怎样回复审稿人意见

Reviewers comments Reviewer 3 While revising the script it is to be suggested that author should clearly indicate the aim scope of the study and while making conclusion it is to be mentioned how the study is useful for the practical purposes In addition the following are the few suggestions comments which may be included while revision 1 Introduction part first para last line author must avoid to write ambiguous statement i e much work is still ahead may indicate properly 2 Author could not demonstrate the reason why to select the organic compound such as ethyl pyruvate for this study 3 Experimental part It is difficult to understand the in situ RAIRS experiments with homemade liquid solid RAIRS cell More detailed information may be useful for the others those who are working in the area Photograph of the assembled cell may be included 4 The description given for the experimental set up page 4 can be presented by flow diagram instead as an ease to understand the set up 5 Resluts Part Page 6 CO adlayers with identical monolayer coverages the monolayer coverage is it been performed with some adsorption model Further it was suggested that CO saturated Pt surface but not mentioned about the saturation experiments Is it obtained after 60 min of CO bubbling 6 Page 12 2nd para The displacement of EtPy by CCl4 flushing is it confirmed by the EtPy peaks If so it has to be mentioned clearly in the para Also in the same para author referred for Fig 7a and 7b but in the figures it didn t appear only figure 7 appeared I feel it refers for figure 7 portion A and B to be corrected Similarly in the text referred the fig 2a 2b etc but on the figure sheet it is mentioned as 2A 2B etc to be corrected 7 Page 14 1st para contamination of the Pt surface by corrosion of o rings in high concentration EtPy but the statement has not been supported by other evidence literature 8 Pages 14 through 17 the observed reactivity of various solvents for adsorbed CO on the Pt surface figs 3 4 has to be discussed more precisely This reviewer is unable to follow the reason why they showed different reactivity is it principally due to the organic moieties or due to the impurities of commercially available chemicals or a mixed effect It has to be clearly demonstrated however the only experiment performed with CO water CCl4 would difficult to describe it in detail 9 The author try to restrain with repeated arguments in the text e g page 3 para 1 It was generalized that also appeared on page 21 first para 10 Captions of the figures are too long the detailed description already given in the text hence would not be included here Captions should be short and crispy Dear Editor I quite appreciate your favorite consideration and the reviewer s insightful comments Now I have revised the JCIS 06 247 exactly according to the reviewer s comments and found these comments are very helpful I hope this revision can make my paper more acceptable The revisions were addressed point by point below general The objective of this research was added at the beginning of the third paragraph of Introduction How the study is useful for practical purposes was added at the end of Conclusion as one paragraph 1 Ambiguous statement i e much work is still ahead was deleted 2 Ethyl pyruvate was used here as a typical compound containing two carbonyl groups to demonstrate the feasibility of using our diagnosing tool to detect low coverage CO coming from decarbonylation of EtPy at the liquid solid interface EtPy is a reactant used in liquid phase chiral catalysis and slight decomposition of EtPy to adsorbed CO was reported to influence the catalytic performance In addition by studying that we can directly compare our results with previous studies More details in the first paragraph of Section 3 2 3 The IR cell was designed according to the IR cells used by many electrochemical workers References were added A photo was given in the Supporting Information 4 A flow diagram of the experimental setup was given in the new Fig 1 5 The CO adsorption experiments were performed in the same adsorption mode by bubbling CO through a clean Pt surface in different days to achieve the same saturation coverage of CO Initial experiments indicated that given the CO bubbling rate was 0 85 cm3 min CO can saturate on Pt after 30 45 min We bubble CO for 60 min to guarantee the same CO coverage If we bubble CO for more time or if we increase the CO flowing rate several times the CO saturation coverage doesn t change indicating 60 min is already enough A figure showing the CO uptake as a function of bubbling time was given in the Supporting Information 6 The displacement of EtPy by CCl4 was confirmed by the removing of EtPy peaks The mention of Fig 7a and 7b etc throughout the text were all corrected 7 It is known that some solvents such as acetone can corrode the Viton o ring We saw the damage of o ring after using high concentration EtPy A reference to the Viton o ring information was given 8 The observed reactivity trend is due to a combination of both effects with the accumulation of organic moieties on Pt surface during numerous flushing cycles the more important reason A few proper sentences were added to clarity this p