所有argument题目提纲.doc

Argument1The argument fails to provide evidence to prove that the residents in Plainsville will prefer heath food.Lacking the reason why their stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned their health, we cant decide they will get profit in PlainsvilleThe arguer fails to take other factors which will influence their business into account.Argument2A threshold assumption upon which the recommendation relies is that Brookville homeowners implemented Brookvilles restrictions in the first place.Even assuming that Brookville homeowners implemented these restrictions, the committee relies on the additional assumption that this course of action was responsible for the increase in Brookville property values. (C.E)Even assuming that Brookvilles rising property values are attributable to the implementation of these restrictions, the committee fails to consider possible differences between Brookville and Deerhaven that might help to bring about a different result for Deerhaven. (F.A)Argument3The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the decrease of graduates who went to work at large firm and the graduates interest. (C.E)The arguers the survey provides few information about his argument because his sample is not representative and too limited.This assert fail to define what job satisfaction is.Argument41. We dont have any evidence suggesting that more real estate agents will cause the result that A is superior to F.2. Moreover, high revenue and high average price of house is not enough to conclude that A is superior to F.3. The arguer fails to consider that other differences in the nine years.Argument5The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the increase of people with arthritis and the big profits in pharmaceutics.No evidence is provided to prove that the profits of X will decrease.The sample of the survey about the Xylan is not representative so we cant decide that Xylan will obtain the most profits.The arguer doesnt take other factors which may influence the profit into accout.Argument6The fact that the nearest club is 65 miles away could not surely lead the C note obtaining the whole market in the local place.There are many factors which will influence the profit, the arguer should not overlook the other factors.The survey doesnt suggest that people are will to go to jazz club.Argument7The argument fails to establish the causal relationship between the examples and the council members overlook of environment.Even assuming that the council members dont pay enough attention to protect environment, we cant decide F will not overlook the problem without any evidence.Even assuming that F doesnt concern with the environment, we cant know G will solve the problem when he is elected.Argument8The assertion provides no evidence to prove that the Ms profits increase is the reason of its strong growth potential.The argument fail to convince us that M is meet the Os need.The arguer fails to take into account possible difference between the whole country and the local place.It will cause many other problems if O buys M.Argument9The argument provides little evidence that the increase of students score is reason for its evaluating system.The potential employers simply assert that the grade at O is inflated because the score of students increase, which is unwarranted.According to the possible differences between the O and the A, we cant conclude that A is more successful than O in finding jobs.Argument 10The increase in the number of dairy farms does not necessarily lead to the increase in the supply of milk. (D.C)The price of milk in Excello Food Market may not be representative. (selective sample/quantity of the sample)How much did the price of milk actually increase after adjustment for inflation? (vague data)The arguer fails to consider the variation of the demand of milk during these years. (I.T)The regulation proposed by the arguer may lead to undesired results. (I.T: unexpected consequences)The regulation proposed by the arguer is not the only solution to the problem. (necessity of the solution)Argument11The arguer infers that the residents support the recycling according to the increasing recycling of aluminum and paper, which is insufficient.The increase of the charge for garbage pickup and the amount of recycling material will not surely lead the decrease of the total amount of trash deposited.Lacking some necessary details of the survey, we cant conclude that people are willingly to support the recycling.Argument12The arguer fails to consider the possible differences between the A and P.Even we assume that A can analogy P, there is no evidence shows the reasons of the accidents in A and how many of them are caused by fatigue and sleep deprivation.Even we assume that most of the accident in A is caused by fatigue and sleep deprivation, we also cant conclude whether shortening work time is sufficient.Argument13No evidence shows that the forth book of Wood will surely obtain success.Saving time in developing our video game cant establish causal relationship to low costs.Whether the company will profits remains to be a question.Argument14The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the peoples interesting in growing their own vegetables and the dissatisfying of the vegetables in supermarkets.The arguer fails to take into account possible difference between the local place and the other places.The fact that the magazine G sold out at V does not surely indicate that consumers are willingly to grow vegetables by themselves.Does the solution sufficient?Argument15There is no evidence to show that the O will not change its products to meet the consumers need.The survey does not indicate that consumer will choose low-fat products.The fact that low-fat foods are in abundant supply in food stores does not necessarily indicate an increasing demand for low-fat dairy products or a diminishing demand for high-fat dairy products.Argument16The arguer fails to consider the possible differences between the state of I and L.The survey lacks credibility because they fails to include other cities or towns in the state of I.No evidence shows that the residents are willingly to spend money on lotteryArgument17The fact that EZ collects trash twice as often as ABC is significant only if the town would benefit from an additional collection each week.The fact that EZ has ordered more trucks proves little in itself about which service would be the better choice for W.The mere fact that most respondents to a recent survey considered EZs service satisfactory provides little support to the authors recommendationArgument18We dont know why the limit of speed is not sufficient, so we cant decide that it is not fit for P.The arguer fails to consider the possible differences between P and B and the difference in the five years.Even we assume that Argument19The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the popularity of D and the As advertising agency.The arguer overlooks the possible differences between the M and the other places.Duplicating the Megalopolis may not effective.Argument20The increasing of people in summer can not establish the causal relationship to the increasing accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians.The limitation is base on a fact that the neighboring island of T enforced similar limits on moped rentals. But the arguer fails to take the differences between the B and T into account.Even the limit will have effect. No evidence shows that it will enough to decrease the number of accidents.Argument21No evidence shows that the new supplier can provide high quality wool fabric.Even we assume that the new supplier is reliable, another assumption that the market need alpaca overcoat needs to be proved.Moreover, whether the consumers will pay the alpaca overcoat for higher price remains to be a problem.Last but no least, the profit of the company will increase, which is unwarranted.Argument22The arguer cites the survey, which cannot prove that the need of low price house is decreased.Even the fact that more high price house is needed in the nation-wide is true, the arguer also overlooks the differences between the S and the other cities.The arguer asserts that they will hire more workers to construct more high price house, which is unwarranted.Argument23The argument is based on a assumption that double incoming people will chose seafood in order to get healthy diet, which is need to be proved.The arguer fails to take the differences between the B and other cities into account.Even the following assumption is rational, the residents may have many choice to eat seafood.Whether it will profitable remains to be a problem.Argument24Should they close some of their existing small assembly plants and build a large central plant?The largest adult population does not refer to abundant workers.The low salary of workers does not refer to low costs.The cancellation of three years cities taxes does not refer to low costs.There are many factors will influence the costs, which the arguer overlooks.Argument25The arguer commits a fallacy of F.A.The arguer neglects other possible methods that may improve Hopewells economy more efficiently.(I.T)The arguer fails to point out how the golf course and resort hotel actually contributed to the economy of Ocean View. (after this, therefore because of this)Argument26The school music band of S has won three regional band competitions, which cannot indicate that it does ascribe to C.The improvement of music facilities and instruments at S also cannot indicate that it will contribute to C.The Saluda school board fails to take the possible differences among the S and other schools into account.No evidence shows that S is fit for the new job.Argument27The memo does not indicate what kinds of jobs Sparks is now advertising-the ones for which salaries are to be twice those paid to experienced assembly-line workers of A.The fact that some of the employees of A have already left to work for S cannot prove that it is necessary to raise the salary.No evidence show that if A does not raise salary, the employees will go to S.Even all of follow above is true, only raising the salary of the best worker is not enough.Argument28The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the eating breakfast at school and the decrease of absenteeism and tardiness.The survey suffers some fallacies so it is insufficient. Sample is limited and the situation of the sample is unknown. The sample is not representative. No evidence can prove that children who regularly eat a healthful breakfast tend to perform better in school.Argument29Does the assertion that Lake City parks are closed to automobile traffic is a wise choice?The arguer fails to consider the possible differences between the Lake City and the Plainsville.The small group of concerned citizens is not representative. So the action of Yu is not wise.No evidence show that only depending on the environmental protection, the I will win the election.Argument30The survey does not surely indicate that the tourists to their city are increased.There is no causal relationship between the C and M and the increasing tourists.The funding for the park and museum should be increased, which is unwarranted.Argument31No evidence shows that most people with cell phones does not cause problems on the road, including serious accidents.There is no need to pass legislation restricting such activities such as listening to the radio or taking care with children, which is unwarranted.There is no need to pass legislation restricting such activities such as listening to the radio or taking care with children, which cannot indicate that we dont need to pass legislation to restriction using cell phones.The conclusion of the argument is absurd because it is unwarranted.Argument32No evidence show that the residents in H no longer need to drive to and from shopping malls for some purchases.The consumption of vehicle fuel will reduce, which is unwarranted. Other factor will use more fuels. Delivering the purchase by mail or by delivery system may cause the consumption of fuel rising.Argument33 ?论断的前提并不一定成立。这个前提是这些骨头都属于原来童年时居住在一个地方的人，但论者没有提供足够的证据支持这个观点。虽然在一些坛子旁发现了这种金属含量很高的骨头，但没有证据证明这种金属只在某一个地方存在，而在其他地方就没有。如果这种金属在很多地方都有，那么这些骨头就有可能属于不同地方的人。 论断的论所不具备说服力。论者说在一些地方发现了这样的骨头，那么就算前提成立，这也只能说明旁边有这种骨头的坛子是由移民传播的。而其他地方的坛子如何并不能一定与这些地方的一样。论据不能说明坛子一定是由移民传播。 论断的结论也很武断。就算不同坛子边的骨头属于同年在一个地方生活的人们，也不能保证他们是因为移民而出现在不同地方的。人出现在童年生活地方以外的区域的原因有很多种，比如狩猎，比如远行，然后因为不可知的原因死在路途中。这些都可能使得这些坛子出现在各种地方，但他们都不是因为移民。 论断武断地排除了贸易这个因素，但正如论者并不能保证坛子旁的骨头都属于一个地方，那不同地方之间进行贸易而使坛子出现在不同地方就不能被排除。结论：论者的结论做得很武断不科学。要增强说服力论者还需要提供关于这种金属的分布情况，发现这种骨头的坛子比例有多少，以及这种坛子被发现时的情景如何，以说明坛子边为什么会有这种骨头。Argument34No evidence show that the people who suffers bone fractures will suffer the osteoporosis.Lacking of necessary details of the survey, it cannot illustrate that drinking more milk products will cause bone fractures easily.Other factor will also influence the rate of osteoporosis, the arguer should not overlook it.Argument35Does Salicylates can cure the headache?Lacking of necessary details about the research, we cannot conclude that the decline in the average number of headaches reported by participants is contribute to the Salicylates.No evidence shows that the prediction is warranted.Argument36The fact that the children spend much more time talking about their biological parents has no causal relationship to the explanation that the children are raised by their biological parents.Only according this example to determine that observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid is insufficient.The arguer fails to consider the possible differences among the islands.No evidence shows that by interview-centered method they can establish a more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions.Argument37No evidence shows that the P hadnt been to B. only by boat? another vehicles like boat?In the ancient time, the situation may be different from today.Plenty of food cannot indicate that the people in P neednt cross the river.The P might go to L many years later.Argument38The arguer provides no evidence to prove that the high consumption of fish is the reason of the fact that few people often feel cold. (C.E)The arguer fails to take into account possible differences between the East Meria and the West Meria. (F.A)We also cant conclude that the Ichthaid is the active constituents because there is no evidence shows that will prevent cold.There are many other solutions to prevent cold.Argument39The arguer provides no evidence to show that the long-distance degree program lead the decrease of expenditure for dormitory and classroom space.The arguer overlooks the possible differences between the O and H.Can the long-distance degree program solve the budget deficits? Argument40Does the natural food stores can compete with the Excello?More concerning about foods grown using pesticides or preserved with chemicals cannot indicate that the consumer will choose the organic food.The survey which conducts on the tasting fair is suspect because the details of the survey is unknown.No evidence shows that stocking organic foods will bring profits to Excello.Stocking a full line of organic food products in all our markets may not be necessary.Argument41No evidence shows that the F company should be responsible for the lost.Only $10,000 worth of the food had been destroyed by pest damage, which cannot indicate that the B company is better.The arguer fails to take the possible differences between the P and W into account.Is it the best way? Are there no Other solutions?Argument42The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between the ecotourism and the rising of per capita income in B.The arguer fails to consider the possible differences between the B and P.To ensure that our advertising campaign is successful, we should hire the current director of B as a consultant for the campaign, which is unwarranted.Is it necessary for us to promote ecotourism?Argument43The arguer fails to consider the possible differences between the R and the A.Does the A profit for their service and equipment?The survey proves nothing because it lack necessary detail and conclusion.Can the R hold its share by offering the same features as A?Argument44Is it necessary to compete with R?There is no evidence shows that opening the caf will attract more consumers.The decline of child population doesnt indicate that the need of childrens book will decrease.Do the consumers accept the action of M? Is it a feasible action?Argument45This argument based on the assumption that the climate here is becoming warm. But the arguer fails to provide certain evidence.The report of the hunters cannot indicate that the amount of the arctic deer is decline.The argument fails to establish the causal relationship between the decline of the arctic deer and the warm climate.Argument46The research into the language and legends of the Innu cannot be creditable when we study the bears and the grizzly.The language of Innu has two words for two different kinds of bears, which cannot indicate that one of them is grizzly.Even we admit that one of the words means grizzly. We also cannot conclude that there is grizzly in the L.The explorer records the grizzly accurately, which is unwarranted.Argument47The argument is based on the