微量残留病检测在急性白血病_第1页
微量残留病检测在急性白血病_第2页
微量残留病检测在急性白血病_第3页
微量残留病检测在急性白血病_第4页
微量残留病检测在急性白血病_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩61页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

微量残留病检测在急性白血病分层治疗中的意义,MRD:The leukemic population undectable by morpglogic methodshas been defined as MRD,Minimal Residual Disease (MRD),MRD is a term used when there is evidence( immunophenotypic, molecular, or cytogenetic) that leukemic cells remain in the BM but there are insufficient cells to be detected by routine examination under the microscope.,MRD检测的方法,MRD监测的临床意义,MRD 检测在分层治疗中的意义,FCM-MRD检测的结果,MRD检测方法,PCR: 基因-定性、 定量(RQ-PCR)b.多参数FCM:免疫标志,发病时寻找免疫标志和基因标志进行检测,目的基因:融合基因:BCR/ABL,AML1/ETO,PML/RAR 基因重排: IgH,TCR(10-4-10-5) 基因突变:FLT3-ITD,NPM1(10-5) 基因表达增加:WT1,PRAME(10-3)优点: 灵敏度高-10-5-10-6/5 copes /10-5 特异性强缺点: 1. 融合基因:应用范围有限: ALL:10-30%,AML:30-50% 2. IgH/TCR : 90%, 操作复杂,费时,需要基因测序,特异引 物/探针(每例患者特异) 3.容易污染,出现假阳性。,RQ-PCR检测MRD特点,优点: 灵敏:ALL-10-4 , AML-10-3-10-4 (获取细胞相关) 定量单位:细胞% 快速:检测当天即可知结果 操作简便 应用范围广:90%缺点: 表型的变化:假阴性 受前体B细胞(Hematogones)的干扰: 形态幼稚,表达CD34,TDT 在小儿、化疗后、SCT后比例增加5% 需要较高的分析水平和技能 应用不够广泛,需要建立标准化操作,FCM MRD检测的特点,定义:正常骨髓/PB中不表达或表达比例较低的 免疫表型,白血病相关的免疫表型(LAIP)(Leukemia Associated ImmunoPhenotype),FCM-MRD:白血病细胞的特异抗原:NG2(7.1),IM/MRD检测的抗原CD34,CD33-:正常分化抗原:表达于正常细胞的不同系列、分化阶段(非白血病细胞所特异),交叉系列抗原: B、T、髓、NK细胞抗原 非同期抗原共表达: CD15/CD117 CD34/CD64 抗原表达量异常:表达强度过高、过低或不表达 异常的光散射信号:FSC和SSC,LAIP的分类,基础:熟悉正常细胞不同分化阶段抗原出现的顺序 和表达量的规律,Cytometry (communications in Clinical cytometry)38:139-152(1999),The effect of end-induction MRD on CIR,Coustan-Smith E.BLOOD,2000;96:2691,Johns Hopkins,Most information displays No. of cases(%) A CD19/CD45/CD20/CD10 (N=82)CD45 vs CD10 48(59)FSC vs CD10 13(16)FSC vs CD20 11(13)CD10 vs CD20 4(5) 76(93)B CD19/CD45/CD9/CD34 (N=77) CD45 vs CD34 27(35) FSC vs CD34 17(22)CD34 vs CD9 16(21) 72(94)A+B 81(99),Leukemia(1999)13,558-567,第8天形态结果与29天MRD关系 (N=1016),两组抗体=90%,Leukemia(2003)17,1566-1572,A Childrens Oncology Group Study(FCM-MRD),Blood.2008;111:5477,诱导缓解后MRD检测的意义(D29), N=2134,The effect of end-induction MRD on early and late relapse,Relapse-free survival,Years,EFS of NCI SR patients with favorable genetic features.,Years,Years,Prognostic significance of day-8 PB MRD,Cox multivariate analysis,Identification of a subgroup of patients with excellent outcome,12% Best-prognosis patients:NCI-SR+DT or TEL-AML1+MRD- at both D8 and D29,成人-ALL-FCM,Blood.2003;10:4695,CD7/CD5/CD3CD4/CD8/CD3CD7/CD2/CD3CD7/CD34/CD38,Spain,MRD水平与RFS,11.76%(n=12/102), Day 14 MRD-/0.03%, RFS OF 90% at 5 years,Multivariate Analysis of the Prognostic Impact on RFS,Status of minimal residual disease after induction predictsoutcome in both standard and high-risk Ph-negative adult acutelymphoblastic leukaemia. The Polish Adult Leukemia GroupALL 4-2002 MRD Study N=116,British Journal of Haematology, 2008:142, 227,CD7/CD2/CD3CD7/CD5/CD3CD7/CD38/CD34CD7/CD4/CD8TDT/CD7/Ccd3CD7/CD1a/CD3cCD3/CD7/CD3,CD10/CD20/CD19CD34/CD22/CD19CD34/CD38/CD19CD45/CD34/CD19TDT/CD10/CD19CD58/CD52/CD19CD33/CD13/CD19CD15/CD117/CD19CD65/CD56/CD19CD7/CD2/CD10,B-ALL,T-ALL,KaplanMeier estimates of relapse according to MRD evaluation after induction,Impact of MRD status after induction on outcome accordingto the treatment actually received.,Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factorsassociated with increased risk of relapse and decreasedleukaemia free-survival.,Risk and response-based classification of childhood B-ALL,Childrens Oncology Group (COG),Blood: 2007; 109: 926935.,Retrospective,CCG:1988-1995,POG:1986-1999,N=6238,Age:1-22y,COG risk classification scheme,Risk factors: Age:10 y WBC:50000/L Cytogenetics:TEL/AML1,Trisomies(4,10.17),BCR/ABL,MLL, Day-14 marrow response:M125% blast Day-29 MRD-FCM CNS/TD,Childhood B-Precursor-ALL,Age:10,WBC:50000/L,:High Risk,:Standard Risk,TEL/Tris,D8/15,29 BM,D29MRD, CNSorTD/MLL,+, M1,M10.1%.-/n,Low Risk,-, M1,M10.1-1.0%.+/+,SR,HR,D8/15 BM,D29BM/MRD,CNS orTD/MLL,+,M1,M10.1-.0%.+/+,HR,HR,Randomized,Augmented,Augmented,BCR/ABL.MLL+SER.DI1.0%+D43-M2,3/MRD1.0%,VHR,Risk and response-based classification of childhood B-ALL,Blood: 2007; 109: 926935.,Pediatric Oncology Group (POG),Childrens Cancer Group (CCG),Risk and response-based classification of childhood B-ALL,IgH TCR基因的阳性率和敏感性,T Flohr,Leukemia (2008) 22, 771782,AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000,PCR MRD-directed risk group stratification,AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000化疗流程,MRD-directed risk group stratification,HR:PPR;NR,BCR/ABL,MLL/AF4,QR-PCR 检测MRD流程,Event-free survival,cumulative incidence of relapse,Blood.2010;115:3206,Molecular response to treatment redefines all prognostic factors in children and adolescents with B-cell precursor acute Lymphoblastic leukemia:results in 3184 patients of the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study,TEL/AML1+,favorable DNA index ( 1.16 and 1.6; B),Prognostic impact of PCR-MRD,Ph+ patients,Prognostic impact of PCR-MRD,Prognostic impact of PCR-MRD in PH-pB-ALL patients within subgroups according to ALL-BFM 95 criteria(N=3184),SR,IR,HR,Results of the univariate and multivariate analyses,正常B细胞的分化规律,北京大学人民医院血液病研究所,CD10 CD34 CD19与 CD45 关系,CD22 CD20 CD19与 CD45关系,CD38 CD58 CD19与 CD45关系,I: CD34+CD10+ cIg- sIg- (Com-B-ALL)II:CD34-CD10+ cIg+ sIg- (pre-B-ALL)III: CD34-CD10- cIg+ sIg+(mature B-ALL),Note : no CD19+CD10-CD34+(Pro-B-ALL),成人与儿童B-ALL各亚型中LAIP 发生率,363/403(90.1),236/262(90.1),127/141(90.1),总,8/15(53.3)e,8/12(69.2)c,0/3(0)a,成熟 -/-,59/75(78.7)d,35/46(76.1)b,24/29(82.8),Pre -/+,238/255(93.3),148/159(93.1),90/96(93.8),Com +/+,58/58(100),45/45(100),13/13(100),Pro +/-,总,成人,儿童,CD34/CD10,B-ALL,亚型,中国实验血液学杂志 2006;14:853,Campana. Cytometry 38:139-152(1999),MRD+0.1%,CD45-CD10st+CD34s+,分析全部CD19+的细胞,以Hematogones作为内对照观察每个双参数的图形,无僵硬设门优点:避免表型改变所致假阴性不依赖于发病时的IM缺点:

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论