow at 8.55% per annum cogst projected based as a percentage*revenuet sg&at projected based as a percentage*revenuet percentage = average of proportion of item of revenue for the past 5 years depreciation adjustment for lease, operating lease expense adjustment and capital lease interest expense adjustment projected as a proportion of revenue positive relationship between leases and revenue 16 2 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk of income statement forecast projected items not based on sales depreciation and amortization projected as a proportion of projected ppe from the balance sheet ending ppe = beginning ppe accumulated depreciation ending accumulated depreciation = beginning accumulated depreciation + depreciation expense interest expense projected as a proportion of projected total debt total debt = current debt + non-current debt proportion is derived as the historical average of interest expense over total debt 17 2 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk of income statement forecast assumptions no r&d were projected interest and investment income were projected to be a constant figure for the next 5 years at $0.24 million every year effective tax rate calculated as 30% was used to calculate projected taxes 18 2 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion 25 breadtalk credit risk of cashflow statement forecast the forecasted cashflow statements are derived from the income and balance statements. the 3 main sections: cashflow of operation cashflow of investing cashflow of financing 2519 3 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion breadtalk credit risk 20112012201320142015 net income13.3514.5215.7917.1618.66 depreciation, total34.5737.5340.7444.2248.0 other op. activities10.8811.8112.8213.9115.10 change in ar-2.3-0.64-0.70-0.76-0.82 change in inv1.59-2.501.51-2.591.42 change in ap1.111.641.781.942.10 change in other net op. assets 2.533.774.094.444.82 cfo61.7366.1276.0378.3289.28 of cashflow statement forecast cashflow of operations (cfo) indirect method cfo = net income + non-cash expense + adjustments in working capital 2520 3 overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion breadtalk credit risk of cashflow statement forecast 20112012201320142015 capital expenditur e -11.91-12.67-13.76-14.93-16.21 cfi-11.91-12.67-13.76-14.93-16.21 2521 3 cashflow of investing (cfi) overviewadjustmentcredit riskforecastconclusion breadtalk credit risk of cashflow statement fore
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 厂房股权转让与新能源产业合作开发合同
- 商业地产项目场地标准租赁协议
- 邻居砸墙协议书范本
- 果园采摘园承包与果树修剪技术服务合同
- 风险防范叉车操作工劳动合同
- 高端餐饮企业员工劳动合同范本(含绩效考核)
- 分公司投资建设与产业园区合作协议
- 中医情志与健康的关系
- AI教育智适应系统应用与发展
- 珍爱生命健康成长幼儿园
- 甘肃省苹果产业发展现状、问题及对策苹果产业的现状及对策
- 培训MSDS专业知识课件
- 夜空中最亮的星二部合唱简谱
- 广东省佛山市南海区2021-2022学年六年级下学期数学学科核心素养水平抽样调研试卷
- YC/T 246-2008烟草及烟草制品烟碱的测定气相色谱法
- 钢结构施工检查记录表格
- 桥梁施工质量控制要点(PPT)
- 一二年级看图说话写话:过河 教学课件
- 售后服务管理制度与工作流程
- 消防改造工程技术标书模板
- 磷化膜质量评定项目与方法
评论
0/150
提交评论