bcg -2026年供应链规划:为何仅凭人工智能还不够 Supply Chain Planning 2026 Why AI Alone Isnt Enough 202602_第1页
bcg -2026年供应链规划:为何仅凭人工智能还不够 Supply Chain Planning 2026 Why AI Alone Isnt Enough 202602_第2页
bcg -2026年供应链规划:为何仅凭人工智能还不够 Supply Chain Planning 2026 Why AI Alone Isnt Enough 202602_第3页
bcg -2026年供应链规划:为何仅凭人工智能还不够 Supply Chain Planning 2026 Why AI Alone Isnt Enough 202602_第4页
bcg -2026年供应链规划:为何仅凭人工智能还不够 Supply Chain Planning 2026 Why AI Alone Isnt Enough 202602_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩47页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

SupplyChainPlanning2026

WhyAIAloneIsn’tEnough

February2026

ByAndresGarro,HenryCafrey,RajeshShetty,SamanthaDunn,MarcelSieke,andFarboudCheraghi

Contents

03Foreword

04Introduction

05VoicesfromtheField

11APS:TheCoreofthePlanningEcosystem

17AIinPlanning:AnInevitableEvolution

25Conclusion:ThePathForward

27AbouttheAuthors

Foreword

Supplychainplanninghasundergoneafundamentalshiftfromback-officecoordinationfunctiontocorestrategiccapability.

Morethan90%ofexecutivessurveyedbyBCGrelyonitto

navigatecomplextrade-ofs,optimizeperformance,andsteertheenterpriseamiduncertainty.

Overthepastfewyears,organizationshavemadesignificantinvestmentsinadvancedplanningsystemsandAItools.

Manyleadershipteamsexpectedtheseinvestmentsto

translatequicklyintobetterforecasts,fasterandbetter

decisions,andmoreresilientoperations,butactualresultshavebeenmixed.

Someorganizationshavesuccessfullyturnedplanninginto

asourceofcompetitiveadvantage.Othersremainstuck,

unabletomakethemostofsophisticatedtoolsoverlaidon

fragmentedprocesses,inconsistentdata,anduncleardecisionrights.Plannerscontinuetodevotedisproportionatetimetoreconcilingnumbersandmanagingexceptionsratherthan

shapingdecisions.Ultimately,theconstraintisn’ttechnology.Successhingesonhowefectivelyorganizationsalignpeople,processes,anddatatoapplyadvancedtoolsatscale.

Atthesametime,theemergenceofgenerativeAIand

agenticAImodelsisexpandingthepossibilitiesforsupplychainplanning.However,thisdevelopmenthasupendedlong-heldassumptionsabouttheproperdesignofsupplychainplanningsystemsandhasraisednewquestions

aboutthecharacteristicsofaworld-classorganization.

WeareexcitedtopresentBCG’sinauguralreportonthe

stateofsupplychainplanning,capturingwhatweseeinthefieldtodayandonthehorizon.Thereportofersinsights

fromsurveys,interviews,androundtableswithglobal

leadersacrossindustries,aswellasfromBCG’sresearch

andhands-onexperienceacrosstransformationsinvolvingadvancedplanningsystemsandAI.Itspurposeisnotto

promoteanysingletoolormethodology,buttoclarifywhatdistinguishesorganizationsthataresuccessfullymoving

forwardfromtheirlessadvancedpeers.

Translatingplanningcapabilityintosustainedperformancewillbeadefiningleadershipchallengeinthedecadeahead.Webelievethatthisreportcontributesessentialinsightsintohoworganizationscanunlockafutureofplanningexcellence.

DUSTINBURKE

BCGManagingDirector

andSeniorPartner,GlobalLeader—SupplyChain

AMYWHITE

BCGSeniorAdvisorandformerChiefPlanningOfficer,Nike,Inc.

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH3

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH4

Introduction

Trueexcellenceinsupplychain

planningisararity.Whilemost

companieshaveinvestedheavilyinsometypeofadvanced

planningsystem(APS)andare

beginningtoexperimentwith

AI,relativelyfewhavetranslatedthoseinvestmentsintoconsistentperformancegains.

Thisdivergenceisnotduetodiferencesinaccessto

technology.APSplatformsandemergingAIcapabilitiesarewidelyavailableandincreasinglyfrequentlydeployed,

albeitathighcostandwithsubstantialefort.Instead,performancediferencesrelecthowefectively

organizationshaveembeddedthenewtoolsintheirdecision-makingprocesses.

Againstthisbackdrop,thisreportofersthreecriticalinsightsforseniorleaders:

•Planningmaturitymattersforbusiness

performance.Surveyresultsandpractitioner

experienceshowastrongcorrelationbetweenhow

efectivelyorganizationsexecutetheirplanning

processesandhowwelltheyperforminareassuch

asservicelevels,forecastaccuracy,andinventory

management.Yetmostorganizationsremaininthe

middleofthematuritycurve.Progressiswide-ranging,butthegapbetweenleadersandlaggardsisgrowing.

•APSisthebackboneofplanning,butvalueoftengoesuntapped.APSplatformsarewidelyembeddedinmostlargeorganizations,yetprocessredesign

andoperatingmodelchangesfrequentlylagbehind

systemdeployment.Asaresult,manycompanies

thathavemoderntoolsinplaceunderutilizetheir

advancedcapabilitiesandfailtoseeexpectedbenefits.SuccessrequirestreatingAPSasanevolvingbusinessinfrastructureratherthanaone-timetechnology

implementation.

•AlthoughinterestinAIishigh,fullyautonomous

planningremainsanaspiration.Mostvaluetoday

comesfromfoundationalapplications—improving

forecasting,exceptionmanagement,datainterpretation,andworklowautomation—ratherthanfromlights-out

planning.OrganizationsthatattempttoleapfrogthroughtheprocessofplanningmaturitybymeansofAIalone

tendtostruggle,whilethosethatlayerAIdeliberately

ontostableplanningfoundationsseemoredurablegains.

Ourfindingsmakeclearthatplanningexcellencedoesnotemergefromanysingletechnologyorinitiative.Instead,itariseswhenorganizationsalignfourelementsinconcert:

thedecisionsthatplanningismeanttosupport,the

processesandoperatingmodelthatgovernthosedecisions,thedatafoundationthatenablestrustandconsistency,andthetechnologiesthatamplifyspeedandinsight.

Asvolatilitypersistsandtechnologiescontinuetoevolve,organizationsthatsequencechangedeliberatelyandtreatplanningasasustainedorganizationalcapability,rather

thanasacollectionoftools,willpullahead.

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH5

VoicesfromtheField

BCGengagedmorethan180

planningleadersacrossindustriesandregionstounderstand

today’smostpressingplanningchallenges,evaluatecurrent

planningmaturity,andexaminehowAPSandAIcapabilities

willredefinethenexthorizonofsupplychainplanning.

Ourresearchspanstheentireecosystem,capturinginsightsfromtechnologyprovidersthatarebuildingadvanced

planningtoolsandfromleadingcompaniesthatareapplyingtheminday-to-dayoperations.(See“

AbouttheSurvey

.”)

Supplychainplanninghasbecomeacriticalstrategiccapability.Throughoutthe2020s,companieshave

experiencedsupplychainfailuresthatresultedfrommajor

disruptions—includingCOVID-19–drivensupplyshortages

anddemandswings,globallogisticsconstraints,geopoliticalvolatility,andluctuatingtarifrates.Inresponse,supply

chainplanninghasmoveddecisivelyintotheexecutive

agenda,withintegratedbusinessplanning(IBP)servingasaprimarymechanismfornavigatingvolatilityandbalancing

tradeofs.Oftheplanningleaderswesurveyed,52%reportthattheirperspectiveiswellrepresentedintheir

organization’sexecutivedecision-makingprocess,and

another39%saythatitisfullyembedded.(See

Exhibit1

.)

Surveyresultshighlightleaders’greatestchallenges.Demandvolatility,geopoliticaldisruption,andsupplyvolatilityareleaders’primaryexternalchallenges.(See

Exhibit2

.)

Torespondefectively,plannersmustaddressobstaclesthatexistwithintheirownorganizations.Inoursurvey,more

thanthree-quartersofplanningleaderspointtoforecast

inaccuracyandmisalignmentastheirmostpressinginternalchallenge.(See

Exhibit3

.)Morethanone-thirdof

respondentsalsocitelimitedend-to-endvisibilityand

systemconstraintsaschallenges,underscoringpersistentweaknessesindata,tools,andintegrationacrossplanningfunctions.Bycontrast,lessthanone-quarterofleaders

identifytalentgapsandlessthanone-seventhviewAIadoptionastopinternalchallenges.

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH6

AbouttheSurvey

BCG7sAnnualStateofSupplyChainPlanningSurvey2025,conductedduringthefourthquarteroftheyear,gatheredperspectivesfrommore

than180supplychainandplanningleaders.

Respondentsrepresentedabroadcross-sectionof

planningroles,industries,andregions.(See

theexhibit

.)

Weaskedparticipantstoprovideperspectivesand

benchmarksacrosspeople,processes,andtechnologyinthefollowingareas:

•Thecurrentstateofplanning,includingstrategicinluence,valueopportunities,KPIs,maturity,andinternalandexternalchallenges

•Thefuturestateofplanning,includingstrategic

priorities,expectedbusinessimpact,focusareasforprocessimprovement,emergingmegatrends,and

needsforexternalpartnershipsandcollaboration

•Technology,investments,andinnovation,including

satisfactionwithtechproviders,theroleandpotential

impactofAIinplanning,andfuturepriorities

BCG’sStateofSupplyChainPlanningSurvey

Respondents

Industry

Respondents’planningresponsibility

End-to-endoperations135

Supplyplanning109

Integratedbusinessplanning107

Inventorymanagement99

Financialplanning99

Demandplanning80

Techenablement59

Other2

181

Respondents

64

60

38

28

8

13

Consumer

Industrial

goods

Technology,media,

andtelecommunications

Health

care

Travel,cities,and

infrastructure

Energy

Region

68

54

30

14

Europe,MiddleEast,andAfrica

NorthAmerica

LatinAmerica

Asia-Pacific

Global

59

Sources:BCGAnnualStateofSupplyChainPlanningSurvey2025.

Note:Multipleresponseswereallowedfortheplanningresponsibilities,industry,andregion.

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH7

EXHIBIT1

NearlyAllLeadersViewSupplyChainPlanningasaStrategicCapability

Extenttowhichsupplychainplanninginfluencestheorganization’soverallstrategy

(%OFRESPONDENTS)

>90%ofleaders

1

Notrepresented

RarelypartofourcorporateorC-suiteagenda

8

Partiallyrepresented

Addressedselectively,butnot

consistentlytopofmindat

enterpriselevel

52

Wellrepresented

Regularlyincludedinexecutive

decisionmaking,butnotalways

central

39

Fullyembedded

Integraltocorporatestrategyandboardroomdiscussions

Source:BCGAnnualStateofSupplyChainPlanningSurvey2025.

EXHIBIT2

VolatilityandGeopoliticalDisruptionDominateLeaders’ExternalPlanningChallenges

Topexternalplanningchallengesin2025

(%OFRESPONDENTS)

70

Demandvolatility

64

Globaltradeandgeopolitics

62

Supplyvolatility

44

Macrouncertainty

24

Competitormoves

17

Regulatoryandcompliancepressures

13

ImpactofAI

7

Cybersecurityrisks

Source:BCGAnnualStateofSupplyChainPlanningSurvey2025.

Note:Respondentswereaskedtoselecttheirtopthreechoicesfromtheoptionsprovided.Becauseofrounding,thetotalforalleightbarsdoesnotaddupto300.

EXHIBIT3

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH8

LeadersViewForecastingandEnd-to-EndVisibilityasTopInternalChallenges

Topinternalplanningchallengesin2025

(%OFRESPONDENTS)

Forecastinaccuracyandmisalignment

78

End-to-endvisibility

38

Systemlimitations

35

Poordemandsignals

30

Planningmisalignment

28

Talentandworkforcegaps

23

Digitalintegrationgaps

21

Masterdataquality

19

AIadoption

14

Unclearprocessownership

13

Source:BCGAnnualStateofSupplyChainPlanningSurvey2025.

Note:Respondentswereaskedtoselecttheirtopthreechoicesfromtheoptionsprovided.Becauseofrounding,thetotalforalleightbarsdoesnotaddupto300.

Asthestrategicimportanceofplanningrises,

diferencesinorganizationalmaturitybecomemoreconsequential.Leadersgenerallyratethematurityof

theirsupplychainplanningcapabilitiesasintermediatetoadvanced.(See

Exhibit4

.)

Acomparisonofself-assessedplanningmaturityto

performanceacrosscoreKPIs—servicelevel,forecast

accuracy,inventoryoptimization,andsupplychain

responsiveness—revealsaconsistentpattern.Relatively

matureorganizationsreportbetterperformancetodayandsetmoreambitioustargetsfortheyearsahead.For

example,forecastaccuracyamongorganizationsreportingthehighestmaturityismorethan25percentagepoints

higherthanamongthosereportingthelowestmaturity.Inotherwords,anorganization’slevelofplanningmaturity

inluenceshowreliably,responsively,andconfidentlyitcanrunitsbusiness.

Mappingrespondentsacrossthematurityspectrum

disclosesasmallgroupofleading-edgeorganizationsthathavetransformedplanningintoacompetitiveadvantage—backedbystrongexecutivesponsorship,dedicatedteamsandcentersofexcellence,andaculturethatembraces

advancedtoolsanddata-drivendecisionmaking.Evenso,

top-performingorganizationsacknowledgethatmeaningfulvalueremainsuntapped.Muchofthatupsideliesin

deeperintegrationoffinancialandoperationaldecisionmakingandinexpandingplanningcollaborationbeyondtheenterprisetoincludekeysuppliers,customers,andotherpartners.

Laggards,bycontrast,strugglewiththefundamentals

despiteinvestinginnewtools.Theyciteconstraintssuchaslackoftraining,poordataquality,andfragmented

processesasforcingthemtofocusonnear-termissues,

suchasbackorders,ratherthanaddressingmedium-andlong-termplanningsupplychallenges.

Unevennessinplanningmaturityisalsoevident

acrossregionsandsectors.Onaverage,companieswithglobaloperationsreportthestrongestadvancesinplanningmaturity,followedbycompaniesbasedintheEurope,the

MiddleEast,andAfricaregion.(See

Exhibit5

.)Average

maturitylevelsarelowerinLatinAmericaandinNorth

America,andlowestinAsia-Pacific.Ofthesixindustry

sectorswetracked,consumercompaniesreportthehighestmaturitylevels,followedbyenergyandtechnology,media,andtelecommunications.Healthcare,industrialgoods,

andtravel,cities,andinfrastructurelagslightlybehind.

EXHIBIT4

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH9

AcrossDimensions,MostCompanyLeadersRateTheirPlanningMaturityasIntermediateorAdvanced

Maturityofplanningprocess

(%OFRESPONDENTS)

BeginnerDevelopingIntermediateAdvancedExcellence

Integratedbusinessplanning

4

17

43

36

1

Demandplanningandforecasting

3

18

41

35

3

Supplyplanning

3

15

43

30

8

Productionplanning

2

13

36

40

8

Inventory

management

3

15

43

33

6

Commercialplanning

2

17

40

36

5

Financial

integration

5

22

43

28

3

Data,digital,

andanalytics

7

18

39

33

4

Change

readiness

13

26

35

23

3

Source:BCGAnnualStateofSupplyChainPlanningSurvey2025.

Note:Becauseofrounding,notallbarsegmentsaddupto100%.

EXHIBIT5

PlanningMaturityVariesbyRegionandSector

AggregateplanningmaturitybyregionAggregateplanningmaturitybysector

3.30

3.20

3.10

3.00

2.90

2.80

2.70

2.60

3.21

3.13

3.04

3.00

2.85

Asia-Pacific

Latin

America

North

America

GlobalEurope,

MiddleEast,andAfrica

3.30

3.20

3.10

3.00

2.90

2.80

2.70

2.60

3.27

3.153.15

3.11

3.09

3.05

Healthcare

Travel,

cities,and

infrastructure

Industrialgoods

ConsumerEnergyTechnology,media,and

telecommunications

Source:BCGAnnualStateofSupplyChainPlanningSurvey2025.

Note:Regionandsectormaturityscoresarecalculatedasaveragesofmaturityscoresatthedimensionlevel(forexample,supplyplanningorinventory

management).Eachdimensionscorereflectsaweightedaverageofcompanyself-ratingsacrossfivematuritylevels,from“Beginner”(1)to“Excellence”(5).Regionsrepresentcompanies’primaryoperatingfootprints.Companiescategorizedas“global”operateacrossmultipleregions,whileallothersoperate

primarilywithinoneofthesmallerregionsspecified.

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH10

Organizationalcapabilitiesandoperatingmodels—nottechnology—driveplanningexcellence.A

commonroadmaptoincreasingmaturityhasemerged.

Mostorganizationsbeginbyfocusingondemand

forecasting,inventoryoptimization,andotherfoundationalcapabilitiesbeforeinvestinginAPStoenablebetter

performanceandcollaboration.Yetfewreportachievingthehighestlevelofintegratedend-to-endplanning:

automated,real-time,scenario-driven,andAI-enabled.

ApartfromAI,thesearenotnewcapabilities;mostAPSprovidershavelongpositionedtheirsolutionstoenablethem.Butifthecapabilitiesexist,whydosofew

organizationsachieveexcellence?

Theanswerisclear:Trueexcellencedependson

transformationcapabilityandchangereadiness—theabilitytoredesignprocesses,applya

decision-ledplanning

approach

,buildcross-functionalwaysofworking,andembednewbehaviorsatscale.

Thesefoundationalenablersremainunderdevelopedinmanycompanies.Inoursurvey,respondentsmostfrequentlyrankedtransformationcapabilityastheir

leastmatureenabler.(See

Exhibit6

.)Financialintegrationlagssignificantly,too,limitingtheorganization’sability

tounifydecisionsacrossoperations,commercial,andfinancefunctions.

EXHIBIT6

MaturityGapsPersistinKeyEnablersofAdvancedPlanning

Enablersthathavebeginnerordevelopingmaturity

(%OFRESPONDENTS)

Transformationcapabilityandchangereadiness

39

Financialintegration

27

Data,digital,andanalytics

25

Demandplanningandforecasting

21

Integratedbusinessplanning

21

Commercialplanning

19

Supplyplanning

19

Inventorymanagement

18

Productionplanning

15

Source:BCGAnnualStateofSupplyChainPlanningSurvey2025.

Note:Respondentswereaskedtoselecttheirmaturityleveloneachdimension.

Theseinsightsunderscoreacentraltensionshapingthefutureofsupplychainplanning.Advancedsystemsandemergingtechnologiesareexpandingwhatispossible,buttheirvaluedependsonanorganization’sabilitytoembedthemindecisionmakinganddailywork.Understandinghowplanningtechnologiesareevolvingandwhytheirimpacthasbeenunevenisessentialtoclosingthegapbetweenaspirationandexecution.

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH11

APS:TheCoreofthePlanningEcosystem

APSplatformsserveasthe

backboneforexecutingdemand,supply,inventory,andIBP.Yet

APSisanenabler,notastand-alonesilverbullet.

Whencombinedwithawell-executedIBPprocess,astrongorganizationwithupskilledtalent,andawell-integrated

datafoundation,APScanbeacompetitivediferentiator.

Butwithoutthoseelements,evenastate-of-the-artsystemwillyielddisappointingoutcomes.EstablishingAPSas

thecoreoftheplanningecosystemisthereforecrucial,astheseplatformsarethefoundationfordeployingadvancedAIandagentictechnologies.

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH12

DeploymentsArePlaguedbyPainPointsandUnderrealizedValue

DespiteextensiveAPSinvestmentsanddeployments,foundationalgapslimitplanningefectiveness.

APSdeploymentiswidespread,butplanning

excellenceremainselusive.Morethan70%ofsurveyedcompanieshaveinvestedinAPS,andmostratetheir

planningcapabilitiesfollowingimplementationasatleastintermediate.Yetfewconsiderthemselvesbest-in-class.Inmanyorganizations,foundationalenablerssuchas

consistentdata,financialintegration,andchangereadinesscontinuetolagbehindtechnologyandrankamongthe

lowestdimensionsinmaturityassessments.

ThegapbetweentechnologyandexecutionpreventscompaniesfromcapturingthefullbenefitsofAPS.Todate,mostoftherealizedvaluefromAPShascomefrom

gettingthebasicsright—suchasimprovingdashboards,harmonizingdata,andstrengtheningexception

management.Advancedcapabilities,includingAI-drivenplanninganddigitaltwins,remainlargelyuntapped.

Theresultisadisappointingreturnoninvestment.

ManyAPSprogramsrunoverbudgetandbehind

schedule—andevenafterlaunch,useradoptionoftenfallsshort.Onlyafractionofintendedplannersconsistentlyusethesystems,whilemanyothersreverttospreadsheetsor

legacytools.Asaresult,significantAPSfunctionalitysits

idle,andexpectedimprovementsinservice,cost,and

agilityfailtomaterialize.Withoutbroadplannerbuy-inandday-to-dayuse,thereturnoninvestmentfromadvanced

planningtechnologywillnotmeetexpectations.

Organizationalandprocessshortcomingslieatthe

rootofchallenges.APSinitiativestypicallyfallshortnotbecauseofsoftwarelimitations,butbecausecompanies

underestimatetheoperatingmodelchanges,data

cleansing,andcross-functionalalignmentrequiredtomakenewtoolsefective.Planningleadersconsistentlyreportthatgapsinoperatingmodels,processredesign,andtraining

constrainadoptionmorethanlackofplatformfunctionalitydoes.(See“

OperatingModelImprovementsBoost

APSEfectiveness

.”)

Responsibilityfordrivingnewwaysofworkingrests

withtheorganization,nottheAPSprovider.APS

vendorsandsystemsintegratorsdesignanddeliverplanningtools;itisuptocompaniestoreimaginehowplanning

shouldoperatewhenthosecapabilitiesareavailable.Too

often,organizationstrytoreplicatelegacyplanning

processesinsideanewsystem—treatingAPSasanIT

deploymentratherthanasanopportunitytoredesign

decisionlows,roles,andgovernance.Theresultisagauntletoffamiliarpainpoints:fragmentedmasterdatawithunclearownership,siloeddecisionmaking,andprocessesnever

adaptedtothesystem’slogic.Withoutsustainedchangemanagement,cleargovernance,anddeliberateprocessreengineering,eventhemostcapableAPSsoftwarewilldeliveronlyafractionofitspotentialvalue.

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH13

OperatingModelImprovementsBoostAPSEfectiveness

Aglobalmedicaltechnology

companyhaddeployeda

leadingAPSsolutionbutfoundthatitwasnotdeliveringthe

expectedvalue.

Althoughthetechnologywasinplace,thesupporting

operatingmodel—processes,governance,anddata

discipline—wasinsufficient,resultingininlated,

unreliablesupplyplansandloworganizationalconfidenceinthesystem’soutputs.

Therootcauseswerelargelyfoundational.Keyplanning

parameterssuchasleadtimes,capacityconstraints,andinventorynettingdidnotrelectactualoperations,and

inventoryvisibilityacrossthenetworkwasincomplete.Asaresult,evenwhengivenaccuratedemandinputs,the

APSoverstatedproductionrequirements,forcingplannerstorelyonmanualoverrides.

Thecompanyresetitsplanningtransformationtoaddressthefundamentals,focusingonforecastvalidation,

parametercorrection,improvedinventorynetting,andastrongerIBPprocess.Withinmonths,thesechanges

reducedthedemandsignalbyapproximately$100

million.Thisimprovementhelpedthecompanyavoid

unnecessaryproductionwithoutimpactingservice

levels—anditdemonstratedwhattheAPScouldachievewhensupportedbytherightoperatingmodel.

BOSTONCONSULTINGGROUPSUPPLYCHAINPLANNING2026:WHYAIALONEISN’TENOUGH14

APSProvidersAreAdvancingPlatformCapabilities

Overcomingthesechallengesisvital,asAPSplatforms

providetheorchestrationlayerthatintegratesdata,logic,andworklows.APSprovidersareadvancingplanningtechnologytosupportnotonlytheexecutionofcoreprocesses—suchasdemandforecasting,supplyandinventoryplanning,IBP,andsalesandoperationsexecution—butalsoworklowsfor

scenarioplanningandcontroltowers.

APSplatformsareevolvingrapidly.Mostmajorprovidersaremigratingtocloud-nativearchitectures,whichenable

morelexibledatamodels,real-timeinterfaces,andmodularservices.Atthesametime,platformsareembeddingmachinelearning(ML)forforecastingandoptimization,aswellas

introducingconversationalcopilotsdirectlyintoplanning

worklows.Theyarealsopilotingnativeagenticcapabilities

thatcanrunrecurringanalyses—suchasinventory

rebalancing,performancediagnostics,andrisksimulations—withminimalhumanintervention.Implementationroadmapsincreasinglyemphasizeintegratedplanningandexecution

lows,digitaltwinsforscenariosimulation,andcontrol-tower-stylevisibilitythataretightlycoupledwithAPSlogicrather

thanbeingdeployedasseparatetools.APSthusremainsthebackbone,butwithanexpandingarrayofcapabilitiesthatblurthelinebetweenclassicplanninganddecisionintelligence.

Eveninafragmentedmarket,mosttechnologypathsassumeanAPS-likebackbone.Aspectrumofarchetypesexistsforsupplychainplanningtechnology.(See

Exhibit7.

)

Althoughthesearchetypesdiferinintegrationdepth,

innovationspeed,andindustryfocus,theyshareacommonpattern:evenwhendeliveredasseparatelayers,AIand

analyticsrelyonaplanningbackbonethatencodesmasterdata,hierarchies,constraints,andprocesscadence.

Whetherthatbackbonetakestheformofasingle-suiteAPS,atightlyintegratedsetofmodules,oramorecustomized

combination,itsroleistoprovidetheinfrastructurethatAIplugsintotodeliverrepeatable,enterprise-scaledecisionsrather

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

最新文档

评论

0/150

提交评论