英文有見不少同學不太熟習DebateSpeeches的寫作模式今

1、Pr 1B Revi Debate Speeches有見不少同學不太熟習Debate Speeches的寫作模式，今課特地跟同學複習DebateSpeeches的格式，順道幫助同學溫習一下argumenive writings（議論作）的language express（常用句式）.FormatRemember:Your arguments must be persuasive. You should use reasons and exles to support your argument.“Counter-argument and refu ion” is always persuasi

2、ve. However, do not pounter-argumentsand refu ion in every paragraph of your speech, as it will be too long and clumsy. You have to be very clear and frm about your stance.You should mainly use present tense.ExpressI frmly / strongly be ve / opeition oft + clausee tax.E.g. I strongly ope the imIts o

3、bvioust + clauseE.g. Its obvioust indulgence inernet surfng would lead to anti-sol behaviour.There is no doubt / It is undoubtedly truet + clauseE.g. It is undoubtedly truet going to bed late will lead to tiredness. Admittedly, / Conceivably,E.g. It is raining heavily now. Conceivably, Tom will be l

4、ate.I am totally against + gerund / noun phraseE.g. I am totally against the idea of keng a dog in a small fat.4. 結語 (): 重申立場，希望讀者支持自己的論點3. 內容正文 (Body Paragraph) Own View 1Own View 2Counter-argument + Refuion2. 引段 (Opening Paragraph): 表明立場1. 稱謂 (Saluion)SequencingHere is a sle of debate speech with

5、some missing senten. From the senten(A -s withE) below, choose fve which best complete the blthe correct letters.she text. Fillhe blYou are taking part in a school debate on the following motion:“Private cars should be banned inWrite ONE speech either supporting or op.”ing the motion.Dear Principal,

6、 teachers, and fellow students,The motion for todays debate is “private cars should be banned in”, whichwe unconditionally ope.he frst place, banning cars fromroads is no different from limiting ourfreedom ofses. (1) The answer is obvious. (2) which are not merely a vehicut also a symbol of wealth.

7、When what we alwaysemphasize nowadays is freedom, it is sarcastic to see such a retreat of freedom.Besides, private cars would be handy whenever you need to get betn pla. Ofcourse, I know how convenient and effcient our transport network is, but I also doubt ifpublic transport can cover every corner

8、 of. (3) Surely, I can understand the reason behind such a motion; pollution, traffic jam, and the use of fossil fuel are major problems of every big city. Banning private cars candefiniy alleviate these problems. (4) Can you afford queuing up for hoursin order to go to school? Are you confdentt the

9、 present public transport can handlethe frightening commute situation? Imjam” would come up instead.sible! (5) but a new “commuterThese are all my main arguments. I hope all of you find my arguments convincing,which I strongly beve is for the good of everypeople.nk you.1.2.3.4.E，題目前一句關於購物的，而後面的The a

10、nswer is obvious暗示是問句。D，因為題目後面所闡述的是關於擁有汽車的，give up解作放棄，能同下文語意。A，這一段講交通網絡的效率，而選擇跟巴士班次有關。B，題目前句說banning private cars可以紓緩問題，後面則是一連串質疑這想法的問題，所以要選擇，用However去表達上的對比。5.C，問題後面的”but a new instead”說會有新問題出現，but 之前當然是有問題被減輕。For those who live in suburbs and villages where the frequency of buses can be as scarce as one sing us per hour, a complete ban of private cars to the city centre is impractical.However, have you ever imagined what would our lifee when all private cars are banned?When implementing this pro al, traff