《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第1页
《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第2页
《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第3页
《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第4页
《经济学与法律的对话》课件 3 2 17 Going over the Midterm plus Coase on China_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩13页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

MidtermOnthisexamMean:56StandardDeviation23Not90-100Aetc.VeryRoughProjectionA:80-100B:60-80C:40-60AnApplicationofEconomicstoExamsTheproblemAfteransweringthequestionsyouknowtheanswerto,tenminutesareleftSoyouwritesomethingontheonesyoudon’tknowtheanswertoThishasseveralcostsItwastesyourtimewritingitandminegradingitImightgivesomeonecreditforsomethinghereallydoesn’tknowbecauseheisgoodatfakingitImightfailtogivesomeonecreditforsomethinghedoesknow,becauseIthinkheisfakingitTheDelphicoraclesaidthatSocrateswasthewisestmaninAthensButSocratesknewhedidn’tknowanythingAftertalkingtoothersinAthens,heconcludethattheydidn’tknowanythingeitherButthoughttheydidMySolution:20%creditforknowingthatyoudon’tknowsomethingYougetitforleavingaquestionblankorwriting“Idon’tknow”ortheequivalentAppliesonlytoacompletequestion,notapart.Willapplyonthefinal.ConsidertheincentivesSomeGeneralIssuesonthisExamTalkingaboutthesubjectinsteadofansweringthequestion.WhenIcrossstuffoutitdoesn’tmeanitiswrongItmeansitisirrelevanttothequestionConfusingwhatisefficientwithwhatwillhappenorwhatisintheindividual’sinterestAnimportantmistake,sinceacentralproblemIshowtopreventsituationswherewhathappensisnotefficientForexampleproblemIBTheairlinedoesnotcontrolnoiseWhichisnottheefficientsolutionButisthesolutionthatresultsfromeachpartyactinginhisowninterestQuestionIA:Soundreduction,nosoundproofing.B.Airlinehastherighttomakesound,isnotliableIfnobargaining,airlinemakessound,homeownerssoundproof.Ifbargaining,homeownerscouldofferamillion+forsoundreductionButprobablywon’tbecauseoftheirpublicgoodproblemAnexampleofaninefficientoutcomefromrationalbehaviorC.Airlinereducessoundwithorwithoutbargaining.SomeseemedtothinkitcouldbargaintogetthehomeownerstopaypartofitButwhywouldthey?Ifitmakessound,theyarecompensated.D.Nowthepublicgoodproblemdisappears,sotheanswerchangesinB“Levelingtheplayingfield”isabadmetaphorItisaseriousmistaketothinkofeverythingasazerosumgameSometimeswhathelpsonepartyhurtstheotherButsometimesitbenefitsbothpartiesbyproducingamoreefficientoutcomeConsidercaseBWithmanyhomeowners,theairlinedoesn’treducenoiseWithonefirm,itispaidbetween$1,000,000and$1,200,000toreducenoiseWhichcostsitonly$1,000,000SobothsidesarebetteroffIfEverythingisZeroSumWhateverhelpsmemusthurtyouSoalldisagreementsareaboutWhichofusgetsthegoodiesExamplesofthemistakeIfChinagetsricher,wearelesscompetitive,whichisbadIftherichgetricherthepoormustgetpoorerAllpoliticaldisagreementsareaboutwhichsideyouareonrichorpoor,blackorwhite,AmericansorforeignersSoRepublicansandDemocratsareenemiesAndallisfairinloveandwarHusbandsandwivesareenemiestooConsiderimplicationsofthebeliefInsettlementnegotiationsIntradenegotiationsIninterpersonalrelationsAverydangerousmistakeQuestionIIRationality:IndividualstendtotaketheactionthatbestachievestheirobjectivesCouldaddthePosnerconjectureasoneapproachAndfiguringouttheconsequencesoflawasanotherButdon’thaveto“LegalIssuesthatithelpstounderstand”requiresThatitisalegalissue.“Whypeoplerobbanks”isnotalegalissueHowlawshouldpreventbankrobberiesisThateconomicstellssomethingwedidn’talreadyknowWealreadyknewwhypeoplerobbanksBecausethat’swherethemoneyisButwemightnotknowtheriskofgivinglifeimprisonmentforarmedrobberyOrtheargumentinfavorofpermittingconcealedcarryWhatmattersisnotifthevictimusuallydefeatsthemugger,butIfithappensoftenenoughtomakemuggingunprofitableQuestionIIIInthePrisoner’sDilemmaitdoesn’tmatterwhattheothercriminaldoesYouarebetteroffconfessingwhetherornothedoesAdominantstrategy,notjustaNashequilibriumApplicationsmightincludeRealizingthatpermittingpleabargainingmaynotreduceaveragesentencesOthercaseswhereindividualrationalitydoesnotproducegrouprationality,forsimilarreasonsMultiplelandholdersoveroneoilpoolOverfishingNobodydidbilateralmonopoly.Ifsomeonehad…TheproblemwithinjunctiveremediesthatcreatealargebargainingrangeTheargumentforlongtermcontractsWhichwewillgetintowhendiscussingmarriageQuestionIVThelackoftroutisanegativeexternalityAslongasanyonelikestofishthereforanyreasonThatisacost.Butwhatistheinefficiencythatresults?ThepriceofAluminumisbelowitsrealcostofproductionSosomepeopleusealuminumwhen,allcostsconsidered,itwouldbecheaperTousesteelorwoodorfiberglassor…AnetlossAlternatively,Idon’tcoolmyfactoryinsomeotherwayThatwouldhaveavoidedtheproblemAndwouldcostmelessthanitsavesthefishermenWarmwatercouldalsobeapositiveexternalityAsafewstudentspointedout,possiblyallswimmersInwhichcasethepriceofaluminumcouldbeinefficientlyaboveitsrealcostofproductionLoweringthepriceofaluminumisapecuniaryexternalityAnegativeexternalitytocompetitors,positivetotheircustomersThetwoeffectscancel,soitdoesnotproduceaninefficiencyWorkersworking,aluminumbeingconsumed,arecostsButtheyarenotexternalcosts,becauseYouhavetopayforbothSotakethemintoaccountinyourdecisionsQuestionVRiskaversionisnotaboutpresentvsfuturebutaboutyoubeingrichorpoorRiskpreferringdoesn’tmeanyoulikeriskThatyouwouldchoosetoflipacoin,headsyouloseathousanddollar,tailsyoudon’t.Onlythatyoulikeacoinflipwhereheadsyouloseathousand,tailsyouwinathousand.Whatdoriskaverse,riskneutral,andriskpreferringmeanInmoneyInlifeIngradesRiskaversioninmoneyisduetodecliningmarginalutilityofincomeAndthatdoesnotimplydecliningmarginalutilityofyearsorgradesExanteexpostquestion:DeathsvsDentsOnemajorproblemwithexpostishavingtoimposelargepunishmentsIftheonlyresultisdenting,thatisunnecessarySoapureexpostsystemmakesmuchmoresensethanifaccidentskillInterestingbutnotentirelycorrectanswerExpostdoesn’tworkifaccidentskill,becauseYoucan’tpunishadeadmanYoucouldstillpunishadriverforanaccidentthatkillssomeoneelseMoreinteresting,therearewaysofpunishingadeadmani.e.thingshappeningafterhediesthat,before,hedoesn’twanttohappenRefusingtoburyasuicideinconsecratedgroundisatraditionalsolutionConfiscatinghispropertysothathiswifeandchildrenstarveKillingorpunishingpeoplehecaresaboutmoregenerallyPunishmentfortreasoninImperialChinaRelativesareexecutedorenslavedAfterall,weknowyoucanrewardadeadmanOtherwisenobodywouldbuylifeinsuranceItonlypayswhenheisdeadAndbuyingitmeanshevaluesnowthathappeningthenQuestionVIEconomicsofinsuranceRiskAversion=DecliningMUIOneimplicationisthatthefactthatpeoplebuyinsuranceisevidenceThatredistributivetaxationcanincreaseutilityAlthoughevidenceshortofproof—asevidenceusuallyisAdverseSelectionShowsareasonnottolimitinsurancecompanies’abilitytochargedifferentratestodifferentcustomersSinceifyoucan’tchargebadriskratestobadrisks,insuranceisapoordealforgoodrisksAndeveryoneendsuppayingbadriskpricesornotgettinginsuredAlsoanargumentforforcingpeopletobuyinsurancesoastopreventadverseselectionThevalueoflifeThevalueofmylifetomeislarge,asshownbymychoicesSodamagesfortortiouslossoflifeshouldincludeitHedonicdamagesButitisfinite,asshownbymychoices,soregulationsshouldnotbeinfinitelycautiousEconomicefficiencyTortdamagessufficienttomakethevictimwhole:TheargumentforPigouviantaxationThechoicebetweenpropertyrulesandliabilityrulesBotharewaysofmovinggoodstotheirhighestvalueduse,whichistheefficientoutcomeAndsometimesone,sometimestheother,doesitatlowercostAndForSomethingDifferentCoase’sFinalBook:HowChinaWentCapitalistStrikingfacts20foldincreaseinGDPpercapitafromMao’sdeathto2010.ShiftfromacommunisttoamostlycapitalistsystemWiththeCommunistPartystillincontrolMaostillrevered,socialismstilltheofficialideologyMao’spartofthestoryInfavorofdecentralization,criticalofStalin,butDidn’tknowhowtodoitThesolutiontothecoordinationproblemispricesandtradeAndheknewthatmustbewrongsincethatwouldbecapitalismSohisversionwaslotsofcommunes,mostlyself-sufficientThesystemoscillatedbetweencentralplanninganddecentralizationSincebothfailed,thesolutionmustbeculture,morale,somethinglikethat.TheGreatLeapForward,whichresultedinafaminethatkilledabout30millionpeopleAndthentheCulturalRevolutionWhathappenedafterMaodied?ManyhighstatuspeoplewhohadbeenpurgedcamebackTheyknewtheGreatLeapForwardandtheCulturalRevolutionweremistakesIndeedsomeofthemhadbeenpurgedforrecognizingthatAndtryingtopersuadeMaoNowtheycouldgoabroad,seetherealityofcapitalismAdeputypremierofChinavisitedEnglandObservedthataLondontrashcollectorhadseveraltimeshisincomeEnglandwouldbetheperfectcommunistcountryifitonlyhadacommunistpartyrunningitConclusion:Wemustbedoingsomethingwrongbutdon’tknowwhatTrylotsofthings,believeinthefactsAndwewillwinoutbecausesocialismisbetterPolicyafterMao’sdeathAttemptstoreformstaterunsector,givemorepowertofirmsMadesomeimprovement,but…Unwillingtogoalltheway,becauseHeavyindustryetc.waswhatmattered,soithadtobesocialistMeanwhile,inthemarginsCovertprivatizationoflandFirmsnominallyrunbylocalgovernments,permittedbutdisapprovedofVerysmallscaleprivateemploymentinthecities,tosoakupunemployedToleratedbecausenotimportantand…learnfromfactsTheSpecialEconomicZonesweredeliberatepolicyIntendedtolearnfromcapitalismwhilepreventingcontagionInitiallydoneinunimportantplaces.WhichrapidlybecameimportantSotheexceptiongraduallybecametheruleDualtrackpricing–govtfirmssoldtheirquotaattheofficialprice,butProductionabovethequotacouldbesoldatwhateverpricebuyerswouldpayGavegovernmentofficialsexperiencewithmarketswithinpublicsectorProvidedaccesstoresources,atacost,totheprivatesectorButalsoproducedinefficienciesandcorruptionCouldnottellifasuccessfulgovernmentfirmwaswellrunorjustgotfavorabletermsfromthegovernmentTheResultPrivatepracticeonthemarginswasverysuccessfulSofirstnotpunishedThenpermitted(agriculture)inparticularlyunsuccessfulplacesThenpushedeverywhereStateownedfirmslargelylosingmoney,atprovincialandlocallevelSomostofthemwereeventuallyprivatizedChinaendedupwithsomestatemonopoliesButmostproductionprivateGovernmentrevenueof~20%ofnationalincome,lowerthanintheU.S.Andtheyredefinedsocialismtob

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论