


全文预览已结束
下载本文档
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文四六更多英语考试-GMAT 考试-请点击这里获得24. The customer-service division of Mammon Savings and Loan recommends that the best way for the bank to attract new customers and differentiate itself from its competitors is to improve its service to customersspecifically, by reducing waiting time in teller lines, opening for business 30 minutes earlier, and closing an hour later. These improvements, it is argued, will give the bank the edge over its competitors and make it appear more customer-friendly. For the most part this recommendation is well-reasoned; a few concerns must be addressed, however. First, the author assumes that Mammons competitors are similar to Mammon in all respects other than the ones listed. In fact, Mammons competitors may be more conveniently located to customers, or offer other services or products on more attractive terms than Mammon. If so, Mammon may not gain the edge it seeks merely by enhancing certain services. Secondly, the author assumes that the proposed improvements will sufficiently distinguish Mammon from its competitors. This is not necessarily the case. Mammons competitors may already offer, or may plan to offer, essentially the same customer-service features as those Mammon proposes for itself. If so, Mammon may not gain the edge it seeks merely by enhancing these services. Thirdly, the author assumes that Mammon can offer these improved services without sacrificing any other current features that attract customers, in fact, Mammon may have to cut back other services or offer accounts on less attractive terms, all to compensate for the additional costs associated with the proposed improvements. By rendering its other features less attractive to customers, Mammon may not attain the competitive edge it seeks. In conclusion, Mammons plan for attracting new customers and differentiating itself from its competitors is only modestly convincing. While improvements in customer service generally tend to enhance competitiveness, it is questionable whether the specific improvemen
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 食品安全学题库填空题及答案解析
- 2025年DL-醉椒素行业研究报告及未来行业发展趋势预测
- 2025年儿童滑板车行业研究报告及未来行业发展趋势预测
- 2025年3D生物打印机行业研究报告及未来行业发展趋势预测
- 2025年复合液体化肥行业研究报告及未来行业发展趋势预测
- 2025年复方硝酸咪康唑软膏行业研究报告及未来行业发展趋势预测
- 2025年动力电池设备行业研究报告及未来行业发展趋势预测
- 家具配件厂设施建设质量管规定
- 2025湖北孝感云梦县消防救援大队招聘政府专职消防员8人考试参考题库及答案解析
- 萍乡武功山旅游集团有限公司2025年公开招聘考试参考试题及答案解析
- 【Google】2025全球短剧营销白皮书(市场数据、渠道打法、ROI全盘点)
- 家政培训服务中心路演
- 模特老师培训课件模板
- IATF16949内审员培训资料
- 危重病人约束护理
- 艾梅乙反歧视培训课件
- 劳模创新工作室申报材料
- 蜂蛰伤的治疗指南讲课件
- GB/T 45785-2025压缩空气站能源绩效评价
- 非物质文化遗产保护与乡村振兴的协同发展路径
- 窑炉施工安全管理制度
评论
0/150
提交评论