HND商务契约关系

BusinessContractualRelationships

Outcome1

CandidateName:

GradeandClass:

Content

TOC\o"1-3"\h\u

1.0Introduction

2

2.0Finding

2

2.1

2

2.2

3

2.3

3

A

3

B

4

2.4

4

A

4

B

5

2.5

5

3.0Conclusion

6

4.0Reference

6

1.0Introduction

ThisreportneedusetheBusinessContractualRelationshipsknowledgetoanalysisfivequestions.AlltheallneedtocontactthecasethatthesomethingwiththeJohn.

2.0Finding

2.1

Yes,theJohnhasthecontractualrelationship.

Offerandacceptanceareelementsrequiredfortheformationofalegallybindingcontract:theexpressionofanoffertocontractoncertaintermsbyonepersontoanotherperson,andanindicationbytheoffereeofitsacceptanceofthoseterms.Theotherelementstraditionallyrequiredforalegallybindingcontractareconsiderationandanintentiontocreatelegalrelations.Offerandacceptanceanalysisisatraditionalapproachincontractlaw.Theofferandacceptanceformula,developedinthe19thcentury,identifiesamomentofformationwhenthepartiesareofonemind.Thisclassicalapproachtocontractformationhasbeenweakenedbydevelopmentsinthelawofestoppel,misleadingconduct,misrepresentationandunjustenrichment.Therearemanytransactionsinvolvingthetransferofownershipwhicharenotcontractsofsale.Forexample,gifts,mortgages,exchanges(barter),thesupplyofmaterialsunderacontractforworkandmaterials,andsoon.Asalemustinvolvethepassingofsomeformofownership,thisdoesnonecessarilyinvolveatransferabsolutetitletothegoods.Therearesomedefinitionswhichyouwillneedtounderstandwhenlookingatthequestioncwhetherornota"contractofsaleofgoods"exists.

Inthecase,theJohnpaidforthelaptop,itbelongtoexchangesandbelongtothecontractofsale.TheJohnhasthecapacitytocontractwiththeMegaTechcompany.

2.2

Yes,Johncanrejectandreturnthelaptop.Becausescratch”ConsumerRightAct2015”section9-SatisfactoryQuality’

Thesection9wasrevisionbythestatutelaw.Thestandardofsatisfactoryqualityisthatareasonablepersonwouldregardassatisfactory,haveafullconsiderofgoodsdescription,thepriceandallotherrelevantenvironment.Andthereare5factorspotentiallyrelevant.Fitnessforthepurposeforwhichgoodsofthekindinquestionarecommonlysupplied.Appearanceandfinish.Freedomfromminordefects.SafetyandDurability.ButinthecasetheJohngotthelaptophasthedifferentappearance.

Section11--SalebyDescription

Aimpliedconditionisthegoodswillcorrespondtothedescription.Ifadescriptionisappliedtothegoods,itisasalebydescriptioneventhoughthebuyerdonothaveinspectedthegoods.Inthecase,thelaptopdifferentwiththeJohndescribe.

SotheJohncanrejectandreturnthelaptop.

2.3

A

Incorrectthesalesassistantcorrect.BytheConsumerRightAct2015thefactthatgoodsareinasaledoesnotdiminishthebuyer'sunlesstheyareclassedas“seconds”etcoraparticulardefectisbroughttotheattentionofthebuyerasbeingthereasonforthereductioninprice.ItisunlawfulundertheConsumerTransactions(RestrictionsonStatements)Order1376，asamended,tostatethatthereis“NorefundonSaleGoods".

InthecasethesalesassistantwanttorefundJohnorreplacethelaptopforhim.

B

No,theshopcannotrelytosignthatexclusioncontract.InaconsumercontractanyattempttoexcludeorrestrictliabilityforbreachIofSections13,14and15isvoid.

Consumercontractsarewhenonepartydealsinthecourseofabusinessandtheotherpartydoesnot-foracontractofsaleofgoods,thegoodsareofatypeordinarilysuppliedforprivateuseorconsumption.

IncommercialcontractsanyattempttoexcludeorlimitliabilityforbreachofSections13,14and15shallhavenoeffectunlessitwasfairandreasonabletoincorporatesuchanexclusionorlimitationclauseinthecontract.Theonusofproofthatsuchanexclusionisfairandreasonablefallsonthepartyseekingtoenforcethecontracting-outclause.

2.4

A

ConsumerCreditAct1974isaconsumercreditagreementorconsumerhireagreementotherthananexemptagreement.Debtor-creditor-supplieragreementisoneofthemaincategories.Debtor-creditor-supplieragreement.Wherethecreditorisalsothesuppliesofthegoods.Intheseagreementswheregoodsorservicescostmorethan£100orlessthan£30,000thedebtorcanholdthecreditorjointlyandseverallyliablewithsupplierwhenheclaimsmisrepresentationIorbreachofcontractagainstthesupplierknownas“connectedlenderLiability”.Ithave3part.Inthecase,Johnisthedebtor,theBankisthecreditorandtheMegaTechcompanyisthesupplier.Thereisaper-existingfinancingarrangementbetweencreditorandsupplier.Inthecase,theshopwasofferingthecreditoptionandthecreditwasfinancedthroughBank.Besidesthat,theMegaTechcompanyandBankarejointlyandseverallyliable.Therefore,JohncouldlettheBankundertaketheresponsibility.

B

Inthecase,thebankandJohnhavejointliability,thentheyareeachliableuptothefullamountoftherelevantobligation.Accordingly,theJohnmaysuebankforthefullamount.However,insuing,thecreditorhasonlyonecauseofaction;i.e.,thecreditorcansueforeachdebtonlyonce.Inthecase,theJohnsuesallofthemfortheoutstandingloanamountandoneofthempaystheliability,thecreditorcannotrecoverfurtheramountsfromthebanksandthecompanywhodidnotcontributetotheliability.

2.5

Yes,Annahasnocontractualrelationship.ConsumerProtectionAct1987isastrictliabilityonaproducerfordamagescausedbyadefectiveproduct.Aboutthe