




下载本文档
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、The Self-Regulation Questionnaires Scale Description | Academic | Prosocial | Health Care | Learning | Exercise | Religion | FriendshipDownload the full packet for the Self-Regulation Questionnaires in a Word fileLearning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L)This questionnaire concerns the reasons w
2、hy people learn in particular settings such as a college or medical school course. Whereas the Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire is for use with children, the Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire is for older students. It asks three questions about why people engage in learning-related behavi
3、ors. This questionnaire was formed with just two subscales: Controlled Regulation and Autonomous Regulation. Thus, the responses that are provided are either controlled (i.e., external or introjected regulation) or autonomous (identified regulation or intrinsic motivation). Because the scale was des
4、igned to have just the two "super" categories of regulation, there was no attempt to have the same number of items from each regulatory style (e.g., identified and intrinsic), and there was no psychometric work done on the individual regulatory styles. The validation was done only at the l
5、evel of the two "super" categories.The scale, which is presented below in two slightly different versions, was developed for use in a study conducted in a medical school course referred to as Organ Systems, in which students learn to do medical interviewing (Williams & Deci, 1996). It
6、is the first of the two versions presented. The scale was adapted slightly for college students learning organic chemistry (Black & Deci, 2000), and that version is presented second. It is essentially the same scale, although two items were dropped for the sake of brevity. The questionnaire can
7、be adapted as needed to refer to the particular course or program being studied. Following each version of the scale is information about scoring it.The ScaleLearning QuestionnaireThe following questions relate to your reasons for participating in the interviewing class. Different people have differ
8、ent reasons for participating in such a class, and we want to know how true each of these reasons is for you. There are three groups of items, and those in each group pertain to the sentence that begins that group. Please indicate how true each reason is for you using the following scale: 12345
9、67not at all true somewhat true very true A. I will participate actively in the organ systems classes: 1. Because I feel like it's a good way to improve my skills and my understanding of patients.2. Because others would think badly of me if I didn't.3. Because learning to interview wel
10、l is an important part of becoming a doctor.4. Because I would feel bad about myself if I didnt study this approach.B. I am likely to follow my instructor's suggestions for interviewing: 5. Because I would get a good grade if I do what he/she suggests.6. Because I believe my instructor's sug
11、gestions will help me interview effectively.7. Because I want others to think that I am a good interviewer.8. Because it's easier to do what I'm told than to think about it.9. Because it's important to me to do well at this.10. Because I would probably feel guilty if I didn't comply
12、with my instructor's suggestions.C. The reason that I will continue to broaden my interviewing skills is: 11. Because it's exciting to try new ways to work interpersonally with my patients.12. Because I would feel proud if I did continued to improve at interviewing.13. Because it's a cha
13、llenge to really understand what the patient is experiencing.14. Because it's interesting to use the interview to try to identify what disease the patient has. Scoring information for this SRQ-L (interviewing).Begin by calculating the two subscale scores by averaging the items on that
14、 subscale. They are: Autonomous Regulation: 1, 3, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14Controlled Regulation: 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12In past studies, the alpha reliabilities for these two subscales have been approximately 0.75 for controlled regulation and 0.80 for autonomous regulation. Analyses can be done with the two
15、separate subscales, or a Relative Autonomy Index can be formed by subtracting the controlled subscale score from the autonomous subscale score.Reasons for Learning QuestionnaireThe following questions relate to your reasons for participating actively in your organic chemistry class. Different people
16、 have different reasons for their participation in such a class, and we want to know how true each of the reasons is for you. Please use the following scale to indicate how true each reason is for you: 1234567not at all true somewhat true very true A. I will participate actively in organic
17、 chemistry: 1. Because I feel like its a good way to improve my understanding of the material.2. Because others might think badly of me if I didnt.3. Because I would feel proud of myself if I did well in the course.4. Because a solid understanding of chemistry is important to my intellectual growth.
18、B. I am likely to follow my instructors suggestions for studying chemistry: 5. Because I would get a bad grade if I didnt do what he/she suggests.6. Because I am worried that I am not going to perform well in the course.7. Because its easier to follow his/her suggestions than come up with my own stu
19、dy strategies.8. Because he/she seems to have insight about how best to learn the material.C. The reason that I will work to expand my knowledge of chemistry is: 9. Because its interesting to learn more about the nature of chemistry.10. Because its a challenge to really understand how to solve chemi
20、stry problems.11. Because a good grade in chemistry will look positive on my record.12. Because I want others to see that I am intelligent. Scoring information for this SRQ-L (chemistry).Begin by calculating the two subscale scores by averaging the items on that subscale. They are: Autonomous R
21、egulation:, 4, 8, 9, 10Controlled Regulation:2, 3, 5, 6, 7,11,12 In past studies, the alpha reliabilities for these two subscales have been approximately 0.75 for controlled regulation and 0.80 for autonomous regulation. Analyses can be done with the two separate subscales, or a Relative Autonomy In
22、dex can be formed by subtracting the controlled subscale score from the autonomous subscale score.References concerning the SRQ-LBlack, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors autonomy support and students autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination
23、theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779.An alternative questionnaire. Robert J. Valleran
24、d, University of Quebec at Montreal (e-mail: vallerand.robert_juqam.ca ) and his associates have developed an additional assessment device for measuring motivation for learning at the high school and college levels. Referred to as the Academic Motivation Scale it is available in both English and French. The relevant references are:Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & V
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2025江苏劳动合同书范本
- 2025房地产买卖合同
- 2025北京室内装修合同样本
- 2025设备抵押担保借款合同范本(附抵押合同)
- 2025版权授权合同范文
- 2025简易服装买卖合同
- 2025商场解除合同协议书
- 2025茶叶销售合同
- 2025年电子计算机配套产品及耗材合作协议书
- 2025年圆柱型锌空气电池项目建议书
- 论语子路篇-论语子路篇讲解课件
- 咯血-护理查房课件
- 公路工程施工现场安全检查手册
- 黄河上游历史大洪水市公开课金奖市赛课一等奖课件
- 激光跟踪仪使用手册
- 马家河金矿选矿试验报告
- 货物采购服务方案
- 图纸答疑格式
- DB11-T 1322.64-2019 安全生产等级评定技术规范 第64部分:城镇供水厂
- 《普通生物学教案》word版
- 2017年最新普速铁路接触网运行维修规则
评论
0/150
提交评论