中国法哲学Ch Philo Law 王凌皞.doc

新设课程申请表（专业课）申请人姓名王凌皞职称讲师学 历博士研究生课程名称Chinese Philosophy of Law课程类别（请打钩）博士生课 硕士生课 课程性质（请打钩）专业学位课专业选修课 涉及专业培养方案调整情况专业一： LL.M. in Chinese Law年级所有年级硕士博士直博生专业二：硕士博士直博生专业三：硕士博士直博生专业四：硕士博士直博生申请理由增进学生对中国古典法律思想的理解，了解中国传统法律文化，让学生了解中国古典法律思想对当下热切讨论的法理学议题有怎样启示和贡献。学科(专业)意 见 学科（专业）负责人签名： 日期：学院意见主管院长签名（ 盖 章）： 日期： 研究生培养处制浙江大学研究生课程教学大纲一、基本情况课程编号 开课（院）系法学院开课学期 秋冬学期中文课程名称 中国法哲学授课语言英语英文课程名称Chinese Philosophy of Law任课教师1王凌皞职称讲师工作证号 E-mail：联系电话内总学时数及其分配（1学分16学时）32自学讲课讨论实验其他 学分数2考核方式期末论文二、课程内容中文简介（不少于300字）本课程是一门研究生的高阶讨论课，主要关注以儒家为代表的中国古典法律思想。借助当代法理学上的分析方法和工具，课程将在精读古典文献的基础上，以不同的基础性主题作为分类来重新阐释古典法律思想。例如：法律是什么？法律的功能是什么？法律与道德有怎样的联系？政治权威的正当性在哪里？我们将借助古典思想家提出的看法，来结合当代的法理学、政治哲学课题，进一步深化对上述这些问题的看法。本课程的最终目标在于训练学生的批判性阅读能力，把握法理学中基本主题，并最终对中国古典法律文化有充分的理解。三、课程内容外文简介This is an advanced-level seminar on Chinese Philosophy of Law, focused especially on the great Confucian thinkers in classical times. We will investigate both positive theory and normative theory of law by reading and reinterpreting the crucial texts of ancient Chinese thinkers. We shall treat these ancient thinkers as our contemporaries who make fundamental claims about the most crucial questions in moral, political and legal philosophy at our time and reinterpret them in a sympathetic as well as critical way. To accomplish this goal, we will inevitably compare their claims and arguments with those of contemporary Western philosophers (in Anglo-American tradition generally). The style of the course will be analytical as well as comparative.四、预备知识或先修课程要求无五、教学目的与要求（不少于200字）教学目的：1、培养学生对中国古代思想文本的文本细读和批判性阅读的能力；2、让学生熟悉并能够运用当代法理学的分析方法来处理古代法律思想；3、有能力重构古典思想家的论证思路，并在此基础上做进一步的批判性处理。最终目标是目标在于训练学生的批判性阅读能力，把握法理学中基本主题，并最终对中国古典法律文化有充分的理解。教学要求：1、提前阅读一二手文献并积极参与课堂讨论；2、对中国古典文献中的法律思想有足够知识上的把握；3、能够运用上述知识来分析当代的问题。六、教材或 讲义 讲义：Chinese Jurisprudence by Wejen Chang七、参考书目Eno, Robert. The Confucian Creation of Heaven. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.Graham, A. C. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1989.Munro, Donald J. The Concept of Man In Early China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1969.Schwartz, Benjamin I. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985.八、教学日历（授课内容详细至二级标题，实验课、讨论课写出题目或主题）周次教学内容（包括课堂讲授、实验、讨论、考试等）备注1A Methodological IntroductionThe historical/classical approach and philosophical approach to ancient thinkers are fundamentally differente. The philosophical approach takes the validity of the claims and the soundness of the arguments as the most central questions we need to evaluative when we read classical texts. A tool set of critical reading will also be introduced that might include the Principle of Charity (of Donald Davidson) and the distinction of Concept and Conception (of Ronald Dworkin).2Confucian Virtue EthicsConfucian moral philosophy is a version of virtue ethics. It has two crucial virtues that are Ren (humanity) and Yi (righteousness). The basic content of the concept of Ren and Yi and its relationship to Li (social norms) will be discussed. It show us the general positions Confucian thinkers take in these fundamental debates in moral philosophy between, for example, emotion v.s. reason and character v.s. rule.3Mencian Theory of Human Nature and its Normative ImplicationMecncius theory of human nature represents a Naturalistic moral theory that see ethics as the continuance of the biology. In its legal form, it claims that the state should take perfection of citizens as its goal and facilitate moral development with the support of legal framework. The state should protect its citizen from bad moral luck by legal means and help them to preserve their fragile condition of moral development and practice.4Moral Conflicts and the Role of LawThe tolerating and concealing between kinfolks is a representative character of Ancient Chinese legal system. Mencius also discussed this topic in three famous cases. This legal arrangement shows what law could do to handle the complex moral dilemmas or conflicts. It shows that law could do more than just serves as authoritative and second-order verdicts for practical reasoning as Raz claims.5Correcting Names and Thick Legal ConceptsA philosophical inquiry into the nature of Confucian theory of Name will be made and Name will be interpreted as a kind of thick evaluative concept (Bernard Williams). Based on the reading that Zhengming is a doctrine concerning the guidance function of legal rules, a critique will be advanced towards some of the doctrinal theorists mechanical method with regard to applying legal concepts.6Dong Zhongshus Particularist Theory of Rule ApplicationDrawing insights from Jonathan Dancys moral particularism and Dong Zhongshus method of “adjudication according to the moral classics,” we will discuss a holistic balancing theory of legal reasons. With this in place, two dogmas of legal formalism will be criticised.7Virtue Theory of AdjudicationTwo general approaches in legal epistemology, virtue reliablism and procedural reliablism will be introduced.These two positions, though seemingly incompatible, are mutually supportive and could be reconciled with each other. After a comparison between two conceptions of justice behind the ideas of “rule of man” and “rule of law,” the Confucian account of Li and Yi sheds lights on our understanding of the virtue of justice and provides a way to justify the centrality of