版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
FinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries
FederalReserveBoard,Washington,D.C.
ISSN1936-2854(Print)
ISSN2767-3898(Online)
AutomatedCreditLimitIncreasesandConsumerWelfare
VitalyM.Bord,AgnesKovacs,andPatrickMoran
2025-088
Pleasecitethispaperas:
Bord,VitalyM.,AgnesKovacs,andPatrickMoran(2025).“AutomatedCreditLimitIncreasesandConsumerWelfare,”FinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSe-ries2025-088.Washington:BoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem,
/10.17016/FEDS.2025.088
.
NOTE:StafworkingpapersintheFinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries(FEDS)arepreliminarymaterialscirculatedtostimulatediscussionandcriticalcomment.TheanalysisandconclusionssetfortharethoseoftheauthorsanddonotindicateconcurrencebyothermembersoftheresearchstafortheBoardofGovernors.ReferencesinpublicationstotheFinanceandEconomicsDiscussionSeries(otherthanacknowledgement)shouldbeclearedwiththeauthor(s)toprotectthetentativecharacterofthesepapers.
1
AutomatedCreditLimitIncreasesandConsumerWelfare*
VitalyM.BordtAgnesKovacs‡PatrickMoran§
September17,2025
Clickformostrecentversion
Abstract
IntheUnitedStates,creditcardcompaniesfrequentlyusemachinelearningalgo-rithmstoproactivelyraisecreditlimitsforborrowers.Incontrast,anincreasingnumberofcountrieshavebeguntoprohibitcreditlimitincreasesinitiatedbybanksratherthanconsumers.Inthispaper,weexploitdetailedregulatorymicrodatatoexaminetheextenttowhichbank-initiatedcreditlimitincreasesaredirectedtowardsindividualswithrevolvingdebt.Wethendevelopamodelthatcapturesthecostsandbenefitsofregulatingproactivecreditlimitincreases,whichweusetoquantifytheirimportanceandevaluatetheimplicationsforhouseholdwell-being.
*ThispaperwaspreparedfortheCarnegie-Rochester-NYUConferenceSeriesonPublicPolicy.TheviewsexpressedinthispaperaresolelythoseoftheauthorsanddonotrepresenttheviewsoftheFederalReserveBoardortheFederalReserveSystem.CordBarnesprovidedexcellentresearchassistance.
tFederalReserveBoard(
vitaly.bord@
)
‡King’sCollegeLondon,UniversityofManchester,andIFS(
agnes.kovacs@kcl.ac.uk
)
§FederalReserveBoard,IFS,andCEBI(
patrick.e.donnellymoran@
)
2
1Introduction
Asalgorithmicdecision-makingreshapesconsumerfinance,acriticaltensionhasemergedbetweentheefficiencyofautomatedcreditdecisionsandtheprotectionofvulnerableconsumers.Inthecreditcardmarket,limitincreasesareaparticularlyimportantbutunderstudiedsourceofcredit,affectingmorethan12%ofaccountseachyear.Countriesdifferintheirapproachtoregulatinglimitincreases.Forexample,intheUnitedStates,theoverwhelmingmajorityoftheseincreasesareimplementedautomaticallybylendersusingproprietarymodelsratherthanrequestedbyconsumers.Bycontrast,reflectingconcernsaboutindebtednessandconsumerprotection,severalcountrieshaverestrictedbanks’abilitytoraisecreditlimits:forinstance,theUKnowprohibitslimitincreasesforborrowerswhohavebeeninpersistentrevolvingdebt,whileCanadaprohibitsbank-initiatedcreditlimitincreaseswithoutconsumers’consent.
Policymakersfaceanimportantquestion:towhatextentshouldtheyregulatealgo-rithmicdecision-makingincreditmarkets,particularlywhenbanksincreasecreditlimitsautomatically?Ontheonehand,automaticcreditlimitincreasescanbebeneficial,astheyrelaxcreditconstraintsandgivehouseholdsgreaterflexibilitytosmoothconsump-tionoveradverseshocks.Ontheotherhand,suchincreasesmayalsobedetrimental.Mostofabank’screditcardprofitscomefromconsumerswhocarrypersistentdebt(
Adamsetal.
,
2022
),creatingincentivesforbankstodirectlimitincreasestowardtheseindividuals.Ifsomeconsumersstrugglewithself-control,additionalcreditmayleadtogreaterindebtedness(
Laibson
,
1997
;
GulandPesendorfer
,
2004
).Indeed,empiricalevi-denceshowsthatconsumersborrowmoreaftercreditlimitincreases,evenwhentheydidnotrequesttheincreaseandarenotobservablyconstrained(
GrossandSouleles
,
2002
).
Inthispaper,weexploitregulatorydataoncreditcardlendingtoinvestigatewhore-ceivesbank-initiatedcreditlimitincreases,thendevelopaquantitativemodeltoevaluatethecostsandbenefitsofallowingbankstoproactivelyraisecreditlimits.Wemakethreemainsetsofcontributions.First,inthedata,wepresentseveralnewstylizedfactsabouttheimportanceoflimitincreasesincreditcardlendingstrategies,theroleofproactivebank-initiatedincreasesthatarenotrequestedbyconsumers,andtheirrelationshiptorevolvingdebt.Second,weexaminetheextenttowhichbank-initiatedcreditlimitin-creasesaredirectedtowardsindividualswithrevolvingdebt,andconsistentwithexistingliterature,documentthatdebtrisesafterlimitincreases.Third,wedevelopamodelofhouseholdbehaviorthatallowsustoperformthefirstquantitativeanalysisofthepositiveandnormativeimplicationsofrestrictingbank-initiatedcreditlimitsincreases,examiningboththeUKapproachofprohibitingincreasesforrevolvingborrowersandtheCanadianapproachofrequiringexplicitconsumerconsent.Overall,webelieveourresultshaveimportantimplicationsforconsumerprotectionandtheemergingfieldof
3
algorithmicregulationinconsumerfinance.Indeed,whilemanyaspectsofcreditcardmarketsareregulated,thereislittleoversightofthefactorslenderscanusetoproactivelyraisecreditlimits.
OurempiricalanalysisutilizesregulatorydataoncreditcardlendingfromFederalReserve’sCapitalAssessmentsandStressTestingReports(Y-14)filedbylargecreditcardissuers,coveringmorethan70%oftheU.S.creditcardmarket.Thisdatasetisuniquelysuitedtoourpurposebecauseitallowsustodifferentiatebetweenbank-andconsumer-initiatedcreditlimitincreases,somethingwhichisimpossibletoobserveinmostotherdatasets,suchascreditbureaudata.TheY-14datacontainmonthly,account-levelinformationaboutgranularaspectsofcreditusageincludingbalances,purchasevolumes,financecharges,andfees.
WebeginbycatalogingseveralnewstylizedfactsabouttheroleandprevalenceoflimitincreasesintheU.S.creditcardmarket.Weshowthatlimitincreasesareanimportantsourceofconsumercredit,withhalfasmuchadditionalavailablecreditcomingfromlimitincreasesasfromnewaccountoriginations.Limitincreasesarerelativelymoreimportantforlowercreditscoreborrowers,aslendersoftenfollowa“lowandgrow”strategyontheseaccounts—withlowlimitsatorigination,followedbyincreasesdependingonborrowerbehavior.Theshareofrevolvingbalances—thepartoftotalbalancesthatarecarriedfromthepreviousmonthratherthanpaidoffandthusaccrueinterest—madepossiblebylimitincreasesissimilarlyhigherforlow-creditscoreborrowers.
Importantly,theoverwhelmingmajorityoflimitincreasesintheU.S.areproactivelyimplementedbybanksratherthanrequestedbyconsumers.Creditcardlendershaveextensiveamountsofdataontheirexistingcustomers,whichtheycanminewithmachinelearningandartificialintelligencealgorithmstoascertainthemostprofitablecustomerstowhomtogivelimitincreases.Consistentwiththeiruseofalgorithms,weshowthatbanksthatmoreoftenreferto‘artificialintelligence’or‘machinelearning’intheirannualfilingstendtosupportalargershareofrevolvingbalanceswithlimitincreases,ratherthanthecreditlimitgrantedatorigination.
Next,buildingonthesestylizedfacts,weexaminetheextenttowhichcreditcardutilizationiscorrelatedwiththelikelihoodofreceivingalimitincrease.Wedistinguishbetweentwodifferenttypesofcreditcardutilization:revolvingutilization,whichreflectsdebtthatiscarriedfrompriormonths,andtransactingutilization,whichreflectsnewpurchases.Whilebothrevolvingutilizationandtransactingutilizationarepositivelycorrelatedwithalimitincrease,wefindthatthelikelihoodofreceivingalimitincreasevariesacrossthetwotypesofutilization.Morespecifically,thecorrelationwithrevolvingutilizationfollowsaninverse-Ushapewiththehighestprobabilityofreceivingalimitincreaseoccurringformoderatelevelsofutilization.Bycontrast,thecorrelationwith
4
transactingutilizationfollowsalogarithmicgrowthpattern:theprobabilityofalimitincreaseriseswithutilizationuntilaboutautilizationof0.3,andabovethatlevel,uti-lizationdoesnotappeartovarywiththeprobabilityofanincrease.Wefindthatthesepatternsvarysomewhatwithcreditscore,likelyreflectingunderlyingdifferencesinrisk.
Weconcludetheempiricalresultswithasimpleeventstudyexaminingwhathappenstoutilizationafteralimitincrease.Ourfindingsareconsistentwiththeresultsestablishedintheliterature:inthemonthsafteralimitincrease,utilizationreboundstopre-increaselevels,asconsumerincreasetheirrevolvingdebt.Notably,thiseffectoccurseveninaccountsthatarenotneartheircreditlimitandsoareunlikelytobeliquidityconstrained.Thisisconsistentwiththepresenceofself-controlissues,whichalsopredictsthathighercreditlimitsmayleadtogreaterborrowing.
Afterpresentingtheempiricalresults,wedevelopamodelthatallowsustoperformthefirstquantitativeanalysisofnovelreal-worldpoliciesthatrestrictbank-initiatedcreditlimitincreases.Inthemodel,householdsmakeconsumption,saving,andborrowingdecisionsoverthelife-cyclewhilefacedwithuninsurableincomeandemploymentrisk.Weallowforheterogeneouspreferencesfollowing
Nakajima
(
2017
),allowingfortwotypesofhouseholdswithandwithoutself-controlissues`ala
GulandPesendorfer
(
2001
,
2004
).Weassumehiddeninformationonhouseholdtype,suchthatcreditcardcompaniescannotmakelendingdecisionsbasedontype,butonlybasedonobservedconsumerbehavior.Inthemodel,thecreditcardcompanyinitiallyoffersasimilarproducttoallconsumers,butwiththeoptionoftailoringcreditlimitslater.WecalibratethecreditlimitincreasefunctionusingY-14data,theninternallyestimatethepreferenceparameterstomatchaggregatestatisticsontheU.S.creditcardmarket.
Theabovemodelcapturestwoopposingeffectsfromallowingproactivelimitincreasesbasedonmachinelearningalgorithms.Accordingtotraditionaltheory,consumersbenefitfromadditionalcredit,asitgivesthemgreaterflexibilitytosmoothconsumptionandself-insureagainstrisk.Atthesametime,ifbankalgorithmsimplicitlytargetconsumerswithself-controlissues,itmayleadtogreatertemptationandincreasedborrowing,whichmaybedetrimentaltoconsumersevenifitisprofitabletobanks.Takentogether,ourmodelcapturesthebenefitofrelaxedconstraints,aswellasthepotentialriskofgivingtoomuchcredittoconsumerswithbehavioralbiases(seee.g.
Livshits
,
2020
).
1
Webeginbyanalyzingthepropertiesofthebaselinemodel,whereconsumersreceivecreditlimitincreasesbasedontheempiricalevidencefromtheY-14data.Throughthelensofourmodel,wefindthatmostcreditlimitincreasesgotowardsconsumerswithself-controlissues,sincetheseborrowersaremorelikelytomaintainrevolvingbalances.Asaresult,manylimitincreasesaredetrimentalfromtheperspectiveoftheconsumer.
1Wefocusonself-controlissuesduetotheirwell-documentedimportanceincreditcardborrowing(
MeierandSprenger
,
2010
;
Gathergood
,
2012
;
KuchlerandPagel
,
2021
).
5
Thatsaid,wefindimportantheterogeneityregardingwhichlimitincreasesarebeneficial:whilecustomerswithzeroorlowutilizationalmostalwaysbenefitfromgreateraccesstocredit,customerswithmoderateorhighutilizationarefrequentlyharmedbyproactivelimitincreases,astheseconsumersaremorelikelytosufferfromself-controlissues.
Usingtheabovemodel,weanalyzethepositiveandnormativeimplicationsofalter-nativeregulationsthatrestrictbanksfromraisingcreditlimitsincertainsituations.Inourfirstcounterfactualexercise,weevaluateapolicythatprohibitsbanksfromraisingthecreditlimitsofrevolvingborrowers,motivatedbyarecentpolicyintheUK.Inourmodel,wefindthatthispolicyresultsinalargedecreaseintheshareofcreditlimitincreasesgoingtowardsconsumerswithself-controlissues.Asaresultoffewerlimitincreases,thedebt-to-incomeratiodeclinesbyroughly2percentagepoints,evenastheaverageutilizationrateincreasesslightlyduetoreducedcredit.Turningtowardswelfare,wefindthatprohibitinglimitincreasestorevolvingborrowersimproveswelfareby1.1%intermsofconsumptionequivalentvariation.Whileagentswithoutself-controlissuesareslightlyharmedbyreducedaccesstocredit,thesecostsaresmallcomparedtothebenefitsofreducedtemptationandlowerinterestexpenditurebyagentswithself-controlissues.Finally,wefindthatwhenthefirmisabletore-optimizeitscreditlimitincreasefunctioninresponsetothenewpolicyrestriction,thepolicyhelpstoshiftcreditlimitincreasesfromagentswithself-controlissuestoagentswithoutsuchissues,andthusthecounterfactualpolicycontinuestoimproveoverallwell-being.
Thesecondcounterfactualpolicyweanalyzerestrictsbanksfromincreasingcreditlimitswithoutconsumerconsent,inspiredbyrecentregulationsinCanada,Singapore,andNewZealand,whichwillbeimplementedacrossEUmemberstatesin2026.Thispolicyshowssimilarpositiveandnormativeimplicationsasprohibitinglimitincreasesforrevolvers,undertheassumptionthatconsumersarefullyawareoftheirself-controlissues.Thatsaid,wefindmeaningfuldifferencesifwealterourassumptionsabouttheshareofsophisticatedversusna.Requiringconsumerconsentimproveswelfarewhenconsumersaresophisticated,whereasprohibitinglimitincreasesforrevolvingborrowersremainseffectiveevenifallhouseholdsarena.
Takingstock,ourresultshaveimportantpolicyimplicationsforalgorithmicregulationincreditcardmarkets.WhiletheU.S.hasextensiveregulationsoncreditrejectionsandlimitdecreases,thereisanotablelackofregulationsurroundingproactivebank-initiatedlimitincreases.
2
Althoughwedonotobservetheexactalgorithmsusedbybankstodeterminetheiroptimalpolicyforproactivelyraisingcreditlimits,ourempiricalanalysis
2Lendershavetofollowtwomaintypesofregulationsaroundcreditlimitchanges:whendecreasingacreditlimitorrejectinganapplicationtoincreaseacreditlimit,lendersneedstoprovideareasonundertheEqualCreditOpportunityAct;andwhenincreasinglimits,theyneedtoabideby“ability-to-pay”rulesandonlymakeloansthatborrowerscanreasonablypaygiventheirincomeandotherobligations,although
FulfordandStavins
(
2025
)findthattheserulesaregenerallynon-binding.
6
demonstratesarevealedpreferenceforgivingadditionalcredittorevolvingborrowers.Inourcalibratedmodel,thisimpliesthatcreditincreasesaredisproportionatelyallocatedtoconsumerswithself-controlissues,raisingconcernsaboutexploitativecontractinginthespiritof
HeidhuesandK˝oszegi
(
2010
).Takentogether,weconcludethatifsomehouse-holdshaveself-controlissues,therearestrongconsumerprotectionreasonstoregulatethealgorithmsusedbybankstoproactivelytoraisecreditlimits.
RelatedLiterature.Ourpapercontributestoseveralstrandsofliterature.First,anextensiveliteraturehasexaminedhowcreditlimitsaffectconsumptionandborrowinginthecreditcardmarket(
Agarwaletal.
,
2023
,
2017
;
FulfordandSchuh
,
2023
;
Grossand
Souleles
,
2002
).Thesepapersgenerallyfindthatborrowersaltertheirspendingwithchangesintheircreditlimiteveniftheyareunconstrainedandhaveutilizationbelowtheircreditlimit.Mostofthesestudiesdonotestablishacausalinterpretationtothesefindings,withtheexceptionof
Aydin
(
2022
)whousesafieldexperimenttoidentifyacausaleffectand
Chavaetal.
(
2023
)whoexaminetheeffectsofcreditlimitchangesarisingfrombankfundingshocks.Acausaleffectisgenerallydifficulttoidentify,asautomatedchangestocreditlimitsmayberesponsestoborroweractions.
Kovrijnykh
etal.
(
2023
)findthatlendersincreaselimitsonborrowers’existingcreditcardaccountswhenborrowersopennewcreditcards,consistentwiththenewaccountsrevealingpositiveinformationabouttheborrowers’creditworthiness.
3
Weaddtothisliteraturebyexaminingtheaccountandborrowercharacteristicsthathelppredictlimitincreases.Toourknowledge,theonlypreviouspaperthathasfocusedonaccount-leveldriversis
FulfordandStavins
(
2025
),whoexaminehowtheability-to-payrulesimplementedaspartofthe2009CreditCardAccountabilityResponsibilityandDisclosure(CARD)Actaffectedlenders’grantingofcreditlimitincreases.Theyfindthatalthoughmostincomeupdatesarefollowedbylimitincreases,lendersoftenincreaselimitswithoutreceivinganyupdatesaboutborrowerincome.Weaddtothisliteraturebybeingthefirsttoevaluatetheimportanceofutilizationandrevolvingbehaviorindrivingbank-initiatedlimitincreases,andtodocumentthedifferentialrolesofbank-andconsumer-initiatedlimitincreases.
Second,ouranalysisofthewelfareeffectsofrestrictingbank-initiatedcreditexpansioncontributestotheliteratureonconsumerprotectionregulationforconsumerswithbiasedornonstandardpreferences.
HeidhuesandK˝oszegi
(
2010
)showthatwhensomeborrowershavepresent-biaspreferences,itiswelfare-improvingtobanlargepenaltiesfordeferringsmallrepayments,and
HeidhuesandKo…szegi
(
2015
)arguethatinthecreditcardmarket,thewelfarecostsoflenderstakingadvantageofconsumers’misunderstandingsmaybelarge.Althoughregulationmayhelppreventover-borrowing,itmayneverthelessbe
3Inaddition,
Yin
(
2022
)showsthatborrowersinferbothhighergrowthinfuturepersonalincomeandandhighermacroeconomicgrowthfromlender-initiatedcreditlimitincreases.
7
welfarereducingforirrationalborrowers(
Exleretal.
,
2024
).Alongtheselines,
Jolls
andSunstein
(
2005
)arguethatthelawcanhelpde-biasconsumersbynudgingthemtowardstherationaloutcome,ratherthanbyenactingregulation.Ontheempiricalside,
BertrandandMorse
(
2011
)performafieldexperimentandfindthatadditionalinformationdisclosuresaboutpaydayloansreducecustomers’borrowing.
Stangoand
Zinman
(
2011
)showthatweakerenforcementofTruthinLendingActdisclosureswidensthegapinpricesbetweenmore-andless-biasedconsumers.
Gathergood
(
2012
)showsthatself-controlissuesarestronglycorrelatedwithover-indebtednessintheUKcreditcardmarket.Relativetotheexistingliterature,wearethefirsttodocumentthatbank-initiatedcreditlimitincreasesareoftentargetedtowardsrevolvingborrowers,andthefirsttoanalyzetherecently-implementedreal-worldpoliciesthatrestrictthisbehavior.
Third,wecontributetoanemergentliteratureontheregulationofalgorithmicdeci-sionmaking(seee.g.
Blattneretal.
,
2021
).Whilebanksreleaselittlepublicinformationontheirapproachtoproactivecreditlimitincreases,manycreditcardcompaniesuselarge-scaleexperimentstoevaluateandoptimizetheprofitabilityofcreditlimitadjust-mentfunctions(
Botella
,
2022
).Thisapproachcloselyresemblesreinforcementlearning,whereabankadoptsapolicyruleforcreditlimitincreases,whichtheyoptimizebasedontheobservedrewardstofollowingthatpolicyversusoccasionallydeviatingfromthatpolicy,asdescribedby
SuttonandBarto
(
2018
).Indeed,recentresearchshowsthatamachinelearningalgorithmsbank-initiatedcreditlimitincreasesmayoutperformotherapproaches.
4
Wecontributetothisliteraturebyexamininghowcreditcardcompaniesgivelimitincreasesbasedonobservedborrowingbehaviorandthepotentialimplicationsforhouseholdwell-being.
Finally,wecontributetotheliteratureontherevolvingandtransacting,orconve-nience,functionsofcreditcards.
AdamsandBord
(
2020
)stresstheimportanceofsepa-ratingaccountsbytheircreditcardusagetounderstandcreditmarketdynamicsduringtheCOVID-19pandemic.
GrodzickiandKoulayev
(
2021
),
FulfordandSchuh
(
2023
),and
LeeandMaxted
(
2023
)showthatrevolverstatusishighlypersistent.
Adamsetal.
(
2022
)emphasizethatrevolversaretheprimarydriverofcreditcardlenders’income,within-terestincomecomprisingthevastmajorityoflenders’revenuesandprofits.Whileotherpaperssuchas
Agarwaletal.
(
2017
)havediscussedprofitabilityinthecontextofcreditlimitincreases,wefocusondisentanglingtherolesthattherevolvingandtransactingutilizationsplayindrivinglimitincreases.
Therestofthepaperisorganizedasfollows.Section2introducesthedataandes-tablishesseveralmotivatingstylizedfactsontheimportanceofproactivelimitincreases,theprevalenceof“low-and-grow”strategies,andtheirroleinmakingpossiblehigherag-
4See(
Alfonso-Snchezetal.
,
2024
)forananalysisoftheoutperformanceoftheDoubleQ-Learning
algorithm
8
gregaterevolvingdebt.Section3evaluatestherelationshipbetweenrevolvingutilizationandlimitincreaseattheloanlevel.Buildingonthesefindings,section4presentsthequantitativemodelandsection5discussesthemainmodelresultsandcounterfactuals.Section6concludesanddiscussesdirectionsforfurtherresearch.
2Dataandstylizedfacts
Inthissection,wefirstdiscusstheregulatorydataweuseintheempiricalpartsofthepaper.Next,wepresentseveralnewstylizedfactsontheprevalenceandimportanceofcreditcardlimitincreases.Finally,weturntoanoverviewoftheregulatoryframeworkregardinglimitincreases.
2.1Data
OurdatacomefromFormFRY-14MoftheFederalReserve’sCapitalAssessmentsandStressTestingReport(henceforth,Y-14)fortheJanuary2014toDecember2024timeperiod.Thesedataprovidemonthly,account-levelinformationonallcreditcardsissuedbylargestress-testedbankswithmorethan§100Binassets.The26banksinthedatasetduringoursampleperiodcomprise,inaggregate,morethan70%ofcreditcardbalancesintheU.S..Becauseofthelargesizeofthedataset,forouranalysis,weusea0.5%sampleofaccounts,consistingofmorethan150millionobservationscorrespondingtomorethan3.6uniqueactivecreditcards.
Thedataincludedetailedinformationonthecharacteristicsandusageofeachcreditcardaccount,includingcreditlimit,balances,utilization,totalpurchases,financecharges,anddelinquency.Thedataalsoincludemeasuresoftheborrower’screditscore,whichareavailablebothupdatedandatorigination.Self-reportedincomeisavailableatoriginationformostborrowers.Until2020,lendersalsoreportedupdatedincomewheneveritwasrefreshedbytheborrower;however,thisinformationisnotavailablesince2020(see
FulfordandStavins
(
2025
)formoredetails).
TheY-14datasethastwoadvantagesovercreditbureaudata,whichisoftenusedtoexamineconsumerfinancialhealthandbehavior.First,becausethedataincludeinformationonbalancesandactualpayments,itispossibletoidentifyrevolvers—accountsthatutilizethecreditfeatureofacreditcardandcarrybalancesmonthtomonthonwhichtheypayinterest.Itisimportanttoidentifyrevolversbecauseinterestcomprisesthevastmajorityoftheprofitabilityofcreditcardportfolios,andsorevolversareacreditcardlender’smostprofitablecustomers(
Adamsetal.
,
2022
).Second,thedataallowustoidentifycreditlimitchangesandwhethertheywereinitiatedbythelenderortheborrower.Toourknowledge,thisistheonlycurrently-availabledatasetthatidentifiesthesourceof
9
achangeincreditlimit,thusallowingustostudybank-initiatedlimitchangesseparatelyfromconsumer-initiatedones.
OnedifferencebetweentheY-14dataandmore-commonly-usedcreditbureaudataisthattheY-14datasetisattheaccountlevel.Althoughweareabletoexaminesomeborrowercharacteristicssuchascreditscore,weareunabletolinktotheborrower’sotherloansorevenothercreditcards.Afurtherdiscussionofthedataandsummarystatisticsispresentedinsection
A.2
oftheAppendix.
2.2Motivatingstylizedfactsaboutcreditcardlimitincreases
Creditcardlimitincreasesareanunderstudiedaspectoftheprovisionofcreditincon-sumercreditmarkets.Inthissubsection,wepresentavarietyofaggregatestylizedfactsthatmotivatethemodelwepresentinsection
4
.
Fact1.Limitincreasesareanimportantsourceofcredit.
Figure
1
,PanelA,plotsthetotalcreditlimit—thatis,theamountofavailablecredit—comingfromnewlyoriginatedcardsandfromcreditcardlimitincreaseseachquarter.PanelBplotsthetotalnumberofcreditcardsthatareissuedeachquarterandthetotalnumberofcardsthatundergolimitincreases.
$B
PanelA.Credit
80
60
40
20
0
2014q12017q12020q12023q1
M
PanelB.Numberofcards
20
15
10
5
2014q12017q12020q12023q1
Limitincreases---Neworiginations
Figure1:Creditcardlimitincreasesandnewissuance
Asthefiguresshow,duringthepost-pandemicperiod,creditcardlimitincreasesresultinmorethan§40Bofadditionalavailablecrediteachquarter,whichisalmost60%oftheapproximately§70Bofavailablecreditthatarisesfromnewcardissuance.Priortothepandemic,creditlimitincreaseswereabout§30B,orabouthalfofnewissuance.Inaddition,thetotalnumberofcardsthatundergoacreditlimitincreaseeac
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 深度解析(2026)《GBT 35786-2017机动车电子标识读写设备通 用规范》
- 深度解析(2026)《GBT 35822-2018自然保护区功能区划技术规程》:生态安全格局构建的法治化与技术化协同演进之路
- 深度解析(2026)《GBT 35644-2017地下管线数据获取规程》
- 深度解析(2026)《GBT 35498-2017工业用乙烯基三氯硅烷》
- 深度解析(2026)《GBT 35451.1-2017埋地排水排污用聚丙烯(PP)结构壁管道系统 第1部分:聚丙烯双壁波纹管材》
- 《DZT 0119-1994地质钻探用往复式泥浆泵技术条件》(2026年)合规红线与避坑实操手册
- 制造业质量控制试卷及详解
- 《CBT 4523-2022集装箱制造业绿色工厂评价要求》从合规成本到利润增长全案:避坑防控+降本增效+商业壁垒构建
- 学校实验仪器设备赔偿制度
- 算力基础设施项目落地实施方案
- ISO9001-2026质量管理体系管理评审计划管理评审报告及各部门管理评审资料
- 2025年压力性损伤考试题(+答案解析)
- 高边坡施工危险源辨识及风险评价方案
- 2025年温州市泰顺县教育局县城学校选调教师考试笔试试卷【附答案】
- DB37-T 5087-2021 建筑与市政工程绿色施工评价标准
- 脐带脱垂护理业务查房课件
- 气体充装工作业指导书
- 2025不分手承诺书:爱情专属情侣忠诚保障协议
- 检验科个人防护培训课件
- 商业道德管理办法
- 高一必修三四数学试卷
评论
0/150
提交评论