每日阅读：只要坚守就能逆历史的潮流嘛.docx

Ten years ago, as Jeff Bezoslaunchedthe Kindle ereader in New York, he declared that “the book is so highly evolved and so suited to its task that its very hard to displace”. Amazons founder was right: this spring, despite the digitalupheavalunleashedbythe Kindle, it will open a bookstore in Manhattan.10年前，杰夫贝索斯(Jeff Bezos)在纽约推出Kindle电子书阅读器的时候宣称，“图书经过高度的演变，非常适合阅读，它很难被取代”。这位亚马逊(Amazon)的创始人说得对：今年春季，它将会在曼哈顿开一家书店，尽管Kindle掀起了数字阅读风暴。There aresignsof the books renaissance all around. Waterstones, the UK book chain,returned to profitlast year after suffering six years of losses. Sales of print books in the US rose by 3 per cent, while those of ebooks have fallen. Digital technology has not unleashed the same revolution in publishing that it has for music, television and news; we still like to read books.如今到处都有图书复兴的迹象 也可以翻译成动词 。英国连锁书店“水磨石”(Waterstones)在6年亏损后，去年恢复盈利。美国纸质图书销售增长3%，同时那些电子书的销售下降。数字技术没有推动出版业爆发音乐、电视和新闻领域的那种革命，我们仍然喜欢读书。The books enduring popularity is widelyhailedas a heart-warming tale of traditional values triumphing over cold, hard technology. This is not the whole story, however. It can equally be read as thenarrativeof Amazons growth: if you cut prices, people buy more and if you raise prices, they buy less.图书持续受欢迎，被普遍誉为温暖人心的传统价值故事胜过了冰冷的技术。然而，这并非故事的全部。它同样可以被解读为亚马逊成长的故事：如果你降价，人们就会更多购买，如果你提价，他们就会减少购买。Customers enjoy thetouch and feelof printed books: Americans read an average of 12 books a year, and most of those arephysical. But they also prefer low prices, and do not like the fact that ebooks are comparatively expensive. Take The Whistler, John Grishams newblockbuster, which was selling on Amazon this week for $14.47 inhardbackand $14.99 on Kindle.顾客喜欢纸质书的触感：美国人平均每年阅读12本书，其中大部分是纸质书。但他们也青睐低价，不喜欢电子书相对昂贵的事实。以约翰格里沙姆(John Grisham)的新畅销书吹口哨的人(The Whistler)为例，它本周在亚马逊的精装本售价为14.47美元，而Kindle上的售价是14.99美元。That is the new reality: ebooks from publishers such as Penguin Random House and HarperCollins often cost more than hardbacks as well aspaperbacks. Mr Bezoss efforts a decade ago to promotemass adoptionof the Kindle by discounting bestsellers to $9.99 and making ebooks cheaper than books has faded. It is now the other way round: Amazonfavours print.这是新的现实：企鹅兰登书屋(Penguin Random House)和哈珀柯林斯(HarperCollins)等出版商的电子书售价往往超过精装本和简装本。贝索斯不再像10年前那样，为了推广Kindle而将畅销书打折到9.99美元，使电子书比纸质书更便宜。现在正好颠倒了过来：亚马逊青睐纸质书。We are, in other words, witnessing not a bibliophile revolution against Amazons digital hegemony but Mr Bezos changing histactics. Amazon sold 35m more print books in the US last year than in 2015, according to one analyst, taking even greater market share from its old competitor Barnes & Noble. The 2m rise in sales at independent US book shops was asideshow.换言之，我们见证的不是爱书人对亚马逊数字霸权的革命，而是贝索斯改变了其战术。一位分析师表示，亚马逊去年在美国的纸质书销量比2015年多3500万本，从其老对手巴诺(Barnes & Noble)那里夺走了更多的市场份额。美国独立书店销量增长200万只是一个次要数字。This is puzzling for anyone who witnessed therelentlessstruggles between Amazon and major publishers in the past decade, with Mr Bezos attempting torevolutionisethe industry and publishers trying torestrainhim. He even got the US government on his side with itsantitrustsuit in 2012 against Apple and large publishers for conspiring tofix the pricesof ebooks.这让那些见证了过去10年亚马逊与主要出版社无情争斗的人们感到困惑，贝索斯试图颠覆出版业，而出版商则试图遏制他。贝索斯甚至让美国政府站到他这一边：2012年，美国政府对苹果(Apple)和大型出版商提起反垄断诉讼，指控他们合谋操纵电子书价格。But having fought for the right to set ebook prices in the same way as print book prices, Mr Bezos thenbacked off. Amazon signed fresh deals with publishers two years ago that limited ebook discounting and prices rose soon afterwards. Hardbacks and paperbacks are relatively cheap because Amazon discounts them; ebooks are expensive because it does so less.但在竭力争取电子书和纸质书相同定价方式的权利后，贝索斯做出了让步。亚马逊两年前与出版商签署了新的协议，限制电子书打折，随后价格上涨。精装书和简装书之所以相对便宜，是因为亚马逊对它们进行了打折；电子书之所以昂贵是因为它们的折扣较少。The way to view this is as an industry reaching a competitive equilibrium after a decade of disruption, with the main forces Amazon on one side and the big five publishers on the other settling on a truce. They cannot formally agree one since it would provoke renewed antitrust action, but that is what it looks like, with the revival of the book as part of their detente.这意味着，行业在经历了10年的扰乱后达到了竞争均衡，主要交战方一方是亚马逊，另一方是5家大出版社达成了停战。它们不能正式签署停战协议，因为那将会引发新的反垄断行动，但它看起来就是停战，纸质书复兴就是它们缓和的一部分。It makes perfect sense for Amazon. The company invested in launching and developing the Kindle and now dominates the ebook market: B&N has retrenched with the Nook and iPhones are used for other activities than reading ebooks. To the degree that cheap ebooks were needed to promote Kindles, the urgency has passed and some profit-taking is rational.这对亚马逊来说非常明智。该公司投资推出并发展了Kindle，如今在电子书市场占据主导地位：巴诺已停产Nook电子书阅读器，iPhone被用于其他活动而非阅读电子书。就当初利用廉价电子书推广Kindle来说，现在已经没有那么急迫，斩获一些利润是理性的。The book, in digital or printed form, has been more stable than other kinds of media. Music has faced waves of disruption: first piracy, then people listening to single tracks rather than CDs, and finally the shift from buying to subscribing to services such as Spotify. Not so books: “We read books one at a time and each one takes us days,” says Douglas McCabe of Enders Analysis.无论是数字的还是纸质的，图书一直比其他种类的媒体更加稳定。音乐曾面临好几波扰乱：最初是盗版，随后是人们听单曲而非唱片，最后是人们从购买转向订阅Spotify等提供商的服务。图书不是这样，Enders Research的道格拉斯麦凯布(Douglas McCabe)表示：“我们看书是一次看一本书，每本书都能让我们看好几天。”Amazon and others havedabbledwith trying to alter consumption patterns, such as turning publishing into a Netflix-type service. Little has changed: Oyster, an ebook subscription service similar to Kindle Unlimited, closed in 2015. Most people still buy books individually and Amazon has no pressing need to demolish this, given that it is the worlds biggest bookseller.亚马逊和其他公司曾尝试改变消费模式，比如将出版转变为Netflix类型的服务。结果什么都没改变：与Kindle Unlimited类似的电子书订阅服务Oyster在2015年倒闭。大多数人仍然一本一本地买书，鉴于其仍然是全球最大的书商，亚马逊并不急于废除这种模式。(Nasdaq NFLX) Netflix是一家在线影片租赁提供商。公司能够提供Netflix超大数量的DVD，而且能够让顾客快速方便的挑选影片，同时免费递送。Theequilibriumalso helps publishers, which profit from ebooks because they can digitise print titles and sell them at highermargins. Since Amazoneaseddiscounts on their ebooks, the pressure has risen: one executive estimates that financing more marketing and discounting themselves could cost US publishers $100m a year.这种均衡状态也有利于出版商，后者从电子书获利，因为它们很容易提供数字版本的图书，获得更高的利润率。既然亚马逊缩小了对电子书的折扣，压力上升：一位高管估计，如果美国