Adapting organizations to today27s markets_第1页
Adapting organizations to today27s markets_第2页
Adapting organizations to today27s markets_第3页
Adapting organizations to today27s markets_第4页
Adapting organizations to today27s markets_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩31页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Structuringanorganization Structuringanorganizationconsistsof devisingadivisionoflabor sometimesresultinginspecialization Dividingtasksintosmallerjobsiscalledjobspecialization settingupteamsordepartmentstodospecifictasks e g productionandaccounting Theprocessofsettingupindividualdepartmentstodospecializedtasksiscalleddepartmentalization assigningresponsibilityandauthoritytopeople Structuringanorganization Generally anorganizationstructurechangesduetochangingbusinessenvironment including moreglobalcompetition fastertechnologicalchanges changeincustomerexpectationslikehigh qualityproducts fast friendlyserviceatreasonablecost Historicaldevelopmentoforganizationaldesign MassproductionmeansefficientlyproducinglargequantitiesofgoodsThebiggertheplant themoreefficientproductionbecameBusinessgrowthledtoeconomiesofscale Thistermreferstothefactthatcompaniescanreducetheirproductioncostsiftheycanpurchaserawmaterialsinbulk theaveragecostofgoodsgoesdownasproductionlevelsincreaseDuringtheeraofmassproduction organizationtheoriesemerged InFrance itwasHenriFayolandinGermany itwasMaxWeber Fayol sprinciplesoforganization Fayolintroducedthefollowingprinciples Unityofcommand Eachworkeristoreporttoone andonlyoneboss Hierarchyofauthority Allworkersshouldknowtowhomtheyshouldreport Divisionoflabor Functionsaretobedividedintoareasofspecializationsuchasproduction marketing andfinance Subordinationofindividualintereststothegeneralinterest Thegoaloftheteamaremoreimportantthanthegoaloftheindividuals Fayol sprinciplesoforganization Authority Authorityandresponsibilityarerelated Degreeofcentralization Theamountofdecision makingpowervestedintopmanagementshouldvarybycircumstances Inasmallorganization it spossibletocentralizealldecision makingpowerinthetopmanager Inalargerorganization somedecision makingpowershouldbedelegatedtolower levelmanagersandemployeesonbothmajorandminorissues Clearcommunicationchannels Allworkersshouldbeabletoreachothersinthefirmquicklyandeasily Order Materialsandpeopleshouldbeplacedandmaintainedintheproperlocation Fayol sprinciplesoforganization Equity Amanagershouldtreatemployeesandpeerswithrespectandjustice Espritdecorps AspiritofprideandloyaltyshouldbecreatedamongpeopleinthefirmThedrawbackofFayol sorganizationtheoryisthatrulemakingoftenledtoratherrigidorganizationsthatdidn talwaysrespondquicklytoconsumerrequests MaxWeber sorganizationaltheory ItwasWeberwhopromotedthepyramid shapedorganizationstructureWeberputgreattrustinmanagersandfeltthatthefirmwoulddowellifemployeessimplydidwhattheyweretoldWeber organizationaltheoryweresimilartothatofFayolbutemphasized jobdescriptions writtenrules decisionguidelines anddetailedrecords consistentprocedures regulations andpolicies staffingandpromotionbasedonqualificationsInotherwords WeberwasinfavorofbureaucracySometimesthepracticeofestablishingrulesandproceduresbecamesorigidthatitbecamecounterproductive Turningprinciplesintoorganizationaldesign FollowingtheconceptsofFayolandWeber organizationsarestillorganizedwitheverythingsetupinahierarchyAhierarchyisasysteminwhichonepersonisatthetopoftheorganizationandthereisrankedorsequentialorderingfromthetopdownofmanagersandotherswhoareresponsibletothatpersonSinceonepersoncan tkeeptrackofthousandsofworkers thetopmanagerneedsmanylower levelmanagerstohelpThechainofcommandisthelineofauthoritythatmovesfromthetopofthehierarchytothelowestlevelAbureaucracyisanorganizationwithmanylayersofmanagerswhosetrulesandregulationsandoverseealldecisions Turningprinciplesintoorganizationaldesign Slowserviceissimplynotacceptableinmanyoftoday scompetitivefirmsTomakecustomershappier somecompaniesarere organizingtogiveemployeespowertomakemoredecisionsontheirownGivingemployeessuchauthorityandresponsibilitytomakedecisionsandpleasecustomersiscalledempowermentEmpowermentworksonlywhenemployeesaregiventhepropertrainingandresourcestorespond Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations Whendesigningresponsiveorganizations firmshavehadtodealwithseveralorganizationalissues centralization decentralization spanofcontrol tallversusflatorganizationstructures departmentalization Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations ThedegreetowhichanorganizationallowsmanagersatthelowerlevelsofthemanagerialhierarchytomakedecisionsdeterminesthedegreeofdecentralizationthatanorganizationpracticesCentralizedauthorityoccurswhendecision makingauthorityismaintainedatthetoplevelofmanagementatthecompany sheadquartersDecentralizedauthorityoccurswhendecision makingauthorityisdelegatedtolower levelmanagersandemployeeswhoaremorefamiliarwithlocalconditionsthanheadquarter smanagementcouldbeForexample controlworkswellforafast foodchainlikeMcDonald sbutnotaclothingretailerlikeJCPenny Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations TheadvantagesofcentralizationGreatertop managementcontrolMoreefficiencySimplerdistributionsystemStrongerbrand corporateimageThedisadvantagesofcentralizationLessresponsivetocustomersLessempowermentInter organizationalconflictLowermoraleawayfromheadquarters Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations TheadvantagesofdecentralizationBetteradaptationtocustomerwantsMoreempowermentofworkersFasterdecisionmakingHighermoraleThedisadvantagesofdecentralizationLessefficiencyComplexdistributionsystemLesstop managementcontrolWeakenedcorporateimage Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations SpanofcontrolreferstotheoptimumnumberofsubordinatesamanagersupervisesorshouldsuperviseAtlowerlevels whereworkisstandardized it spossibletoimplementawidespanofcontrolThenumbergraduallynarrowsathigherlevelsoftheorganizationbecauseworkislessstandardizedandthere smoreneedforface to facecommunication Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations Variablesinspanofcontrolincludethefollowing capabilitiesofthemanager capabilitiesofthesubordinates geographicalcloseness functionalsimilarity needforco ordination planningdemands functionalcomplexity Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations Atallorganizationstructureisoneinwhichthepyramidalorganizationchartwouldbequitetallbecauseofthevariouslevelsofmanagementandasmallspanofcontrol thatis fewpeoplereportingtoeachmanager Aflatorganizationstructureisonethathasfewlayersofmanagementandabroadspanofcontrol thatis manypeoplereportingtoeachmanager Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations TheadvantagesofanarrowspanofcontrolMorecontrolbytopmanagementMorechancesofadvancementGreaterspecializationClosersupervisionThedisadvantagesofanarrowspanofcontrolLessempowermentHighercostsDelayeddecisionmakingLessresponsivenesstocustomers Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations TheadvantagesofabroadspanofcontrolReducedcostsMoreresponsivenesstocustomersFasterdecisionmakingMoreempowermentThedisadvantagesofabroadspanofcontrolfewerchancesofadvancementOverworkedmanagersLossofcontrolLessmanagementexpertise Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations Departmentalizationisthedividingoforganizationalfunctions design marketing etc intoseparateunitsThetraditionalwaytodepartmentalizeorganizationsisbyfunctionFunctionalstructureisthegroupingofworkersintodepartmentsbasedonsimilarskills expertiseorresourceuse Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations TheadvantagesofdepartmentalizationbyfunctionEmployeescandevelopskillsindepthandcanprogresswithinadepartmentastheymasterthoseskillsThecompanycanachieveeconomiesofscaleinthatitcancentralizealltheresourcesitneedsandlocatevariousexpertsinthatareaThere sgoodco ordinationwithinthefunction andtopmanagementcaneasilydirectandcontrolvariousdepartments activities Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations ThedisadvantagesofdepartmentalizationbyfunctionTheremaybelackofcommunicationamongthedifferentdepartmentsIndividualemployeesmaybegintoidentifywiththeirdepartmentanditsgoalsratherthanwiththegoalsoftheorganizationasawholeThecompany sresponsetoexternalchangesmaybeslowPeopletendtobecomenarrowspecialistsPeopleinthesamedepartmenttendtothinkalikeandmayneedinputfromoutsiderstobecreative Issuesinvolvedinstructuringorganizations Thealternativewaystodepartmentalizeinclude byproduct byfunction bycustomergroup bygeographiclocation byprocess Organizationalmodels Tostructureanorganization youcanlookatfourcommonmodels lineorganization lineandstafforganizations matrixstyleorganizations cross functionalself managedteams Organizationalmodels Alineorganizationhasdirecttwo waylinesofresponsibility authority andcommunicationrunningfromthetoptothebottomoftheorganizationAlineorganizationdoesnothaveanyspecialistswhoprovidemanagerialsupportSuchorganizationsfollowallofFayol straditionalmanagementrulesThemilitaryandsmallbusinessesareorganizedthisway Organizationalmodels Tominimizethedisadvantagesofsimplelineorganizations manyorganizationstodayhavebothlineandstaffpersonnelLinepersonnelarepartofthechainofcommandthatisresponsibleforachievingorganizationalgoals e g productionworkers distributionpeople andmarketingpersonnel Staffpersonneladviseandassistlinepersonnelinmeetingtheirgoals e g marketingresearch legaladvising informationtechnology andhumanresourcemanagement Organizationalmodels TheimportantdifferencebetweenlineandstaffpersonnelisauthorityLinepersonnelhaveformalauthoritytomakepolicydecisionsandmaychoosetoseekorignoretheadvicefromstaffpersonnelStaffpersonnelhaveformalauthoritytoadvisethelinepersonnelandmakesuggestionsthatmightinfluencethosedecisions buttheycan tmakepolicychangesthemselvesStaffpositionsstrengthenthelinepositionsandarenotinferiororlower paid Organizationalmodels Bothlineandline and stafforganizationstructuressufferfromacertaininflexibilityToday seconomicsceneisdominatedbyhigh growthindustries e g telecommunications robotics biotechnology Insuchindustries competitionisstiffandthelifecycleofnewideasisshortEmphasisisonproductdevelopment creativity specialprojects rapidcommunication andinter departmentalteamwork Theeconomic technological andcompetitiveenvironmentsarerapidlychangingFromthosechanges grewthepopularityofthematrixorganization Organizationalmodels Inamatrixorganization specialistsfromdifferentpartsoftheorganizationarebroughttogethertoworkonspecificprojectsbutstillremainpartofaline and staffstructureAprojectmanagercanborrowpeoplefromdifferentdepartmentstohelpdesignandmarketnewproductideasTheadvantagesofamatrixorganizationstructureItgivesflexibilitytomanagersinassigningpeopletoprojectsItencouragesinter organizationalco operationandteamworkItcanresultincreativesolutionstoproblemssuchasthoseassociatedwithproductdevelopmentItprovidesforefficientuseoforganizationalresources Organizationalmodels ThedisadvantagesofamatrixorganizationstructureIt scostlyandcomplexItcancauseconfusionamongemployeesastowhethertheirloyaltybelongs totheprojectmanagerortotheirfunctionalunitItrequiresgoodinter personalskillsandco operativeemployeesandmanagers communicationproblemscanemergeItmaybeonlyatemporarysolutiontoalong termproblemApotentialproblemwithmatrixmanagementisthattheprojectteamsarenotpermanentTheyareformedtosolveaproblemordevelopanewproduct andthentheybreakupThereislittlechanceforcross functionallearningbecauseexpertsfromeachfunctionaretogetherforsolittletime Organizationalmodels Ananswertothedisadvantageofthetemporaryteamscreatedbymatrixmanagementistoestablishlong livedteamsandtoempowerthemtoworkcloselywithsuppliers customers andothersquicklyandefficientlybringingoutnew highqualityproductswhilegivinggreatserviceCross functionalself managedteamsaregroupsofemployeesfromdifferentdepartmentswhoworktogetheronalong termbasis asopposedtothetemporaryteamsestablishedinmatrix styleorganizations Sometimestheteamsareinter firmandalsogobeyondnationalboundaries Managingtheinteractionsamongfirms Whetheritinvolvescustomers suppliersanddistributors orthegovernment networkingisusingcommunicationstechnologyandothermeanstolinkorganizationsandallowthemtoworktogetheroncommonobjectivesOrganizationsaresocloselylinkedbytheInternetthateachcanfindoutwhattheothersaredoinginrealtime RealtimesimplymeansthepresentmomentoftheactualtimeinwhichsomethingtakesplaceTransparencyoccurswhenacompanyissoopentoothercompaniesworkingwithitthattheonce solidbarriersbetweenthembecomeseethroughandelectronicinformationissharedasifthecompanieswereone Managingtheinteractionsamongfirms Theorganizationstructurestendtobeflexibleandchanging Thatis onecompanymayworkwithadesignexpertfromadifferentcompanyinItalyforayearandthennotneedthatpersonanymore Anotherexpertfromanothercompanyinanothercountrymaybehirednexttimeforanotherproject Suchatemporarynetworkedorganization madeofreplaceablefirmsthatjoinandleaveasneeded iscalledavirtualcorporationTraditionally organizationshavetriedtodoallfunctionsthemselves Today sorganizationsarelookingtootherorganizationstohelptheminareaswheretheyarenotabletogenerateworld classquality Benchmarkinginvolvescomparinganorganization spractices processes andproductsagainsttheworld sbestForexample K2isacompanythatmakesskis snowboards skates andrelatedproducts Itstudiedthecompact discindustryandlearnedtouseultravioletinkstoprintgraphicsonskis ItwenttotheaerospaceindustrytogetPiezotechnologytoreducevibrationinitssnowboards theaerospaceindustryusesthetechnologyforwingsonplanes Andfinally itlearnedfromthecable TVindustryhowtobraidlayersoffiberglassandcarbon andadaptedthatknowledgetomakeskis Managingtheinteractionsamongfirms Ifanorganizationcan tdoaswellasthebestinanyparticulararea suchasshipping itoftenwilltrytooutsourcethefunctiontoanorganizationthatisthebest e g UPSorFedEx Outsourcingisassigningvariousfunctions suchasaccounting production security maintenance andlegalwork tooutsideorganizationsWhenafirmhascompleteditsoutsourcingprocess theremainingfunctionsarethefirm scorecompetencies CorecompetenciesarethosefunctionsthattheorganizationcandoaswellasorbetterthananyotherorganizationintheworldandisusuallydifficulttoimitateForexample Nikeisgreatatdesigningandmarketingathleticshoes Thoseareitscorecompetencies Itout sourcesthemanufacturingofthoseshoestoothercompaniesthatcanmakeshoesbetterandlessexpensivethanNikeitselfcan Adaptingtochange Onceyouhavestructuredanorganization youmustbepreparedtoadaptthatstructuretochangesinthemarketMergersandacquisitionsposespecialchallengesinadaptingtochange That swhysomanymergersofbigcorporationsfailandwhysomanypeoplewereskepticalaboutmergersandacquisitionsToimplementtheempowermentofemployees firmsoftenmustreorganizedramatically Sometimesthatmaymeanrestructuringthefirmtomakefront lineworkersthemostimportantpeopleintheorganization RestructuringisredesigninganorganizationsothatitcanmoreeffectivelyandefficientlyserveitscustomersAfews

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论