![《杜甫全集》PPT课件.ppt_第1页](http://file.renrendoc.com/FileRoot1/2019-1/10/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf0743237/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf07432371.gif)
![《杜甫全集》PPT课件.ppt_第2页](http://file.renrendoc.com/FileRoot1/2019-1/10/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf0743237/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf07432372.gif)
![《杜甫全集》PPT课件.ppt_第3页](http://file.renrendoc.com/FileRoot1/2019-1/10/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf0743237/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf07432373.gif)
![《杜甫全集》PPT课件.ppt_第4页](http://file.renrendoc.com/FileRoot1/2019-1/10/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf0743237/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf07432374.gif)
![《杜甫全集》PPT课件.ppt_第5页](http://file.renrendoc.com/FileRoot1/2019-1/10/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf0743237/e689a583-529c-48db-a81a-dadbf07432375.gif)
已阅读5页,还剩16页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
Pregnancy Experience & Use of Emergency Contraception Among Young Women in the Bay Area,Shira Rutman June 2006,Significance,Three and a half million unintended pregnancies occur each year in the United States. (Henshaw 1998) Emergency contraception EC has the potential to prevent 50% of these pregnancies and 60-70% of abortions annually. (Trussel 1992) EC is effective when taken 72 to 120 hours after intercourse, but is most effective the sooner it is taken. (Ellertson 2003),“Parent” Study Design & Setting,A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial Conducted by investigators at UCSF July 2001 to June 2003 at four California clinics providing family planning services Three arms: advance provision, pharmacy access and clinic (control) Examined reproductive outcomes (pregnancy, STIs and contraceptive/sexual behaviors Total N=2,117,Participants,Young women 15-24 years old Spoke English or Spanish Had sexual intercourse in the previous six months (“sexually active”) Lived in the San Francisco Bay Area Available for follow-up 6 months later,Participants continued,Not pregnant or desiring pregnancy Not using long-term hormonal contraception (injectables, IUD or implants) Not requesting EC at the enrollment Had not had unprotected intercourse in the previous three days Not using “patch” or “ring” (not yet FDA approved),“Parent” Study Findings,No significant reduction in pregnancy rates in pharmacy access and advance provision groups No increase in STIs No differences by study group in: contraceptive patterns condom use sexual behaviors EC use during the study N=571 (26.9%),“The public health impact may be negligible because of high rates of unprotected intercourse and relative underutilization of the method.”,Raine TR, Harper CC, Rocca CH, Fischer R, Padian N, Klausner JD, Darney PD. Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293: 5462.,Study Hypotheses,Young women who have experienced pregnancy are more likely to use EC, than young women who have not experienced pregnancy. 2) Among young women who have experienced pregnancy, those who have experienced abortion are more likely to use EC, than young women who have not experienced abortion, who may or may not have experienced pregnancy.,Measures,Outcome Measure (Follow-up visit): o EC use Main Predictor Measures (Baseline visit): o Previous pregnancy (yes/no) o Previous abortion (yes/no-includes those who have been pregnant, but not had an abortion and those who have not been pregnant),Measures continued,Predictor Measures: o Level of access to EC (study arm) o Clinic site (enrollment site) o Age (continuous) o Race/Ethnicity o Ever used EC (yes/no) o Frequency of intercourse o Unprotected intercourse past 6 mos (yes/no) o Contraceptive method o Pregnancy Attitude (very unhappy/other),Methods,Chi-square tests: Differences between previous pregnancy/abortion and no previous pregnancy/abortion groups. Crude odds ratios: Association between previous pregnancy/abortion and characteristics of participants at enrollment (demographics, contraceptive/sexual behaviors and pregnancy attitudes). Multivariate logistic regression: Impact of previous pregnancy/abortion (and other predictors) on EC use during the study (adjusted).,Previous pregnancy N=686 (32.4%) Used EC during study (outcome) N=200 (35.0%) Chi-square tests showed significant differences between pregnancy experience groups in every characteristic examined except for level of access to EC (study arm),Results: Previous Pregnancy,Multivariate Logistic Regression: Previous Pregnancy,32% higher odds of EC use among participants who had had a previous pregnancy compared to those who had not, adjusting for all the other variables,Odds of EC use: Unprotected intercourse Ever used EC OC use and use of both OC and condoms *Adjusted for all the other variables,Multivariate Logistic Regression: Previous Pregnancy,Of the 686 (32.4%) participants who reported pregnancy at baseline, 562 (81.9%) reported that they had had an abortion. Used EC during study N=167 (29.2%) Chi-square tests showed significant differences between abortion experience groups in every characteristic examined except for level of access to EC (study arm) and clinic site.,Results: Previous Abortion,Multivariate Logistic Regression: Previous Abortion,41% higher odds of EC use among participants who had had a previous abortion compared to those who had not, adjusting for all the other variables,Odds of EC use: Unprotected intercourse Ever used EC OC use and use of both OC and condoms *Adjusted for all the other variables,Multivariate Logistic Regression: Previous Abortion,Limitations,Risk perception was not directly measured in the study Self-reported pregnancy and abortion; likely under-reported, leading to under-estimates of EC use Data were not collected to test my hypotheses,Conclusions,Increased rates of unprotected intercourse and increased EC use among young women with previous pregnancies and abortions (may cancel each other out) A reduction in unintended pregnancies may not be observed in these subgroups of young women Education about contraceptive risk in these subgroups is indicated,Thank You!,Thesis Committee Members: Drs. Jane Rees (Chair), Cynthia Harper & Hendrika Meischke Nate Mercaldo and the Dept. of Biostatistics consultants Family and Friends
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 动画设计师聘用协议
- 咨询服务提供合同
- 建筑设计委托合同
- 建设工程设计合同
- 广告位租赁合同范本
- 房屋出租合同-住宅
- 生态保护用地地契协议书
- 美术课程预订押金协议书范例
- 大型工厂安保服务合同范本
- 篝火晚会场地山地租赁合同书
- 幼儿园跳绳活动方案及总结大班
- 主编控制器项目项目申请书
- 浙江省绍兴市2022-2023学年七年级下学期语文期末试卷(含答案)2
- (高清版)WST 408-2024 定量检验程序分析性能验证指南
- 两个甲方和乙方的合同范本
- DZT 0206-2020 矿产地质勘查规范 高岭土、叶蜡石、耐火粘土(正式版)
- 中医内科学研究进展智慧树知到期末考试答案章节答案2024年浙江中医药大学
- 服装设计综合实践活动设计方案
- 医院实训室管理制度
- KCN慢性毒性及神经毒性机制研究的开题报告
- 保安公司大型活动安保方案
评论
0/150
提交评论