【背】观点对比范文.doc

高三分类作文 表明态度，说明理由1.(2002高考题) 最近，你校同学正在参加某英文报组织的一场讨论。讨论的主题是：公园要不要收门票。请你根据下表提供的信息，给报社写一封信，客观地介绍讨论的情况。60% 的同学认为40% 的同学认为1 不应该收门票2 公园是公众休闲的地方3 如收门票，需要建大门、围墙、会影响城市形象1 应收门票，但门票不宜高2 支付园林工人的工资3 购买新花木Dear editor, Im writing to tell you about the discussion weve had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for park. Opinions are divided on the question. 60% of the students are against the idea of entrance fees. They believe a public park should be free of charge. People need a place where they can rest and enjoy themselves. Charging entrance fees will no doubt keep some people away. What is more, it will become necessary to build gates and walls, which will do harm to the appearance of a city. On the other hand, 40% think that fees should be charged because you need money to pay gardeners and other workers, and to buy plants and young trees. They suggest, however, fees should be charged low.Yours Truly, Li Hua 2. 你校学生会组织高二部分学生讨论： 题目是：春节放鞭炮的利与弊。假如你是李华，请给报社编辑写一封信，客观地介绍讨论的情况，然后表述你对该问题的看法或建议。40%的同学认为20% 的同学认为40%的同学认为燃放鞭炮是很好的民间传统可增加节日气氛没有考虑无所谓燃放鞭炮造成空气和噪音的污染会造成对人身和财产的伤害Dear editor,Im writing to tell you about the discussion weve had on the afternoon of last Wednesday about the good and bad sides of setting off firecrackers during the Spring Festival. We have different opinions on the question. 40% of the students believe that setting off firecrackers certainly adds pleasure and joy to the festival. Therefore, it is a wonderful tradition. However, 40% of the students argue that setting off firecrackers causes air and noise pollution. Whats more, it sometimes causes terrible accidents to us and to our property. The rest have never thought about it or dont care a bit. I suggest we shouldYours truly, Li Hua3. 最近， 你校同学正在参加一场讨论。主题是：中国是否应大力发展小汽车？ 请你根据下表提供的信息，客观地介绍这两种意见。60%的同学认为40% 的同学认为1 应大力发展2 促进国家经济发展3 增加就业机会4 提高生活质量，方便，省时1 应有限制地发展2 增加城市交通的拥挤，交通事故3 修路占用土地4 空气和噪音污染Weve had a discussion about whether China should make every effort to develop car industry. Opinions are divided on the question. 60% of the students think China should fully develop car industry. They believe this will speed up the development of the national economy. More workers will be employed. With cars the peoples life quality will be raised. They will save time and be more convenient in their life and work.On the other hand, 40% of them argue that China should control its car industry development. Otherwise, the city traffic will be even heavier and more traffic accidents will take place. At the same time, more land will be used for the new roads. Whats more, air and noise pollution will become more serious. 4. 你校组织了一次讨论，主题是：英语高考(NMET)是否有必要进行口试。 假如你是李华， 请你就下表提供的信息，给报社编辑写一封信，介绍讨论的情况，并陈述你的观点。参考词：主观的subjective, 公正的just, 推动pushforward, 改革reform60%的同学赞成口试40%的同学不赞成口试口语是英语的重要技能之一口试可以推动中学教学改革口试主观性强，结果不一定公正目前大多数学生口语能力欠佳，时机不成熟Dear editor, Im writing to tell you about the discussion weve had about whether it is necessary to include a test of spoken English in NMET. Opinions are divided on the question. About 40% students are for the idea of an oral test in NMET. They think that spoken English should be tested because it is one of the most important language skills that we should have. If an oral English test is included in the NMET, it will push forward the reform in middle school English. On the contrary, 60% of the students have quite a different opinion. They argue that students may not get just results because an oral test is so subjective. Whats more, most students spoken English is not good enough so it is too early to add an oral test. In my opinion, Im in favor of having an oral test, which will help improve communicative skill. Li Hua表明态度，说明理由-练习一2009年秋季，北京大学公布了39所高中学校的校长具有资格推荐其学生不用参加高考而升入北大。对此,“中学生英语报”组织了一场讨论。请你根据下表所提供的信息，介绍讨论情况，并说明自己的观点。支 持反 对你的观点1. 有助于推选具有综合能力和特长的学生。2逐渐改变目前单一的高考选拔模式。1对其他学生不公平。2校长权利太大，不好监 控。注意：1词数120左右。2可以适当增减细节，以使行文连贯。3开头语已为你写好，不计词数。入学：enrollment Last autumn, Peking University released a name list of 39 high school principles who are recognized to recommend their students to be enrolled without taking national college entrance examination.a possible version：Last autumn, Peking University released a name list of 39 high school principles who are recognized to recommend their students to be enrolled without taking national college entrance examination.Some people think that it is a good experiment They agree that it helps to recommend the students with comprehensive abilities and specialties and it can free some students from dealing with all sorts of testsBesides, it can gradually change the current single college enrollment method by a national exam. On the other hand , some people oppose itThey hold the view that it is unfair to the rest of the students, and in some ways, high school principles rights are far from regulation nowThey are afraid that something against law will occur among their practice. In my opinion, I think that it is an experiment of enrollment reform and it provides us with two channels to find out a more reasonable measure in college students enrollmentsIt is really worth trying.【背8】正反议论A 校长推荐制（观点对比文章）Opinions are divided on the question. Some students are for this idea. They believe that this will help choose those students who have comprehensive abilities and skills, making them stand out of the others. More importantly, the single pattern of the present college entrance examination selection will gradually be changed in this way.On the other hand, others who are opposed to the policy think it not fair to other students to admit students without strict testing. Apart from this, principals power is so great that it might lead to cheating or corruption. Its also very hard to supervise the use of the power or to judge whether it is abused.From my perspective, this policy can be beneficial to our educational system as long as it is well monitored. Universities should set objective standards for principals to check whether a student has the potential and qualification for the enrollment. After all, its offering more chances to students that matters. BViews vary from person to person. People in favour of this proposal believe that it is consistent with the current trend of MET reformation. More importantly, guaranteed with more MET chances each year, students and even their parents will feel less stressful and perform better. Therefore, more students will be able to enjoy the four-year college study.However, a coin always has two sides. There are other individuals harboring the idea that this policy wont work as smoothly as we expect it to. On the contrary, it may put heavier burden on the students and the teachers, for they have to spend more time practicing and preparing. They also express their concerns about the waste of manpower, financial resources as well as other social resources.From my perspective, I am actually in favor of trying this out. Daring experiment is exactly what we need to improve education in China. It wont do any harm to adopt this method on a relatively small scale and see whether it works out. Those who are in doubt of this change should really expand their horizon and embrace new possibilities.【背9】饼图和柱图Recently, a survey on homework preference has been conducted among Senior 3 students. The results are as follows. As can be seen in the pie chart, math homework whi