免费预览已结束,剩余1页可下载查看
下载本文档
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
XX内蒙古鄂尔多斯高考英语阅读理解训练 出guo高考频道在考试后及时公布各科高考试题答案和高考作文及试卷专家点评。请广大考生家长关注,祝福广大考生在xx年高考中发挥出最佳水平,考出好成绩!同时祝愿决战xx高考的新高三学员能倍加努力,在xx年高考中也能取得优异的成绩。 People have wondered for a long time how their personalities and behaviors are formed. Its not easy to explain why one person is intelligent and another is not, or why one is cooperative and another is petitive. Social scientists are, of course, extremely interested in these types of question. They want to explain why we possess certain characteristics and exhibit certain behaviors. There are no clear answers yet, but two distinct schools of thought on the matter have developed. As one might expect, the two approaches are very different from each other, and there is a great deal of debate between proponents of each theory. The argument is often conveniently referred to as nature vs. nurture. Those who support the “nature” side of the conflict believe that our personalities and behavior patterns are largely determined by biological and geic factors. That our environment has little, if anything, to do with our abilities, characteristics and behavior is central to this theory. Taken to an extreme, this theory maintains that our behavior is predetermined(注定) to such a great degree that we are almost pletely governed by our instincts(本能). Proponents of the “nurture” theory, or, as they are often called, behaviorists, claim that our environment is more important than our biologically based instincts in determining how we will act. Behaviorists see humans as beings whose behavior is almost pletely shaped by their surroundings. Their view of the human being is quite mechanistic; they maintain that, like machines, humans respond to environmental stimuli (something that helps sb./sth. to develop better and more quickly )as the basis of their behavior. The social and political connections of these two theories are significant. In the United States, for example, blacks often score below whites on standardized intelligent test. This leads some “nature” proponents to conclude that blacks are geically worse than whites. Behaviorists, in contrast, say that the differences in scores are due to the fact that blacks are often robbed of many of the educational and other environmental advantages that whites enjoy, and that, as a result, they do not develop the same responses that whites do. Neither of these theories can yet fully explain human behavior. In fact, it is quite likely that the key to our behavior lies somewhere between these two extremes. That the argument will continue for a long time is certain. 66. The author is mainly concerned about solving the problem _. A. why our personalities and behaviors differ B. what makes different stages of intelligence C. how social scientists form different theories D. what causes the “nature/ nurture” argument 67. The word “proponents” can best be replaced by _. A. approaches B. advocates C. principles D. characters 68. Which of the following statements may be supported by the “nature” school? A. We are born with certain personalities and behaviors. B. Environment has nothing to do with our personalities. C. Abilities and characteristics are showed by behaviors. D. Only extreme behaviors are determined by instincts. 69. What can we learn about the behaviorists? A. They believe human beings are mechanical. B. They pare our behaviors to the machines. C. They suggest that we react to the environment as the machines do. D. They agree that the mechanistic theory can be applied on us as well. 70. The “nature” theorists believe that the blacks low scores _. A. are the result of the educational disadvantages B. are a display of the blacks poor intelligence C. have nothing to do with their true intelligence D. have nothing to do with factors other than heredity(遗传) 答案与解析: 66. A. 主旨大意题。首段首句指出作者要讨论的问题,第2段开始从两个方面解释该问题,末段是总结段,由此看来,首段首句和末段首句提到的human behavior 是本文的中心内容,因此答案为A。虽然文章首段第2句就提到intelligent一词,但该句的intelligent,cooperative,petitive等都只是举例说明首句有关personalities和behaviors的问题,由此可见,选项B并非本文主旨;作者提到两种理论是为了解释性格和行为形成的原因,并非讨论这两种理论形成的原因,因此C、D两项均不正确。 67. B. 词义猜测题。根据文章内容,我们可以判断proponent应指人,指这两种理论的支持者,只有advocates“拥护者”符合这种推测,故选B。 68. A. 细节理解题。 第3段首句的largely determined by biological and geic factors和末句的governed by our
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 湖南省岳阳市湘阴县城南四校2025-2026学年九年级上学期11月期中物理试题(含答案)
- 辽宁省鞍山市海城市育才学校2025-2026学年高三上学期11月期中物理试题(无答案)
- 2025年综合基础知识题库及答案
- 2025年高中物理竞赛高温超导与拓扑物态测试(二)
- 2025年高中化学竞赛专题训练六十二
- 2025年高中物理竞赛冲刺模拟卷一
- 2025合作协议承揽合同范本
- 2025 年绿色低碳标识发展研究报告
- 2025物流服务合同协议范本
- 2025年储能电站投资模式创新报告
- 2025年度哈尔滨“丁香人才周”(春季)民兵教练员补充招聘20人笔试考试备考题库及答案解析
- 2025年中国铁路成都局集团有限公司招聘高校毕业生笔试题库真题及答案
- 中国建筑热环境分析专用气象数据集
- 人教版九年级数学上册《切线的概念、切线的判定和性质》评课稿
- 辽海2011版六年级美术上册《妙思巧做》教学设计
- 2023年06月上海市浦东新区临港新片区文员招考聘用笔试题库含答案解析
- 云南文山州州属事业单位选调考试真题2022
- 常用食物 五畜类 五畜类 食疗药膳课件
- 电气线路设备安装操作规程
- SB/T 238-2008切菜机技术条件
- GB/T 908-2019锻制钢棒尺寸、外形、重量及允许偏差
评论
0/150
提交评论