国际商学院评价标准.doc

Document Version January 2014EPAS CRITERIA EVALUATION FORM2 programme setsName of the Institution:Name of Programme set 1:Name of Programme set 2:Date of the evaluation:1. Institutional Context SECTION1.1Institutional strategy and management1.1.1Mission and strategy in its national & international context1.1.2Availability of resources to implement the strategy1.1.3Present positioning relative to its programme competitors1.1.4Internal institutional governance & management1.1.5Institutional culture re internationalisation1.1.6Institutional culture re corporate focus1.1.7Institutional culture re ERS1.2Physical resources and facilities for the programme(s)1.2.1Learning environment, eg classrooms, study spaces, library1.2.2IT: e-learning platform, databases, computer access, etc.1.3Faculty for the programme(s)1.3.1Adequacy of faculty: qualifications, size and subject profile1.3.2Faculty intellectual contribution (eg research) to teaching1.3.3Teaching ethos towards academic depth & rigour1.3.4Internationalisation of the faculty1.3.5Faculty engagement with the corporate world 1.3.6Faculty engagement with ERS1.3.7Faculty management, eg workload, performance, developmentPROGRAMME SET 1: (add name of the programme)2. Programme Design SECTION2.1Programme objectives and target markets2.1.1Coherence of programme objectives & fit with institutional context2.1.2Appropriateness of target markets & intended graduate profile2.1.3Marketing/promotion of the programme (including institutional context)2.2Curriculum design2.2.1Clarity of programme rationale 2.2.2Specification of Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)2.2.3Programme structure and content/coverage2.2.4Balance of academic and managerial dimensions 2.2.5Inclusion of external guidelines (eg EQUAL, PRME)2.2.6Up-to-date design including opportunities for integrated learning 2.2.7International focus of the programme 2.2.8Responsiveness to corporate needs2.2.9Coverage of ERS and other trends in society2.3Design of delivery modes & assessment methods2.3.1Appropriateness of delivery methods, eg FT, PT, modular, online2.3.2Structure and balance of in- to out-of-class learning2.3.3Quality of programme management & administration 2.3.4Quality of student handbooks, etc. 2.3.5Assessments methods explicitly designed to match ILOs2.3.6Range of student assessment methods2.3.7Focus on individual assessment3. Programme Delivery & Operations SECTION3.1Student recruitment3.1.1Appropriateness of entry criteria & their application in selection 3.1.2Quality of incoming students qualifications & experience3.1.3Internationalisation of the student body3.1.4Enrolment and induction processes3.2Pedagogy 3.2.1Quality of teaching & learning delivery3.2.2Academic depth including expectations on academic reading3.2.3Pedagogical innovation, eg use of e-learning platforms3.2.4Quality of the teaching/learning materials3.2.5Focus on student centred learning3.3Personal development of students 3.3.1Quality of overall personal development3.3.2Individualised learning support from faculty3.3.3Development of transferable intellectual skills3.3.5Quality of support services (eg counselling, international office)3.4International aspects3.4.1Quality of overall international learning experience3.4.2Quality of the international partners & exchanges3.4.3Student take up of opportunities to study/work abroad3.4.4Preparation as potential international managers3.5Corporate interactions3.5.1Quality of overall corporate learning experience3.5.2Teaching input from practitioners 3.5.3Other corporate involvement, eg provision of internships 3.5.4Take up of opportunities for project-based work, internships3.6Ethics, Responsibility & Sustainability3.6.1Quality of the overall ERS learning experience3.6.2Linkage of ERS to the students future roles as managers4. Programme Outcomes SECTION4.1Quality of student/participant work 4.1.1Objectivity & rigour in the assessment process4.1.2Confirmed achievement of ILOs4.1.3Standards of student exams/coursework 4.1.4Standards of student theses/projects/dissertations4.1.5Evidence of academic depth4.1.6Progression and pass rates meet international norms4.2Graduate quality4.2.1Quality of graduates meets programme objectives4.2.2Quality of career placement services4.3Alumni 4.3.1Support for and from the programmes alumni association4.4Programme reputation 4.4.1Evidence for programme reputationPROGRAMME SET 2: (add name of the programme)2. Programme Design SECTION2.1Programme objectives and target markets2.1.1Coherence of programme objectives & fit with institutional context2.1.2Appropriateness of target markets & intended graduate profile2.1.3Marketing/promotion of the programme (including institutional context)2.2Curriculum design2.2.1Clarity of programme rationale 2.2.2Specification of Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)2.2.3Programme structure and content/coverage2.2.4Balance of academic and managerial dimensions 2.2.5Inclusion of external guidelines (eg EQUAL, PRME)2.2.6Up-to-date design including opportunities for integrated learning 2.2.7International focus of the programme 2.2.8Responsiveness to corporate needs2.2.9Coverage of ERS and other trends in society2.3Design of delivery modes & assessment methods2.3.1Appropriateness of delivery methods, eg FT, PT, modular, online2.3.2Structure and balance of in- to out-of-class learning2.3.3Quality of programme management & administration 2.3.4Quality of student handbooks, etc. 2.3.5Assessments methods explicitly designed to match ILOs2.3.6Range of student assessment methods2.3.7Focus on individual assessment3. Programme Delivery & Operations SECTION3.1Student recruitment3.1.1Appropriateness of entry criteria & their application in selection 3.1.2Quality of incoming students qualifications & experience3.1.3Internationalisation of the student body3.1.4Enrolment and induction processes3.2Pedagogy 3.2.1Quality of teaching & learning delivery3.2.2Academic depth including expectations on academic reading3.2.3Pedagogical innovation, eg use of e-learning platforms3.2.4Quality of the teaching/learning materials3.2.5Focus on student centred learning3.3Personal development of students 3.3.1Quality of overall personal development3.3.2Individualised learning support from faculty3.3.3Development of transferable intellectual skills3.3.5Quality of support services (eg counselling, international office)3.4International aspects3.4.1Quality of overall international learning experience3.4.2Quality of the international partners & exchanges3.4.3Student take up of opportunities to study/work abroad3.4.4Preparation as potential international managers3.5Corporate interactions3.5.1Quality of overall corporate learning experience3.5.2Teaching input from practitioners 3.5.3Other corporate involvement, eg provision of internships 3.5.4Take up of opportunities for project-based work, internships3.6Ethics, Responsibility & Sustainability3.6.1Quality of the overall ERS learning experience3.6.2Linkage of ERS to the students future roles as managers4. Programme Outcomes SECTION4.1Quality of student/participant work 4.1.1Objectivity & rigour in the assessment process4.1.2Confirmed achievement of ILOs4.1.3Standards of student exams/coursework 4.1.4Standards of student theses/projects/dissertations4.1.5Evidence of academic depth4.1.6Progression and pass rates meet international norms4.2Graduate quality4.2.1Quality of graduates meets progr