PresentationuationSheet

1、powerpoint presentation evaluation sheet evaluators name _ period _ given the criteria for an effective presentation, rate the presentation on a scale of 15. 5excellent4above average3average2below average1not effectivetopic of presentationcontent(the presentation was factual and informative. th

2、e major points were made clearly and concisely) text formatting (font type & size is readable; no spelling/ grammar errors) organization (content is well organized and easy to read.) delivery(speaks clearly, makes eye contact, and delivers smoothly.) attractiveness (use of font, color, graphics,

3、 effects, etc.) total points (out of 25) evaluating a presentation topic of presentation:     given the criteria for an effective presentation, rate the presentation on a scale of 15. 5excellent4above average3average2below average1not effective in the space pr

4、ovided below each detail, note specifics as to why you rated the presentation this way.presentation detail:rating:message is focused          design is simple, easy to read, appropriate for the content        &

5、#160; attractive colors that make the slides easy to read.          concise text: (limit 6 lines w/ 6 words per line)          only one concept per slide       

6、   appropriate use of white space          fontsno more than 2 fonts, bold and italics used sparingly, text not smaller than 18 point          visuals used effectively to communicate th

7、e message (do not overcrowd a slide)           oral presentation evaluation sheetas discussed in class, your oral presentations are evaluated on content, organization and delivery. i have structured this evaluation sheet into these three categor

8、ies to provide clear feedback in terms of your presentation. areas for improvement are indicated with a mark next to related criteria. please feel free to discuss this evaluation with me during office hours.student name: _ 1. content:o clear objective or thesis stated. o news item or issue summarize

9、d effectively. o social problem defined clearly in terms of social origin, definition and/or treatment. o social problem analyzed in relation to key concept(s) from weekly chapter reading. o social problem and/or proposed solution(s) discussed in relation to approaches and ideologies presented in ch

10、apter 1 of text (e.g., enemy blaming and interactional approach, manifest and latent effects, etc.). o questions answered in relation to class materials and readings. o other: o comments/notes: 2. organization: o notes prepared and/or obvious rehearsal. o provide set or "hook" for listener

11、s. o listeners informed of key ideas to be discussed (i.e., structure). o use of discourse markers to maintain focus on key issues (e.g., "the main idea is," "the second point i wish to make is," "in conclusion," etc.) o provides closure for presentation by summarizing

12、main point and link to "set." o other: o comments/notes: 3. delivery:o clear enunciation of words and appropriate volume. o not read from script. o appropriate modulation of voice to maintain listeners' attention. o good use of eye contact with listeners. o audio/visual materials appro

13、priate for presentation (e.g., amount, use of, visibility, appearance, etc.) o delivered in assigned time (i.e., not too long or too short). o professional manner/appropriate for university class. o other: comments/notes: overall mark out of 5.oral presentation evaluation formadventures in critical

14、readingname of presenter: 1. what was the topic?2. what main point or points do you recall? àplease rate each of the following statements by circling the appropriate number on the scale below it. add any comments and suggestions below each question or on the back of this sheet. try to be f

15、air and constructive.   3. the presentation was well-planned and effectively organized.  strongly disagree     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10         strongly agree  4.

16、 the major points of the presentation were made clearly and concisely.  strongly disagree     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10         strongly agree 5. the speaker gave class inst

17、ructor a copy of the outline before the talk.strongly disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 strongly agree 6. the speaker read the poem well. strongly disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 strongly agree 7. the speaker applied the 5 levels to the poem (pp. 24-26): context, retelling, interpreting, critical eval

18、uation, personal meaning).strongly disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 strongly agree 8. the speaker carried out adequate additional background research (dictionary, proper pronunciation of unfamiliar words, explaining things listeners might not know).strongly disagree 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 strongly ag

19、ree 9. the presentation was factual and informative.        strongly disagree     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10         strongly agree     10.

20、 i enjoyed listening to the speaker and learned something.        strongly disagree     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10         strongly agree   

21、0; 11. the presentation followed time guidelines: 4-8 minutes.        strongly disagree     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10         strongly agree   

22、  12. verbal portions of the presentation were clear and understandable.        strongly disagree     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10         strongly agr

23、ee   9. the speaker effectively used handouts, blackboard, overhead, computer equipment, or other audio-visual materials.             strongly disagree     0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10