写作我的资源Lesson4-agree or disagree

议论文介绍段+核心段+结尾段,轻松搞定6-6.5,Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,糟糕的心路历程,1.我到底要赞同还是不赞同啊！2.要不哪边好写就写哪边吧！3.(写了100词以后)完蛋！写不下去了！4.要不把两边都写了吧！5.完蛋！我到底赞不赞同啊！6.不管了，反正都讨论到了！,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,整篇文章只能讲解你自己的观点或者陈述事实，绝对不要花大量笔墨去讨论别人的看法。,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,三种可能的个人观点,pletelyagree-顺着题目写咯(出现的几率最低，因为题目中经常出现极端限定词)pletelydisagree-逐一反驳咯(比较高的可能性，怼起来很爽。但是你的怼人能力有限。)3.一分为二地来看问题(其实相当于部分赞同partlyagree，但我要求尽可能是一个明确的个人观点，要求比较高的掌控力)1).虽然我承认,但是我认为(必须确认题目能被分出清晰的两部分，一部分对，一部分错)2).我认为是否应该取决于(别乱用，一定要确保有明确的划分标准),2020/5/4,2020/5/4,完全赞同的写法并不常见，最主要的原因是官方出题的时候经常在题目里设定极端限定词，这就导致完全赞同的写法会显得比较肤浅。但是，大家最好还是把完全赞同的逻辑藏在某个小角落，万一有时候能用到呢。,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,1.改写观点，然后表达完全赞同；2.赞同理由-13.赞同理由-24.赞同理由-35.Inconclusion,重复自己的观点.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Somepeoplethinkthatunpaidcommunityserviceshouldbeacompulsorypartofhighschoolprogrammes(suchasworkingforacharity,improvingtheneighbourhoodorteachingsportstoyoungchildren).Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Somepeoplehavebenefitedfrommoderncommunicationtechnology,butsomegroupsofpeoplehavenotbenefitedatall.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,The21stcenturyhasseenalargenumberofchangesthatarebeyondourwildestexpectations.Oneoftheseadvancesistherapiddevelopmentofcommunicationstechnology.Theadvantagesofconvenienceandhighefficiencybroughtbydigitalcommunicationareobvious,butIdonotthinkthateveryonehasaccesstothesebenefits.Digitalformsofcommunicationenablemanypeople,mainlyincludingstudents,familiesaswellasentrepreneurs,toreapthemaximumbenefits.Fromaneducationalperspective,learningcanbeincrediblyefficientandeffective,asstudentshavingtheinternetconnectioncanvirtuallysolvealltheirpuzzlesbybrowsingteachingwebsitesoraskingforhelpfromteacherssimultaneously.Internet-basedcommunicationalsocontributespositivelytostrengtheningfamilyrelationshipsandincreasingclosenessbetweenfamilymembers.Forexample,studentswhoattendboardingschoolsorstudyabroadareabletokeepindailycontacteasilywithparentsbysendinggreetingmessagesorcamerachatting.Whatismore,companiescanberunatamuchlowercostbecausetheinternetandcomputershelptoexpandbusinesscheaplyandbecauseinformationtechnologyallowsemployeestoworkathome,whichsavesmostoftherentsforofficespace.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,However,Iwouldarguethatthebenefitsofinformationandcommunicationtechnologyarerestrictedtocertaingroupsofusers.Inotherwords,somepeople,particularlytheoldandthepoor,arenotbeneficiariesofmodernwaysofcommunication.Withregardtotheformer,alargepercentageofelderlypeopleareunableandreluctanttoadapttonewtechnology,whichmeansthattheybarelyenjoytheconvenienceandfunbroughtbythedevices.Asforpeoplelivinginextremepoverty,mobilephones,computersandanyotherelectronicdevicesareluxuries.Allweb-basedactivitiesmeannothingtothem,neithermakingthemrelaxednorprovidingthemwithcareeropportunities.Inconclusion,Iagreewiththeideathattechnologicaladvancesininformationandcommunicationhaveonlybroughtbenefitstoacertaingroupofpeople,eventhoughitisalargegroup.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,完全不赞同逻辑的使用比例比完全赞同多得多，这是因为有的题目读起来简直丧心病狂。作为作者，只想怼死这个提出观点的人，所以就直接针对题目里的各个点进行反驳就好。,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,1.改写观点，然后表达完全不赞同；2.不赞同理由-13.不赞同理由-24.不赞同理由-35.Inconclusion,重复自己的观点.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Somepeoplebelievethatwildanimalshavenoplaceinthe21stcentury,soprotectingthemisawasteofresources.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Somepeoplearguethatitispointlesstospendmoneyontheprotectionofwildanimalsbecausewehumanshavenoneedforthem.Icompletelydisagreewiththispointofview.Inmyopinion,itisabsurdtoarguethatwildanimalshavenoplaceinthe21stcentury.IdonotbelievethatplanetEarthexistsonlyforthebenefitofhumans,andthereisnothingspecialaboutthisparticularcenturythatmeansthatwesuddenlyhavetherighttoalloworencouragetheextinctionofanyspecies.Furthermore,thereisnocompellingreasonwhyweshouldletanimalsdieout.Wedonotneedtoexploitordestroyeverylastsquaremetreoflandinordertofeedoraccommodatetheworldspopulation.Thereisplentyofroomforustoexistsidebysidewithwildanimals,andthisshouldbeouraim.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Ialsodisagreewiththeideathatprotectinganimalsisawasteofresources.Itisusuallytheprotectionofnaturalhabitatsthatensuresthesurvivalofwildanimals,andmostscientistsagreethatthesehabitatsarealsocrucialforhumansurvival.Forexample,rainforestsproduceoxygen,absorbcarbondioxideandstabilisetheEarthsclimate.Ifwedestroyedtheseareas,thecostsofmanagingtheresultingchangestoourplanetwouldfaroutweighthecostsofconservation.Byprotectingwildanimalsandtheirhabitats,wemaintainthenaturalbalanceofalllifeonEarth.Inconclusion,wehavenorighttodecidewhetherornotwildanimalsshouldexist,andIbelievethatweshoulddoeverythingwecantoprotectthem,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Somepeoplethinkthatcompaniesshouldhavethesamenumberofmaleandfemaleemployees.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Itisundeniablethatmenandwomenshouldhaveequalaccesstojobopportunities.However,Icompletelydisagreewiththeideathatthenumberofmalesandfemalesinacompanyshouldbeexactlythesame.Firstofall,manycompaniesaremoreattractivetoonegenderthantheother,sothenumberofjobapplicantsishighlylikelytobeone-sided,meaningthatitisalmostimpossibletorecruitthesamenumberfrombothsexes.Forexample,acompanyengagingintheconstructionindustrywillreceivemostofapplicationsfrommen,withfewwomeninterestedinitspositions.Asaresult,havingthesamenumberofmenandwomeninsuchacompanyseemsunrealistic.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,AnotherreasonwhyIamagainstthegivenopinionisthatitissimplyunfairtobaseemploymentforapositiononthegenderofanapplicant.Ifamalecandidateisthebestchoiceforapositioninacompany,itissurelywrongtorejecthiminfavourofafemalewithlowercompetenceandfewerqualifications.Companiesshouldtreatallcandidatesfairlybyconsideringtheirworkexperience,expertiseandsocialskills,etc.,ratherthantheirgender.Finally,althoughanequalnumberofemployeesofeachsexseeminglymakespositivecontributionstoimprovinggenderequalityinjobmarket,itislikelythatworkefficiencyofacompanyadoptingsuchapolicywillbenegativelyaffected.Thisisbecausemalesoutperformfemalesincertainjobs,andviceversa.Forexample,ifaprivatehospitalhada50:50splitofmaleandfemalenurses,therewouldbealotofcomplaintsasaresultofthesignificantdifferencebetweenmenandwomenintermsoftheirabilitiestotakecareofpatients.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Inconclusion,theselectionofemployeesshouldbebasedonfactorsthatrepresentacandidatesqualitiesandqualifications.Itwouldbecounterproductivetomakeaselectiondecisionongender.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Individualscandonothingtochangesociety.Newdevelopmentscanbeonlybroughtaboutbygovernmentsandlargeinstitutions.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Opinionsaredividedonwhetheritispossibleforindividualstomakechangestosociety.Ibelievetherearemanyexamplesofindividualscientists,inventorsorevenpoliticalactivistswhohavemadesignificantcontributionswhichhavebenefitedtheirsocietiesormankindingeneral.Therefore,Icompletelydisagreewiththegivenstatement.Onefieldinwhichindividualshavemadepositivechangesisthatofscience,examplesofwhicharemedicineandelectricity.Withregardtotheformer,aBritishscientistscalledSirAlexanderFlemingaccidentallydiscoveredpenicillinwhenhenoticedthatbacteriacouldnotsurvivenearcertainfungi.Thisdiscovery,thefirstantibiotic,hassavedmillionsoflives.Asfaraselectricityisconcerned,perhapsthegreatestscientistofallwasNicolaTesla,withoutwhoseinventionsinthisfieldwemightnothavethesafesystemofdistributingelectricitybyalternatingcurrentthatwehavetoday.AmonghisotherinventionswereradiowaveswhichareusedtobroadcastTVandradio,andofcoursewifi.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,Apartfromscience,anumberofpoliticalactivistshavealsomadesignificantcontributionstotheirsocieties,andhavehelpedtowinfreedomfortheirpeople.PerhapsthemostfamousofthesewasMahatmaGandhi,anIndianlawyerwhohelpedtowinindependenceforhisnationfromtheBritishwithhisuniquestyleofpeacefulprotest,whichwaslateraninspirationtootherleadersinthe20thcentury.Forexample,intheUS,ablackcivilrightsleadercalledMartinLutherKingacknowledgedtheinfluenceofGandhi.Kingspassionatestyleandnon-violentprotestsagainstsegregationhelpedtobringaboutpoliticalchangeforblackpeopleinthatcountry.Inconclusion,thescientists,inventors,andactivistsmentionedaboveshowclearlythatindividualscancontributegreatlytotheirsocieties,soitisnottruethattheycannotchangesociety.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,思考这个问题在历史上，男性领导者带来了很多的暴力和冲突。有人认为如果女性来承担领导人角色的话，她们能创造一个更和平的世界。你是否赞同此观点？.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,占到80%以上的一分为二逻辑,一分为二的逻辑被严重依赖，这是因为两个原因。首先，这种写法能充分保障字数；其次，这种构思能体现你对所给观点的精准观点。,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,覆盖更全面的一分为二逻辑,1.改写陈述题目观点。Ibelievethat一句话写出你的清晰观点(前面所提到的两种一分为二方法)2.Itistruethat/Iacceptthat/Iadmitthat(这里有n种方法来写topicsentence)3.However/Nevertheless,Iwouldarguethat开始做出补充或者选择。4.Inconclusion,重复自己的观点和看法。,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,“虽然但是”的一分为二,Schoolsshouldstopteachingchildrenwithbookswhichstudentsthinkboring,andusefilms,TV,videogamesandcomputerinstead.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,“虽然但是”的一分为二,Itisbelievedthattraditionaltextbooks,whichappeartobelessappealingtostudents,shouldgivewaytovariouselectronicteachingtools,suchasvideogamesorfilms.Personally,Ipartlyagreewiththisopinion.Ontheonehand,theintroductionoftechnologicalteachingmethodscouldcontributepositivelytoimprovinglearningeffects.Theprocessofimpartingknowledgeintheformofsoundsandmotionscanbefarmoreeffectivethanthatdonewithwordsandillustrations.Forexample,pupilsexposedtounconventionalwaysofteaching,whetheritisafilmintroducingthehistoryofScotlandoracomputergamedesignedtoenhancemathematicalskills,aremorelikelytoeasilyunderstandwhattheteacheristeachingthanthosewhoaretaughtwithprintedmaterials.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,“虽然但是”的一分为二,Ontheotherhand,despitetheadvantageofteachingwithelectronicdevices,Idonotthinkthatcompletelyremovingtextbooksfromtheclasscanbejustified.Forsomesubjects,suchasliteratureandphilosophy,usingtextbooksisasuperiorwayofstudyingbecausewordsbetterstimulatestudentsimagination.Thisability,however,wouldbeunderminediftheclasswastaughtwithTVdramasorfilmsasalltheinformationisalreadyavailableandseeninthesamewaybyallviewers.Inconclusion,Iagreethatitisentirelyreasonableforschoolstoapplytechnologyineducationduetoitsadvantagesintermsofbeingvisuallyandaudiblyappealing.However,Iamnotinsupportofstoppingtheuseoftraditionaltextbooksbecausetheyplaysignificantrolesincertainsubjectsthatrequireconcentrationandimagination.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,“取决于”的一分为二,Task2：Toomuchmoneyisspentlookingafterandrepairingoldbuildings.Weshouldknockthemdownandbuildmodernonesinstead.Doyouagreeordisagree?,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,“取决于”的一分为二,Mostgovernmentsarefacedwiththedilemmaofwhethertospendahugeamountofmoneyprotectingoldbuildingsorsimplyknockthemdown.Inmyopinion,whetheranoldbuildingshouldbetorndownandmakewayforanewonemainlydependsonitsvalueintermsofartandhistory.Ontheonehand,itisnotwiseforthegovernmenttoinvestfinancialandotherresourcesinprotectingsomevaluelessoldbuildingsinspiteoftheircenturialexistence.Ifahouseortowercloselyresembleshundredsofotherbuildingsintermsofdesignandfunction,thenitwouldbeawasteofmoneytokeepitalive.Thegovernmentinsteadshouldconsidermakingspaceformodernbuildings,especiallythosehigh-riseones,whichwillbefollowedbyarangeofbenefits,suchasincreasingaffordablehousingsupplyandimprovinglivingconditions.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,“取决于”的一分为二,Ontheotherhand,itisundoubtedlyworthwhiletopreservebuildingswithhistoricandartisticmeaningsevenatasignificantcost.Thefirstreasonisthatthesebuildingsattractpeoplefromdomesticcitiesandallovertheworld.Whetherthefeelingispatrioticorexotic,visitorstothesemeaningfulsitescanbespirituallysatisfiedandatthesametimemakeeconomiccontributionstothecity.Inaddition,todaysdesignersmaybeabletolearnfromsomecreativelydesignedandwellerectedbuildings.Forexample,acentury-oldmansionmaybeatextbookteachingmoderndevelopershowtoconstructhousesthatcouldwithstandthefiercestofhurricane.Inconclusion,Idonotagreethatalloldbuildingsshouldbedemolishedwithouttakingtheiruniquemeaningsintoconsideration.Culturallyandhistoricallyvaluableoldarchitecturalworksareworthpreservingandprotecting.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,介绍段的可能性,改写原题观点+自己的观点-最常用事实背景+改写原题观点+自己的观点-容易重复词汇事实背景+自己的观点-难度最大,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,是否赞同的介绍段,Increasingthepriceofpetrolisthebestwaytosolvegrowingtrafficandpollutionproblems.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththisopinion?版本一：Itissometimesarguedthattheincreaseinthepriceoffuelscanbethebestsolutiontoproblemsrelatedtotrafficandenvironment.Icompletelydisagreewiththisopinion.版本二：Itissometimesarguedthattheincreaseinthepriceoffuelscanbethebestsolutiontoproblemsrelatedtotrafficandenvironment.AlthoughIbelievethathigherfuelpricescanreducethenumberofcarsonthestreet,Idonotagreethatasimpleriseinthepriceisenough.,2020/5/4,2020/5/4,是否赞同的介绍段,Somepeoplethinkthatinsteadofpreventingclimatechange,wene