反倾销介绍及案例分析课件

1、Anti-dumping and countervailing duties against China in 2009 Anti-dumping and countervailing duties allegedly occur when a product sells its products abroad at an “unfair” price, generally defined that the firm charges its domestic customers or “below cost”.Dumping is often seen as equivalent to pre

2、datory pricing - selling below cost to drive competitors out of business.Anti-dumping and countervailing dutiesWTO allows countries to impose anti-dumping or countervailing duties on a product When there isExistence of dumpingMaterial injuryCause-and-effect linkage 。After the global financial crisis

3、, foreign enterprises are facing competition and dual pressure from global and domestic market because of the rapid decline in global marlet demand. many countries had introduced a variety of trade-protecting measures to prevent global market from shrinking due to trade diversion.Background目前全球35%的反

4、倾销调查和71%的反补贴调查针对中国出口产品。截至2008年，中国已连续14年成为遭受反倾销调查最多的经济体，连续3年成为遭受反补贴调查最多的经济体。仅自2008年11月以来，中国就遭受超过100项的贸易保护主义壁垒，占同期世界各国各地区采取的贸易保护主义措施的三分之一强，名列世界第一。 At prsent 35% of the world anti-dumping investigations and 71% of the anti-subsidy investigations are directed against Chinese exports. By the year of 2008

5、, China has been hit the most by anti-dumping investigations for 14 years in succession and by anti-subsidy investigations for 3years running.Since November 2008 , China had suffered more than 100 of trade barriers measures, accounting for nearly 1/3 of the whole protectionism measures, ranking firs

6、t throughout the world.Company LogoReasonFor the enterprises in China, anti-dumping is fairly unfair. Some countries such as EU and U.S. do not aknowledge China as a nation of market economy. And therefor cost and price are planed, not determined by the market, resulting that when calculating normal

7、 value, foreign countries uaually adopt a surrogate countrys market value to replace the cost and price of the enterprises involved in China.The approah mentioned above is appearantly unfair . However, the US and EU will contine to adopt this approach in the next 15 years. In terms of the countries

8、and regions that initiated anti-dumping and countervailing investigations against China, India comes to the first place to file the most cases against China. Although the number of compliants that EU and the US made is less than that of India,they two still hold a tremendos market share accounting f

9、or 40% in Chines exports.In terms of the items, the anti-dumping and countervailing investigation initiated against China are mainly concentrated on steel, texiles, auto parts and light industry products. China-US tires safeguard Events EUs anti-dumping lawsuit on Seamless Steel Pipes and tubes Anti

10、-dumping lawsuits on shoesChina-US tires safeguard Events 4月20日：美国钢铁工人协会宣布，依据美国1974年贸易法第421条款，向美国国际贸易委员会提出对中国输美商用轮胎的特殊保障措施案申请，要求美政府对中国出口的用于客车、轻型卡车、迷你面包车和运动型汽车的2100万个轮胎实施进口配额限制4月29日：美国国际贸易委员会在联邦纪事上公告启动对中国轮胎产品的特保调查。这是时隔三年多之后，美国又一次对中国产品发起特保调查，而且涉案金额巨大。我国政府对此表示强烈不满并坚决反对6月18日：美国国际贸易委员会对中国乘用车及轻卡车轮胎特保案做出肯定

11、性损害裁决，认定中国轮胎产品进口的大量增加，造成或威胁造成美国内产业的市场扰乱。中国政府对此深表遗憾6月29日：美国国际贸易委员会就对中国轮胎采取特保措施，提出了对乘用车、轻型货车用中国制轮胎征收3年特别关税的方案，第1年至第3年额外征收的关税分别为55%、45%、35%8月7日：美国贸易代表办公室在华盛顿举行听证会，就“中国输美轮胎特保案”听取各方意见。这已是美方第二次就这一特保案进行听证9月2日：美贸易代表办公室将在咨询财政部、劳工部、商务部等部门意见后，向奥巴马提出相关建议9月17日前：奥巴马将综合各方建议作出最后裁决China-US tires safeguard Events Sep

12、t 11th 2009, the US President Barack Obama decided to take special protective measures on Chinese tire for 3 years, respctively add 30%, 25% and 20% punitive tariffs on the original price.China-US tires safeguard Events On January 19th 2010, WTO dispute mechnism set up an expert panel and published

13、the report on December 13th that American measures did not break against WTO regulations.In 2011, China gave it a try once again to submit an appeal to WTO.On Sept.5th the final report on the dispute settlement mechanism maintained the same and continued to recognize the compliance of the US measure

14、s China-US tires safeguard Events CommentsMr. zhou, Senior professor on China-US relations of Tinghua University, told the reorters that the US safeguard measures is an abuse of protective instruments. Adding this is abviously trade protectionism.Chinas steel export in 2009 is exceptionally difficul

15、t. Because of the global financial crisis, the international steel demand fell sharply, wosening trade environment. In 2009, there was 21 anti-dumping and counterviling cases against China mainly initiated by the US and EU. In July 2009 the EU Commission announced that the seamless steel pipe import

16、ed from China is in existence of dumping, and had caused substantial damage to EUs industry, and proposed anti-dumping duties imposed 17.7-39.2%. It was learned that 12 members vote in favor of taxation, 11 against and four abstained (in the voting mechanismthe of EU, abstention regarded as the supp

17、ort), the European Commission tax proposals were ultimately approved. EUs anti-dumping lawsuit on Seamless Steel Pipes and tubes EUs anti-dumping lawsuit on Seamless Steel Pipes and tubesAugust 2009, EU anti-dumping committee supported European Commission on imposing 5-year levy anti-dumping duties

18、on seamless steel pipe imported from China.And analysists said the anti-dumping tax rate could be up to 40%. EUs anti-dumping lawsuit on Seamless Steel Pipes and tubesOn october 6th 2009, EU council of Ministers made an announcement that seamless steel pipe imported from China had caused material in

19、jury to EU industries and they decided to impose anti-dumping duties of 17.7%39.2%.Hurt the trade rations with Chinahurt the mutual interest of both parties EUs anti-dumping lawsuit on Seamless Steel Pipes and tubesSignificanceThe anti-dumping duties imposed by EU Anti-dumping lawsuits on shoes In v

20、iew of China-US tires safeguard events, the Latin America countries jointly imposed anti-dumping measures on shoes imported from China.July 1th 2009 Argentina Sept. 9th Brazil Anti-dumping lawsuits on shoesEdnard Bianchi explianed that if only one country took anti-dumping meaures, while the other country did not do the same thing, which will make the goods flow to another country,leading to trade diversion, thus making it difficult to set limitations on these products effectively.This is why the two countries jointly took measures on Ghinese shoes. A