人人网校内-浏览日志-gmat阅读方法论自然阅读法vs结构化阅读法（RenrenCampus-browselog-GMATReadingMethodologynaturalreadingvsstructuredreading）.doc

人人网 校内 - 浏览日志 - gmat阅读方法论 自然阅读法vs结构化阅读法（Renren Campus - browse log - GMAT Reading Methodology natural reading vs structured reading）Renren Campus - browse log - GMAT Reading Methodology natural reading vs structured reading method recently usedLog album sharing public HomepageEveryone present state farm message mall recruitment test game center mortal comprehension Daily Horoscope happy kitchen room escape sunshine ranch contraTexas poker together back word - good reading books and color on top of the fate test speed racing all applications?Managing my applicationBrowse more appsData editingPrivacy settingsApplication settingsAccount settingMail subscriptionThe default look embarrassed embarrassed bear AliSuper expression sorry, this function needs level 9 or above or open VIP can use.orHome page personal dress up friends applicationGame station messageUpgrade VIPRecharge invite settings search search exitYanshan University students dream Yanshan University students dream log log returns the current log log home?A newer one / an older oneshare2009-12-15 11:42:32 Author: Chen Huping source: Beijing New Oriental School North America project departmentGMAT exam reading based on academic journals and magazines, is a highly condensed version of academic articles, and the topic is for academic reasoning rather than professional background knowledge, therefore, GMAT reading need special preparation, I called structured reading method.GMAT reading method, natural reading method, vs structured reading method2010-10-10 17:50 | (classification: GRE/GMAT)2009-12-15 11:42:32 Author: Chen Huping source: Beijing New Oriental School North America project departmentGMAT exam reading based on academic journals and magazines, is a highly condensed version of academic articles, and the topic is for academic reasoning rather than professional background knowledge, therefore, GMAT reading need special preparation, I called structured reading method.The method of structured reading is different from natural reading method. The so-called natural reading means to understand phrases and sentences by understanding words, especially new words and professional nouns, so as to understand paragraphs and the whole article. One of the necessary reasons for this approach is that reading is not good enough because the quantity of words is not enough. The fact that this observation is supported is that there are always unknown words in academic articles, so reading is of course not good. However, the logic of GMATs reading often focuses on the new words.Natural reading is another corollary is that even if the sentence does not understand enough words, too, so need to learn English grammar and long sentences. The analysis of long and difficult sentences is of great importance, of which the main function is to overcome the psychological fear of reading long sentences. But people often turn long difficult sentences into grammatical analysis, and the grammar of long sentences is clear, but the core meaning of this sentence is still unclear. Admittedly, by while,Whereas,The although guide word sentence, the sentence itself is the core in the contrast, but for other sentences, their core meaning but not expressed in the isolated sentence itself; in fact, there is not only a criterion to determine what grammatical components determines the most important information. On the contrary, the core of long sentences is in a context, that is, in the interaction between the upper and lower sentences, so it is in the authors intention, rather than in the sentence grammar.The third statement of natural reading is that reading more is enough to practice reading. It sounds good to read more; the problem is efficiency. Candidates need to train their problem-solving ability in a very short period of time. Therefore, it is necessary to train the understanding of the logical relationship of the test questions. In addition to the limitations of time, the weakness of multi reading as a solution lies in the fact that reading may never solve the core problem.This conclusion is shocking, but it is true. Two cases are considered: 1.Read 50 GMAT articles, the answer is remembered, the translation of the article also see, background knowledge also checked, spent a lot of thought to remember; 2.After reading 20 GMAT articles, the logical relationship between sentences is clearly analyzed, and even can be understood by the test friends. In which case, is it easier for examinees to get good results in the GMAT test? The answer is not surprising to those who are thinking about academic English: second. Why? GMAT reading is based on English academic logic test, not professional background for discrimination of non professional candidates test. Background knowledge and article translation are all unnecessary, although some translations can make the translator himself sure that he understands something. A friend who advocates reading more should be careful: reading more often is always right, but we need to know what to focus on when we read. The focus of academic article reading is the logical reasoning embodied in the upper and lower sentences and the upper and lower sections, rather than the isolated new words or professional nouns in each isolated sentence. Run on the wrong road, work hard and crash.The fourth common saying of natural reading is to remember more. The more information you remember, the better you can do it. This is a counter intuitive error strategy: an article is not equal to the sum of all words is the core of information; in fact, remember not remember all the words, can be in 2-3 minutes after reading an article to remember is only cognitive sensitive words, such as words or last a few words. The fifth and last misunderstanding of natural reading is reading. Sometimes the reader is just familiar with the basic background of the reading, the result will be with their own knowledge to correspond and understand, and sometimes even do not hesitate to own the existing knowledge to distort the logical chain in the article. Reading examines what the author writes and how he writes, not what the reader thinks of a problem. Therefore, readers can not bring their knowledge into their own when reading academic articles. Read more to understand, in the title may also be more careful, to give back to the original location error, but more than those who do not understand the wrong topic, it is not surprising.The above five issues will take non natural reading method, reading method is structured the basic standpoint: the word awareness is not equal to the understanding of the sentence; read is not equal to grasp the logical structure; reading is not enough to grasp the logic, the number of articles do not even have to win; target reading the memory to focus on a target; read often bring understanding deviation. Although due to the nature of reading reading method is a basic human cognitive configuration method, so it is difficult to eliminate, but also because of the lack of scientific reasoning processing mode of thinking Chinese academic tradition, coupled with the previous Chinese reading on the entanglement of the word itself the traditional, more difficult to change the Perspective, however, the master method of logical analysis, the benefits are enormous, benefit is lifelong, worthy of all the outstanding young students try.The main problem of GMAT structured reading is to grasp the logical ideas in academic articles. The logic not practical meaning of vocabulary, especially words directly in the article to express, but with some basic routines, and commonly used terms of academic reasoning, these words are present in almost any article. This proposition adapts to the examination articles of GMAT, GRE and LSAT, and may also be adapted to all English academic articles after a certain adjustment.Contrary to the reading path from the bottom up to the top, which is usually from the base of the word, the comprehension of the sentence, the passage to the paragraph and the article, the structured reading is the orientation from the top down. This method starts from the whole and writing intention of the article, deducing and inferring the structural relationship of the paragraph in deductive way, and then thinking in accordance with the total score structure from the first sentence of the paragraph,Inferring and inferring the logical relations between some sentences in the paragraph and the core of lexical refinement, and then to the middle sentence level in the paragraph, only focus on the sentences written in the form of contrast and concession.The opposition between this idea and the usual reading method is not the cause of its existence, but a by-product of itself. The first reason is that the theme of academic articles is antecedent. The author begins with the basic picture of writing, and then begins writing. Reading cant write like the author so clear, but at least you can find what you want, the core of the roadmap. Natural reading is like a man entering a dense jungle of words, and then sinking into a swamp. Structure reading is like a person with a map and compass, into the sometimes bright and sometimes deep woods, along the most direct way forward, successfully arrived at the end, and then to the people outside the woods to tell the wonderful journey. The bright region is the sentence structure, including the end of the first sentence, sentence and sentence turning attitude, deep zone is a professional details sentences, especially those of pure evidence specific to a subject description, including professional nouns and appears in the middle of the sentence even if it is not to know the verbs and adjectives.How do you get the structure of the article? The structure is not from the induction of words, but from the pre determined writing patterns. When analyzing the academic articles of GMAT reading, we seem to assume arbitrarily that the article has a relatively stable writing structure, and then force this structure on the articles to be read. 90% of the articles are consistent with one or the other of these patterns, and 10% of them are variations of some of them. Therefore, this method is that readers first form a set of hypotheses about the logical structure of academic articles, and then apply the hypothesis to specific facts.The discovery process of structured reading itself conforms to the principle of scientific method. First of all, find out some random GMAT Zhenti reading, then analyze whether can be classified into several models, this is a process, then the formation of structure hypothesis, the limited model used in more articles, to verify whether the application, if not, according to the exceptions to the first amendment structure hypothesis. I found GMAT after studying a large amount of articles,GRE,LSAT reading Zhenti articles are structured to meet our proposed hypothesis. So, we began to seem to be in an arbitrary decision, the article and paragraph are some kinds of structure mode, but then we conjecture has been verified hypothesis (hypothesis) has become the logical structure of the theory about academic English (theory). This is the analysis process from data to schema to more data validation.Usually people think that mode is eight shares, but the pejorative term actually refers to the central theme of this article is to prove a proposition for the introduction of ideology, specific writing process, even language expression. Writing follows certain procedures, which does not necessarily mean eight shares; a reasonable operation process can greatly improve the efficiency of communication. The language expression again, of course for any articles are not good, especially when the statement is empty. But in modern academic English, the subject is a living fact, reasoning is a strict iron logic, there is no eight shares of the problem. Sometimes people say that patterns are routines. Of course there are routine words, while the building itself is just a routine framework, core words of the article itself still have different words and routines, although they often appear at the same time and routine words in a sentence. Therefore, the pattern is not just routine, but also includes the main line vocabulary, these words often appear in the paragraph first sentence argument.The structural model derived from the data analysis method is a word that has been repeated, identified and easily identified in various articles,Not just any article of different professional concept itself, not just those who said the introduction is the vocabulary, such as however,But, on the other hand,Alternative, the core word but transforms word and sentence by the introduction of interrelated. Through these words, the reader can easily distinguish and judge the authors subject and intention, so as to form a specific expectation of the subsequent content of the article, and then according to this expectation to manage their reading attention. In the paragraph level, pattern is reflected in specific argument structure, this is a way itself also has its certain vocabulary, through these words, the reader can also expected period of writing, and information extraction in accordance with these core paragraph writing rules accordingly, rather than trying to read each word intact then, summarized paragraphs drift. The main idea is not concluded, but that will appear in the first sentence or paragraph turning sentence; in most of the time, the drift of judgment and even not to read all the sentences to complete section of the premise, but directly from the specific words that.There are two aspects of structured reading. The first aspect is from data to model to form the structural hypothesis is the process of research, which has been described above; the second aspect is from the structure hypothesis, and then deduce the specific logical relationship, which is the process of examinee learning. Candidates dont have to repeat the process of finding the method, but they need to learn how to apply structured reading.The efficient preparation process starts with analysis and ends with application. As long as the candidates to understand the abstract theory about structured reading, applying these theories to actual analysis of 20 papers Zhenti articles, write the relationship between each article of the sentence will be able to master the whole way. Since there are only 3-5 kinds of structures in the article, paragraph and sentence, the candidate will repeat 5, 15 and 50 times after analyzing 20 articles, more than 60 paragraphs and 250 sentences. Repetition is important, and accumulating the necessary amount of reading is, of course, the first step in the analysis, which is the process of data collection. Without data, there will be no pattern. Of course, only the amount is not enough: as the only data, no data analysis framework, data is just a bunch of scattered and meaningless numbers only, the same, just read a lot of paragraphs and sentences, no analysis of the structure of the framework, the article paragraphs and sentences are still scattered, the lack of related content, not in long-term memory, after a few days will be forgotten. Therefore, the analytical framework and the necessary amount of reading are both indispensable. After careful analysis done the relationship between these 20 articles and paragraphs of sentences, candidates will basically understand structure model is how one thing, then you can use these abstractions, but still can operate theory to analyze any new GMAT article.Because the structured reading follows the academic research mode of thinking, if you dont fully understand the academic method, the logical structure of the academic learning English, will not meet on the idea, because this method itself is counterintuitive, and even some candidates for the analysis of logical structure of resentment, because the former is misleading wrong ways of reading the. The common question is: are these patterns all the patterns of academic articles? Is there no article without patterns? Or, the model is dead, the article is alive, in case the article does not meet these patterns, how to do? For these problems, I believe that it is not only a pro forma problem, but also a transformation of the mode of thinking. It is better to understand the essence of these problems by changing their faces: is there really a law of motion of objects? Isnt there anything that doesnt fit these rules? Indeed, rolling stones fly, apple, missile launch, the spacecraft to leave the earth, the movement of the planets, physical objects of this world rich and colorful, but the phenomenon is so variable are in line with the basic principles of Newtonian mechanics.From several limited hypotheses, we can deduce the specific movement of almost all macroscopic physical objects that human beings see, which is the power of the scientific hypothesis deduction method. We hope that this model also provides structured reading can imitate the physics of great creation, for changing the English academic articles provide a unified operating procedures, guidelines for writing write well structured articles, reading guidance logic meaning read. The logical structure may not change, so it is not so lively, but the logical structure of academic English is the law of survival, does not comply with these principles of academic articles are in the academic exchanges slowly eliminated. But even if the logical structure of only a limited number of models, they can hold the theme, according to which they can write articles, is also a multitude, rich and colorful and wonderful. In fact, to read logical clues is