雅思高分范文 教育类

精品文库1. The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they should not waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software,videos and DVDs.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 公共图书馆是否应该提供高科技的东西2. Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their childrens studies.On their mental and physical development. What is your opinion?电脑对儿童的学习以及身体和智力的发展都没有好处吗3. Topic: some people think computer and the Internet are important in childrens study ,but others think students can learn more effectively in school and with teachers.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.儿童是和老师一起学习好还是用电脑和网络好？4. Computers are increasingly used in education. In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important?在哪些领域电脑更重要，哪些领域老师更重要？5 Some people believe that all the children in school are required to learn at least one foreign language. However, others say that those who are not talented do not have to learn. What is your opinion?所有学生都要求学语言还是只有有天赋的学生才要学、？6. In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a wide range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. For todays world, which system is appropriate?中学教育应该更广泛还是针对具体的职业？7 Some teachers say students should be organized into groups to study, while others argue that students should be made to study alone Tell the benefits of each study method. Which one do you think is more effective? 单独学习还是分组学？8 In modem society, many people think primary schools should teach science and technology rather than history and geography, which are useless and boring.Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 学校不应该教无聊和没用的历史和地理而应该教科学和技术吗？9 Some people think intelligent students should be educated together with other students. Do you agree or disagree?高智商的学生应该和其他普通学生一起学习吗10 Some people think students should take courses that are decided by the government .others think students should be allowed to focus on subjects that they prefer. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.学生应该自己决定学什么还是按照政府的安排11 Children who grow up in needy families are better prepared to deal with problems in their adult life than children who are brought up in wealthy parents. Do you agree or disagree?穷孩子会比富孩子更好的处理问题吗12 University students should pay all the cost of their studies because university education benefits individuals more than society as a whole. To what extent do you or disagree with this opinion?大学教育可以使个人收益比社会收益更多，所以大学学生应该自己支付所有的费用吗？13 Some people believe that children are given too much free time. They feel that this time should be used to do more school work. To what extend do you agree?学生被给了太多的自由时间，它们应该被用来做家庭作业吗？14 In many countries, good school and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think universities graduates who become new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years. What is your view?大学刚毕业的老师和医生应该下乡吗、15Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on children. Do you agree or disagree?每天使用电脑益处多还是害处多？16 Some people believe that childrens leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree?学生的闲暇时间应该是有教育意义的，否则就是浪费时间吗17 Some people think rote learning (memorization of information through frequent repetition) is not useful for school today. To what extend do you agree or disagree?死记硬背没用吗1、Topic：The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldnt waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?With the advent of new technology, libraries have been given new means of storing and retrieving information on media by the age digital devices are widely used in public libraries and they serve both the library and the readers.Someone would argue that multimedia facilities are expensive. This may be true to some extent，because a DVD player is often more expensive than a bookshelf. However，with immense storage capacity，these new high-tech media can actually save the most valuable resource-space. A computer disc 12 cm in diameter can store a whole Encyclopedia Britannia which，in printed volumes，would occupy a complete shelf section.Furthermore，magnetic and digital media can store information much longer than traditional means. It takes great care to protect books from moisture，fire or human damage and a book in a library serves readers for only a few hundred years. But digital files, easily duplicated and restored，can perhaps last forever.Finally，visiting a library with multiple media access is much more interesting. Multimedia resources offer readers a dynamic combination of images, sounds and videos. A reader can actually hear Martin Luther King crying out “I have a dream”,or roam about the world with an interactive atlas.To sum up, a public library has been turned by modern technology from a place of lending and borrowing books into an interactive center for the spread of human knowledge and experience. Governments can invest more in multimedia facilities by a public library。2、Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their childrens studies. On their mental and physical development. What is your opinion?In present age society, computers have been playing an increasing important role in peoples life such as working, studying, entertainment. computer games attract numerous kids, however, in my opinion，these games have little value to them and produce a lot of harmful effects on their physical and mental development.To begin with, intense radiation produced by an operating computer not only causes failing eyesight but also poses untold hidden health hazards in those young children. Another of the most obvious disadvantages is that these games are highly addictive, compelling children to sit in front of the computer for many straight hours. As a result, they have little time for sports activities and many of them start developing health problems. According to a recent survey, the obesity rate among adolescent aged between13 and19 is soaring in industrialized nations as well as in less developed countries, and one of the contributing factors is the lack of physical exercise.For one thing, an increasing amount of time spent in playing games means less and less time is devoted to their studies. No wonder that teenagers having this undesirable habit are finding it difficult to meet the deadlines of their school assignment. For another，being accustomed to the fast changing images that are inherent in every computer games， they can hardly concentrate on any serious subject and their attention span is found to be increasingly short. Moreover，teenagers are exposed to sexual and violent scenes featured in many computer games.To conclude，computer games are indeed valueless and may exert negative impacts on the development of young children. Therefore, it is high time that parent and schools should be alert to the problem, and restrict childrens access to those games, only by which we can keep them on the correct developing way.3、Topic: some people think computer and the Internet are important in childrens study ,but others think students can learn more effectively in school and with teachers.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.In present society，high-tech have been play an increasing vital role in peoples life, even in childrens study . However, this phenomenon has sparked many debates. A majority of them think more time should be spent with teachers by children. As far as I concerned, while modern technologies are important in assisting a childs learning, this learning should be guided and directed by the experience of teachers.A traditional and long-established practice is for children to study and gain knowledge at school, learning skills in various ways taught by traditional methods. A school is a place where students gather to be educated and learn from each other as well as formal educators. At school, studentsdevelopment is orchestrated stage by stage ,step-by-step by experienced teachers, and their acquisition of knowledge is guided and backed up in a systematic way.Admittedly, there is no denying the fact that computer and the Internet are popularly used in the field of education；they can present knowledge in a vivid and novel way. Computer and the Internet can also enable students in enhancing their general understanding of how to solve difficulties in study as well as giving them vital skills in readiness for later life.To sum up ,I dont think overemphasizing the use of computers and Internet is wise .Instead, modern technologies should complement more traditional teaching and learning methods. Only when they are not regarded as a replacement for traditional means，can their functions be developed to the utmost。Topic: Computers are increasingly used in education. In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important?In present age society, computers have been playing an increasingly significant role in many areas of life, such as communication, management and science. People doubt that it is also the same situation for education. In my opinion, at a simple level some subjects may be better taught using computers, but to explain important concepts a human teacher is still indispensable.There are some subjects in which a computer can be used successfully to teach. Elementary mathematics, elementary language learning and any area which requires a student to memories basic facts through repetition is well suited to computer learning. The computer can be programmed to provide an endless number of simple questions, and as the student answers these questions the facts are learned and reinforced.However, in the learning and practice of more complex ideas, the computer is not adequate. A computer can evaluate an answer as right or wrong, but it cannot determine why. It cannot find out why a student is making mistakes and then represent important concepts in a different way so the student will understand. It cannot determine at what stage in a mathematics problem the student has made an error; it can only indicate that the final answer is wrong. Tasks involving reasoning cannot be taught by computers, as there are too many variables that a computer cant deal with successfully. In all these cases, a human teacher seems indispensable in class.To sum up, computers are not as a tool. Maybe in the future, with the advent of more new technology, human teachers will be replaced. However, they are indispensable now.Topic：Some people believe that all the children in school are required to learn at least one foreign language. However, others say that those who are not talented do not have to learn. What is your opinion?In this society with all kinds of development and competition，communication seems to be an vital factor to fulfill ones life. Thus, some people think its necessary for all the students to learn at least one foreign language. While others opinion run contrary to theirs. I dont think a foreign language should be a compulsory course for children to study, for the reason that some of them may not have no interest at all, but not they dont have the gift to learn.The study of a foreign language-especially English for children at Grade 1-is now a compulsory requirement at all primary schools in Shanghai. With increased globalization, comes increased cross-cultural contact and because of this, it is important for children to master at least one foreign language at an early age so as to important prepare them for this global society. To understand a foreign language is also an opportunity for children to learn about, and to understand a little about another culture or cultures. Also, it is an opportunity to cultivate students talent, develop their ability in learning and boost their potential for further education.It is irresponsible, and indeed, even harmful, to separate and label students as talented or not in education at such a tender and vulnerable age. Why should the study of a foreign language alone be used as the only yardstick to label students as talented or not in education? It is advisable to help all students to understand that the study of a foreign language will bring benefit to their studies and, in the future, their careers.To sum up, I think it is necessary to make students understand the importance of another language and interest them to learn. But labeling of students as talented or not in the study of languages is not healthy。In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a wide range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. For todays world, which system is appropriate?It has always been a controversial issue over whether general education or specific education is deemed more suitable for children. Even though some people argue that the latter alternative could prepare students better for future employment, I firmly believe that schools provide a general education. Its an undeniable fact that children would be much better off is they have access to abundant knowledge in a diverse range of fields. this is necessary for them too deal with a multitude of problems they might encounter in they daily life .for instance , simple mathematical calculations would come to the rescue in case of totaling up the bill ; fundamental knowledge of chemical terms would be of huge assistance if you are picking up prescriptions or drugs in a pharmaceutical store ; malfunctioning electrical appliances due to ignorance of basic knowledge of basic knowledge of electricity could be quite unsettling ; current affairs including momentous events happening in spheres of economy or politics around the globe are often considered good conversation-openers in occasions of social mingling or business dinner . As children grow up, specific education on teaching one or two particular subjects are thought also useful for them. The jobs available nowadays increasingly demand job seekers with one particular skill. Its sensible to place students on a more focused education once they reach the phase of secondary education.However, the general education can board individuals horizons and expand the knowledge, which are common sense of life.In conclusion, I think general education should be provided more. Some teachers say students should be organized into groups to study, while others argue that students should be made to study alone Tell the benefits of each study method. Which one do you think is more effective? With the development of the society, Students are provided better circumstance to study. Whether they should be divided into groups has sparked much debate. In my opinion, study together is more effective. Group study is strongly advocated by some because it requires the sharing of ideas amongst group members. During group study, students listen to what they fellow students say debate with them is there is a disagreement. Naturally, their communication skills and critical thinking abilities are greatly enhanced. Moreover, peer pressure can be a positive force which can motivate and challenge the students to do their best. The competitive learning environment also prepares the students for the future reality. However, study alone also offers some unique benefits to the students. First of all, the individual leaner is kept away from the distracting conversation or unnecessary interruptions in a classroom with many students. Then they can concentrate well and make more efficient use of their time. Also, the individual learner can pace his or her own learning and decide for himself/herself when to start or when to stop. This is especially helpful to those intellectually gifted students those may be bored with regular but simple classroom teaching.To conclude, although every individuals has his own preferable way to study, group study is suitable to the majority. If the leaner shares what he knowsIn modem society, many people think primary schools should teach science and technology rather than history and geography, which are useless and boring.Do you agree or disagree with this statement?If knowledge must be divided to two groups, there will be science and art. The issue of which is more important has been causing heated debate for many years.The topic statement clearly plays favorite with sciences while belitting liberal arts, which, in my opinion, is biased and misleading, and may also cause negative influence among the students.However, those people who advocate that only science and technology subjects should be taught at school are ignorant of. They fail to understand the relationships between different subjects and their mutual overlap; they only see the individual trees in the forest, rather than the forest as a whole. A student can not learn science well without a basic knowledge of human evolution and scientific history. In order to learn technology well, a student must from the very basics of geography that deals with the interaction of the diverse physical, biologic and cultural features of the earths surface.To conclude,