版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
PublicDisclosureAuthorizedPublicDisclosureAuthorized
PolicyResearchWorkingPaper10794
MeasuringGreenJobs
ANewDatabaseforLatinAmericaandOtherRegions
HernanWinkler
VincenzoDiMaro
KellyMontoya
SergioOlivieri
EmmanuelVazquez
WORLDBANKGROUP
PovertyandEquityGlobalPracticeJune2024
ReproducibleResearchRepository
Averifiedreproducibilitypackageforthispaperisavailableat
,click
here
fordirectaccess.
PolicyResearchWorkingPaper10794
Abstract
Agrowingbodyofliteratureinvestigatesthelabormarketimplicationsofscalingup“green”policies.Sincemostofthisliteratureisfocusedondevelopedeconomies,littleisknownaboutthelabormarketconsequencesfordevelopingcoun-tries.Thispapercontributestofillingthisgapbyprovidingnewstylizedfactsontheprevalenceofgreenoccupationsandsectorsacrosscountriesatvaryinglevelsofeconomicdevelopment.GreenoccupationsaredefinedusingtheOccupationalInformationNetwork,andgreensectorsarethosewithrelativelylowergreenhousegasemissionsperworker.Thepaperoffersaninitialassessmentofhowtheimplementationofgreenpolicies—aimedatexpandinggreensectorsandstrengtheningtherelativedemandforgreenskills—mayaffectworkersindevelopingeconomies.Itfindsthattheshareofgreenjobsisstronglycorrelated
withthelevelofgrossdomesticproductpercapitaacrosscountries.Whencontrollingforunobservedheterogeneity,a1percentincreaseingrossdomesticproductpercapitaisassociatedwith0.4and4.1percentagepointincreasesinthesharesofnewandemerging,andenhancedskillsgreenjobs,respectively.ThepaperthenfocusesonLatinAmericaandfindsthatonly9percentofworkershaveagreenjobwithrespecttobothoccupationandsector.Thefindingsshowthatwithincountries,workerswithlowlevelsofincomeandeducationaremorelikelytobeemployedinnon-greensectorsandoccupations,andtolacktheskillsforagreenereconomy.Thisevidencesuggeststhatcomple-mentarypoliciesareneededtomitigatethepotentialroleofgreenpoliciesinwideningincomeinequalitybetweenandwithincountries.
ThispaperisaproductofthePovertyandEquityGlobalPractice.ItispartofalargereffortbytheWorldBanktoprovideopenaccesstoitsresearchandmakeacontributiontodevelopmentpolicydiscussionsaroundtheworld.PolicyResearchWorkingPapersarealsopostedontheWebat
/prwp.Theauthorsmaybecontactedathwinkler@
.Averifiedreproducibilitypackageforthispaperisavailableat
,click
here
fordirectaccess.
R
Y
C
I
L
R
A
E
S
E
O
P
H
C
S
TRANSPARENT
P
E
R
W
O
R
K
I
ANALYSIS
A
NGP
ThePolicyResearchWorkingPaperSeriesdisseminatesthefindingsofworkinprogresstoencouragetheexchangeofideasaboutdevelopmentissues.Anobjectiveoftheseriesistogetthefindingsoutquickly,evenifthepresentationsarelessthanfullypolished.Thepaperscarrythenamesoftheauthorsandshouldbecitedaccordingly.Thefindings,interpretations,andconclusionsexpressedinthispaperareentirelythoseoftheauthors.TheydonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheInternationalBankforReconstructionandDevelopment/WorldBankanditsaffiliatedorganizations,orthoseoftheExecutiveDirectorsoftheWorldBankorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.
ProducedbytheResearchSupportTeam
MeasuringGreenJobs:
ANewDatabaseforLatinAmericaandOtherRegions
HernanWinkler,VincenzoDiMaro,KellyMontoya,SergioOlivieri,EmmanuelVazquez
*
Keywords:GreenJobs,GreenSectors,ClimateChange,LaborMarkets,StructuralTransformation.JELCodes:Q5,Q52,Q56,J01,J21,
*DiMaro,Montoya,Olivieri,andWinklerarewiththeWorldBankPovertyandEquityGlobalPractice,VazqueziswithCEDLAS(IIE,FCE)-UniversidadNacionaldeLaPlata,Argentina.WearegratefultoGuillermoBeylis,MikiDoan,AlvaroGonzalez,RuthHill,NancyLozano,GhazalaMansuri,CarlosRodriguez-Castelan,TrangVanNguyenandHugoNopoforusefulcommentsanddiscussions.
2
1.Introduction
Thereisagrowingbodyofliteratureinvestigatingthelabormarketconsequencesofscalingup“green”policies.
1
However,mostoftheevidenceisfocusedonthelabormarketimplicationsfordevelopedeconomies,andlittleisknownabouttheconsequencesofgreenergrowthonjobsfordevelopingcountries.
2
WhilerichcountriesaccountforadisproportionateshareofGreenhouseGasEmissions(GHGE;seeIPCC,2022),developingeconomiesareexpectedtoexperienceadisproportionateincreaseinGHGEinthefuture(Blacketal.,2022).Inaddition,policiestopromoteagreenergrowthstrategymayinduceaskill-biasedshiftinlabordemand,potentiallycreatingbottlenecksindevelopingcountrieswithlowerstocksandadaptabilityofskills.Thisshiftwouldraiseconcernsaboutthetransitionpathofdisplacedworkerstonewjobsinthegreeneconomy.
Thispapercontributestothisliteraturebydevelopinganewdatasetongreenoccupationsfor120countries.Itdescribesnewstatisticsongreenoccupationsacrosscountriesatdifferentlevelsofeconomicdevelopment.Thisoffersaninitialpictureofhowtheavailability(orscarcity)ofgreenoccupationscanaffecttheimplementationofgreenpoliciesandtheirimpactonthelabormarket.ThepaperthenfocusesonLatinAmericaandCaribbean(LAC)countriestoprovidemoregranularinsightsintotherelationshipbetweengreenoccupations,greensectors,andthesocio-economicprofileofgreenjobholders.
3
Greenoccupationsaremeasuredfollowingthe“GreenEconomy”programdevelopedbytheOccupationalInformationNetwork(O*NET).
4
Itconsidersthreetypesofoccupations:newoccupationsthatareemergingdirectlybecauseofgreenpolicies(“newandemerging”),existingoccupationsthatareexpectedtoexperiencechangesinthetaskstheyentail(“enhancedskills”),andexistingoccupationsthatwillnotchangesubstantiallybutthatwillbeinhigherdemand(“increaseddemand”).AmethodologicalcontributionofthispaperistodevelopamappingoftheO*NETclassificationofgreenoccupationsintothe4-digitInternationalStandardClassificationofOccupations(ISCO)-08taxonomy.
Usingdetailedoccupationaltabulations(2-digitISCO-08)fromlaborforcesurveysfor120countriesfrom
2011to2020,
5
thepaperfindsthat,onaverage,21.4percentofemploymentisingreenoccupations,and
1Abroaddefinitionofgreenpoliciesincludesallpoliciestoremovebarrierstogreen,clean,andresilientgrowth(seeAwe,2012).
2Someexceptionsincludethe
2011UNEPILOGreenJobsreport.
Morerecently,seethe
2018ILOGreeningwithJobsreport
and
2021K4DFDCOCreatingGreenJobsinDevelopingCountriesreport.
SeealsoTimilsina(2022)foradiscussionofrelatedissues.
3SeealsoAlfonsoetal.(2022)forarecentanalysisofgreenjobsinLAC.
4O*NETisadatabasedevelopedbytheU.S.DepartmentofLaboronoccupationalinformationfortheU.S.workforce(see
/overview.html)
.
5Dataisavailableforeachyearintheperiod2012-2019forasetof47countries.
3
that1.8,10.3,and9.3percentarethesharesofemploymentin“newandemerging,”“enhancedskills”and“increaseddemand”categories,respectively.Thepapertheninvestigatesthelinksbetweengreenjobsandincomebetweencountries,tounderstandifthelabormarketadjustmenttoagreenereconomyisexpectedtobemoredemandinginpoorercountries.Whencomparingcountriesinthelatestyearofavailabledata,theresultsshowthattheshareofgreenjobsis,infact,lowerinpoorercountries,buttherearesubstantialdifferencesacrosstypesofgreenjobs.Theassociationwithincomelevelsisverystrongfor“newandemerging”and“enhancedskills”occupations,butweakerfor“increaseddemand”ones.Afixed-effectsregressionconfirmsthesestrongassociations.
Thesecondpartofthepaperasksthefollowingquestion:ifcountriesweretoimplementpoliciesthatpenalizeGHGE(suchasacarbontax,acarbonborderadjustment,orbanningcertainformsofenergyproduction),whichjobswouldbemoreatrisk?Toanswerthisquestion,thepaperestimatestheoccupationalstructureofsectorsofeconomicactivityaccordingtotheirGHGElevelsperworker.
6
Thenitclassifiessectorswithineachcountryasgreenandnon-greenaccordingtowhethertheyareaboveorbelowthesectormedianGHGElevelineachcountry.Itisimportanttoemphasizethatthisdefinitionof“greenness”doesnotincludeotherimportantdimensionssuchasthepotentialfortransformationthroughtheadoptionofgreentechnologies.Combiningthegreenjobandthesectorclassification,fourgroupsofworkersaredefined:(i)Greenoccupationsingreensectors(GOGS);(ii)Greenoccupationsinnon-greensectors(GONS);(iii)Non-greenoccupationsingreensectors(NOGS),and(iv)Non-greenoccupationsinnon-greensectors(NONS).Greensectorswouldbelessvulnerabletoanincreaseinthecostofcarbon.Asaresult,workersingreenoccupationsinsuchsectorswouldfacethelowestriskofdisplacementandhighestre-employmentlikelihoodinagreenereconomyincaseofjobloss.Incontrast,workerswithnon-greenoccupationsinnon-greensectorswouldfacethehighestlabormarketvulnerabilityintermsofbothjob-lossriskandre-employmentopportunities.
UsingdatafromcountriesinLatinAmericaandtheCaribbean(LAC)—becauseofbetteravailabilityofgranularoccupationdataattheISCO082-digitlevel—weanalyzetherelationshipbetweengreenoccupationsandsectors.Thefirstfindingisthattheconcentrationofemploymentinnon-greenoccupationsandnon-greensectors–i.e.themostvulnerablegroupduringagreentransition–is
6ThefocusonGHGEimpliesthatthepaperfocusesonmitigation,ratherthanadaptation,indefininggreensectors.Wenoteherethatthisisnottheonlywaygreensectorscanbedefined.Forinstance,analternativedefinitionofsectorsthatconsidersmoreprominentlytheadaptationanglewoulddefinegreensectorsnotonlybasedonthelevelofemissions,butalsoonthepotentialtocreategreenjobsand/orfostergreentechnologiesinthelongerrun.Examplesofsectorsthatwouldbeaffectedbythisalternativedefinitionincludewatermanagementandwastemanagement.
4
significantinseveralLACcountries.Around90percentofworkersineachcountrywithavailabledatahaveajobineitheranon-greensectororanon-greenoccupation.Non-greensectorsaccountforalargeshareofjobs,from37percentinArgentinato59percentinGuatemala,Bolivia,andHonduras.Mostworkerswithgreenoccupationsareinanon-greensector(about60percentoftheminmostcountries),whichsuggeststhathigh-emissionsectorscouldfindsomeoftheneededskillsforthetransitionalreadyinthelaborforcetheyoccupy.Itisimportanttohighlighttheveryhighconcentrationofnon-greenoccupationsinahigh-emissionsectorsuchasagriculture—about90percentormoreinmostLACcountries.
Thedynamicsofgreenoccupationsandsectorsalsoofferimportantinsights.Theshareofgreenoccupationshasbeenremarkablyconstantoverthelastdecade(i.e.between2010and2019)inLAC.Theshareofnon-greenjobsinnon-greensectorsandoccupationsfellslightlyfrom35to34percentduringthatperiod.Inaddition,weimplementadecompositionofchangesinGHGEperworkerinbetween-andwithin-sectorcomponents.GHGEperworkerincreasedbetween2005and2018insevenlargeLACcountries,mostlydrivenbyanincreaseinGHGEperworkerwithinsectors.Incontrast,thereallocationofworkersfromrelativelyhighGHGEsectors—i.e.agricultureandindustry—torelativelylowGHGEsectors—e.g.utilities,transport,andInformationandCommunicationTechnologies(ICT)—contributedtopartiallymitigatetheincreasedrivenbythewithin-sectorchanges.Thisdecompositionillustratessomeoftheimplicationsoftheprocessofstructuraltransformationonthegreeneconomy,wherebyincreasingenergyintensitytendstomaketheeconomylessgreen,butthereallocationofworkersawayfromagricultureandmanufacturingtowardsservicestendsto“green”theeconomy(assumingeverythingelseremainsthesame).
Thepaperalsoinvestigatestheprofileofgreenjobholders.Overall,greenoccupationsaremoreprevalentformalesandresidentsofurbanareas.Totalemployment(includinggreenandnon-greenoccupations)ingreensectorsishigherforfemalesandmoreeducatedworkers.Greenoccupationalsharesdonotvarymuchbyinformalitystatusorsizeoftheemployerfirm.Still,alargeshareofinformalworkersisconcentratedinthenon-greenoccupationandsectorgroup,whichcanbeconsideredthemostvulnerableduringatransition.Likewise,poorerworkers(thoseinthelowestincomequintiles)areconcentratedinthismostvulnerablegroup.Thisisconsistentwiththefactthatgreenjobsarelinkedtohigherwages.
Therestofthispaperisstructuredasfollows.Section2discussesthedefinitionofgreenjobs,themethodologytogeneratethecategoriesofgreenjobsandsectorsconsideredinthispaperanddescribesthedata.Section3presentscross-countrypatternsofgreenjobs,patternsofgreenoccupationsand
5
sectors,andtheprofileofgreenjobholdersinLAC.Section4discussessomecaveatsofthestudyandpresentssomerobustnesschecks.Finally,section5drawssomeconclusions.
2.MethodologyandData
Greenoccupations
Therearedifferentdefinitionsofgreenjobs.ThispaperusestheOccupationalInformationNetwork(O*NET)
7
classificationofoccupationsdevelopedbyDierdorffetal.(2009,2011)todefinegreenandnon-greenjobs.
8
Dierdorffetal.(2009)arguethatthefirststeptoclassifyingjobsasgreenornon-greenistodefinethegreeneconomy,whichtheyconsiderinvolvingeconomicactivitiesrelatedtoreducingtheuseoffossilfuels,decreasingpollutionandGHGE,improvingenergyefficiency,increasingrecyclingandadoptingrenewableformsofenergy.Consideringthis,the“greening”ofoccupationstakesplacewhenthegrowthofthegreeneconomyincreasesthedemandforexistingoccupations,shapestheworkandworkerrequirementsneededforoccupationalperformance,orgeneratesuniqueworkandworkerrequirements.
TheclassificationisbasedontheUS2010StandardOccupationalClassification(SOC)System.Itprovidesalistof1,110occupations,204ofwhichareidentifiedasgreenanddividedintothreemutuallyexclusivecategories:GreenIncreasedDemand(64occupations),GreenEnhancedSkills(62occupations),andGreenNewandEmerging(78occupations).Table1showsthedefinitionofeachgroupofoccupationswithexamplesofjobsfallingintoeachcategory.Therestofthelistedoccupations(906)areconsiderednon-greenandrepresentjobsthatarenotaffecteddirectlybythegreeningoftheeconomy.
7SeealsotheAppendixformoredetailedinformationonthedatasourcesusedinthispaper.
8Incontrast,ILO(2018)definesgreenjobsbasedonwhether“theyreducetheconsumptionofenergyandrawmaterials,limitGHGE,minimizewasteandpollution,protect,andrestoreecosystemsandenableenterprisesandcommunitiestoadapttoclimatechange.Inaddition,greenjobshavetobedecent”.Decentjobsaredefinedas“opportunitiesforwomenandmentoobtaindecentandproductiveworkinconditionsoffreedom,equity,securityandhumandignity”(ILO,1999).However,thisdefinitioncombinesseveraldimensionssuchasthetasksinvolvedinthejob,the“greenness”oftheeconomicsectororfirm,aswellascharacteristicsofthejobnotclearlylinkedtothegreeneconomy(forexample,socialsecuritybenefitsorwagelevels).ThispaperdoesnotfollowILO’sapproachbecauseitsgoalistoinvestigatetheimplicationsofthegreeningoftheeconomy(basedonthe“greenness”ofsectorsofeconomicactivity)onworkersaccordingtotheirgreenskillsortasks.Insteadofusingthe“decency”ofajobtocharacterizeitasgreenornon-green,thispaperexploresthecharacteristicsofjobsrelatedtosuchdimensions(e.g.,wagelevels,informalstatus,etc.)accordingtotheirvulnerabilitytothegreeningoftheeconomy(i.e.,bywhethertheyareinsectorswithahighlevelofemissionsand/orhavethegreenskillsneededintheneweconomy).
6
Table1–Greenoccupationcategories
Greenjobcategory
Definition
Examples
IncreasedDemandOccupations
Occupationsthatalreadyexist.Theymayfaceincreaseddemandwithanexpandinggreeneconomy.Whiletheirworkcontextmaychange,thetasksandskillstheyusewillnot.
Carpentersandweldersthatwillberequiredintheconstructionofnewenergy-efficientbuildingsoragriculturalworkersneededformoreorganicfarming.
EnhancedSkillsOccupations
Occupationsthatalreadyexist.Agrowinggreeneconomymayormaynotincreasethedemandfortheseoccupations,butitwouldaffectthetypeoftasksorskillsrequired.
Constructioninspectors,agriculturaltechnicians,andarchitects.Workersinthesejobsmayneedtolearnhowtousenewmaterialsoradheretonewenergy-efficientbuildingcodes.
NewandEmergingOccupations
The“purest”formsofgreenjobs.Theseoccupationsemergebecauseofthegreeneconomycreatingtheneedfornewanduniqueworkandworkerrequirements.Assuch,theseoccupationsemergedmorerecently.
Windenergymanagers,climatechangeanalysts,orwaterresourcespecialists.
Source:OwnelaborationbasedonO*NETdatabaseandDierdorffetal.(2009,2011).
ThispaperusestheInternationalStandardClassificationofOccupations(ISCO)oritsadaptationstoclassifyoccupations,insteadofO*NET.PreviousstudieshavemappedtheO*NET-SOC2010classificationofgreenoccupationsintothelatestISCO-08taxonomytoallowformorestraightforwardcross-nationalcomparisonsofgreenoccupations(Hogarth,2011;SofroniouandAnderson,2021).However,theirmappingsareproducedattheISCOthree-digitlevelatbest.Moreimportantly,theirmethodologiesarebasedonadichotomicdefinitionofgreenjobs,inwhichawholeISCOcategoryisconsideredeithergreenornon-green.ThispapermapstheO*NET-SOCclassificationofgreenoccupationsintothemostdetailedfour-digitISCO-08taxonomyusingaprobabilisticinsteadofadichotomicapproach.Specifically,thepaperusesdataontotalemploymentatthe2-digitlevelISCOfor120countriesfromcirca2001tocirca2020(676country-yearobservations).SinceeachISCOcodemayhaveseveralO*NET-SOCoccupationsassociatedwithit(notallnecessarilygreen),itwouldbemisleadingtoconsiderawholeISCOoccupationasgreenornon-greenbasedonwhetherthenumberofO*NET-SOCassociatedoccupationsareprimarilygreenornon-green.Therefore,insteadofconstructingabinaryclassification,thepaperestimatestheshareofemploymentwithinanISCO-08categorythatcorrespondstoO*NET-SOCoccupationsconsideredgreenandthenconsidersthisshareastheprobabilitythatanoccupationwiththatISCOcodeisgreen.SincetheO*NET-SOCclassificationisbasedontheUSstructureofemployment,employmentsharesare
7
basedonU.S.estimates,whichareobtainedfromthe2018OccupationalEmploymentandWageStatistics(OEWS)publishedbytheU.S.BureauofLaborStatistics.
9
TheO*NET-SOC2010codesarelinkedtotheircorrespondingfour-digitISCO-08codesusingtheU.S.BureauofLaborStatisticscorrespondencetablebetweenSOC2010CodesandISCO-08categories.Thiscorrespondence,aswellastheemploymentestimatesintheOEWS,isavailableatthesix-digitleveloftheSOC.Atthesametime,theO*NET-SOC2010classificationofgreenoccupationsispresentedwithaneight-digitlevelofdetail.Since12.7percentofthe6-digitSOCoccupationsareassociatedwithmorethanone8-digitSOC,thetotalnumberofworkersina6-digitSOCoccupationwasequallydistributedamongthe8-digitSOCcodesassociatedwithit.
10
Asanexample,Table2showshowtheshareofgreenoccupationswasconstructedforaspecificISCOcode,representingtheprobabilitythatanindividualwithanoccupationinthisISCOcodehasagreenjob.
Table2–ExampleofthemethodologyusedtoestimatetheprobabilityforanISCO-08codeto
representagreenoccupation.
ISCO-08Code
O*NET-SOC2010Code
GreenJob?
2010SOCCode
NumberofUSworkers
“Simulated”
NumberofUS
workers
ShareofGreenoccupations
1234
17-2061.01
Yes
17-2061
10
5
5%
=5/(5+5+40+50)
1234
17-2061.02
No
17-2061
5
1234
17-2063.00
No
17-2063
40
40
1234
17-2064.00
No
17-2064
50
50
Source:OwnelaborationbasedonO*NETdatabase(GreenOccupations&O-NET-SOC2010OccupationList),U.S.Bureauof
LaborStatisticscorrespondencebetweenSOC2010CodesandISCO-08categories,and2018OccupationalEmploymentand
WageStatistics.
9Estimatesfor2018areusedsinceitisthemostrecentyearinwhichsurveydatawascollectedusingthe2010SOCclassification.Afterthisyear,estimatesuseahybridofthe2010and2018SOCsystems,whichmakesthelinkwiththeO*NET-SOC2010classificationofgreenjobslessdirect.Whileemploymentestimatesfromthisprogramarenotperfectsincetheyexcludeself-employment,theyaretheonlysourceofpubliclyavailabledatawithinformationatthe6-digitleveloftheSOC.
10Thisassumptionhadtobeusedinothercasesinwhichmoreinformationwasnotavailable:1)forsixSOCoccupationsatsix-digitsforwhichU.S.employmentdatawasonlyavailableatfivedigits(inthesecasesemploymentat5-digitswasequallydistributedamongtheSOCoccupationsatsix-digitscorrespondingtothe5-digitcode);2)toestimateemploymentinsomeofthesixcasesinwhichtheSOCclassificationfromO*NETandOEWSweredifferent:SOC211018inOEWS(SubstanceAbuse,BehavioralDisorder,andMentalHealthCounselors)wasequallydistributedbetweenSOC211011(SubstanceAbuseandBehavioralDisorderCounselors)and211014(MentalHealthCounselors)fromO*NET;SOC512028inOEWS(Electrical,Electronic,andElectromechanicalAssemblers,ExceptCoilWinders,Tapers,andFinishers)wasequallydistributedbetweenSOC512022and
512023fromO*NET(ElectricalandElectronicEquipmentAssemblers+ElectromechanicalEquipmentAssemblers);SOC512098inOEWS(AssemblersandFabricators,AllOther,IncludingTeamAssemblers)wasequallydistributedbetweenSOC512092and
512099fromO*NET(TeamAssemblers+AssemblersandFabricators,AllOther).
8
Greensectors
Asmentionedabove,thispaperusesthelevelofGHGEperworkertoclassifysectorsintogreenandnon-
greencategories.TocalculatethelevelofGHGEbysector,thispaperfollowsthemethodologyproposedbyAlcantara(2007),Alcantaraetal.(2010),andBinSuetal.(2013).Thisisbecausetoaccountforthetrue‘greenness”ofasector,weshouldconsiderboththedirectandindirectGHGE.Forexample,whilethefinancialsectormayhavelowlevelsofdirectGHGEperworker,itstotalGHGEmaybesubstantiallyhigheronceweconsideritslinkswith,forexample,theutilitiesortransportationsectors.ThemethodologyappliestheInput-OutputmodelproposedbyLeontief,W.(1986)toavectorofemissionsmultiplier.TheoriginalLeontiefmodeltocalculategrossproductionhasthefollowingstructure:
Y=[I—A]−1f
WhereYcorrespondstoacolumnvectorcontainingthelevelofgrossproductionbyeconomicsector,Iistheidentitymatrixoforderncorrespondingtothen-sectors,Aisannxnmatrixcontainingthetechnologycoefficientsforeachincludedsector,andfisacolumnvectorcorrespondingtothefinaldemandforeacheconomicsector.
Anemissionmultipliermatrixisincorporatedintothepreviousequationtocalculatethelevelofemissionsbysector.Thismatrixisdiagonalandcontainsthenumberofemissionsperproductionunitforeachsector.Thenewequationforcalculatingemissionsbysectorhasthefollowingstructure:
C=C^[I—A]−1f
WhereCcorrespondstoacolumnvectorcontainingthelevelofemissionsbyeconomicsector,andC^isadiagonalmatrixcontainingtheemissionsmultipliersforallsectors.
Thelevelofemissionsperworkerbysectorisestimatedasthelevelofemissionsdividedbythenumberofworkersaged15to64yearsineachsector.Inthissection,threeprimarysourcesofinformationareimplementedtoestimateGHGEperworkerbysector:theSocioeconomicDatabaseforLatinAmericaandtheCaribbean(SEDLAC),
11
the2018editionoftheOrganizationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment(OECD)country-levelInput-OutputTables(IOTs),
12
andtheClimateWatch(CAIT)Historical
11SEDLACisadatabaseofharmonizedsocio-economicstatisticsconstructedfromtheLatinAmericanandCaribbean(LAC)householdsurveys.SEDLACincludesinformationfromover300householdsurveyscarriedoutprimarilyin18LACcountriesforwhichacomparableincomeaggregate(forwelfareanalysis)canbecreated:Argentina,Bolivia,Brazil,Colombia,CostaRica,Chile,DominicanRepublic,Ecuador,ElSalvador,Guatemala,Haiti,Honduras,Mexico,Nicaragua,Panama,Paraguay,Peru,andUruguay.TheSEDLACdatabaseandprojectwerejointlydevelopedandarejointlymaintainedbyCEDLAS(UniversidadNacionaldeLaPlata)andTheWorldBank’sLACTeamforStatisticalDevelopment(LACTSD)inthePovertyandEquityGlobalPractice.
12Availablein
/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=IOTSI4_2018.
9
GHGE.
13
TheOECDIOTscontaininformationabouthoweachsector’sgrossproductionisdistributedamongalleconomicsectors(intermediatedemand)andthefinaldemand.Thelattercompriseshouseholds’domesticdemand,non-profitinstitutions’domesticdemand,government’sdomesticdemand,capitalformation,changeininventories,exports,andimports.Thesectorcl
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 幼儿园安全教育奖惩制度
- 幼儿园配班老师奖惩制度
- 建筑施工安全奖惩制度
- 天然气公司输差奖惩制度
- 托管班学生积分奖惩制度
- 初级中学卫生奖惩制度
- 创省级卫生乡镇奖惩制度
- 便利店销售业绩奖惩制度
- 创卫工作兑现奖惩制度
- 供应商奖惩制度具体办法
- 2025安徽单招会计试题及答案
- 《构成基础(第2版)》技工中职全套教学课件
- 初中数学作业设计汇报
- 医院环境卫生监测课件
- 吞咽障碍康复护理专家共识
- 春季渣土车安全培训记录课件
- 商务部安全生产培训课件
- 营养与膳食(第3版)课件 第一章.绪论
- 江苏镇江2019-2024年中考满分作文46篇
- 完整版教育部发布《3-6岁儿童学习与发展指南》(全文)
- (2025)中国石油化工集团中石化招聘笔试试题及答案
评论
0/150
提交评论