坎特伯雷故事集读后感

坎特伯雷故事集读后感篇一：坎特伯雷故事集的英文读后感Itappearstothemanexceptionallylonganddrearyjourney,stiflingmonotonyfirmlyenfoldingthirtyseemingly well religiously-conscious pilgrims, whotrooped to a shrine named Canterbury. It issufficiently conspicuous that the march would havemountedtonofunatallifthepropositionofthestory-telling contest hadnotbeenbred. Theflock ofpilgrimscameindiversewalksofthesocietyatthattime, demonstrating their typical values andperceptionsanchoredintheirvarioussocialroles.Eyesfloatingthroughtheseold-establishedpages,IwasoverwhelmedbytheenormouscontrastbetweenwhatIpresupposedittobeandwhatitreallydisplays.Tobefrank,previouslyIdeemedthatitwasallaboutthetalesofthereligiousfiguresorgodswhichcanextinguishmygleamingpassionwithinonlyonesecond.However,the protagonists of these tales are just ordinaryenoughnottoevokeanysenseofdistance.它似乎他们异常漫长而枯燥的旅程

,令人窒息的单调牢牢拥抱着三十看似好宗教意识的清教徒

,他们成群结队地前往一个名叫坎特伯雷神殿。 它是足够明显,3月将会安装到毫无乐趣可言,如果命题的讲故事比赛没有被饲养。那群朝圣者是在不同社会阶层的当时 ,展示他们的典型的价值观和看法锚定在他们的各种社会角色。通过这些老牌页面眼睛浮动 ,我是被巨大的反差我预先假定它是和它真正显示。说实话 ,以前我认为它是所有关于的故事正是宗教人物或神可以扑灭我的闪闪发光的激情在只有一个第二。然而 ,这些故事的主角就是普通到不唤起任何意义上的距离。BeforeIsatdowntoelaborateonmyownviewpoints,I consulted some reviews on the Internet, butreinforcedismyoncewaveringfaithinthisoldsayingthatthereareathousandHamletsinathousandpeople’seyes.IwilllaymyemphasisonsometalesgroundedonwhichIhaveerectedmyowninterpretations, someofwhicharedistinct fromsomeothers.

在我坐下来详细阐述我自己的观点

,我咨询了一些评论在互联网上

,但钢筋是我曾经动摇信仰在这个老说有一千个村庄在一千人的眼睛。我将把我的一些故事强调基于我所建立我自己的解释 ,其中有些是不同于其他一些。TheKnight ’staleislookeduponbysomecriticsasashining exampleofChivalry whichembracesthetraitsofknightly virtues, honorandcourtly love. Admittedly,thedueltheyfoughttocontendfortheirmutuallover,tosomeextent,reflectedthevaloranddeterminationofaknight,butthehatredtowardsoneanotherspawnedbythisdeformedloveillustratesChivalryatanimmensediscount.ShouldfraternallovebeexcludedfromChivalry?Afterall,theyhadaclosebrotherlybondwhichwassoeasilydemolishedbythesenseofcompetitionandthecravingtomonopolizeaflowergirl.Fairplayisirreproachableandtypicalofknightsinthemedievaltime,butviolenceagainstbrothersisfarfromtheessentialmoralsofChivalry.Itisanirrefutabletruthuniversallyacknowledgedthatlovecanmaddenanyonesteepedinit,sohowtostrikeabalancebetweenintenseloveandindispensablereasonalsoremainsanissuecallingforourpenetratingreflection.骑士的故事是由一些评论家看着骑士精神的光辉典范学科特征的骑士的美德 ,荣誉和威严的爱。诚然 ,他们战斗的决斗争他们的共同的情人 ,在某种程度上 ,反映出的勇气和决心的一个骑士,但对彼此的仇恨引发的这畸形的爱展示了骑士精神在一个巨大的折扣。应该友爱被排除在骑士精神 ?毕竟,他们有兄弟般的密切债券是那么容易被竞争的感觉和渴望独占一个卖花女。公平竞争是无可指责的 ,典型的骑士在中世纪的时候,但暴力对付兄弟远从基本道德的骑士精神。这是一个无可辩驳的举世公认 ,爱可以madden任何人沉湎于它 ,所以如何罢工之间的平衡的爱和不可或缺的原因也仍是一个问题要求我们穿透反射。Chaucer’sintentions oftheClerk’stale retain anopenguess.Somearguethatthistaleservesalessontoallandsundry,particularlysusceptiblewomen,toconfrontadversitywithinexhaustible fortitude. I have to admit thatGriselda’svirtueissuchastodisarmeventhemostprejudiced,butherunconditionalandevenueasonabletolerancedoesn ’t find favor with me. From myperspective, theunderlyingmotiveofthetaleistotargetthegunofassault at the patriarchal society. The husbandsplurgesthewife ’spatiencelavishly,butwasgreetedbyhiswife ’scomplianceandcompromiseandultimately ended up in a blissful life. Honestlyspeaking, thewholetale soundspretty laughable tome.乔叟的意图的职员的故事保持一个开放的猜测。一些人认为这个故事是给所有的人一个教训 ,尤其是敏感的女性 ,面对逆境以无穷的毅力。我不得不承认女子名的美德是如解除甚至最偏颇的 ,但她的无条件的 ,甚至是不合理的公差不得宠我。从我的角度来看 ,其潜在动机的故事就是针对枪的攻击在父权社会。丈夫妻子的耐心大手大脚挥霍 ,但迎接他的妻子的合规和妥协 ,最终结束了在一个幸福的生活。老实说 ,整个故事听起来很可笑的我。GeoffreyChaucer ’sspringinHisPoetryInthepoetryof,thepoetGeoffreyChaucer described abeautiful spring by using hisgorgeouslanguage. Heshowedtopeople anideal springwhichwasdeeplyrootedinhisheart.Andawonderfullife in Geoffrey Chaucer’s spring, everyone liveharmonious with eachother andenjoy their life. TherewasnowarinGeoffrey Chaucer’sspring, thewholelifeintherewerefilledwithpeaceful.一个理想弹簧

,深深地扎根于他的心。和一个美好的生活在杰弗里·乔叟的春天

,大家彼此生活和谐

,享受他在诗歌《坎特伯雷故事集

>,篇二：坎特伯雷故事集的英文读后感Itappearstothemanexceptionallylonganddrearyjourney,stiflingmonotonyfirmlyenfoldingthirtyseemingly well religiously-conscious pilgrims, whotrooped to a shrine named Canterbury. It issufficiently conspicuous that the march would havemountedtonofunatallifthepropositionofthestory-telling contest hadnotbeenbred. Theflock ofpilgrimscameindiversewalksofthesocietyatthattime, demonstrating their typical values andperceptionsanchoredintheirvarioussocialroles.Eyesfloatingthroughtheseold-establishedpages,IwasoverwhelmedbytheenormouscontrastbetweenwhatIpresupposedittobeandwhatitreallydisplays.Tobefrank,previouslyIdeemedthatitwasallaboutthetalesofthereligiousfiguresorgodswhichcanextinguishmygleamingpassionwithinonlyonesecond.However,theprotagonistsofthesetalesarejustordinaryenoughnottoevokeanysenseofdistance.BeforeIsatdowntoelaborateonmyownviewpoints,IconsultedsomereviewsontheInternet,butreinforcedismyoncewaveringfaithinthisoldsayingthatthereareathousandHamletsinathousandpeople’seyes.IwilllaymyemphasisonsometalesgroundedonwhichIhaveerectedmyowninterpretations,someofwhicharedistinctfromsomeothers.TheKnight’staleislookeduponbysomecriticsasashiningexampleofChivalrywhichembracesthetraitsofknightlyvirtues,honorandcourtlylove.Admittedly,thedueltheyfoughttocontendfortheirmutuallover,tosomeextent,reflectedthevaloranddeterminationofaknight,butthehatredtowardsoneanotherspawnedbythisdeformedloveillustratesChivalryatanimmensediscount.ShouldfraternallovebeexcludedfromChivalry?Afterall,theyhadaclosebrotherlybondwhichwassoeasilydemolishedbythesenseofcompetitionandthecravingtomonopolizeaflowergirl.Fairplayisirreproachableandtypicalofknightsinthemedievaltime,butviolenceagainstbrothersisfarfromtheessentialmoralsofChivalry.Itisanirrefutabletruthuniversallyacknowledgedthatlovecanmaddenanyonesteepedinit,sohowtostrikeabalancebetweenintenseloveandindispensablereasonalsoremainsanissuecallingforo