美银-欧洲股票策略:2008、2020、2022…还是1979?-European Equity Strategy:2008,2020,2022or 1979-20260327_第1页
美银-欧洲股票策略:2008、2020、2022…还是1979?-European Equity Strategy:2008,2020,2022or 1979-20260327_第2页
美银-欧洲股票策略:2008、2020、2022…还是1979?-European Equity Strategy:2008,2020,2022or 1979-20260327_第3页
美银-欧洲股票策略:2008、2020、2022…还是1979?-European Equity Strategy:2008,2020,2022or 1979-20260327_第4页
美银-欧洲股票策略:2008、2020、2022…还是1979?-European Equity Strategy:2008,2020,2022or 1979-20260327_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩140页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Accessibleversion

BofAGloBALRESEARCHBofASE

https://www.valuelist

EuropeanEquityStrategy

2008,2020,2022…or1979?

UsinghistoricalanalogiestogetasenseofhowthecomplicatedIransituationcouldplayout:withtheconditionsinIranstillfluidandawiderangeofoutcomespossible,lookingatpastepisodescharacterizedbymeaningfulsupplyshocksandcomparingthesimilaritiesanddifferencesallowsustogaugethelikelihoodthateachofthesepastoutcomescanrecurtoday.

Whatthepasthastoteachus.Wethinkthefollowinghistoricalepisodesholdimportantlessonsforthe

currentimbroglio:(1)1979:anoilsupplyshockthatleadstobothhigherinflationandademandshock,with

theinflationaryimpulsepartlyfuelledbyinflationmultipliers(highenergyintensity,wage-priceindexation);(2)2007/08:anoil-pricespikeagainstthebackdropofpre-existingfragilitiesintheUSlabourmarketandcreditmarketsleadstoaspikeininflationconcernsfirst,whichisquicklyovershadowedbydemanddestruction;(3)2020:apandemic-relatedsupplyshockthatneverturnsinflationary,asthelockdown-fuelleddeclineindemandisevenstronger;(4)2022:anotherwar-relatedsupplyshock,butnodemanddestructionduetogrowthsupportfrompost-pandemicreopening,largeexcessconsumersavingsandameaningfulwideningintheUSbudget

deficit;and(5)2025:growthandinflationconcernsinresponsetorisingUStariffs,butneithercomesthroughduetoaswiftpolicyreversal.

WeremainnegativeonEuropeanequitiesevenafteranalmost10%pull-backtodate:marketstodayappeartobepricingamixofthe2022andthe2025outcomes,i.e.ascenariowhereverylittledemand

destructionoccursbutwiththepotentialforhigherinflation.However,wewouldnotethatthefactorsthat

ensuredrobustdemandin2022arenotpresenttoday.Whilea2025-stylescenario,inwhichatimelypolicy

reversalminimisesthegrowthandinflationdamage,isstillpossible,thelongertheconflictlasts,thelargertheriskofdemanddestructionviaasqueezeonconsumers’purchasingpower.Ourglobalstrategistshighlightthatthecurrentepisodehasimportantsimilaritieswith2007/08(aspikeinoilpricesincombinationwithaweak

USlabourmarketandgrowingcredit-marketrisksagainstthebackdropoflowriskpremia),whileourglobaleconomistsarguethatmarketshavesofarmainlyfocusedoninflationrisksandmightbeunderpricing

downsideriskstogrowth.WestaynegativeonEuropeanequities,withafurther10%projecteddownsidefortheStoxx600,followingan8.5%declinefromtheall-timehighinFebruary.

27March2026

EquityStrategyEurope

SebastianRaedler>>InvestmentStrategistMLI(UK)

+442079961749

sebastian.raedler@

ThomasPearce,CFA>>InvestmentStrategist

MLI(UK)

+442079962081

tpearce@

AndreasBruckner>>InvestmentStrategistMLI(UK)

+442079961306

andreas.bruckner@

PMI:PurchasingManagers’Index

ISM:InstituteforSupplyManagement

TWI:trade-weightedIndex

ERP:equityriskpremium

Tradingideasandinvestmentstrategiesdiscussedhereinmaygiverisetosignificantriskandarenotsuitableforallinvestors.

Investorsshouldhaveexperienceinrelevantmarketsandthefinancialresourcestoabsorbanylossesarisingfromapplyingtheseideasorstrategies.

>>Employedbyanon-USaffiliateofBofASandisnotregistered/qualifiedasaresearchanalystundertheFINRArules.Referto"OtherImportantDisclosures"forinformationoncertainBofASecuritiesentitiesthattakeresponsibilityfortheinformationhereininparticularjurisdictions.

BofASecuritiesdoesandseekstodobusinesswithissuerscoveredinitsresearchreports.Asaresult,investors

shouldbeawarethatthefirmmayhaveaconflictofinterestthatcouldaffecttheobjectivityofthisreport.Investorsshouldconsiderthisreportasonlyasinglefactorinmakingtheirinvestmentdecision.

Refertoimportantdisclosuresonpage71to73.12951940

2EuropeanEquityStrategy|27March2026

BofAGLOBALRESEARCH

2008,2020,2022..or1979?

Mappingoutthehistoricalanalogies:thesituationinIranremainsinfluxwithmanyoutcomesstillpossible.Togetasenseofthedifferentscenariosthatcouldunfold,ithelpstogetasenseofhowsupplyshockshaveplayedoutinthe

pastandhow,inthesepastscenarios,thetwokeyvariablesimpactingmarkets–globalgrowthandinflation–have

beenimpacted.Takingacloselookathowthecurrentepisoderesembles,anddiffersfrom,thesepastshocksalso

allowsustogaugethelikelihoodwithwhicheachofthesepastoutcomescanrecurtoday.Ourmaintake-awaypoint

fromthisanalysisisthatmarketsarestillmostlypricingtheenergyshockfromtheIranwarasacombinationofa

2022-stylescenario(inflationshockwithoutdemanddestruction)anda2025-stylescenario(timelyde-escalation

meanslittledamageforeithergrowthorinflation).Againstthis,ourglobalstrategistsnotethatthecurrentepisodeinmanywaysresembles2007/08(seereport:TheFlowShow,Mar12),whileourglobaleconomistsarguethatmarketsarefocusedmainlyontheupsideriskstoinflation,butarelikelyunder-pricingthedownsideriskstogrowth(seereport:

GlobalEconomicWeekly,Mar20).

Whataretherelevanthistoricalscenarios?

1979-theclassicenergy-drivenstagflationaryshock

•Whathappenedthen?TheIranianRevolutioninFebruary1979ledtotheremovalofaround4%ofglobaloilsupply,withUSoilpricesrisingbymorethan150%byApril1980.Thisenergyshockcoincidedwithabroadersupply

disruption.OnewaytocapturethisisthroughthegapbetweentheUSmanufacturingISMsupplierdeliverytimesindex(ameasureofthedemand/supplybalanceintheeconomy)andthenewordersindex(aproxyforunderlyingdemand).Thisdifference—referredtohereas“supply-sidestress”—rosetoaround2.5standarddeviations

aboveitslong-runaverage.Demandbegantoslowrelativelyquickly.ManufacturingISMnewordersdeclined

almostcontinuouslyfromalocalpeakof64inJuly1978toarecordlowof24byJune1980.Thisslowdown

intensifiedtowardstheendoftheperiodasmonetarypolicytightenedsharplyfollowingPaulVolcker’s

appointmentasFedChair,withtheFedFundsraterisingbynearly7percentagepointsbetweenAugust1979andApril1980.Yet,initiallytheincreaseinsupply-sidestressoverwhelmedthedeclineindemand,leadingtheoveralldemand/supplybalance,akeydriverofinflation,totheupperendofitsrange.BothheadlineandcoreUSCPI

inflationacceleratedmeaningfullyfromalreadyelevatedlevels.Headlineinflationrosefromaround10%inearly1979toapeakof14.8%inMarch1980,whilecoreinflationincreasedfrom9.2%to13.6%.However,ultimatelytheongoingdemanddestructionhelpedtodampeninflationarypressures.Afterreachingits1980peak,core

inflationfellsharply,reaching9.5%byApril1981—thoughitwouldtakeuntil1999forittoreach2%.

•Howdidmarketsreact?TheUS10-yearbondyieldspikedfrom9.2%atthestartof1979toalocalpeakof13.7%inFebruary1980(itwouldgoontomakeevenfurtherhighslater,astheFedkepthiking,reaching15.8%in

September1981).Forequitymarkets,thecombinationofweakergrowth(pushinguptheequityriskpremium)andhigherinflation(leadingtohigherrealbondyields,i.e.ahigherrisk-freediscountrate)isaworst-casescenario,

thoughinnominaltermsthemarketwaspartlyprotectedbytheshifthigherinthegeneralpricelevel.Innominalterms,USequitiesonlyfellby14%betweenlate1978andMarch1980,butthiswaspartlyduetotheinflationupliftforEPS.Inreal,i.e.inflation-adjusted,termsthemarketwasdownby28%overthesameperiod.

EuropeanEquityStrategy|27March20263

BofAGLOBALRESEARCH

•Howdoestheepisodecomparetotoday?DespitethereductioninoilsupplyfromthecurrentIranwarbeingarounddoublewhatitwasin1979,accordingtotheInternationalEnergyAgency(IEA),USoilpricesareupby40%sofar,i.e.afarlesspronouncedpriceshock,thoughthiscould,ofcourse,stillworsen.Similarly,supply-sidestressintheUShasnotyetspiked,accordingtotheMarchPMI,pointingtolittlebywayofabuild-upofunderlyinginflation

pressuresofar(thoughsupply-stresshasincreasedintheEuroareaandtheUK–andmightstilldosointheUSaswelloverthecomingmonths).Moregenerally,inflationmultipliersbackthenweremuchmorepowerfulthantheyaretoday(duetohigherenergyintensiveness,morepowerfullabourunions,agreaterdegreeofwageindexation

andloweroverallcentralbankcredibility).

2007/08–acredit-inducedslowdownexacerbatedbyanenergy-driveninflationshock

•Whathappenedthen?ByAugust2007,USjobgrowthhadslowedtozeroonathree-monthchangebasis.Atthe

sametime,signsofstressinsub-primemortgagecreditwerebecomingincreasinglyvisible,includingBearStearnshaltingredemptionsinitsstructuredcreditfundsinJune.Corporatecreditdemandhadalreadybeguntoweaken,andbankssubsequentlytightenedcreditsupply.Againstthisbackdrop—andwithcoreCPIinflationstillbroadlyinlinewithtarget—theFedbegancuttingratesinSeptember2007,evenasmanufacturingISMneworders

remainedrobustataround56.Thischangedasoilpricessurgedbyaround110%betweenAugust2007andJune2008,drivenbystrongemerging-marketdemand,limitedOPECsparecapacity,supplydisruptionsandaweakUSdollar.Theenergyshocksignificantlybluntedmonetarypolicytransmission.Bythetimeoilpricespeaked,theUS10-yearyieldhadfallenbyonly55bps,despitetheFedFundsratehavingbeencutby325bps.Theoilpricesurgealsopushedheadlineinflationupbyaround2percentagepoints,intensifyingthedownwardpressureonfinal

demandbysqueezingrealpurchasingpoweratatimewhencreditconditionswerealreadytightening.

ManufacturingISMnewordersfellfrom59inSeptember2007toatroughof26inDecember2008.Asin1979,

demanddestructionultimatelydampenedinflationpressures,withUScoreinflationfadingclosetozeroby

mid-2010.

•Howdidmarketsreact?TheUS10-yearbondyieldspikedby90bpsto4.2%betweenMarchandJune2008,astheriseintheoilpricefuelledinflationconcerns,withtheECBevenhikingratesby25bpsinJuly2008.However,as

themacrodamagefromarapidlyweakeninglabourmarketandthecrunchinthecreditmarketbecameincreasinglyobvious,markets’focusshiftedfrominflationconcernstoworriesaboutdemanddestruction,leadingtheoilpricetocollapseto$36/bblbyyear-endandtheUS10-yearbondyieldtofalltoalowof2.1%.Despitethesupportto

multiplesfromthesharpdeclineintherisk-freediscountrate,globalequitiesdroppedby56%betweenMay2008andMarch2009onthebackofaspikeintheequityriskpremiumandadeclineinEPSexpectations,withthe

lossesacceleratingsharplyafterthefailureofLehmanBrothersinSeptember2008.

•Howdoestheepisodecomparetotoday?USjobgrowthissimilarlyweaktodayasitwasinAugust2007(with3-

monthpayrollgrowthat0%),therearesignsofrisingstressinthe(private)creditmarket,andrisingoilpricesaresettoputastrainonconsumerpurchasingpower.Moreover,thepricingandperceptionofriskinfinancialmarketsissimilarlyinsouciant.TheStoxx600equityriskpremiumandUShigh-yieldspreadsarecurrentlyat5%and

310bps,respectively–bothlevelsthatwereseeninJuly2007–whiletheBofAFundManagerSurveyshowssimilarnear-recordlowsofrecessionriskbeingperceived(seereport:EuropeanFundManagerSurvey,Mar17).Themost

frequentpush-backagainstthecomparisonto2007/08isthatbackthenthereweremeaningfulimbalancesin

termsofstretchedfinancialbalancesheetsandUShousing-marketvulnerability,which,theargumentgoes,meant

4EuropeanEquityStrategy|27March2026

BofAGLOBALRESEARCH

thatacrisisoutcomewasalwayslikelyandpredictable.However,wethinkthatthisargumentisbasedonafallacy:

fortheseimbalancestypicallyonlybecomeobviousinhindsight.Atthetime,riskpremiawereextremelylowand,

ontheGlobalFundManagerSurveyinAugust2007,investorssawglobalrecessionrisksclosetoall-timelow,even

thoughtherecessionstartedamerefourmonthslater.Thismisplacedoptimismwasduetoanarrativethatthe

economywasinaı”GreatModeration”,thattheboomandbustcyclehadbeentamed,thatfinancialderivatives

helpedtodistributerisksinthesystem,makingitsaferdespitehigherleverage,andthatsub-primewasonlya

smallpartoftheeconomyand,therefore,oflimitedrisk.Allthesebeliefsturnedouttobefalse,ofcourse,butit

wasonlywhenthetidewentout,inWarrenBuffett’swords,thattheimbalancesandunderlyingriskswere

exposed,orasBuffettputit,onecouldseewhohadbeenswimmingwithouttheirtrunkson.Rather,inourview,

themaindifferencewiththe2007/08episodeisthattheweakeningintheUSlabourmarketinthesummerof

2007wasdrivenbyacleartighteningincreditconditionsonthebackofasharpincreaseinUScorporates’net

interestexpense(i.e.theproportionoftheirincomethathavetodedicatetodebtservicing),whilethistimeround

creditconditionsarestillmoderatelyeasyandcorporates’netinterestexpenseremainsclosetoall-timelows.

2020–amajorsupply-chainanddemandshock

•Whathappenedthen?InFebruary2020,marketsremainedsereneinthefaceofworryingpandemic-related

headlinesandclearsignsofdisruptionstoeconomiclifeinAsia,mostlikelybasedontheassumptionsthatsimilardisruptionswereunlikelytooccurintherestoftheworld(weourselveswereguiltyofthisbelief;seereport:

EuropeanEquityStrategy,March2020).WidespreadlockdownsinMarch2020inresponsetothepandemicdrovea

spikeinsupply-sidestresstoarecordhighofover5standarddeviationsabovethelong-runaveragebyApril.This,

byitself,wouldbeinflationary.However,thelockdownsalsocausedanoffsettingdropindemand,withthe

manufacturingISMplungingfrom51inFebruaryto27inApril.Asaconsequence,thedemand/supplybalance

shiftedtothelowerendofits20-yearrange,leadingcoreinflationtofadebyaround0.5pptsto1%.Oilpricesalso

plungedsharplyinresponsetofallingdemandand,infact,brieflyturnednegative.

•Howdidmarketsreact?Withdemanddestructionfromthelockdownswampingtheinflationaryimpactofdisruptedsupply,centralbankswerefreetoshiftintomaximumeasingmode,bothintermsofcuttingrateszeroand

restartingtheirQEprograms.Onthebackofthismonetaryeasingeffort,bondyieldscollapsed,withtheUS10-yearbondyieldreaching0.5%inMarch2020.Globalequitymarketsinitiallycollapsed,asthecollapseinglobalgrowthmomentumpushedupriskpremiaandtriggeredearningsdowngrades,buttheswiftreversalofmany

lockdownmeasuresallowedtheglobalPMItotroughinApril2020,ameremonthafterthestartofthecrisis,followedbyastrongrebound,whichcompressedriskpremia,triggeringasharprebound.

•Howdoestheepisodecomparetotoday?AsinFebruary2020,marketsremainclosetoall-timehighsandlifein

manyWesterneconomiesstillremainmostlyunaffected,evenasworryingheadlinesdiscusspotentialfuture

shortages.Inanechoofthatearliercrisis,therearealsoalreadysignsofactualshortagesineverydaylifeinAsia–themostexposedregiontothesupply-chainramificationsoftheIranwar–suchasrestaurantclosures,fuel

shortages,flightcancellationsandgovernment-mandatedactivityrestrictionsinsomecases.Lastweek,theIEA

advisedgovernmentstorespondtopotentialenergyshortageswithwork-from-homemandatesandthecurbingofnon-essentialtravel,i.e.measuresfamiliarfromthestruggleagainstthepandemicsixyearsago.IftheIranwarandtheblockageoftheStraitofHormuzgetresolvedsoon,thesesimilaritiesto2020willfadequickly.However,a

prolongedlossoftheenergysuppliesrunningthroughtheStrait(aswellasthelossofotheressentialproduct,

EuropeanEquityStrategy|27March20265

BofAGLOBALRESEARCH

includingfertilizer,heliumandsulphuricacid)orevenafurtherescalationoftheconflict,leadingtomoredamage

toessentialenergyinfrastructure,couldforcegovernmentstoresorttorationingandotherdemand-curbing

measures,whichwouldweighonglobalgrowthmomentum.

2022–asupplyshockwithoutdemanddestruction

•Whathappenedthen?Theepisodeof2022standsoutfromtheothersdiscussedsofarinthatitfeaturedasupplyshock(fromtheoutbreakoftheRussia-UkrainewarinMarch2022)thatdidnotultimatelytranslateintodemanddestruction.Hence,globalgrowthneverweakened,thedemand/supplybalanceonlyshiftedlowerbriefly–andthewholeepisodewasmainlyabouttheinflationarypressuresthatresultwhensupplydecreaseswithoutanoffsettingreductionindemand.Globalgrowthwasweakatthestartoftheyear,withUSGDPgrowthbrieflyturningnegativeasmanyofthepandemic-erastimulusmeasureswereremoved,leadingtoasharplynegativefiscalimpulse,whileChinawaslabouringunderthedragfromitsZero-Covidcampaigninresponsetorecurringwavesofthepandemic.

Then,oilpricesstartedtospikeinresponsetothestartofthewar,withpricesincreasingby60%between

December2021andJune2022.Thishelpedtodriveanaccelerationinheadlineinflationofaround1pptoverthe

period.Inwhatlookedlikeaperfectstormformarkets,theFedalsostartedraisingratesinMarch2022forthe

firsttimesince2018andwentontohikebyover400bpsbytheendoftheyear.Yet,whilethecombinationof

reducedconsumerpurchasingpowerfromspikingoilpricesandtightermonetarypolicyagainstthebackdropof

already-weakgrowthcouldbeexpectedtoleadtomeaningfuldemanddestruction,infacttheoppositeoccurred.

Globalgrowthstronglyacceleratedfromalowof1.1%inQ12022to5.6%inQ3,helpedbyareopeninginChina

andacceleratingUSgrowthdueto:(a)arenewedwideningintheUSbudgetdeficitfrom2%ofGDPonasix-

monthrollingbasisinMay2022to8%inSeptember2023;and(b)thereopeningoftheUSeconomy,allowing

consumerstospendtheirsignificantpandemic-eraexcesssavingsonservicessuchrestaurantsandtravel.With

suppliesdisruptedbythewarandChina’son-and-off-againCovidpoliciesanddemandincreasingsharply,the

demand/supplybalance,asakeydriverofunderlyinginflationpressure,spikedtooneofthehighestlevelsince

the1970s,fuellingariseincoreCPIinflationtoa40-yearhighof6.6%.

•Howdidmarketsreact?Withdemandreboundingandinflationblisteringlyhot,marketsquicklymovedtowards

pricingextremecentral-bankhawkishness,leadingtheUS10-yearbondyieldfrom1.5%atthestartof2022to

4.9%bytheendof2023.Globalequitiesinitiallyfellby27%fromlate2021toOctober2022inresponseto

weakeningglobalgrowth,butthensoaredbackby30%byJuly2023despiteacontinuousriseintherisk-free

discountrate,asthesurgeinglobalGDPgrowthandglobalPMIshelpedtocompressriskpremiaandliftEPS

expectations(thelaunchofChatGPTinNovember2022gaveafurtherboosttomarketsbyintroducingthenotionofapotentialAI-fuelledpick-upinproductivitygrowth).

•Howdoestheepisodecomparetotoday?TheIranwarhastriggeredamajordisruptiontoglobalenergysupplies–thelargesteveraccordingtotheIEA–andtheriseinoilpricesofnearly40%,similartowhatwasseenin2022.

Manycentralbanksstillhavethe2022episode,whentheywereinitiallytemptedtolookthroughtheinflationspike

onlythentohavetocatchup,freshintheirminds,makingthemeagertoavoidasimilarlytardyresponse.With

bondyieldshavingspikingoverrecentmonthsandriskpremiainequityandcreditmarketsstillclosetoa20-year

low,marketsalsoappeartosomedegreetobepricingarepeatofthe2022experience(i.e.discountinginflation

upside,butverylittlebywayofgrowth/demanddownside).Fromourperspective,thekeyfeatureof2022isthat

thesqueezeinconsumerpurchasingpowerfromhigherenergypricesneverresultedindemanddestruction,as

6EuropeanEquityStrategy|27March2026

BofAGLOBALRESEARCH

powerfulforces,ChinaandUSreopening,USfiscalstimulusandthepresenceofUSexcesssavings,provideda

meaningfuldemandboost.Withdemandthussupported,war-relatedsupplydisruptionsimmediatelyturnedinto

tangibleinflationpressure.Unlike2007/08andtoday,therealsowerenopre-existingfragilitiesintheUSlabour

market,withUSjobsgrowthstillrunningclosetotheupperendofits40-yearrangeandjobopenings,ataround

4m,stillplentiful,reducingtheriskofaweakeningindemandfromlabour-marketweakness.Arepeatof2022

hingesonseeingacombinationofbothmeaningfuldemandstrengthandsupply-sidestress.Giventhescaleof

disruptionfromtheIranwarandthewarningsignalsfromtheEuroareaandtheUK,ariseinsupply-sidestressisa

risk.However,theweaknessintheUSlabourmarketandanupcomingsqueezeforpurchasingpowerfromhigher

energypricessuggeststousthatdemandgrowthstrengthsimilartothepost-pandemicperiodleadingupto2022

isunlikelytomaterializethistimeround.

2025–growthandinflationworriesthatdidnotamounttomuch

•Whathappenedthen?TariffhikesinAprillastyearwereexpectedtogeneratebothagrowthshockandaninflationspikethroughacombinationofatighteningfiscalimpulse(tariffsbeingaformoftaxation),disruptionoftrade

flowandthepass-throughofhighercostsforcorporatestoconsumers.However,partlyinresponsetotheadversemarketreaction,theUSadministrationswiftlymoderateditsplannedtariffincreases,withtheexpectedUS

effectivetariffratedecliningfromapeakof28%inAprilto16%inJune,accordingtotheYaleBudgetLab(atthestartoftheyear,ithadbeen2%).ThemoderationinthetariffonslaughtincombinationwiththesupporttogrowthfromtheAIcapexboomandstrongconsumerspendingonthebackofafadeinthesavingsratio,supportedbya

wealtheffectfromequity-marketgains,meantthatthefearedhittoglobalgrowththatmarketshadbeenpre-pricing,neverarrived,withtheglobalPMIrisingby2pointsbetweenAprilandNovember2025andglobalmacrosurprises(whichmeasurethedegreetowhichglobalmacrodatasurprisestotheupsideordownside)staying

almostconsistentlypositiveduringtheremainderoftheyear.Despiteariseinsupply-sidestressfromthetariffincreases,thelevel,atonestandarddeviationabovethelong-runaverage,wasrelativelymodestandalsoshort-lived,fadingbyJuly.Meanwhile,politicalsensitivitiesandyearsofrisingpricesmeantthatcorporateschosetoshouldermuchoftheburdenofhighertariffs.Asaconsequence,bothheadlineandcoreinflationacceleratedbyonlyamodestdegreefromtheAprillevelsthroughuntillatelastyear(0.5pptsforheadlineand0.3pptsforcore).

Withgrowthsolidagainstthebackdropofaweakeninglabourmarketandinflationwell-behaved,theFedcutrates

by75bpsthatyear,generatinggoldilocks-likeconditionsformarkets.

•Howdidmarketsreact?Globalequitiesdroppedby16%aroundthetimeofthetariffannouncements,whiletheUS10-yearbondyieldroseby60bpsbetweenAprilandMayduetoconcernsabouthigherinflationahead.However,astariffswerewatereddown,theincominginflationandgrowthdataremainedbenign,themarketshiftedfrom

pricinginflationandgrowthconcernsbacktowardsagoldilockssetting,withequitiesreboundingby36%andbondyieldsdecliningby40bpsto4.15%byyear-end.

•Howdoestheepisodecomparetotoday?Themainlessonfrom2025isthatagrowthandinflationshockthatseemsalmostunavoidablecanquicklydissipateifmarkets’re-pricingoftheeventputsenoughpressureonpolicymakerstochangethepoliciesthatwerethreateningtocausetheimpactinthefirstplace.IftheIranwarandthe

blockagesintheStraitofHormuzareresolvedtomorrow,leadingglobalenergyflowstoresumeandif,

furthermore,thewar-relateddamagetoenergyinfrastructureturnsouttobemildandeasilyreversible,then2025couldturnouttobeagoodplaybookforthecurrentepisode.However,thereareimportantcaveats:(a)in2025,a

EuropeanEquityStrategy|27March20267

BofAGLOBALRESEARCH

singlepartycoulddecidetochangecourse,allowingthepotentialdamagetogrowthandinflationtobeunwound

relativelyquickly.ThistimearoundaresolutionwouldrequiretheagreementofIran,IsraelandotherGulfcountries

aswell,creatingmorepotentialfordisagreementanddelay;(b)someofthedamagetoenergyinfrastructure

seemssubstantialandmightleadtolonger-lastingdisruptionsevenifthewarweretoendtomorrow;and(c)even

iftheoilpriceremainsatthecurrentlevelof$90/bblfortherestofthemonthbeforefadingto$80/bblinApril,in

linewiththeBofAQ2averagebasecase(seereport:GlobalEnergyWeekly,Mar10),thiswouldimplyaround3ppts

ofupwardpressureforthree-month/three-monthannualisedUSheadlineCPIinflationfromenergycommodities

byMay,whichcomparestoamaximumaccelerationof1.6pptslastyearonthismeasurebetweenJuneand

October.OurbasecaseistonotseeupsidepressurefromothercomponentsofUSinflationasaresultofbroader

supply-sidestressthatisgeneratedbytheIranwar,butthehistoricalexperiencesofenergypriceshocks

mentionedabove,andwhathasbeenseenintheEuroareaandtheUK,suggestthattheriskliesclearlytothe

upside.Asaco

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论