论文资料-效率违约论文：效率违违制度研究.doc

薅螅莄芈袃螄肃蒄蝿袄膆芇蚅袃芈蒂薁袂羈芅薇袁膀薀袆袀节莃螂衿莅蕿蚈袈肄莁薄袈膆薇蒀羇艿莀螈羆羈薅蚄羅肁莈蚀羄芃蚃薆羃莅蒆袅羂肅艿螁羂膇蒅蚇羁芀芇薃肀罿蒃葿聿肂芆螈肈膄蒁螃肇莆莄虿肆肆蕿薅肆膈莂袄肅芀薈螀肄莃莁蚆膃肂薆薂螀膅荿蒈蝿莇薄袇螈肇蒇螃螇腿蚃虿螆芁蒅薅螅莄芈袃螄肃蒄蝿袄膆芇蚅袃芈蒂薁袂羈芅薇袁膀薀袆袀节莃螂衿莅蕿蚈袈肄莁薄袈膆薇蒀羇艿莀螈羆羈薅蚄羅肁莈蚀羄芃蚃薆羃莅蒆袅羂肅艿螁羂膇蒅蚇羁芀芇薃肀罿蒃葿聿肂芆螈肈膄蒁螃肇莆莄虿肆肆蕿薅肆膈莂袄肅芀薈螀肄莃莁蚆膃肂薆薂螀膅荿蒈蝿莇薄袇螈肇蒇螃螇腿蚃虿螆芁蒅薅螅莄芈袃螄肃蒄蝿袄膆芇蚅袃芈蒂薁袂羈芅薇袁膀薀袆袀节莃螂衿莅蕿蚈袈肄莁薄袈膆薇蒀羇艿莀螈羆羈薅蚄羅肁莈蚀羄芃蚃薆羃莅蒆袅羂肅艿螁羂膇蒅蚇羁芀芇薃肀罿蒃葿聿肂芆螈肈膄蒁螃肇莆莄虿肆肆蕿薅肆膈莂袄肅芀薈螀肄莃莁蚆膃肂薆薂螀膅荿蒈蝿莇薄袇螈肇蒇螃螇腿蚃虿螆芁蒅薅螅莄芈袃螄肃蒄蝿袄膆芇蚅袃芈蒂薁袂羈芅薇袁膀薀袆袀节莃螂衿莅蕿蚈袈肄莁薄袈膆薇蒀羇艿莀螈羆羈薅蚄羅肁莈蚀羄芃蚃薆羃莅蒆袅羂肅艿螁羂膇蒅蚇羁芀芇薃肀罿蒃葿聿肂芆螈肈膄蒁螃肇莆莄虿肆肆蕿薅肆膈莂袄肅芀薈螀肄莃莁蚆膃肂薆薂螀膅荿蒈蝿莇 效率违约论文：效率违违制度研究【中文摘要】效率违约理论是英美契约法理论的重要内容之一,是随着西方经济分析法学的起而不断发展成熟的私法理论。其核心思想在于鼓励人们在发生违约收益大于履约收益的情况下违约,从而实现效率的最大化。效率违约制度自其诞生之日起就引起了激烈的争论与分歧西方英美法系国家对其推崇备至甚至奉若经典,在实务中也得到了全面的接纳和贯彻,但大陆法系国家却对此不屑一顾,并持以相当明确的否定批判态度。而我国合同法在制定时仍恪守了大陆法系“契约神圣”的思想与传统,并没有引入效率违约制度。本文试图通过回顾效率违约理论的发展历程,在分析其构成要件、具体分类、理论基础和价值取向的前提下,对于效率违约理论的全貌做一个相对全面的阐述,并对于其存在的法学价值与现实意义做出自己的判断,并结合我国合同立法与司法相关实践提出自己的建议与意见。下面简要介绍下本文的主要内容。第一部分,介绍效率违约制度的理论问题,包括效率违约理论形成的历史渊源,经典表述,以及与相关制度的辨析。并对效率违约理论做初步的分析。第二部分,介绍效率违约制度的基本内容,包括效率违约的构成要件,效率违约的几种不同的分类,并对效率违约的适用范围和条件进行了讨论。为进一步细化研究效率违约的适用做准备。第三部分,全面展示最新的有关效率违约制度的科研成果。针对目前世人对于效率违约分为旗帜鲜明的两派,本文综合两派的观点从经济学,社会学,法理学,和基本价值取向等四个方面对该制度进行了引述及重点分析。并在论证充分的基础上提出自己的观点：即对于效率违约不能一概而论,而应当结合效率违约制度的不同种类进行扬弃,使之发挥更大的作用。第四部分,探讨了我国引入效率违约制度的可行性及建议。由于现实生活中众多的效率违约现象无从规制,加上大陆法系国家对于效率违约制度的态度有所松动,我国引入效率违约制度的时机已经成熟。本文通过对他国立法例的研究,结合我国的实际,给出了我国引入效率违约制度的建议。【英文摘要】Theory of efficient breach is an important part of the theory is with the Western Economic Analysis of Law from the continuous development of mature private law theory. Its core idea is to encourage people to return in the event of breach of contract revenue is greater than the case of breach of contract compliance in order to achieve maximum efficiency.Efficient breach of contract system since the date of his birth caused a heated debate and disagreement-Western common law countries, or even something between their highly regarded classic, in practice, has also been fully accepted and implemented, but the civil law countries But this disdain, and hold to the negative critical attitude quite clear.In China, “contract law” is still adhered to in the development of civil law when the “contract sanctity” of thought and tradition, and not the introduction of efficient breach of contract system.This paper attempts to review the development process of efficient breach theory, the analysis of its constituent elements, the specific classification, theory and values of the premise, the picture theory of efficient breach of contract to do a relatively comprehensive exposition of existing law and its value Significance to make their own judgments, combined with China-related legislation and judicial practice of contracts put forward their own suggestions and opinions.A brief introduction of the general content about this article is given as follows.The first part introduces the theory of efficient breach of contract system, including the formation of efficient breach theory of history, the classic expression, and Analysis and related systems. Theory of efficient breach of contract and a preliminary analysis.The second part describes the basic system of efficient breach of contract, including the composition of elements of efficient breach, efficient breach of several different categories, and the application of efficient breach of contract and conditions were discussed. To further refine the application of research to prepare for efficient breach.The third part, a comprehensive display of the latest scientific research on the efficiency of the system default. Breach of contract for the current efficiency of the world is divided into clear-cut for the two groups, this integrated view of the two factions from economics, sociology, jurisprudence, and the basic value orientation of the four aspects of the system was cited and analyzed. Adequate basis in the argument put forward its own view:that can not be generalized for the efficient breach of contract, and breach of contract system should be combined with the efficiency of different types were discarded, so as to play a greater role.The fourth part discusses the introduction of efficient breach of the feasibility and recommendations. Since the efficiency of many real life no defaults regulation, coupled with the efficiency of Breach of Contract for civil law countries have relaxed attitudes, the introduction of efficient breach of contract system of the time is ripe. Based on the research that he national legislation, combined with Chinas reality, given the introduction of efficient breach of our regime.【关键词】效率违约 制度【英文关键词】Efficient breach System【目录】效率违违制度研究摘要3-4Abstract4-5引言8-10第一章 效率违约基本问题10-171.1 效率违约的理论渊源及发展10-141.1.1 法律与道德分离及合同选择理论10-121.1.2 “有效率的违约”12-131.1.3 效率违约概念的正式提出13-141.2 效率违约的经典表述与辨析14-171.2.1 效率违约的经典表述14-151.2.2 效率违约与相似制度辨析15-17第二章 效率违约的基本内容17-262.1 效率违约的构成要件17-192.1.1 以趋利避害为动机172.1.2 违约受益超过履约所能取得的期待利益17-182.1.3 违约后对预期利益的损害赔偿有限18-192.2 效率违约的分类19-242.2.1 意外收获型的效率违约与意外损失型的效率违约192.2.2 转售型效率违约、减损型效率违约、缓和型效率违约19-242.3 效率违约的适用前提24-262.3.1 实际履行与损害赔偿之间的无差异性242.3.2 违约救济中损害赔偿方式的优先选择24-252.3.3 违约方拥有对被违约人的充分信息以评估损失25-26第三章 效率违约争鸣26-363.1 对效率违约的正当性观点总结26-323.1.1 经济学基础:科斯定理及帕累托优势理论26-273.1.2 社会学基础:社会价值最大化的价值取向27-283.1.3 法理基础:法律与道德相分离与违约责任的补偿性28-303.1.4 价值基础:效率违约与自由、公平、诚实信用30-323.2 对效率违约的批判性观点总结32-353.2.1 对逻辑起点的批判:契约选择理论的不正当性323.2.2 对价值取向的批判:对”社会价值最大化”合理性质疑32-333.2.3 对法律规则的批判:”效率”的不确定性与无法预知性33-343.2.4 对立法精神的批判:对诚实信用原则的冲击与挑战34-353.3 小结35-36第四章 我国引入效率违约制度的基本构想36-434.1 我国引入效率违约制度的可行性分析36-394.1.1 国外引入效率违约制度的立法例评析36-374.1.2 我国现实生活中大量存在着”效率违约”现象374.1.3 制度性引入效率违约理论的障碍与分析37-394.2 我国合