商学院案例手册2017_第1页
商学院案例手册2017_第2页
商学院案例手册2017_第3页
商学院案例手册2017_第4页
商学院案例手册2017_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩200页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

WhartonConsultingClubCasebook2017

NotetotheReader

DearConsultingClubMember,

Thiscasebookismeanttoprovideyouwithabriefoverviewofconsultingrecruitingandinterviewpreparationaswellasanumberofpracticecases.Pleasenotethatthisismeanttosupplementtheexcellentworkdonebyourandotherschoolsinearliercasebooks,sowestronglyencourageyoutonotmakethisyoursolereference.

Goodluck!

-2017WhartonConsultingCasebookEditorialTeam

TypicalCareerPath

Consultant/Associate

SeniorConsultant/Associate

Manager/ProjectLeader

Partner

InterviewProcess

Caseinterview–involvessolvingabusinesscase;candidateexpectedtodrivetowardsasolutionandaskforrelevantdata;focusonstructure

Fitinterview–numerousbehavioralquestionsfocusingonpriorexperiences

Overviewofmanagementconsulting

Problem-solvecomplexandunstructured

Workcloselywithseniormanagementontheclientside

Intellectuallystimulatingworkandabilitytobuildastrongsetofskills

Constanttravel(dependingonofficelocationandconsultingfirm)canposesignificantchallenges

Industry(priortoeconomicdownturn)wasexpectedtogrowat8.8%in2009

Mostfirmshaveaglobalpresenceandofferinternationalprojectopportunities

IndustryOverview–ManagementConsulting

Management consulting involves solving complex business problems and offeringrecommendationstocompanies

ATypicalConsultingInterview

TheFit

Process

Waitinhospitalitysuitewithothercandidates/recruiters

Interviewerasksforyoubyname

Handshake/greeting

Walktointerviewsuite/smalltalk

Youshould

Appearwarm,confident,professional

Interviewermaygivepersonalbackground

Questionsaboutresume/experience

Convinceinterviewerthatyouarefitforthefirm

Passthe“airporttest”

Interviewerwillstartcase

Keeptrackoftimesothatyoubywhenyouareexpectedtoreachaconclusion

Maintainconfident,controlled,upbeatdemeanor

Yourchancetoaskquestions

Walkbacktohospitalitysuitewithinterviewer

Notaskstockquestions

Agoodchancetogettolearnabouttheinterviewer’spersonalexperiencesatthefirm

Casetypesandcaseinterviewmethods

Whatisacase?

Abusinessissue/problemcompanyisfacinginafewsentences

Takesabout25minutes;haslimiteddatawhichisusuallyprovidedifaskedforApproachtosolutionismoreimportantthanthefinalsolution

Therearetwocommoncaseinterviewmethods:

‘Gowiththeflow’cases(typicalofmostfirms)–Youwilldeterminewhichareastoexploreandleadthediscussion,i.e.drivethecase

Commandandcontrol(typicalofMcKinsey)–Interviewerguidesthediscussionandcasehasheavybrainstormingcomponentsandquantitativework

Commoncasetypes*(notacomprehensivelist):

Profitability

MarketEntry

Acquisition

Organization

IndustryAnalysis(incl.non-profit)

MarketSizing

CapacityExpansion(incl.outsourcing)

Investments

OverallflowofaCase

~3min. ~1-2min. ~12-15min. ~3min.

Listenactively

Askclarifyingquestions

Takejudiciousnotes

Organizenotesasslides

Formulateaninitialhypothesisaboutpossiblesolutions

Writedownkeyquestion

Mentionyouwilltakeaminutetoplanyourapproach

Drawoutaframeworkaschecklistoftopicstoexplore

Select3to5majortopicareas

Identifyrelevantsub-topics

Presentplanofattacktointerviewer–startwiththemostimportant

Followyourplan!

Askspecificquestionstotesthypothesis

Adjusthypothesisandplanasdataemerges

Organizenotesasslides

Highlightinsightsfromanynumericalcalculations

Noteconclusions

Drivethecasetoaconclusionbeforetimeexpires

Answerthequestion

Takeadefinitestand

Makebestconclusionwithdataonhand

Makerecommendationsandfollowthemwithsupportingevidence

Address“risks”and“nextsteps”

TableofContents

Case PageNo.

Unicloth 9

BrazilianHighwayConcessions 18

SnacksFoodAcquisitions 27

USManufacturing 34

ChicagoParkingMeters 42

HighEngineerAttritionatSLSOilGasServices 55

SaltLakeCityAirport 68

ClothingChainAcquisitions(HumanCapital) 77

PharmaOutsourcingandTechAdoption 94

MiningCompetitiveStrategy 111

PhightingPhillies 121

InsurancefortheunderservedinIndia 131

NationalParkService 139

Penn&Teller 147

WellingtonEquestrianFestival 161

MedicalDevicesCo 169

TVScreens 176

HomeInspectionCo 191

Unicloth

Case1:Unicloth

LevelofDifficulty:Medium

CaseSimilartoCasesatFirms:BCGsecondround

TopicsTested:i.e.marketsizing,mathematicalcalculation,

Prompt:Ourclient,Unicloth,isanAsianclothingretailerattemptingtoestablishaprofitablepresenceintheUnitedStates.However,sincetheyarrivedfiveyearsago,theyhavestruggledtoachievethatgoalandhaveengagedourfirmtofindoutwhyandtorecommendnextsteps.Howcanwehelp?

FrameworkandClarifyingQuestions

SampleofStrongFramework:

Product

Whatdotheysell?

Whereisitmade?

Competitiveproduct?

Market

Whoarethecompetitors?

Whataretheeconomicconditions?

Havetherebeennewentrants?

Revenue

Averagepriceperunit

NumberofunitssoldintheUSperday

Cost

COGS

Rent

Storemaintenance

Labor

Costoflostsales

FrameworkandClarifyingQuestions

ClarifyingQuestions

Product:

Thiscompanysellscasualclothing,thinkjeans,t-shirts,knitsweaters,dresses,etc.

Theyfollowthedesignsofthecompany’shomemarketinAsia

TheyaremanufacturedinChinaandBangladesh

Market:

Theretailmarkethasbeenstable,noeconomicdownturns,etc.

Revenue:

Price:averageproductpriceis~$40.Thisisinlinewithmid-tiercompetitorssuchasAmericanretailerBapandabitbelowEuropeanretailerMara

Revenue

Revenue

Price:averageproductpriceis~$40.Thisisinlinewithmid-tiercompetitorssuchasAmericanretailerBapandabitbelowEuropeanretailerMara

Sales:

Marketsizing:TheretailerhasaUSpresencecomprisedofthreemallstoresplusoneflagshipstoreon5thAvenue.Havecandidateattempttocalculateannualsalesbasedonintuition.

Threemallstores:

Sellonaverage1,375itemsperday

Havecandidatecalculate:1375items*$40=$55,000perday

$165,000perdayallmallstoresputtogether

$60,225,000annualrevenuefrommallstores

Flagshipstoreon5thAvenue

Sell4,500itemsperday

Havecandidatecalculate4,500items*$40=$180,000perday

$65,700,000peryear

Moveforwardwith$125Mrevenueperyear

Costs

Costs-havecandidatebrainstormwhatcostsmightbe.Iftheydon’tcomeupwithallofthem,givethemthebelow

COGS

Profitmarginonclothingsalesis30%

Costofitemsperyearis$125M*.7=$87.5M

Roundto$90M/year

Rent:

Flagshipstorerent:$1.5Mpermonth=$18Mperyear

Mallstore:$200Kpermonth*3stores=$600Kpermonth,$7.2Mperyear

Roundto$25Mperyear

Maintenanceofstores,utilities,etc.

$5Mperyear

COSTSCONTINUEDONNEXTSLIDE

CostsContinued

Costs-continued

Labor:

Flagshipstore:

500associates,average20hoursperweek,$8.5perhour=

$85,000/week,$4.42Mperyear

5managers,$100Ksalary=$.5Mperyear

Mallstores:

20associatesperstore*3,20hoursperweek,$8.5/hour

$10,200/week,$530,400peryear

1manager,$100Ksalary

$.12Mperyear

Totallaborcost:

Roundto$6Mperyear

Storage,sendingunsoldclothesbacktowarehouse,markdowns,etc.

$12Mperyear

Totalcosts

$138M-notbreakingeven!!(Underby$13Mvs.$125Mrevenue)

ImprovingProfitability

Nowthatwehavealloftherevenueandcosts,let’sworkonmakingthecompanymoreprofitable.Havethecandidatebrainstormandthenguidethemthroughthebelow:

Costs

Manufacturing-Wearealreadyproducingourclothinginthecheapestmannerpossible.

Shipping-Wecouldcut5%ofourCOGSbyshippingtheclothingbyboatinsteadofair

Savings:$4.5Mannual(90M*5%)

Labor-Wehavewhatweneed,cannotreduce

Rent-Havecandidatebrainstormhowyoucouldpotentiallyreducetherentburden.Someoptions:

Movelocationofflagship-No,weneeditformarketing

Closemallstores-Wearenotreadytomakethatmoveaswearehopingtocontinueexpandinginthesuburbsinthefuture

Sharetherentwithanotherbusiness-YES!Openingacoffeeshopwithinthestorewouldcut25%ofourdebtburdenattheflagshipstore.

Savings:$1.75Mannual

Revenue

Havecandidatebrainstormhowwecanimproverevenue

Trainthesalesstaffbettertosell-No,they’reprettywelltrained

Lowerprices-No,itwouldn’tsolveourmarginissue

Onlinestore-Wearenotreadytomakethatinvestmentatthistime

TurnsoutthatAmericancustomersdon’tlovethestylesandhavesometroublewithAsiansizes(thestylestendtobetooconservative,thecolorsaretoomuted,ourclothingtendstorunsmallfortheUSmarket)

AdjustingdesignandsizesandcontinuingtomanufactureseparatelyfortheAmericanmarketwillcostus$12Mannually,butitwillprovide$23Madditionalrevenueperyear

Incrementalrevenue:$11Mannual

Totalincrementalincome

$1.75M+$4.5Msavings

$11Mincrementalrevenue

Total$17.25M→makesupfor$13Mdeficit

Recommendation

TheCEOisabouttowalkinandshewouldliketohearthecandidate’srecommendations-havehim/hermakesome.*Makesureyousaysheandgivethecandidatefeedbackifhe/shefallspreytobiasandcallstheCEOa“he”*

Currentlyweareseeingrevenuesof$125Mannually,butcostsof$138M,meaningweare$13Minthered.However,wehavestudiedthecostandrevenuestructureofyourretailoperationandfoundthatthereareafewactionsyoucantakeatthistime.Onthecostside,werecommendchangingyourmeansofshippingfromairtoboat,achangewehavefoundwillbring$4.5Minannualsavings.Additionally,werecommendseekingapartnertoshareyourrent/spaceattheflagshipstore.Webelieve,forexample,thatplacingacoffeeshopwithinthestorewouldsaveyou25%inrent,forasavingsof$1.75Mannuallyandperhapsencourageyourcustomerstoshopmore.Finally,werecommendrevampingyourinventoryfortheAmericanmarketbyadjustingdesignsandsizestobettermeetdemand.Weestimatethiswilldrive$11Minadditionalannualrevenue.Together,thesemeasureswillmorethanmakeyouprofitable,breakingevenandmaking

$4.25Minprofit.Potentialrisksofthisplanincludehavinganunreliableretailpartnerattheflagshipstore,makingproductsthattheAmericanmarketstilldoesn’tlike,anddelayinginventorystockingthroughthenewshippingmethod.Forthis,werecommendastudyintowhomtheretailpartnershouldbe,engaginginextensivemarketresearchtoproducethecorrectSKUsforthemarket,andadjustingUSwarehouseoperationsandleadtimestoensurethatstockingisnotdelayed.

BrazilianHighwayConcessions

Brazilian Highway Concessions

LevelofDifficulty:Mediumtohard

CaseSimilartoCasesatFirms:McKinseyfinalround

TopicsTested:internationalexpansion,graphicalinterpretation,marketentry,mathematicalcalculations(ROIC).

Prompt:AleadingBrazilianhighwayconcessionscompanyislookingtoexpandinternationally.EconomicgrowthinBrazilhasstalled,andinordertocontinuetogrowbothtop-linerevenuesandbottom-lineprofitability,theclientwantstodiversifyitsportfolioanddecreaseitsexposuretotheBrazilianeconomy.Whatfactorsshouldtheclientconsiderasitthinksthroughitsinternationalexpansionoptions?

OpeningFrameworkandClarifyingQuestions

SampleofStrongFramework

Cultureandmanagementcomplexity

Whatarethelanguageandculturalbarriers?

Whichcountrieswouldbeagoodfitforcurrentleadership’sworkingandmanagerialculture?

CanmanagementadapttothemanagerialstylesofcountriesthatarenotsimilartoBrazil?

Isgeographicaldistanceaproblemtomanageassets?

Pipelineandeconomicprospects

Whatisthepipelineofprojects?Willtherebesignificantprivatizationsornewprojectsinthefuture?

Whatisthesize,complexityandvalueoffutureprojects?

Isthecountrygrowing?Doesitrequireinfrastructureinvestment?

Howadvancedisthecurrentinfrastructureframework?

Politicalenvironment

Whatiscurrentregulationfortheprivatizationofpublicinfrastructure?Whichgovernmentsarepro-privatesectorparticipation?

Isthepoliticalclimatevolatileinthecountry?Istherehighprobabilityofchangesinregulation?

Isthecountryreceptivetobusinessoverall?

Competitiveenvironment

Whoarethecurrentplayersininfrastructureinthecountry?Arethereinternationalplayers?

Howlargearetheyandhowconcentratedistheindustry?

Isitlikelytobestrongcompetitiononbidsforpublicauctions?Howarethevaluationsofthelatestprojects?

SampleClarifyingQuestionsandAnswers

WhereelsedoestheclientcurrentlyoperatebesidesBrazil?

TheclientoperatesonlyinBrazil,hasscopedopportunitiesinSouthAmerica.TheirstaffspeaksprimarilyPortuguese.

Doestheclientoperateinanyindustriesbesidesroadconcessions?Aretheiradjacentindustriestheycouldpursue?

No,theclientcurrentlyonlyfocussesonroadconcessions(buildingandoperatingpublicroadways).

Whoaretheclientstypicalcustomersandhowdotheytypicallywinbusiness?

Theclients’customersarealwaysmunicipal,state,ornationalgovernments.Theybid,usuallythroughcompetitiveRFPs.

Doesthecompanywanttofocusonaspecificregion,orisitopentoallgeographies?

Theclientwantstoconsiderallgeographies,withabiastowardsopportunitiesinSouthAmerica.

GraphicalInterpretation:Introduction

Afterseveralconversationswiththeclientandaninitialanalysisbyourteam,we’vedecidedthatopportunitiesoutsideofSouthAmericaarenotworthpursuingbecauseof1)culturaldifferences;and2)managerialcomplexity.TheteamhasgatheredthebelowdatainordertoassesswhichcountriesinSouthAmericawouldbethemostattractive(providetheintervieweewiththegraph).

Basedonthegraph,whichmarketsshouldourclientfocustheireffortson?Whichshoulditdefinitelyeliminate?CorrectanswershereareMexico,Colombia,ChileandPeru(upperrightquadrant).YoumayalsobeabletoargueArgentinaaswell–forwhicheaseofdoingbusinessisnotenoughbutpipelineisstrong.

Assumingtheclientchoosestoenteroneormoreofthesemarkets,howshoulditapproachmarketentry?Correctanswersherecouldbegreenfieldorprimaryinvestment,jointventure(JV),oracquireacompetitor(M&A).

Whataretheprimaryprosandconsofeachmarketentryapproach?

Primaryinvestment:limitedknowledgeofmarket/greatercontrol

JV:lesscontrol/somemarketknowledge

M&A:moreexpensive/loweridiosyncraticrisk/localmarketknowledge

GraphicalInterpretation

Dataforinterviewee

Colombia

Argentina

Chile

Bolivia

Honduras

PrimaryInvestmentvs.M&A(Qualitative)

TheclienthasdeterminedthattherearenoviableJVopportunities,andsowantstodecidewhethertogotheprimaryinvestmentorM&Aroutes.Ifyouweregoingtoevaluatethetwoopportunitiessidebyside,whichinputswouldyouneedtocomparethevalueofeachinvestment?

Primaryinvestment

Annualprofit=(Km*$/km*vehicles)*(1-opex)

Payback=initialinvestment/annualprofit

InvestmentValue=annualprofit/discountrate[*assumeperpetualconcession]

ROIC=(investmentvalue/initialinvestment)-1

M&A

Annualprofit=revenue*(1-opex)+(revenue*synergies)

Payback=initialinvestment/annualprofit

Value=annualprofit/discountrate

ROIC=(value/initialinvestment)-1

Providetheintervieweewiththedatasheetafters/hehaswalkedthroughthemajorinputslistedabove.

PrimaryInvestmentvs.M&A(Quantitative)

Dataforinterviewee

Input

Primaryinvestment

M&A

Km

300

NA

$/Km

$5

NA

Expectedtraffic(vehicles/month)

20,000

NA

Annualrevenue

Km*$/Km*expectedtraffic

$120,000,000

Opex

30%

40%

Investment

$150,000,000

$750,000,000

Contractterm

Perpetual

NA

Discountrate

10%

10%

Synergies

NA

15%(ofrevenue)

Answersforinterviewee

Input

Primaryinvestment

M&A

Annualrevenue

$30,000,000

(300*5*20,000)

$120,000,000

Annualopex

$9,000,000

(30,000,000*.3)

$48,000,000

(120,000,000*.4)

Annualprofit

$21,000,000

(30,000,000-9,000,000)

$90,000,000

(138,000,000-48,000,000)

Paybackperiod

7years

(150,000,000/21,000,000)

8.33years

(750,000,000/90,000,000)

Value

$210,000,000

(21,000,000/.1)

$900,000,000

(90,000,000/.1)

ROIC

40%

((210,000,000/150,000,000)-1)

20%

((900,000,000/750,000,000)-1)

OnceintervieweehascomeupwithanROIC,askthemfortheirconclusion.

Wrap-up

Whatshouldtheclientdo?

TheclientshouldenteraSouthAmericanmarket(preferableMexico,Chile,orColombia)throughaprimaryinvestment:

There are high levels of cultural similarity and low levels of managerialcomplexitywithintheSouthAmericanmarkets.

Mexico, Chile, Peru and Colombia all have large pipelines and attractivebusinessenvironmentrelativetootherSouthAmericanmarkets.

AprimaryinvestmentinoneofthesemarketsislikelytoyieldahigherROICandshorterpaybackperiodrelativetocurrentlyexistingM&Aopportunities.

Asfollowonsteps,theclientmaywishtounderstandwhetherfurthernegotiationsmayyieldalowerpriceforanM&Aopportunity,howsensitiveourinvestmentanalysesaretomacroeconomicfactors,andthelikelihoodofwinningdealsasaprimaryinvestorinthenewcountry.

SnackFoodsAcquisition

SnackFoodsAcquisition

LevelofDifficulty:Medium

CaseSimilartoCasesatFirms:BainRound1case

TopicsTested:marketsizing,break-evenanalysisandpaybackperiod,mathematicalcalculation,

Prompt:AUSsnackfoodscompanyspecializinginsnackingpeanuts,PeanutCo.,isplanningtoacquireanothercompanyspecializinginsnackingalmonds,AlmondCo.PeanutCo.iscurrentlythemarketleaderinsnackingpeanuts,buttheoverallsegmentisgrowingslowlycomparedtothemarketandtheywanttodiversify.Theyhavehiredyoutotellthemwhetherthisisagoodidea.

FrameworkandClarifyingQuestions

SampleofStrongFramework:

Acquireornot?

Marketsize

Profitability

Synergies/dis-

synergies

Competition

DealPrice

Howlargeisthemarketforsnackingalmonds?

Howmuchisthisindustryexpectedtogrow?Isittrendingup,

down,orstagnant?

Howprofitablewillthisproductbe(e.g.,pricing,costs)?

Issnackingalmondsamorepremiummarketthensnackingpeanuts,intermsofprice?

CanweleveragePeanutCo.’sexistingcapabilities(distribution,mktg,sales)?

Willenteringcannibalizeexistingsales?

Istheoverlapbetweenalmondandpeanutcustomershigh?

IsAlmondCo.thepreferredbrandinthemarket?

Whoarethecurrentcompetitors?

Whatarethebarrierstoentry?

Howlargeisthethreatofnewentrants?

Whatisthedeal

price?

Howwillwefinancethedeal?

SampleClarifyingQuestionsandAnswers

Areweonlylookingatthesnackingalmondmarket?

Yes–allotheralmonds(e.g.,forcooking)areexcluded

Sincethesnackingpeanutmarketgrowthisslowing,isthistrendaffectingtheentiresnackingnutindustry?

No–thealmondindustryisnotimpactedbecausealmondsareconsideredtobehigherinnutrients

SizingtheUSmarketforsnackingalmonds

Candidatecoulddomarketsizingbasedonfrequencyofpurchase.

Providethefollowingassumptions:

AssumethepopulationoftheUSis300M

1snackalmondspacket:16ounces

Priceof1packet:$2

Askcandidatereasonsfornumbersbrainstormed

“Don’tsnacknuts”

“Casualconsumers”

“Healthconsciousconsumers”

“Frequentconsumers”

%ofUSpopulation

75%

10%

10%

5%

Populationsize

210M

30M

30M

15M

Numberofsnackalmondspacketsconsumed/year

0

25

(2/month)

60

(5/month)

120

(10/month)

Totalconsumption

0

750M

1800M

1800M

Totalnumberofpackets:0.75B+1.8B+1.8B=4.5B(roundto5B)

Costof1packet:$2

Totalmarketsize:5B*$2=$10B

Totalmarketsizeis$8-10B

Pressuretestifthisistoolarge

BreakevenforPeanutCo.onthisinvestment

Providethefollowingassumptions:

AlmondCo.’scurrentmarketshare:10%

AlmondCo.’sprofitmargin:50%

PurchasepriceforPeanutCo:$1.5B

AlmondCo.’srevenues:$1B

AlmondCo.’sprofits:$500M

Assumerevenueandcoststructurestaysthesameoverthenextfewyears

Purchasepriceis$1.5B

Paybackperiod=$1.5B/$500M=3years

Morecomplexquestions:

IfthepurchasepricewasdoubledandAlmondCo.’smarketsharewashalved,whatwouldthenewpaybackperiodbe?(3*(2/(1/2))=12years

Whatassumptionsareyoumostuncomfortablewith?Whichoneswouldyoutestfurther?

GivenPeanutCo.’sexistingsnacknutsbusiness,whatelsewouldyouconsider?

PotentialBenefits

Crosssellalmondproductstoexistingpeanutcustomers

LeveragecurrentdistributionnetworktoexpandreachofAlmondCo.anddrivesales

Canextendinnovationfrompeanutstoalmonds(e.g.,flavor,packaging,etc)

PotentialRisks

Potentialforcannibalizationofexistingsales

Potentialofbranddilution

RecommendationstotheCEOofthePeanutCo.

Goodsummarywillincludethefollowing:

Answer–acquireornot?Eithercanbejustified.Seebelow

Strongjustificationonwhy?(Include2-3keynumbersfromthecase)

Outlinekeyriskswithrecommendation

Outline2-3keynextsteps

IfrecommendationtoacquireAlmondCo.:

Largeandgrowingmarket

Quickpaybackperiodof3years

Highoverlapwithcustomers

Risks:couldcannibalizecurrentpeanutsales,coulddilute/confusebrand

Nextsteps:canwegetamorefavorabledealprice;determinewhatexactinnovationcanbecarriedoverfrompeanutbusiness

IfrecommendationistonotacquireAlmondCo:

Cannibalizecurrentsales

Couldimpactourcurrentmarginstructure

Coulddilutebrand

Risks:ifcompetitoracquiresAlmondCoandsucceeds,PeanutCo’scompetitivepositionwouldbeweaker

Nextsteps:determineifthereareotherplayersthatwecouldacquire

U.S.ShoeManufacturing

U.S.ShoeManufacturing

LevelofDifficulty:Hardifyouaren’tfamiliarwithoperationsstrategy

CaseSimilartoCasesatFirms:McKinseyfinalround

TopicsTested:onshore/offshore,operations,mathematicalcalculations(unitprofitability,totallandedcost).

Prompt:AmajorU.S.shoemanufactureriscurrentlymanufacturingitsentireproductlinedomestically.Becauseofincreasedlaborcostsandcompetitivepressure,themanufacturerisnowinterestedinunderstandingwhetheritshouldoffshoresomeorallofitsproductionand,ifso,whereitshouldoffshoretoandwhatpercentofitstotalproductlineshouldbemanufacturedonshorevs.offshore.Whatfactorsshouldtheclientconsiderasitcomparesonshoretooffshoremanufacturing?

OpeningFrameworkandClarifyingQuestions

SampleofStrongFramework

Demandfactors

Demandvolatility

Demandgrowth

Demanddiversity(foreignvs.domestic)

Competition(foreignvs.domestic)

Requiredservicelevel

Supplyfactors

Supplyvolatility

Supplyleadtime/responsiveness

Availabilityofsuppliers

Directlaborvs.totalcosts

Capitalinvestmentsandeconomiesofscale

Technologicalfactors

Accesstohumancapital(knowledgeandskills)

Manufacturinginfrastructure(downstreamsuppliers,manufacturingfacilities)

Generalinfrastructure(roads,electricity,ports)

Processinnovation(efficientfrontierofproduction)

Macroeconomicandregulatoryfactors

Tariffs,quotas,andotherprotectionism

Tradeandglobalinstitutionalagreements

Exchangerates

Politicalstability

Culturalaffinityandmanagerialalignment

SampleClarifyingQuestionsandAnswers

Whatotherproductsdoestheclientcurrentlysellbesidesshoes?

Theclientcurrentlyspecializesinshoemanufacturing,butalsomanufacturessomeapparelaswell.

WhereelsedoestheclientcurrentlysellitsproductsbesidestheU.S.?

Theclientcurrentlysellsitsproductsindevelopedmarkets(NorthAmerica,Europe,andAustralia)

Whatarecompetitors,bothdomesticandforeign,currentlydoingwithrespecttoonshoring/offshoring?

Mostoftheclients’competitorscurrentlydonotoffshoretheirproductionduetomanufacturingandmanagerialcomplexity.

OutsideoftheU.S.,inwhichmarketsareshoestypicallymanufactured?

Wherearehigh-Fqouralcitayssehoinetsemrvaineuwfamctautreerdi?alsandtraining,pleasefollo

LowerqualityshoestendtobemanufacturedinChina,SoutheastAsia,

waWndeCCenhtartalOAfmfiecriiacla,Ahcigchouqunat:litgydobnwesnixnEasterwnwEuwr.oCpea.reerE

UnitProfitability

TheclienthasbegunassessingamanufacturerbasedinVietnam.Theywantustodoanin-depthanalysisoftheper-unitprofitabilityofshoesproducedinourexistingfacilityvs.theVietnamfacility.Assumenocapexineithercase(U.S.capitalissunk,Vietnamarrangementwouldbecostplus).Whatdoestheequationforper-unitprofitabilityforshoeslooklike?

profit=retailrevenue–(COGS+labor+SG&A+transportation+quality+tariffs+retailmargin)

Givetheintervieweethebelowdataandhavethemsolveforprofitability.

U.S. Vietnam

Retailrevenue

$200

$200

COGS

30%

20%

Directlabor

25%

5%

SG&A

20%

25%

Transportation

4%

10%

Quality

1%defectrate

5%defectrate

Tariffs

NA

10%

Retailmargin

10%

10%

Profit

$10

$15

UnitProfitabilityConclusion

Givenestimatedprofitabilityatbothfacilities,whatshouldtheclientdo?Whatarethekeyconsiderationsandsensitivitiesthatthisbasicmodelcontains?

Basedontheunit-profitabilityanalysis,theclientshouldoffshoremanufacturingtoVietnambecauseitis50%moreprofitableonaunitbasistomanufacturethere.Thereareseveralconsiderationsandsensitivitiestokeepinmind:

MaterialcostsandlaborcostsaremuchlowerinVietnamthanintheU.S.,drivingmostoftheVietnammanufacturingcostsavings.

ProductionqualityissignificantlyworseinVietnam(5%vs.1%),andfurtherqualitydeteriorationwouldimpactprofitabilityandswingthedecisiontotheU.S.

ProducinginVietnamalsoentailsaddedtransportationandtariffcosts,whicharevulnerabletomacroeconomicshifts(increasedfuelcosts,increasedtariffs).

Arewemissinganythingelseinthisanalysisthatmightdrivecostshigherintheoffshoringcase?Orisitpossiblethattheclientshouldsplitmanufacturingacrossthetwooptionsand,ifso,whatproportionofshoesshouldbemadeinVietnamvs.theU.S.?Oncetheintervieweehastouchedonmosttheabove,introducethisquestion.Directtheintervieweetotheopeningframeworkandaskaboutleadtimeandthevolatilityofdemand.

TotalLandedCost

Theclientjustgaveusonepieceofinformationinadditiontothecostingdata.ShoesmanufacturedinVietnamhavealeadtimeofthreemonths(timefromordertodelivery).ShoesmanufacturedintheU.S.,incomparison,havealeadtimeofonemonth.Whatadditionalfactorsshouldtheclientaddtotheunit

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论