五种桉树木材吸声系数的测试与分析

五种桉树木材吸声系数的测试与分析

acustiphincien,acsscien,联邦,acsso内部,联邦我很抱歉。我很抱歉。根据结构，评估声音传输的结构是将录制和耳中的声音传输到建筑和家庭的过程。在2008年，评估声音传输的结构是将录制和未组装的压力结构的特征。舞台和屋顶证据、第四环电话和第四环电话的母性控制，以及路面的区域情景、第四环电话或第四环电话的受害者（watanabeharut1986）、第三类证据和第四类证据的受害者（乍得等人，第二面包壳等人，第二面包壳等人，第二面包壳和第四面包壳的受害者（乍得等人，第二面包、第三面板、第四面板等人，第二面板和第二面板（乍得等人，第二面板等人，第二面板等人，第二面板、第三面板、第四面板、第二面板、第三面板、第四面板、第二面板、第二面板、第二面板、第二面板、第三面板、第二面板、第三面板、第四面板等。Eucalyptwoodisusednotonlyforpulpandfiberbutalsoforthejoiner,furniture,flooringboard,interiordecoration,etc..AlargerareaofeucalyptartificialforesthasbeenplantedinSouthChina,covering600countiesthroughou17provincesandcities.Thisstudytestedthesoundabsorptionpropertiesofwoodoffiveeucalyptspeciesforthepurposetoprovidescientificdataforproperutilizationoftheeucalyptwoodresourceanddecreaseoftheenvironmentanoiseinhouses.会计与方法案例4:eucalyptusurophyraptusFiveeucalyptspecies,includingEucalyptusurophylla,Eucalyptusurophylla×E.grandis,Eucalyptusurophylla×E.tereticornis,Eucalyptusurophylla×E.camaldulensisandEucalyptuscloeziana,werecollectedfromtheplantationinDongmenForestryCenterofGuangxiProvincefortestingsoundabsorptionproperty.ThesamplingmethodwastakeninaccordancewiththestatestandardGB1930~41-91.SamplesizeisΦ100mmindiameterand0.5cmand1.0cminthickness.methodmethodTestmethodwastakeninaccordancewiththestatestandardGBJ88-85“Measurementcriterionofstandingwavemethodforsoundabsorptioncoefficientandsoundimpedance”.Thestandingwavemethodisasimpleandeconomicalmethodusedtomeasuretheverticalsoundabsorptioncoefficient;thesoundabsorptioncoefficientunderrandomincidenceiscalculatedaccordingtotheresultsmeasured.Eachspecieshastheradial-sawnboardandthetangential-sawnboardfortest.Testapparatus:Φ100mmB&K4002StandingWaveFitting,B&K2010AnalysisMeter,GF–10PowerAmplifierandB&K2110AudioFrequencyAnalysisMeter.Depthoftestcavity:95cm影响的神圣迪迪斯运营相关的acustiptionWhenthesoundwavemeetsthematerialsurface,partisreflectedback,partisabsorbedandpartispassed.Theabilityforabsorptionandsoundreflectiondependsonthematerial.TheacousticabsorptionofcommonmaterialsislistedintheTable1.AsitisseenfromTable1,thedensityofthebrick,glassandpolishedwoodishighwhiletheiracousticabsorptionislow;theacousticabsorptionoftheuntreatedwoodislowerthanthatofthepolishedwoodbecausethepaintchangestheabsorptionofwoodtosound;thecarpet,wallboardandsound-absorbingwallboardhaveagoodperformanceintheacousticabsorption.eucalyptied&mecterblotwolenspecing标准Infact,allmaterialshavetheabsorptiontosound,butthedifferenceistheextentofabsorption.Theabsorptionofmaterialsisdecidedbytheirownproperties;ontheotherhand,theabsorptionisalsodecidedbythefrequencyandtheincidencedirectionofthesound.Therefore,thesoundabsorptioncoefficientisanaverageoftheabsorptionvaluesfromeachdirection,anditisspecifiedunderacertainfrequency.ThesoundabsorptioncoefficientsforfiveeucalyptwoodspeciesunderdifferentfrequencyareshowninTable2.Thesoundabsorptioncoefficientsofthefiveeucalyptwoodspeciesdidnotchangeevidentlybelow1000Hz,butabove1000Hztheirsoundabsorptioncoefficientsincreasedwiththeincreasingfrequency.Thestudyresultsarethesamewiththetestresultsundercommonmaterialtests(Ma1983).Moreover,thesefivespeciesofeucalyptwoodweredifferentinthesoundabsorptioncoefficientunderdifferentfrequencies.Attherangefrom200Hzto1600HzthesoundabsorptioncoefficientsofEucalyptusurophyllaandEucalyptusurophylla×E.grandiswerehigherthantheseoftheotherthreespecies.At2000HzforthesoundabsorptioncoefficienttheEucalyptusurophylla×E.tereticorniswashighest,followedbyEucalyptuscloeziana,andthelowestwasEucalyptusurophylla..ThevarianceforthesoundabsorptioncoefficientwasfurtheranalyzedasdescribedinTable3.Theresultsindicatethatthedifferenceinthesoundabsorptioncoefficientofdifferentspeciesisnotsignificantunderthetestedfrequencyrange.u2004范围Solidwoodisoftensawnintotwokindsofboards,thequarter-sawnboardandtheback-sawnboard.Comparisoninsoundabsorptioncoefficientwasmadeforthetwokindsofboards(Table4).Thesoundabsorptioncoefficientsoftheback-sawnboardsfromfivespecieswerehigherthanorequaltotheseofthequarter-sawnboardsatafrequencyof200-800Hz;thechangeofsoundabsorptioncoefficientamongthefivespeciesisofnoclearruleatafrequencyofabove800Hz.Itcanbethoughtthatthesoundabsorptionoftheback-sawnboardisbetterthanthatofthequarter-sawnboardatarangeoflowfrequency.Atthetestrangethesoundabsorptioncoefficientoftheback-sawnboardfromEucalyptusurophyllawashigherthanthatofitsquarter-sawnboard.Atafrequencyof1250-1600Hzthesoundabsorptioncoefficientofthequarter-sawnboardfromEucalyptusurophylla×E.grandiswashigherthanthatofitsback-sawnboard;at2000Hzthesoundabsorptioncoefficientoftheback-sawnboardwashigherthanthatofitsquarter-sawnboard.Atafrequencyof1000-1600Hzthesoundabsorptioncoefficientoftheback-sawnboardfromEucalyptusurophylla×E.camaldulensiswasequaltoorhigherthanthatofitsquarter-sawnboard;at2000Hzthesoundabsorptioncoefficientofthequarter-sawnboardwashigherthanthatofitsback-sawnboardandreachedthemaximumshowingthebettersoundabsorptionathighfrequencyrange.At2000Hzthesoundabsorptioncoefficientsofthequarter-sawnboardandtheback-sawnboardfromEucalyptuscloezianareachthemaximumandthesoundabsorptionisbetterthanthatatlowfrequency.Itcanbeseenfromtheaboveanalysisresultsthatthesoundabsorptionoftheback-sawnboardfromEucalyptusurophyllaisbetterthanthatofitsquarter-sawnboard;thesoundabsorptionchangeoftwokindsofboardsfromotherspeciesisnotevidentatafrequencyof1250-2000Hz.indictorybroh&mexg......3日非织造心理的可检验性参数,主要包括.......................................................4.Thesoundabsorptioncoefficientsoftheboardswithdifferentthicknessdecreasegraduallyattheincreasingfrequencyfrom200Hzto1000Hz,whileatafrequencyofabove1000Hz,thesoundabsorptioncoefficientsincreaseslowlyandthedifferenceismoreevident(Fig.1).Fortheboard0.5cminthickness,itssoundabsorptioncoefficientatthehighfrequencywashigherthanthatatthelowfrequencyandthecoefficientwasobviouslyhigherthanthatoftheboard1.0cminthickness.At1600HzthesoundabsorptioncoefficientsofEucalyptusurophyllaandEucalyptusurophylla×E.camaldulensisreachedthemaximum,anditindicatesthatthesoundabsorptioncoefficientatthehighfrequencyishigherthanthatatthelowfrequency.Inall,theacousticabsorptionofboardsof0.5cminthicknessismuchbetter.Fig.2showsthattherelationshipofacousticabsorptionandfrequencyofplywoodof3mminthickness.WhencomparingFig.1andFig.2,itisfoundthatsoundabsorptioncoefficientoftheplywoodwithathicknessof3cmatthelowfrequencyrangeishigher,however,thecoefficientathehighfrequencyrangedecreaseswiththeincreasingfrequencyandremainsconstantat2000Hz.ThebehavioisjustoppositetothecoefficientchangeofeucalyptwoodTherefore,thethicknessofmaterialsdecidestheiracousticabsorption.Inaddition,theeffectivethicknessofeucalypwoodandtheaccordingoptimumsoundabsorptionpropertyneedafurtherstudy.相关概念分析Theaveragesoundabsorptioncoefficientofeucalypwoodismuc