版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
Chapter1Introductionto
SupplyChainManagementWhatIsaSupplyChain?Flowofproductsandservicesfrom:RawmaterialsmanufacturersIntermediateproductsmanufacturersEndproductmanufacturersWholesalersanddistributorsandRetailersConnectedbytransportationandstorageactivitiesIntegratedthroughinformation,planning,andintegrationactivitiesCostandservicelevels1.1WhatIsSupplyChainManagement?Supplychainmanagementisasetofapproachesutilizedtoefficientlyintegratesuppliers,manufacturers,warehouses,andstores,sothatmerchandiseisproducedanddistributedattherightquantities,totherightlocations,andattherighttime,inordertominimizesystemwidecostswhilesatisfyingservicelevelrequirements.TwoOtherFormalDefinitionsThedesignandmanagementofseamless,value-addedprocessacrossorganizationalboundariestomeettherealneedsoftheendcustomerInstituteforSupplyManagementManagingsupplyanddemand,sourcingrawmaterialsandparts,manufacturingandassembly,warehousingandinventorytracking,orderentryandordermanagement,distributionacrossallchannels,anddeliverytothecustomerTheSupplyChainCouncilPCIndustrySupplyChainTracingbackthescreenyoustareatforthebulkofyourtime.Cisco’sValueNetworkSourceSupplierSupplierDistributorDistributorRetailerEnd-UserConverterConverterConsumersInformationFlowFunds/DemandFlowValue-AddedServicesMaterialFlowReuse/Maintenance/AfterSalesServiceFlowSCMDefinitionTheSCMNetworkFIGURE1.1:ThelogisticsnetworkKeyObservationsEveryfacilitythatimpactscostsneedtobeconsideredSuppliers’suppliersCustomers’customersEfficiencyandcost-effectivenessthroughoutthesystemisrequiredSystemlevelapproachMultiplelevelsofactivitiesStrategic–Tactical–OperationalOtherRelatedObservationsSupplychainstrategylinkedtotheDevelopmentChainChallengingtominimizesystemcostsandmaximizesystemservicelevelsInherentpresenceofuncertaintyandriskSetofactivitiesandprocessesassociatedwithnewproductintroduction.Includes:productdesignphaseassociatedcapabilitiesandknowledgesourcingdecisionsproductionplans1.2TheDevelopmentChain1.2TheDevelopmentChainFIGURE1-2:Theenterprisedevelopmentandsupplychain1.3GlobalOptimizationGeographicallydispersedcomplexnetworkConflictingobjectivesofdifferentfacilitiesDynamicsystemVariationsovertimeMatchingdemand-supplydifficultDifferentlevelsofinventoryandbackordersRecentdevelopmentshaveincreasedrisksLeanproduction/Off-shoring/OutsourcingGlobalApparelValueChain
TracingbackthedressyouarewearingQC&Shipping[HongKong]ProductDesign[HongKong]Zippers+…[Japan+…]Stitching[Indonesia]Weaving[Taiwan]YarnSpinning[Korea]AnIllustration:HowLi&FungLimitedMightMakeaDressGloballyDispersedManufacturing1.4UncertaintyandRiskFactors
MatchingSupplyandDemandaMajorChallengeREASONSEXAMPLESRawmaterialshortagesInternalandsupplierpartsshortagesProductivityinefficienciesBoeingAircraft’sinventorywrite-downof$2.6billionSalesandearningsshortfallLargerthananticipatedinventoriesSalesatU.S.SurgicalCorporationdeclined25percent,resultinginalossof$22millionStiffcompetitionGeneralslowdowninthePCmarketIntelreporteda38percentdeclineinquarterlyprofitHigherthanexpectedordersfornewproductsoverexistingproductsEMCCorp.misseditsrevenueguidanceof$2.66billionforthesecondquarterof2006byaround$100million1.4UncertaintyandRiskFactors
FluctuationsofInventoryandBackordersthroughouttheSupplyChainFIGURE1-3:OrdervariationsinthesupplychainForecastingisnotasolutionDemandisnottheonlysourceofuncertaintyRecenttrendsmakethingsmoreuncertainLeanmanufacturingOutsourcingOff-shoring1.4UncertaintyandRiskFactorsAugust2005–HurricaneKatrinaP&GcoffeesuppliesfromsitesaroundNewOrleansSixmonthimpact2002WestCoastportstrikeLossesof$1B/dayStorestock-outs,factoryshutdowns1999TaiwanearthquakeSupplyinterruptionsofHP,Dell2001India(Gujaratstate)earthquakeSupplyinterruptionsforapparelmanufacturers1.4UncertaintyandRiskFactors1.5EvolutionofSupplyChainManagement1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s2000sBeyondTraditionalMassManufacturingInventoryManagement/CostOptimizationJIT,TQM,BPR,AlliancesSCMFormation/ExtensionsFurtherRefinementofSCMCapabilitiesProgressionofLogisticsCostsFIGURE1-4:Logisticscosts’shareoftheU.S.economyCompositionofLogisticsCostsFIGURE1-5:TotalU.S.logisticscostsbetween1984and20051.6Complexity:TheMagnitudeU.S.companiesspendmorethan$1trillioninsupply-relatedactivities(10-15%ofGrossDomesticProduct)Transportation58%Inventory38%Management4%Thegroceryindustrycouldsave$30billion(10%ofoperatingcost)byusingeffectivelogisticsstrategiesAtypicalboxofcerealspends104daysgettingfromfactorytosupermarket.Atypicalnewcarspends15daystravelingfromthefactorytothedealership.Complexity:TheMagnitudeCompaqcomputer’slossof$500millionto$1billioninsalesinoneyearLaptopsanddesktopswerenotavailablewhenandwherecustomerswerereadytobuythemBoeing’sforcedannouncementofwrite-downsof$2.6bRawmaterialshortages,internalandsupplierpartsshortages….
Cisco’smulti-billion($2.2b)dollarwrite-offofinventoriesin2001-2002CustomersbalkedonordersduetomarketmeltdownTransactionalComplexityNationalSemiconductors:Production:Produceschipsinsixdifferentlocations:fourintheUS,oneinBritainandoneinIsraelChipsareshippedtosevenassemblylocationsinSoutheastAsia.DistributionThefinalproductisshippedtohundredsoffacilitiesallovertheworld20,000differentroutes12differentairlinesareinvolved95%oftheproductsaredeliveredwithin45days5%aredeliveredwithin90days.PCValueChain
PerformanceofTraditionalPCManufacturerPCValueChain:FocusonCostReduction
PerformanceofDellComputersMagnitudeofSupplyChainCosts
CostElementsofaTypicalTradeBookMagnitudeofSupplyChainCosts
Example:TheApparelIndustryManufacturerDistributorRetailerCustomerCostperPercentShirtSaving$52.720%$41.3428%$20.4562%ManufacturerDistributorRetailerCustomerManufacturerDistributorRetailerCustomerSupplyChain:ThePotentialP&G’sestimatedsavingstoretailcustomersof$65millionthroughlogisticsgainsDellComputer’soutperformingofthecompetitionintermsofshareholdervaluegrowthovermorethantwodecadesbyover3,000%using:DirectbusinessmodelBuild-to-orderstrategyWal-Marttransformationintotheworld’slargestretailerbychangingitslogisticssystem:highestsalespersquarefoot,inventoryturnoverandoperatingprofitofanydiscountretailer1.7KeyIssuesinSupplyChainManagementChainGlobalOptimizationManagingRiskandUncertaintyDistributionNetworkConfigurationSupplyYInventoryControlSupplyYProductionSourcingSupplyYSupplyContractsBothYYDistributionStrategiesSupplyYYStrategicPartneringDevelopmentYOutsourcingandOffshoringDevelopmentYProductDesignDevelopmentYInformationTechnologySupplyYYCustomerValueBothYYSmartPricingSupplyYTABLE1-1:Keysupplychainmanagementissues1.8BookObjectivesandOverview•Inventorymanagement•Logisticsnetworkplanning•Supplycontractsforstrategicaswellascommoditycomponents.•Thevalueofinformationandtheeffectiveuseofinformationinthesupplychain.•Supplychainintegration.•Centralizedanddecentralizeddistributionstrategies.•Strategicalliances.•Outsourcing,off-shoring,andprocurementstrategies.•Internationalsupplychainmanagement.•Supplychainmanagementandproductdesign.•Customervalue.•Revenuemanagementandpricingstrategies.•Informationtechnologyandbusinessprocesses.•Technicalstandardsandtheirimpactonthesupplychain.SoftwarePackagesComputerizedBeerGameRiskPoolGameProcurementGameCASE:MeditechSurgicalIntent–diagnosisofsupplychainBusinessoverviewSupplychainProductionplanningWhat’swrong?Howtofixit?EndoscopicSurgicalInstrumentsPermitsminimallyinvasivesurgeryMarketcreatedinearly80’s,rapidlygrowingOldproductscontinuallyupdatedandreplacedwithnewproductintroductionsBusinessOverviewNationalandMeditechsplitthemarketCompetebasedonproductinnovations,customerservice,costNationalsellstophysicians;MeditechsellstomaterialmanagersCustomerpreferenceschangeslowlyExternalSupplyChainPartsuppliersMeditechAssemblyMeditechWarehouseDomesticDealersInt’lMeditechAffiliatesHospitalsHospitalsInternalSupplyChainPartsInventoryAssemblyBulkInventoryFGInventoryPackaging&Sterilization2-16weeks2weeks1weekProductionPlanningAnnualForecastMonthlyRevisionTransferRequirementsMonthlyPlanMRPPartsProcurementPlanWeeklyAssemblyScheduleProductionPlanningPartsInventoryAssemblyBulkInventoryPackaging&SterilizationFGinventoryMonthlyPlanMRPOrderpoint;OrderquantityMaterialPlanWhat’sWrong?PoorservicefornewproductintroductionsPoorforecasting?Panicordering?AndhighFGinventoryWhatIsGoingOn?DemandisquitepredictableUsageinhospitalsisquitestableMarketsharemovesslowlyovertimeWitheachnewproduct,dealermustbuildinventorytofillpipelineWhyDidMeditechThinkDemandWasUnpredictable?PoorinformationsystemsNoonelookedatdemandNoonehadresponsibilityforforecasterrorsTendencytoshifttheblameBuilt-indelaysandmonthlybucketsinplanningsystemAmplifierinplanningsystemWhattoDo?RecognizethatdemandisstableandpredictableEstablishaccountabilityforforecastEliminateplanningdelaysand/orreducetimebucketAlternatively,putassemblywithinpullsystemandeliminatebulkinventoryChapter2Inventory
Management
andRiskPoolingCASE:SteelWorksBackgroundofcaseandintentOverviewofbusinessWhatdoesdatatellyouaboutSpecialty?Howmuchinventorymightyouexpect?WhatopportunitiesarethereforCustom?WrapupStephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedBackground&IntentAbstractionfromsummerconsultingjobIntentistoexaminearealistic,butsimplifiedinventorycontextandperformadiagnosisofproblem–poorserviceandtoomuchinventoryStephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedCustomProductsRapidgrowth,1/3oftotalsales($133MM)OnecustomerperproductVeryhighmarginsHighservicelevel3plants,co-locatedwithR&DcenterEachproductproducedatasingleplantStephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedSpecialtyProductsRapidgrowth,2/3oftotalsales($267MM)6productfamilies3plants,eachproducing2productfamilies130customers,120productsFewbigcustomersHighlyvolatiledemandHighservicelevelStephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedConsultantRecommendationDroplowvolumeproductsImproveforecastsConsolidatewarehousesStephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedWhatDoesDataTellYou?mscvDBR1015.513.20.85DBR1210082560.25DBR1524644940.20DFR109792.50.95DFR1218.511.40.62DFR1555801.46DFR2335.545.91.29StephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedWhatDoesDataTellYou?DurabendR12:Onecustomeraccountsfor97%ofdemand7products:Highvolume(2)isnotveryvolatileLowvolume(5)isveryvolatileStephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedHowMuchInventoryShouldYouExpect?AssumebasestockmodelwithperiodicreviewReviewperiod=r=?Leadtime=L=?StephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedmsCyclestockSaf.stockE[I]Act.Inv.DBR1015.513.28263472DBR1210082565045101014740DBR152464494123299022221875DFR109792.549185234604DFR1218.511.49233255DFR15558028160188388DFR2335.545.91892110190S1848198638343824Assumesr=1;L=0.25;andz=1.8Cyclestock=rm/2 Safetystock=zs
r+LStephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedWhatAretheOpportunitiesatCustom?Combineproductionandinventoryforcommonitems,e.g.DFR23Producemonthly:reducesetupsbyhalfandpoolsafetystocksProducetwiceamonth:samenumberofsetupsbutcutcyclestockandreviewperiodinhalfStephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReservedWrapUpRealisticdiagnosticexerciseInreallife:notasclean,moredataandmoreconsiderationsYetsimplemodelsandprinciplescanprovidevaluableguidanceStephenC.GravesCopyright2003AllRightsReserved2.1Introduction
WhyIsInventoryImportant?Distributionandinventory(logistics)costsarequitesubstantial
TotalU.S.ManufacturingInventories($m):1992-01-31:$m808,7731996-08-31:$m1,000,7742006-05-31:$m1,324,108Inventory-SalesRatio(U.S.Manufacturers):1992-01-01:1.562006-05-01:1.25GM’sproductionanddistributionnetwork20,000supplierplants133partsplants31assemblyplants11,000dealersFreighttransportationcosts:$4.1billion(60%formaterialshipments)GMinventoryvaluedat$7.4billion(70%WIP;RestFinishedVehicles)Decisiontooltoreduce:combinedcorporatecostofinventoryandtransportation.26%annualcostreductionbyadjusting:Shipmentsizes(inventorypolicy)Routes(transportationstrategy)WhyIsInventoryImportant?WhyIsInventoryRequired?UncertaintyincustomerdemandShorterproductlifecyclesMorecompetingproductsUncertaintyinsuppliesQuality/Quantity/Costs/DeliveryTimesDeliveryleadtimesIncentivesforlargershipmentsHoldingtherightamountattherighttimeisdifficult!DellComputer’swassharplyoffinitsforecastofdemand,resultingininventorywrite-downs1993stockplungeLizClaiborne’shigher-than-anticipatedexcessinventories1993unexpectedearningsdecline,IBM’sineffectiveinventorymanagement1994shortagesintheThinkPadlineCisco’sdecliningsales2001$2.25BexcessinventorychargeInventoryManagement-DemandForecastsUncertaindemandmakesdemandforecastcriticalforinventoryrelateddecisions:Whattoorder?Whentoorder?Howmuchistheoptimalorderquantity?ApproachincludesasetoftechniquesINVENTORYPOLICY!!SupplyChainFactorsinInventoryPolicyEstimationofcustomerdemandReplenishmentleadtimeThenumberofdifferentproductsbeingconsideredThelengthoftheplanninghorizonCostsOrdercost:ProductcostTransportationcostInventoryholdingcost,orinventorycarryingcost:Statetaxes,propertytaxes,andinsuranceoninventoriesMaintenancecostsObsolescencecostOpportunitycostsServicelevelrequirements2.2SingleStageInventoryControlSinglesupplychainstageVarietyoftechniquesEconomicLotSizeModelDemandUncertaintySinglePeriodModelsInitialInventoryMultipleOrderOpportunitiesContinuousReviewPolicyVariableLeadTimesPeriodicReviewPolicyServiceLevelOptimization2.2.1.EconomicLotSizeModelFIGURE2-3:InventorylevelasafunctionoftimeAssumptionsDitemsperday:ConstantdemandrateQitemsperorder:Orderquantitiesarefixed,i.e.,eachtimethewarehouseplacesanorder,itisforQitems.K,fixedsetupcost,incurredeverytimethewarehouseplacesanorder.h,inventorycarryingcostaccruedperunitheldininventoryperdaythattheunitisheld(alsoknownas,holdingcost)Leadtime=0 (thetimethatelapsesbetweentheplacementofanorderanditsreceipt)Initialinventory=0Planninghorizonislong(infinite).DerivingEOQTotalcostateverycycle:Averageinventoryholdingcostinacycle:Q/2CycletimeT=Q/D
Averagetotalcostperunittime:
EOQ:CostsFIGURE2-4:Economiclotsizemodel:totalcostperunittimeSensitivityAnalysisb.5.8.911.11.21.52Increaseincost25%2.5%0.5%0.4%1.6%8.9%25%TotalinventorycostrelativelyinsensitivetoorderquantitiesActualorderquantity:QQisamultipleboftheoptimalorderquantityQ*.Foragivenb,thequantityorderedisQ=bQ*2.2.2.DemandUncertaintyTheforecastisalwayswrongItisdifficulttomatchsupplyanddemandThelongertheforecasthorizon,theworsetheforecastItisevenmoredifficultifoneneedstopredictcustomerdemandforalongperiodoftimeAggregateforecastsaremoreaccurate.MoredifficulttopredictcustomerdemandforindividualSKUsMucheasiertopredictdemandacrossallSKUswithinoneproductfamily2.2.3.SinglePeriodModelsShortlifecycleproductsOneorderingopportunityonlyOrderquantitytobedecidedbeforedemandoccursOrderQuantity>Demand=>DisposeexcessinventoryOrderQuantity<Demand=>Losesales/profitsSinglePeriodModelsUsinghistoricaldataidentifyavarietyofdemandscenariosdetermineprobabilityeachofthesescenarioswilloccurGivenaspecificinventorypolicydeterminetheprofitassociatedwithaparticularscenariogivenaspecificorderquantityweighteachscenario’sprofitbythelikelihoodthatitwilloccurdeterminetheaverage,orexpected,profitforaparticularorderingquantity.Orderthequantitythatmaximizestheaverageprofit.SinglePeriodModelExampleFIGURE2-5:ProbabilisticforecastAdditionalInformationFixedproductioncost:$100,000Variableproductioncostperunit:$80.Duringthesummerseason,sellingprice:$125perunit.Salvagevalue:Anyswimsuitnotsoldduringthesummerseasonissoldtoadiscountstorefor$20.TwoScenariosManufacturerproduces10,000unitswhiledemandendsat12,000swimsuits Profit =125(10,000)-80(10,000)-100,000 =$350,000Manufacturerproduces10,000unitswhiledemandendsat8,000swimsuits Profit =125(8,000)+20(2,000)-80(10,000)-100,000 =$140,000ProbabilityofProfitabilityScenarioswithProduction=10,000UnitsProbabilityofdemandbeing8000units=11%Probabilityofprofitof$140,000=11%Probabilityofdemandbeing12000units=27%Probabilityofprofitof$140,000=27%Totalprofit=WeightedaverageofprofitscenariosOrderQuantitythatMaximizesExpectedProfitFIGURE2-6:AverageprofitasafunctionofproductionquantityRelationshipBetweenOptimalQuantityandAverageDemandComparemarginalprofitofsellinganadditionalunitandmarginalcostofnotsellinganadditionalunitMarginalprofit/unit= SellingPrice-VariableOrdering(or,Production)CostMarginalcost/unit= VariableOrdering(or,Production)Cost-SalvageValueIfMarginalProfit>MarginalCost=>OptimalQuantity>AverageDemandIfMarginalProfit<MarginalCost=>OptimalQuantity<AverageDemandFortheSwimsuitExampleAveragedemand=13,000units.Optimalproductionquantity=12,000units.Marginalprofit=$45Marginalcost=$60.Thus,MarginalCost>MarginalProfit =>optimalproductionquantity<averagedemand.Risk-RewardTradeoffsOptimalproductionquantitymaximizesaverageprofitisabout12,000Producing9,000unitsorproducing16,000unitswillleadtoaboutthesameaverageprofitof$294,000.Ifwehadtochoosebetweenproducing9,000unitsand16,000units,whichoneshouldwechoose?Risk-RewardTradeoffsFIGURE2-7:AfrequencyhistogramofprofitRisk-RewardTradeoffsProductionQuantity=9000unitsProfitis:either$200,000withprobabilityofabout11%or$305,000withprobabilityofabout89%Productionquantity=16,000units.Distributionofprofitisnotsymmetrical.Lossesof$220,000about11%ofthetimeProfitsofatleast$410,000about50%ofthetimeWiththesameaverageprofit,increasingtheproductionquantity:IncreasesthepossibleriskIncreasesthepossiblereward
ObservationsTheoptimalorderquantityisnotnecessarilyequaltoforecast,oraverage,demand.Astheorderquantityincreases,averageprofittypicallyincreasesuntiltheproductionquantityreachesacertainvalue,afterwhichtheaverageprofitstartsdecreasing.Risk/Rewardtrade-off:Asweincreasetheproductionquantity,bothriskandrewardincreases.2.2.4.WhatIftheManufacturerHasanInitialInventory?Trade-offbetween:Usingon-handinventorytomeetdemandandavoidpayingfixedproductioncost:needsufficientinventorystockPayingthefixedcostofproductionandnothaveasmuchinventoryInitialInventorySolutionFIGURE2-8:ProfitandtheimpactofinitialinventoryManufacturerInitialInventory=5,000Ifnothingisproduced,averageprofit= 225,000(fromthefigure)+5,000x80=625,000IfthemanufacturerdecidestoproduceProductionshouldincreaseinventoryfrom5,000unitsto12,000units.Averageprofit= 371,000(fromthefigure)+5,000•80=771,000Noneedtoproduceanythingaverageprofit>profitachievedifweproducetoincreaseinventoryto12,000unitsIfweproduce,themostwecanmakeonaverageisaprofitof$375,000.Sameaverageprofitwithinitialinventoryof8,500unitsandnotproducinganything.Ifinitialinventory<8,500units=>producetoraisetheinventorylevelto12,000units.Ifinitialinventoryisatleast8,500units,weshouldnotproduceanything
(s,S)policyor(min,max)policyManufacturerInitialInventory=10,0002.2.5.MultipleOrderOpportunitiesREASONSTobalanceannualinventoryholdingcostsandannualfixedordercosts.Tosatisfydemandoccurringduringleadtime.Toprotectagainstuncertaintyindemand.TWOPOLICIESContinuousreviewpolicyinventoryisreviewedcontinuouslyanorderisplacedwhentheinventoryreachesaparticularlevelorreorderpoint.inventorycanbecontinuouslyreviewed(computerizedinventorysystemsareused)Periodicreviewpolicyinventoryisreviewedatregularintervalsappropriatequantityisorderedaftereachreview.itisimpossibleorinconvenienttofrequentlyreviewinventoryandplaceordersifnecessary.2.2.6.ContinuousReviewPolicyDailydemandisrandomandfollowsanormaldistribution.Everytimethedistributorplacesanorderfromthemanufacturer,thedistributorpaysafixedcost,K,plusanamountproportionaltothequantityordered.Inventoryholdingcostischargedperitemperunittime.Inventoryleveliscontinuouslyreviewed,andifanorderisplaced,theorderarrivesaftertheappropriateleadtime.Ifacustomerorderarriveswhenthereisnoinventoryonhandtofilltheorder(i.e.,whenthedistributorisstockedout),theorderislost.Thedistributorspecifiesarequiredservicelevel.AVG=AveragedailydemandfacedbythedistributorSTD=StandarddeviationofdailydemandfacedbythedistributorL=Replenishmentleadtimefromthesuppliertothedistributorindaysh=Costofholdingoneunitoftheproductforonedayatthedistributorα=servicelevel.Thisimpliesthattheprobabilityofstockingoutis1-αContinuousReviewPolicy(Q,R)policy–wheneverinventorylevelfallstoareorderlevelR,placeanorderforQunitsWhatisthevalueofR?ContinuousReviewPolicyContinuousReviewPolicyAveragedemandduringleadtime:LxAVGSafetystock:ReorderLevel,R:OrderQuantity,Q:ServiceLevel&SafetyFactor,zServiceLevel90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%98%99%99.9%z1.291.341.411.481.561.651.751.882.052.333.08zischosenfromstatisticaltablestoensurethattheprobabilityofstockoutsduringleadtimeisexactly1-αInventoryLevelOverTimeInventorylevelbeforereceivinganorder=Inventorylevelafterreceivinganorder=AverageInventory=FIGURE2-9:Inventorylevelasafunctionoftimeina(Q,R)policyContinuousReviewPolicyExampleAdistributorofTVsetsthatordersfromamanufacturerandsellstoretailersFixedorderingcost=$4,500CostofaTVsettothedistributor=$250Annualinventoryholdingcost=18%ofproductcostReplenishmentleadtime=2weeksExpectedservicelevel=97%MonthSeptOctNov.Dec.Jan.Feb.Mar.Apr.MayJuneJulyAugSales20015210022128717615119824630998156ContinuousReviewPolicyExampleAveragemonthlydemand=191.17Standarddeviationofmonthlydemand=66.53Averageweeklydemand=AverageMonthlyDemand/4.3Standarddeviationofweeklydemand=Monthlystandarddeviation/√4.3
ParameterAverageweeklydemandStandarddeviationofweeklydemandAveragedemandduringleadtimeSafetystockReorderpointValue44.5832.0889.1686.20176Weeklyholdingcost=Optimalorderquantity=Averageinventorylevel=679/2+86.20=426ContinuousReviewPolicyExampleAverageleadtime,AVGL
Standarddeviation,STDL.
ReorderLevel,R:2.2.7.VariableLeadTimesAmountofsafetystock=OrderQuantity=InventorylevelisreviewedperiodicallyatregularintervalsAnappropriatequantityisorderedaftereachreviewTwoCases:ShortIntervals(e.g.Daily)DefinetwoinventorylevelssandSDuringeachinventoryreview,iftheinventorypositionfallsbelows,orderenoughtoraisetheinventorypositiontoS.(s,S)policyLongerIntervals(e.g.WeeklyorMonthly)Maymakesensetoalwaysorderafteraninventorylevelreview.Determineatargetinventorylevel,thebase-stocklevelDuringeachreviewperiod,theinventorypositionisreviewedOrderenoughtoraisetheinventorypositiontothebase-stocklevel.Base-stocklevelpolicy2.2.8.PeriodicReviewPolicy(s,S)policyCalculatetheQandRvaluesasifthiswereacontinuousreviewmodelSetsequaltoRSetSequaltoR+Q.Base-StockLevelPolicyDetermineatargetinventorylevel,thebase-stocklevelEachreviewperiod,reviewtheinventorypositionisreviewedandorderenoughtoraisetheinventorypositiontothebase-stocklevelAssume:
r=lengthofthereviewperiod L=leadtime AVG=averagedailydemand STD=standarddeviationofthisdailydemand.
Averagedemandduringanintervalofr+Ldays=SafetyStock=Base-StockLevelPolicyBase-StockLevelPolicyFIGURE2-10:InventorylevelasafunctionoftimeinaperiodicreviewpolicyAssume:distributorplacesanorderforTVsevery3weeksLeadtimeis2weeksBase-stocklevelneedstocover5weeksAveragedemand=44.58x5=222.9Safetystock=Base-stocklevel=223+136=359Averageinventorylevel=Distributorkeeps5(=203.17/44.58)weeksofsupply.Base-StockLevelPolicyExampleOptimalinventorypolicyassumesaspecificserviceleveltarget.What
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 1月住院患者VTE健康宣教相关知识问卷调查
- 2026年包装印刷设计师案例分析考试试题及答案
- 高空作业人员安全培训工艺
- 幼儿消防安全课教案设计
- 2025年城市眼镜市场周边信号协调控制
- 2025年城市污水直排AI监测技术
- 2025年城市文化消费券发放效果评估
- 厂区绿化临时外包合同
- 方舱医院服务外包合同
- 柳林县城区环卫外包合同
- SB/T 10812-2012超市商品基本分类规范
- MT/T 154.8-1996煤矿辅助运输设备型号编制方法
- GB/T 4957-2003非磁性基体金属上非导电覆盖层覆盖层厚度测量涡流法
- GB/T 11944-2012中空玻璃
- 主题班会-纪念长征胜利80周年-图文
- 清创缝合【急诊外科】课件
- 乙醇-水精馏浮阀塔设计化工原理课程设计
- 区域市场销售规划方案课件
- 旅游概述《旅游学概论》课件
- ERCP诊疗及护理查房
- 梅毒诊疗指南(2023年)
评论
0/150
提交评论